>>26348
Oh lighten up, if you were a real /k/ommando you'd notice that that image is from a series of edits designed to make fun of cuckrangeTV, not praise it.
>>26361
It's hard to say if it's him or his butt-buddy Karl that's the source of the problem, but yeah, they're guilty of more than their share of lefty retardation. As annoying as the ponytail faggot can be, I'll still watch his videos on Invidious once in a blue moon, because he has access to toys that no one else does.
>Also if anything the banite philosophy is just the opposite of superweapons dick measuring. Stealth, cunning, manipulation, those were the tools of the banite Sith.
I can see where you're coming from, but are Banite Sith not the most stealthy, the most cunning, the most manipulative, etc.? Each one is supposed to be a Sith to surpass Metal Gear, each generation of more powerful than the last. Each Bane Sith is a high-investment, high-potency Force user, the result of investing a lot into a small number of darksiders as opposed to investing a little into a large number of them. That's similar to the superweapon mindset, no?
>The thing is that people in charge of EU wanted to create their own DS and leave their mark
Obviously, but that's the boring answer. Isn't coming up with autistically precise in-universe justifications more fun than just accepting that answer?
>And in-universe there was a lot of people pointing the waste of money in those expensive toys instead of churning SD and tie fighters.
Yeah, that's part of my point. Even though there's clearly visible waste in the superweapon strategy, Bane-line Sith have a psychological hangup that prevents them from seeing these downsides, because, for most of their lives, they've had the Rule of Two hammered into their brains. And the Rule of Two demands that you put all of your eggs into two very powerful baskets. That having two uber-powerful Sith is better than having a thousand semi-powerful ones. It's only natural that they'd apply that philosophy to other parts of their life, as well.
>>26409
Only way to fix that is to keep going to the range, anon.