[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / b2 / cartoons / choroy / dempart / marxism / miku / polru / vichan ]

/qresearch/ - Q Research

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
Verification *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


Welcome Page | Index | Archive | Voat Subverse | Poal Sub | Q Posts | Notables | Q Proofs
Q's Board: /PatriotsFight/ | SFW Research: /PatriotsAwoken/ | Bakers Board: /Comms/ | Legacy Boards: /CBTS/ /TheStorm/ /GreatAwakening/ /pol/ | Backup: /QRB/

File: df731ce74a78640⋯.png (265.65 KB, 533x770, 533:770, 3nuke17 - Copy.PNG)

51ae36  No.6524679

Some Nuclear Anomalies and Sources Pertaining to the Questionable History of Nuclear Bombs

The dreaded mushroom cloud presented by the Hiroshima memorial is actually a photo of Hiroshima on fire. HERE.

A squadron of 66 bombers was directed to Imabari. in the early morning of August 6 (666) – the morning of the A-bomb – but Imabari. had been bombed already, twice. This bombing squadron might have fire-bombed Hiroshima instead. HERE.

Initial reports in Japan were that Hiroshima was firebombed. AP filed the same report. HERE.

In the aftermath of the explosion, Hiroshima (and Nagasaki) look no different than Tokyo after it was firebombed. HERE and HERE.

In Hiroshima numerous buildings are standing along with erect tree stumps. HERE.

Limited trolley service was revived in Hiroshima after only three days. HERE.

The Hiroshima bank at the epicenter of the bomb is fully functional and can be seen HERE.

Predictions of endless radiation poisoning for thousands of years proved untrue. Today, Hiroshima and Nagasaki’s radiation levels are normal. HERE.

Outdoor shadows and other dramatic evidences of the Hiroshima bombing seem to be faked. HERE.

The initial American reporting on Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs came from Wilfred Burchett and William L. Laurence. One was a communist (Burchett) who hated America and reportedly ended up on the Kremlin’s payroll. HERE.

The other was secretly a paid employee of US armed forces. He was the man who rode with the crew to witness the nuke dropped on Nagasaki. His report on the attack is painful to read for all the wrong reasons. HERE.

Laurence was also the only reported to cover the development of the atomic bomc, see the initial bomb testing (from 20 miles away) and to report from Nagasaki. In other words, only one reporter, paid by the US war dept, provided the entirety of the initial civilian narrative for the testing of nuclear devices and then bombing of Nagasaki. Just one. It was roughly the same at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Reporters were not allowed to visit. HERE.

Military officers were asked to exaggerate the injury count.

Hiroshima and Nagasaki were apparently shut down for months. There was no influx of Western reporters. The nuclear narrative was developed by the Pentagon from what we can tell. HERE.

It was immediately made a crime punishable by death in both the US and Japan to discuss nuclear attacks and the technology that created them. (“The restricted dataclauses of the US Atomic Energy Act specifies that all nuclear weapons-related information is to be considered classified unless explicitly declassified, and makes no distinction about whether said information was created in a laboratory by a government scientist or anywhere else in the world by private citizens.”) HERE.

As for Little Boy, the bomb dropped on Hiroshima, photos show it seems to lack the necessary antennas to function. HERE.

There were apparently several Little Boys of various sizes, not just one. HERE.

The narrative surrounding the dropping of the Hiroshima bombing is reportedly inaccurate. “Levers” were “pulled” to drop the bomb, but the automatic system did the job. HERE.

The automatic targeting system itself was an inaccurate device that reportedly might drop bombs miles from where the pilot hoped to deliver them. The odds that both bombs ended up delivering effective blasts are surprisingly low.

The Nagasaki bombing narrative was confused for decades. The story kept changing. Even the pilot was misidentified. The crews were switched. HERE.

The photos of the Nagasaki mushroom cloud are suspicious. They appear to be composite images with cloud cover inserted to ensure that identification of Nagasaki is impossible. HERE. Other Nagasaki photos appear fake.

One of the two famous and supposedly identical photos of the Nagasaki mushroom cloud includes part of a plane. One of the photos is thus fake, or at least retouched. HERE.

For events of such magnitude, there are surprisingly few eyewitness accounts of the actual blast. Many eyewitness accounts start the day after the blast or during the firestorm. Only a few Japanese survivors have stepped forward to become regular “faces” of the blast.

