>>1013556
>It helps solve the dependency on Google for media.
And who created/amplified the dependency to use the browser for everything ?
Want more comparison ?
You can not browser youtube without mandatory JS.
You can not browser peertube without mandatory JS.
Most of the time the torrent links are not working.
I don't say peertube isn't a good idea, it actually just needs a few tweaks to make a viable solution that mitigates the nefast effects that JS and bad human habits have.
>ContentID, unwarranted bans, all that stuff.
This will still be a thing even with peertube actually I think it's going to be worse when it will come into light of our politicians and of course they have a complete biased interpretation of what it is because when they'll know about it they are going to impose laws similar to what France imposed for example the one that says that administrators are responsible of the post/word of those who post on their server and that servers can be removed immediately without a judge.
What will happen when they say that the law force instances to have flag warnings ? warning that could of course send IDs automatically to automated bot to block the server national wide. And don't tell me that such absurd law can't happen laws as absurd as that happen all the time.
>I cannot see evidence of it being a fork. Please give some. Big if true.
The rebrand it mobilizon.
https://pleroma.soykaf.com/notice/22829249
To avoid misinterpretation in what I said earlier, what's not possible with the GPLv3 is not the rebranding, but the removing of the original project and developers names. That as been corrected but framasoft aren't made of people who don't know that sort of thing.
>How so? I don't see evidence of that, but it's also irrelevant. That's like saying the groups behind most browser probably don't like people saying 'nigger'.
No they support place like witches.town
https://framapiaf.org/@Framasoft/99551717546833038
witches.town is dead btw but look for some post on google you'll see that it was infested with social justice fags.
>Doesn't impede any of us.
Free software does not impede anyone freedom, except, when it's related to software who's principal functions are networking.
The direction of a distribution isn't that much of a problem, and it was proved with the systemd fiasco, people went against it and made distributions without systemd.
But for software like for example Tor, I2P, peertube and similar, their goal is to make content available trough the internet. you can of course fork it and build your own system but what if you aren't ok with the feature number 11, you find it dangerous, worse of number 11 is mandatory because other functionalities are dependent on it now and it goes further because all the other servers have update it and now you are excluded from the network if you don't comply. This is something that license can't cover because it's design related further than that it human related.
>Also, highly irrelevant.
>highly
If you want to cater to emotions go post somewhere else.
It is relevant. People who follows ideological mantras are the one destroying/dividing the free software world.
They don't care about the hacker way, they don't care about freedom, they care about pushing their ideas and using free software as a mean to get that.
You can see that with their behavior, their marketing, they way they phrase their shit.
> I believe in meritocracy when it comes to software.
Yeah that's your way of thinking and I agree with it, what if I told you they shit on your meritocracy because it's used by privileged white males to stay in power and oppress people of color ?
>4chan was made by a literal Jew and it became the birthplace of /pol/ - Antisemitism. No-one fucking cared about moot's ideology when they used his site.
How many users who use proprietary software cares or knows about what they use ? I say that because 4chan is non-free.