/strek/ - Star Trek ★

>>17608 (OP)

The treaty with the Romulans (at the end of the Romulan war) explicitly forbids the Federation from doing so. Do we have a QTDDTOT up on Strek?

>>17611

>literally the top-bumped thread at the time this piece of shit OP was made >>15661

>>17611

Feds stole it well before the treaty though right? Also what are the odds it went straight to section31 and since they don't technically exist it was lost forever in bureaucratic development hell and never made it to official SF ships

honestly not sure why "no stealth technology for only one side" would be a requirement in a peace treaty. seems like a really bad idea.

>>17805

>Imblying that S31 doesn't in fact have its own fleet of Abrams tier oversized warships permanently cloaked and flying around fixing shit.

>>17806

The Romulans have no reason not to try getting that into the treaty, and apparently the Feds actually were cucked/inattentive enough to let it slide into law.

Feds are cucks

Romulans are smart

No cloak = no war

Terrible thread OP should be put in the agonizer booth for a week.

>>17809

My first >imblying

!!!

Also did not mean to imply that. I had envisioned something closer to your post in fact.

The reason we never saw cloaking fed ships was because sec31 had exclusive access to the tech- and we never saw section 31 till ds9.

Another reason we never saw them in fed ships could be…

they were cloaked

>>17906

I think that giving Sec31 their own ship, let alone their own fleet, would be a terribad idea for any Star Trek writer to let out of their head. It kind of destroys their character and just turns them into a cut rate obsidian order.

>>17926

you think the air force is more interesting than the cia? it isnt

>>17929

The cia has planes too

>>18456

But who gets to stay on your aircraft?

>>19761

Tell me about Kirk, why does he wear the mask?

>>19823

Lot of loyalty for a Federation Captain!