There don’t seem to be any civilian photos of either mushroom cloud taken by Japanese civilians or even military facilities. This one HERE looks evidently faked.

Much of the Western Hiroshima narrative regarding the blast was developed by a single Jesuit priest who, along with other Jesuits, had survive at the epicenter of the blast through the intervention of the Virgin Mary. HERE.

The eyewitness accounts of the blast itself have a repetitive and artificial quality to them, at least the ones we read. One doctor claims to have treated 2000-3000 injured on the first day. HERE.

>https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-06/atom-bomb-anniversary-youre-being-lied-about-hiroshima-and-much-more

51ae36  No.6524707

File: 3e05e09d4777973⋯.pdf (6.63 MB, 1nuclearweaponshoax - Copy.pdf)

>>6524679

Death Object

Exploding the Nuclear Weapons Hoax

About the Author

Akio Nakatani is a Professor of Applied Mathematics and Statistics. His

research interests include Stochastic Systems, Parameter Estimation, Stochastic

Optimization, Monte Carlo Methods and Simulation, Neural Networks,

Statistical Pattern Recognition, Statistical Image Analysis, Nonparametric Bayes

and Bayesian Hierarchical Models, Time Series, Graphical Models,

Nonparametric Bayes and Bayesian Hierarchical Models.


51ae36  No.6524713

File: fee63d58dc8cce0⋯.png (1.08 MB, 1440x600, 12:5, 2nuke1 - Copy.png)

>>6524707

Here's our supposed proof of "Atomic bombs".

<in fact, one of the pictures is of firebombed Tokyo, can YOU tell which?


51ae36  No.6524720

File: 04dbfc6cec6e462⋯.png (697.16 KB, 1116x836, 279:209, 6nuke11 - Copy.PNG)

>>6524713

Ground Zero

Telephone poles & wires still standing!

Directly below "nuclear" blast???


51ae36  No.6524725

>>6524720

The Hiroshima Mushroom Cloud That Wasn’t

https://www.nytimes.com/2016/05/24/science/hiroshima-atomic-bomb-mushroom-cloud.html

https://archive.fo/HHFrt


51ae36  No.6524731

File: df731ce74a78640⋯.png (265.65 KB, 533x770, 533:770, 3nuke17 - Copy.PNG)

>>6524725

>The Hiroshima Mushroom Cloud That Wasn’t

This is a photo of a FIRESTORM


51ae36  No.6524744

File: 1c892e9598a34d8⋯.png (543.71 KB, 715x903, 715:903, 4nuke13 - Copy.PNG)

File: af39fb973d09512⋯.png (1.15 MB, 1343x794, 1343:794, 5nuke16 - Copy.PNG)

File: 8b209805bde8971⋯.png (389.49 KB, 1183x749, 169:107, 2clouds - Copy.PNG)

>>6524731

Firestorm.

Pic on left shows the fire burning on the ground and as the smoke rises to the upper atmosphere it expanded into that fake looking "mushroom cloud"

<You can see that the third pic is actually of two clouds which in the other pics were misleadingly photographed to look like one mushroom cloud


51ae36  No.6524752

File: 937c4539c858b04⋯.png (116.07 KB, 981x900, 109:100, 7nuke14 - Copy.PNG)

>>6524744

Radiation

>https://www.genetics.org/content/203/4/1505

The explosion of atom bombs over the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1945 resulted in very high casualties, both immediate and delayed but also left a large number of survivors who had been exposed to radiation, at levels that could be fairly precisely ascertained. Extensive follow-up of a large cohort of survivors (120,000) and of their offspring (77,000) was initiated in 1947 and continues to this day. In essence, survivors having received 1 Gy irradiation (∼1000 mSV) have a significantly elevated rate of cancer (42% increase) but a limited decrease of longevity (∼1 year), while their offspring show no increased frequency of abnormalities and, so far, no detectable elevation of the mutation rate.

"only a limited decrease of longevity (∼1 year), while their offspring show no increased frequency of abnormalities and, so far, no detectable elevation of the mutation rate."

