[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir ][Options][ watchlist ]

/qresearch/ - Q Research

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

Welcome Page | Index | Archive | Voat Subverse | Poal Sub | Q Posts | Notables | Q Proofs
Q's Board: /projectdcomms/ | Bakers Board: /Comms/ | Legacy Boards: /CBTS/ /TheStorm/ /GreatAwakening/ | Politics News & Debate: /pnd/

File (hide): c51b588fc142585⋯.png (219.95 KB, 586x479, 586:479, Putabirdonit.png) (h) (u)

[–]

033344 (6)  No.8257360[Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

I wanted to discuss an interesting phenomenom that I would call the “input output effect” for lack of better term. The purpose of this overview is not to reveal some secret knowledge or to put an end to the system that instigates its mechanisms, as that would not be possible and is inadvisable to attempt. However, I think describing its existence can help better understand some of the cause and effect patterns that influence reality. The IO effect probably is implemented to the general population most likely in some sort of segmented fashion but the experience I want to describe is the more individualized and personal approach that is sometimes mentioned by targeted individuals as part of gangstalking. The reason for this is that the mechanisms in the IO effect are hyper realized for TI’s by nature and purpose of the program.

The components of the IO effect

When I say the IO effect I mean the manipulation of an individuals experience of reality based on their inputs. An overly simplified and narrow example of inputs would be the individuals historical behavior pattern and their personality / characteristic mapping.

Digital versus IRL

Digital implementations of the IO effect are mainstream and commonly understood. For example, if you have a google account, your web history and online behavior is used in targeted advertising, however it can also impact the “digital reality” that you reside. When you go on youtube or search for news it would cater to the digital avatar that makes up your behavior and characteristics. I would go further to say that for TI’s the actual contents on a website might be temporarily manipulated to appear different from a normal person either for the purposes of harassment, behavior manipulation, or other. However, most people would assume that the IO effect would be difficult if not impossible to implement IRL as that would require much more effort, would be much more permanent, and there are too many external independent actors compared to digital which can be personalized to the viewing portal of the recipient.

Examples IRL for a TI

1. Output manipulation based on behavior pattern would be if a TI commonly purchased a type of cereal, lets say Fruit Loops (because they like Toucan Sam) every week. When the TI goes grocery shopping they would find that the cereal was expired every week or boxes or ripped open. This would be a low effort low impact output manipulation as it would not impact many outside individuals besides the TI.

2. Output manipulation based on personality mapping would be if for example a TI went to a therapist and told them that when they were a child their friends used to say they were like a “bear” because of such and such reason and that is the animal that they most closely associate with. The TI would then start noticing that “bears” are referenced in conversations with people, seen on billboards and advertisements, have talk shows, news and other communication mediums referencing it as a subject. The concept of a “bear” could also be used to influence or shame the TI’s actions. For example, if they eat a lot of junk food, they would keep hearing about a bear in a certain state that was really fat and had to be put down.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

033344 (6)  No.8257378

Influencing the IO effect

Now that a general background was established, I wanted to get to the real purpose and experimentation that this is all about. So something I had been wondering for a while is instead of just being the recipient of the IO effect, can a TI manipulate the mechanisms themselves? In addition, what is the extent that they can influence reality through this manipulation? Here are some results:

1. The easiest input to manipulate was myself, so the above example of being referenced as a “bear” was something I did several years ago and to this day although less commonly it is still being used as an output into my reality. I did this by intentionally and voluntarily meeting with a therapist three times and then stopping. The first meeting was to establish the relationship, the second was to give time for perpetrators to coerce the therapist into doing what they want, and the third meeting was to drop the bear reference to see what happens.

2. I then wanted to see if I can effect another person’s reality, although preferably not too negatively. It also had to be someone that was not in direct contact with me and would not normally be influenced within the IO effect range of my daily life. The simplest way that I could think of was to find a celebrity who had frequent interactions with social media so I chose a random youtube celebrity that I had previously not watched any content and based on brief research was not already involved in the “illuminati” or other media spiderweb (not sure what to call it). After following the YT personality for sometime the following event occurred (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6w6pEXZutoY). Specifically, when someone that has not previously been aware or involved with the “system” is to be co-opted or put under the influence, they are first put through a traumatic event such as a car accident, death in family, or other. Afterwards, I could see personal elements of my IO effect as implemented by my personal gangstalking program within certain content and communications by the celebrity.

3. I then tried to see if actual organizations /entities can be effected as well. I won’t describe what I did on my end but I can show the end result. “A CIA police officer encountered her on April 22 [2019] at the vehicle entrance to CIA headquarters, and she told the officer she had applied for employment there, and a recruiter directed her to come to the agency. Hernandez came back the next two days, asking to “speak with Agent Penis.” (https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/woman-pleads-guilty-to-trespassing-at-cia-in-search-of-agent-penis)

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

033344 (6)  No.8257390

The experiment

So after seeing the results above and other examples not given, I wanted to see if it were possible to influence someone who should theoretically be out of reach, specifically the president, not in a negative way but to see if elements of the IO effect as personalized to me would appear in their communication/life. The idea for this came from another TI who had complained that they were receiving communication from the president, at the time Obama. Specifically Miriam Carey, “She stated that President Obama put Stamford in lockdown after speaking to her because she is the Prophet of Stamford. She further stated that President Obama had put her residence under electronic surveillance and that it was being fed live to all the national news outlets.” (https://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/style/2014/11/26/how-miriam-careys-u-turn-at-a-white-house-checkpoint-led-to-her-death/?utm_term=.450450a6b5b7).

So in order to do this, besides just following the white house YT page, DJT twitter, and other common channels I had to make it clear that I was trying to get “direct” communication from the president. I can’t detail everything but one of the methods was to send a tweet specifically asking for direct communication or for the president to reference a certain object that would not normally be referenced and had plausible deniability as to association with the recipient. Specifically, I asked that if DJT referenced a type of bird I would in turn take a certain action that would be against the preferred plan of events of my personal gangstalking program. The result was that a bird was referenced however, it was only due to the intentional planting of a gangstalking perpetrator through a retweet (https://twitter.com/gr8tjude_08/status/1232392025363927040) as seen on the number “8” reference in their username. In other words, what makes this difficult to pull off is that gangstalking perpetrators go out of their way to artificially create the output I was trying to arrive at. However, it does show that as a TI, my reality is in a sort of bubble of artificiality as influenced by my personalized program. This also has some other implications that would not be good for me to explain further but are very interesting.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

033344 (6)  No.8257413

Some final thoughts

Some issues with the experiment was the expedited and overly short timeline. This was necessary due to me coming up with the idea a little too late so I only had a short window with which to try it out. There is also the fact that the perpetrators plan to kill me at some point so I didn't know how long of a timeline would even be possible to implement, although supposedly they will give me another year and kill me on the anniversary of when my parent(s) die but not sure on that part.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

033344 (6)  No.8257441

Another aspect of the experiement was to see if I could confirm whether or not Q and DJT were in fact intertwined with the GS program and FM or other secret societies as is sometimes implied by certain outlets. The retweet goes in line with the usual, it could potentially be the case but it could also just be the GS perpetrators creating the illusion that there is such a relationship in order to further divide the population. So in other words, inconclusive, but based on other factors, personal experience, and overall content in Q posts I do not think this is the case, or the relationship is more complicated than appears.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

033344 (6)  No.8258880

bump, lets see how quickly they bury

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
5 replies | 0 images | 1 UIDs | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir ][ watchlist ]