/qresearch/ - Q Research Board

Thanks Baker! , I expected this.

Internet Bill of Rights

Thomas Jefferson pointed out in the Declaration of Independence, that #WeThePeople possess "certain unalienable rights" which we were given by our Creator. These rights are inseparable from us: they are part of our humanity. Freedom of Speech is one of these rights, and is implicitly protected in the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally by parties that maintain, build, and develop communications infrastructure to include (but not limited to) cellular telephone providers, last mile infrastructure, and other products and services enabled by communications infrastructure to the furthest extent of the imagination.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as (but not limited to) TOS, EULAs, service clauses or other contractual stipulations.

If we have #1 we can sue entities that violate United States free speech laws.

#2 says what AT&T said but more.

#3 tells them that we don't care what they put on our screens that nobody reads or understands and it doesn't even matter because our unalienable rights supersede their garbage 'agreements'.

Words of Eurtwtf@g

>>572257

>>566881

>>566899

>>571763 (Draft of IBOR)

>>571869 (tips for the IBOR)

>>571878

Notable posts

>>566720

>>571831 (PUSH IBOR!)

>>571941 (AT&T, Our Guy?)

>>572509

>(AT&T, Our Guy?)

Q heavily implies that they'll back this. Eurwtf@g didn't want to use their exact wording but #2 includes what they said (and more). I don't have a problem with their exact wording.

>don’t throttle, discriminate, or degrade network performance based on content

But we're supposed to be working together which means compromise so I changed it and asked for more because why not?

>>572590

Mmm., same.., AT&T doesn't import a lot.., the priority is the #IBOR..

>>572664

I think this might inadvertently include firewalls. Thoughts?

Where does Gov get its Power?

What is a 'Petition'?

Can Gov have more Power than its Creator?

>>572692

take the good ideas from the doc, add to the

one you are all working on.

If everything included in urs already,

just do the finishing touches, leave for Eurt to

review. She be back soon.

Rembr, creating this petition is only part.

Once launch, then must push, otherwise we

do this part, create IBOR, in vain. It's looking

good.

Does pres Gov have Power?

Q - Truth to power.

Does Gov have Truth?

If no truth then no Power - non?

>>572668

>the priority is the #IBOR

I hear you, but just because the title is #IBOR doesn't mean we can't specifically target the important bit (the medium the internet exists on). If we only focus on the internet as it stands now we might screw future generations when something new exists and it's not covered by the 'internet' moniker. Calling it 'communications infrastructure' is pretty crafty since then the have to argue that something ISNT a piece of communications infrastructure and an easy test is obviously demonstrating communication with the medium in question. This could potentially cover everything from tin cans and bits of string to satellite comms.

>>572664

Ok I figured out the one detail that would make this really good, change 'connector(s)' to User. It's established terminology, unless you have some reason to call it 'connector' like I do 'internet' and 'communications infrastructure'.

>>572768

>>572786

why beg from antity that has no Power? puts under theri speyll

why no jst Pray to the true Power and ask it be sorted - God Given - who has Power to take away?

>>572837

God helps those who help themselves.

its my Fathers birthday today. He passed back in 2006. miss him

<3

>>572842

no sure God wuld b 2 chuffed at me beggin to some artificial corrupt entity

the Ops r levl multi - Spirit also

No Deals

God given rights will be upheld - thats it

>>572787

I agree established terminology will be best. I thought about these two terms in debate for a while.

The thought at the time was the Connector is a user who chose to connect to the IOT. Once becoming the Connector the IBOR jurisdiction will kick in.

This was my logic at 2 A.M.

User seemed to be more malleable as a term in court as opposed to a defined direct connector.

That being said, your point is still not negated, As long as User is clearly defined in the declaration it would serve Ideally, as you are proposing.

initially - transition phase

this anon cannot sign any petition

>>572940

Who Judges on Gods behalf?

Who claims that Jurisdiction?

>>572940

a living being is not subject to rules/codes of a fictional entity

>>573027

Fake constructs will be obliterated

transition will be rqd - interim measures

>>572940

please consider my cmnts anon and God Bless to ALL for their Wonderful efforts here

<3

>>572940

Thomas Jefferson pointed out in the Declaration of Independence, that #WeThePeople possess "certain unalienable rights" which we were given by our Creator. These rights are inseparable from us: they are part of our humanity. Freedom of Speech is one of these rights, and is implicitly protected in the Bill of Rights.

This delaration shall serve as a reminder of the great and innumerable powers granted to each and every human by our Creator. In addition, we remember and honor through precedent of this Declaration, the protections of the United States of America's, Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally by parties that maintain, build, and develop communications infrastructure to include (but not limited to) cellular telephone providers, last mile infrastructure, and other products and services enabled by communications infrastructure to the furthest extent of the imagination.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as (but not limited to) TOS, EULAs, service clauses or other contractual stipulations.