BECAUSE GASOLINE AND INCENDIARY & HIGH EXPLOSIVE BOMBS DON'T CAUSE MUTATIONS


51ae36  No.6524756

File: 9e30ea2897f04ed⋯.png (247.84 KB, 982x790, 491:395, 8nuke3 - Copy.PNG)

File: 30121b1d9ec3772⋯.png (522.68 KB, 1695x875, 339:175, 8nuke6 - Copy.PNG)

File: c3cc64c1d7de0ab⋯.png (452.76 KB, 1607x904, 1607:904, 8nuke7 - Copy.PNG)

>>6524752

Trinity Test

Prior to the first "atomic" test, a bomb composed of 100-tons of TNT was detonated.

It created a crater 5 ft deep x 30' wide.

Then the Trinity Test, supposed first detonation of world's first nuclear bomb.

It created a crater 5 ft deep x 30' wide.

But it was 20,000 times more powerful than the TNT test????


51ae36  No.6524759

File: 60de830ea342024⋯.png (1.01 MB, 1583x823, 1583:823, 9nuke8 - Copy.PNG)

File: 378b3afd08d24e7⋯.png (636.14 KB, 1173x911, 1173:911, 9nuke9 - Copy.PNG)

File: e9b94ecfa8137f3⋯.png (753.78 KB, 867x728, 867:728, 9nuke10 - Copy.PNG)

>>6524756

Crater

Here's your 'crater'


51ae36  No.6524761

File: b671babb0f018f4⋯.png (148.8 KB, 1598x751, 1598:751, 10nukes - Copy.PNG)

>>6524759

Born Secret

Did you know that the science behind how an uncontrolled nuclear fission reaction creates a 'nuclear' explosion is completely 'classified'? Not talking about how to build a bomb. I'm talking about the actual physics of the atoms.

Someone could get a PhD in nuclear sciences and work their whole life as a nuclear physicist, but they still can't explain how 'nuclear' explosions are possible


51ae36  No.6524768

File: 8429e090dc7b2d3⋯.png (603.38 KB, 945x836, 945:836, 11nuke12 - Copy.PNG)

>>6524761

In this photo, we can see on the right how that might look like a 'mushroom cloud' from a nuclear explosion.

But the original photo on the left clearly shows that fire are burning and billowing into the air.

Someone doctored the photo on the right to make it appear as tho a nuke went off


51ae36  No.6524784

File: c3713a79443fb87⋯.jpg (3.11 MB, 2181x2700, 727:900, 15nuke18 - Copy.jpg)

File: 2b95d3d467ca954⋯.png (601.91 KB, 930x749, 930:749, 12nuke2 - Copy.PNG)

>>6524768

Here's a photo of giant piles of TNT that were exploded to make it look like a "nuclear explosion" test

Also see vid

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u8SooMQBFVE


51ae36  No.6524789

>>6524784

Why fake it?

They certain originally thought they could build 'the bomb'

But it didn't work.

It may in fact be physically impossible.

It was a 'theory' after all when they started the manhattan project.

Why might they decide to go ahead and make it look like they were successful?

Japanese surrender, Soviet halts advance in Europe. WWII officially ends. No one fucks with America again. Etc.


51ae36  No.6524808

File: d8bd70ecaacf387⋯.jpg (232.8 KB, 1342x923, 1342:923, Bravo test set up - Copy (….JPG)

File: 575aa5dff6141e4⋯.jpg (220.55 KB, 1261x904, 1261:904, Bravo test set up - Copy.JPG)

File: 4de85ed7f7a6576⋯.png (757.02 KB, 962x723, 962:723, Castle_Bravo tower2 - Copy.PNG)

File: f775da5de984815⋯.png (862.67 KB, 957x727, 957:727, Castle_Bravo tower6 - Copy.PNG)

>>6524789

Castle Bravo

First H-Bomb Tests

See the pipes going to the device?

That's where they pumped liquid hydrogen (and/or whatever other combustible materials) into the supposed "H-bomb" which was nothing other than a spout which spread the material to create a giant fireball.

Which they called a "thermonuclear device"


51ae36  No.6524816

File: 693423be747de9f⋯.png (1.47 MB, 1298x847, 118:77, c - Copy.PNG)

>>6524808

This is nothing more than a giant ball of burning hydrogen


51ae36  No.6524832

File: a4bcb05616c938d⋯.pdf (909.08 KB, 2trinity - Copy.pdf)

File: f7f73845871eadc⋯.pdf (669.72 KB, bikini - Copy.pdf)

File: 596b50c73012d99⋯.pdf (360.24 KB, caes - Copy.pdf)

>>6524816

More info & links.

