I wanted to discuss an interesting phenomenom that I would call the “input output effect” for lack of better term. The purpose of this overview is not to reveal some secret knowledge or to put an end to the system that instigates its mechanisms, as that would not be possible and is inadvisable to attempt. However, I think describing its existence can help better understand some of the cause and effect patterns that influence reality. The IO effect probably is implemented to the general population most likely in some sort of segmented fashion but the experience I want to describe is the more individualized and personal approach that is sometimes mentioned by targeted individuals as part of gangstalking. The reason for this is that the mechanisms in the IO effect are hyper realized for TI’s by nature and purpose of the program.
The components of the IO effect
When I say the IO effect I mean the manipulation of an individuals experience of reality based on their inputs. An overly simplified and narrow example of inputs would be the individuals historical behavior pattern and their personality / characteristic mapping.
Digital versus IRL
Digital implementations of the IO effect are mainstream and commonly understood. For example, if you have a google account, your web history and online behavior is used in targeted advertising, however it can also impact the “digital reality” that you reside. When you go on youtube or search for news it would cater to the digital avatar that makes up your behavior and characteristics. I would go further to say that for TI’s the actual contents on a website might be temporarily manipulated to appear different from a normal person either for the purposes of harassment, behavior manipulation, or other. However, most people would assume that the IO effect would be difficult if not impossible to implement IRL as that would require much more effort, would be much more permanent, and there are too many external independent actors compared to digital which can be personalized to the viewing portal of the recipient.
Examples IRL for a TI
1. Output manipulation based on behavior pattern would be if a TI commonly purchased a type of cereal, lets say Fruit Loops (because they like Toucan Sam) every week. When the TI goes grocery shopping they would find that the cereal was expired every week or boxes or ripped open. This would be a low effort low impact output manipulation as it would not impact many outside individuals besides the TI.
2. Output manipulation based on personality mapping would be if for example a TI went to a therapist and told them that when they were a child their friends used to say they were like a “bear” because of such and such reason and that is the animal that they most closely associate with. The TI would then start noticing that “bears” are referenced in conversations with people, seen on billboards and advertisements, have talk shows, news and other communication mediums referencing it as a subject. The concept of a “bear” could also be used to influence or shame the TI’s actions. For example, if they eat a lot of junk food, they would keep hearing about a bear in a certain state that was really fat and had to be put down.