Do your own research


51ae36  No.6524835

>>6524832

links: https://pastebin.com/3CPKBMJa


51ae36  No.6525255

File: 91f3a02bd890e0d⋯.png (647.1 KB, 960x720, 4:3, Castle_Bravo tower4 - Copy.PNG)

>>6524835

hmmm

looks like hydrogen gas exploding…


51ae36  No.6525274

File: ed0dd6d1fab8e44⋯.png (413.7 KB, 1581x791, 1581:791, mushroom.PNG)


7a08ef  No.6525721

File: 11dc997d6c68820⋯.jpg (252.93 KB, 1288x952, 23:17, Bravo Charlie island shelt….JPG)


7a08ef  No.6526091

File: 8d95ca8f4c1e7a7⋯.png (583.54 KB, 1578x840, 263:140, l - Copy.PNG)

File: 4943fc6163f1b07⋯.png (200.15 KB, 1635x857, 1635:857, m - Copy.PNG)


ee1c87  No.6526326

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.


b1a26f  No.6526703

File: 03de368495cc714⋯.png (133.83 KB, 1637x922, 1637:922, chernobylfukishima - Copy.PNG)


b1a26f  No.6526766

File: 1af52525ddcdc4b⋯.png (125.42 KB, 1144x969, 1144:969, fear - Copy.PNG)

File: ce77bbbc4678978⋯.png (172.18 KB, 1516x911, 1516:911, fear4 - Copy.PNG)


0a0165  No.6528815

File: 91f3a02bd890e0d⋯.png (647.1 KB, 960x720, 4:3, Castle_Bravo tower4 - Copy.PNG)

File: 4ca2c2d3ecdebe8⋯.png (885.15 KB, 978x661, 978:661, time - Copy.PNG)

File: 3f5385b5b5c2441⋯.png (392.99 KB, 664x251, 664:251, vents - Copy.PNG)

>>6526091

Watch sloooowly

>https://youtu.be/jo7Ytg9ckC0?t=4201

Pic 1: gases in the air surrounding the "bomb" igniting. Note the tower which sparks the ignition from high up.

Pic 2: time lapse: sped up to make it look faster. clouds moving quickly.

Pic 3: see the vents coming out of the "bomb" to disperse the gas?


0a0165  No.6528834

>>6528815

For keks:

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5XTFd495aE&feature=youtu.be&t=92


3d483e  No.6531226

File: 7aacbef7ce1d4b4⋯.gif (17.49 KB, 695x489, 695:489, usradonpotmap.gif)

File: 04d152e6de66c91⋯.gif (95.54 KB, 523x423, 523:423, 12657_original.gif)

File: 9490591235b23fb⋯.jpg (96.25 KB, 960x720, 4:3, U.S Dose Rates from Natura….jpg)

Don't get me started fags. 3 maps of the U.S. 1 - Levels of Radon , 2 Levels of Natural background radiation, and 3, Incidence of Lung Cancer. WHY DO THEY NOT COORELATE? Mo' Radiation, Mo' Cancer…. but the maps do not lie. Its the opposite. More radon and background radiation, the less cancer.


3d483e  No.6531378

File: 3c4a8a8c9076eff⋯.jpg (246.33 KB, 859x853, 859:853, hanford.jpg)

File: 16145c70ad3554f⋯.gif (62.54 KB, 935x585, 187:117, CDCNoCancer.gif)

Same fag here. Handford in Washington dumped a fuck-ton of Iodine 131, and Scientists slobered over how many deaths this would cause in Thyroid deaths over the next 30 years. It was taught in school how damaging it was to the environment.

Read it for your self the results - No cancer https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/radiation/hanford/htdsweb/pdf/htds_aag.pdf

When you review all of the studies, you find very, very weak evidence, but in most cases, test sites and accidental releases case no higher cancer incidences.


3d483e  No.6531436

File: 9490591235b23fb⋯.jpg (96.25 KB, 960x720, 4:3, U.S Dose Rates from Natura….jpg)

File: ce309fd6d463b70⋯.gif (92.04 KB, 755x623, 755:623, lifeexpectancy.gif)

Not convinced Radiation in small doses is good for you? you say " You are such a fag if you don't think radiation is bad for you!" .

Two maps of the US. 1 - Life expectancy by county, and 2 - background ionizing radiation . Tell me I am still a fag here.


67b45f  No.6534058

>>6531436

You there?


ed4048  No.6534587


3d483e  No.6539446

File: 947a7c339e187ec⋯.jpg (36.7 KB, 620x413, 620:413, Grumpy-Cat-Good-Morning-Me….jpg)

>>6534058

I'm here lurking.


02df88  No.6539464

Symbolism = End

"mushroom" cloud - Mushrooms are one of the most phallic things in nature

"Manhattan Project" - "Hats" symbolize jobs - thus this is symbolic of removing a few key plants in regimes -

Hydrogen (water) bomb = Water is symbolic of information in the cult https://twitter.com/CodesUcq/status/1091570932001337344

The first two atomic bombs used in war one of which was named "Little Boy" - which is made from Uranium - named after Uranus - well, add up the symbolism and you get a likely indication of the type of blackmail this was. - The other one Fat man is also coded but I think going too deeply into symbolism codes here would be a mistake as I merely wanted to mention that while I'm not 100% convinced yet New Clear bombs aren't real - there are a lot of coding that make me think they might be just more cult symbolism comms for taking out cultist plants by using blackmail.

Also all those New Clear tests after "Little Boy" - took place on Bikini Atoll - "toll" as in a count and bikini is more obvious for blackmail logic.

Ok, and as said I'm still digging into this so I'm not 100% confident either way - a lot of things are not what they seem and this could very well be another of them. - related - https://ufodigest.com/users/patrick-ocarroll - a really good list of logistical problems with the things NASA does - again not saying one way or another on either - merely digging in and trying to be objective and taking new avenues for it.


1851cb  No.6539720

>>6539464

>a really good list of logistical problems with the things NASA does

Not trying to go off topic, but here's my biggest question regarding that:

How did Apollo slow down for trans-earth injection?

<with no fuel left?

Atmospheric entry?

<at what speed?


1851cb  No.6539744

>>6539464

>The first two atomic bombs used in war one of which was named "Little Boy" - which is made from Uranium - named after Uranus - well, add up the symbolism and you get a likely indication of the type of blackmail this was

Ha. Thanks for the insight.

It has become apparent to me that the following is true:

Trinity Test was fake.

Hiroshima & Nagasaki were faked.

H-Bomb Tests were fake.

Subsequent testing? See here: >>6528834

Then they banned all testing.

And after making trillions selling us fake bombs they'll make trillions decommissioning them and then prohibiting all other nations from ever trying to replicate them while keeping the secret science behind how they supposedly work hidden from everyone.


1851cb  No.6539785

File: 0a99d17b7e22125⋯.png (125.76 KB, 1891x827, 1891:827, ban - Copy.PNG)

>>6539446

>>6539464

I tried posting about this elsewhere to see what people think because for me it is an entirely new concept and the biggest red-pill of my life and I noticed a couple things:

I posted about it in Qresearch general threads and got hit with shills HARD. If you put this in tree view and see the responses you'll see what I mean: https://8ch.net/qresearch/res/6506802.html#q6506848

Then I tried posting about it in /pol/ and the whole thread was deleted. So I tried again and it was deleted again. See pic.

It's interesting that a place that allows such degeneracy about so many things does not allow this subject to be talked about.


02df88  No.6539849

>>6539720

when you get deep into the list it becomes very absurd. - anyway I do believe the Moon landing was faked because I can read symbolism comms and it's coded everywhere -

Course Q "confirms" it's real

False, moon landings are real.

Programs exist that are outside of public domain.

Q

but what about that next sentence about programs outside of public domain? Well… that's a bit of a dig - keeping it to the moon stuff I got a mysterious message just saying "Moon Township, PA" which kept me from thinking I had been proven wrong about my digging into the moon. Basically the reason I was sent that message was because they did land on the moon - it makes a better lie if they take the astronauts to a place called Moon for the show - that way they aren't even lying that they went there.- and Q is just trying to teach us symbolism comms (that and he knows the brainwash is so strong on this one that it'd be self destruction to do it.)

sorry, like you I'm not trying to go off topic - I just know more about celestial symbolism than rocket science - which oddly enough is rocket science when we get into the stuff that actually goes on there. - it's tied to the hip and yet visibly distanced


1851cb  No.6539858

>>6539464

>I'm still digging into this

There's not much out there on the topic, but this pdf convinced me: https://media.8ch.net/file_store/3e05e09d477797326888699b39554e8800b512b5323387b5df162fb6b6c0199c.pdf

These are a few other links. As I said, there's not much out there, so I don't endorse everything on these people's sites, but it's a place to start after that pdf.

>https://coconutrevival.com/?p=3611

>http://breakfornews.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=7188&start=12

>https://arcticcompass.blogspot.com/2017/09/are-nuclear-weapons-hoax-to-keep-us-in.html

>http://heiwaco.tripod.com/bomb.htm

>http://www.big-lies.org/NUKE-LIES/www.nukelies.com/forum/

>https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-08-06/atom-bomb-anniversary-youre-being-lied-about-hiroshima-and-much-more


02df88  No.6539884

>>6539785

I don't think they should ban people - but this doesn't belong in the main chat yet. I don't talk about moon landing being faked in my twitter feed specifically because I know normies can't handle it yet. They can't handle nukes either - Got to ease them into it - learn the symbolism first then the rest will make perfect sense -


1851cb  No.6539886

>>6539849

>he knows the brainwash is so strong on this one that it'd be self destruction to do it.

This is a big issue for all red-pill topics.

And ya, the moon landings are related because the fake hollywood style footage supposedly proving nukes exist is the same way they produced the moon landing footage, if in fact, those were staged too


02df88  No.6539995

>>6539858

thanks, yea there isn't much indeed. I think this is such a good potential psyop because years before that Nuclear reactors are certainly a real thing and so they probably rode the name branding to some degree. In any case - DECLAS has to be handled very carefully to avoid mass hysteria

>>6539886

Digging into nobel peace prize winners and hollywood awards - both reveal an equal amount of fraud - just people lying making up crap for the cabbal. Got to get people to see the cult rather than the narrative thrust in front of their face. The problem is Alex Jones types get in the way and any resistance that forms they try and capture and redirect them into harmless directions. That's the real reason Q is so attacked I think

>>6539744

np - yea there is something odd about all of it when I start digging - a big "don't look here" kind of thing - which really makes me wonder about the Uranium 1 scandal - and what Yellow cake uranium actually is… well I can dig there at least


02df88  No.6540051

File: a4149bf07306936⋯.png (164.28 KB, 1074x406, 537:203, cancer.png)

File: a84a0c255129d02⋯.png (129.47 KB, 1082x400, 541:200, 80s.png)

>>6528834

yea, that's a text book case of people not seeing the forest for the trees - oh it's dangerous - they got cancer…. they lived till their 80's! how is that proving any danger if after being unguarded right next to a nuke blast they live for 40+ years with no ill effects. It disproves itself yet the comments don't even realize this oddity.

Tho of course all of them getting cancer is strange - but given the timeframe I do not buy it was the bomb that did it.


7ea75f  No.6540080

You have managed to make the flat earth idiots look good by comparison.

What a waste when we are trying to stop pure evil.

Be ashamed.


1851cb  No.6540144

>>6539995

>thanks, yea there isn't much indeed.

also: https://www.thedailybell.com/all-articles/news-analysis/questions-about-vietnam-nukes-as-evidence-mounts-of-previous-fakery/


02df88  No.6540214

>>6540080

thank you, I was legit wondering where the shills where if this was a real thing. You have provided that necessary shilling.

>>6540144

and again - tx , I'm still far from convinced because I feel like such a big conspiracy must have much more info that I have yet to see the moon stuff I am because I've seen enough symbolism comms + Science https://ufodigest.com/users/patrick-ocarroll to feel confident in - the nuke stuff I never looked thru before so while it seems plausible I'm going to take it seriously and keep digging as I go. Drudge is a good place to look for comms involving nukes so that's probably where I'll go next.


f92ff6  No.6703728

>>6539886

Staged at Laurel Canyon




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / b2 / cartoons / choroy / dempart / marxism / miku / polru / vichan ]