>Furthermore;

>We Demand Connector(s) Right to Privacy If They Choose.

Can be solved if competition is allowed, it's also important to remember that future tech will include more options which by demand will include everything you want in as many flavors as you can handle once real competition is allowed.

>We Demand that Once content is created it must remain, in its entirety on the global world wide network, unless

global world wide is redundant

>or until the creator decides to delete it themselves

Unfortunately this is unenforceable, think Streisand Effect.

>We Demand Connector(s) have the Right to Delete their Footprint to the best of their ability

This is unenforceable.

>We Demand Connector(s) Can Create Openly & Freely without Interference from any aspect or Access Point of the global world wide network.

Need to reword this but I like the idea.

>We Demand No such aspect of the global network shall be allowed to infringe on any other aspect or connector(s) right to access the global world wide network.

It would require the NSA to play ball and detect these attacks. Not saying it's not doable, just that it requires the NSA to play ball.

>This precedent set, shall allow us to proceed with Rule of Law regarding human rights when connected to the global world wide network, as connector(s) with this declaration as precedent we clearly are afforded our freedoms when we access the global world wide network

We can work with this too. How many characters do we get?

>>573065

800 i saw smwhr

>>573065

Order is better thn Demand (euk) (de anythin is bad)

howe is regina?

>>573065

I saw 800 also, but not sure characters or words.

i apologise to anons for my outburst last night - info o/load n brain ready to xplode

>>573181

i recall char

>>573198

i.e space is a premium - concise wording reqd

Shit, 800 characters might as well be a book.

>>573205

thot i had - not sure if of valu - sep doc with definitions? as long as mentioned in doc - they need to refer definitions ?

use as Learnign exercise tooooooo

definitions doc - with 'oor' definitions (((they))) cannot chnge

>>573065

any anon have crrnt status of US Inc?

>>573259

bnkrpt - ?

>>573278

recal smthin Pope removal o debt?

Here's a more condensed version. 669chars

This Declaration shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally by parties that and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as (but not limited to) TOS, EULAs, service clauses or other contractual stipulations.

Fixed. Char Count: 663.

This Declaration shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as (but not limited to) TOS, EULAs, service clauses or other contractual stipulations.

shall serve as a reminder of -> guarantees

mod >every American by God through the etc etc

mod >#WeThePeople - definition reqd

mod> all personal communication traffic be treated as private by ALL entities Public and Private. Violators MUST be punished in accord with Private Law.

citizens -NO! ROMAN!

>>573301

exellent draft anon - hope u dont mins my sggstns

>>573286

https:// petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/establish-internet-bill-rights-protecting-1st-amendment-freedoms-encompassing-online-environments

>>573394

>mod >every American by God through the etc etc

I think God will forgive us for not namedropping him this time.

>mod >#WeThePeople - definition reqd

Self explanatory imo, it's at the beginning of our Constitution.

>mod> all personal communication traffic be treated as private by ALL entities Public and Private. Violators MUST be punished in accord with Private Law.

This can only be enforced by things like encryption which is beyond the scope of the IBOR, with an IBOR however entities would have to respect encrypted traffic which means God wins. If you have good encryption, then it is physically impossible to read your communication if you are not the intended recipient. Third party services can compete based on what they can prove they're not saving or sharing.

>>573400

Thanks for the help.

Made less bad again. Char Count: 646

This Declaration shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as (but not limited to) TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

>>573507

#2 cannot be enforced by words. you need encryption.

>other contractual stipulations

Needs to be removed because legally binding contractual obligations cannot interfere with your unalienable rights. You cannot agree your rights away.

Otherwise if you feel we really need to namedrop God we have the characters but I like my last iteration better. Thanks for getting an image we can share though, that will be vital for sharing in general and on twitter.

If we get

>2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

People can make you software that works that way, but in the past, attempts to have secure encryption have been met with resistance. So you still get your #2 if we go with my #2 because my #2 allows me to make your #2 a reality if that makes sense.

>>573507

>>573540

Contracts can not infringe on the individuals corpus - corpus 'the body' of the TRUST,

fiction is Public - Trust private

>>573540

do not claim the rights given and then abuse the giver

>>573569

Your #2 cannot be enforced without encryption, sorry, I don't agree with it.

>>573585

why is encryption reqd?

who does it protect you from?

this world is going to change

(((they))) will play no part!

>>573615

Contracts for Man should all be Private - no corp can move into Private

>>573577

This is a chance to get 100k individuals who do not necessarily feel the way you do about creation to sign a petition. We'd do best to remember we want the widest audience possible.

>>573615

>why is encryption reqd?

Because IP, because commerce, because safe communications. You are using encryption right now. Even if you don't think you need it you're not in a position where you can make that decision for everyone. You're asking them not to look when I can guarantee they cannot look. I prefer my way.

>who does it protect you from?

Anyone with a computer.

>this world is going to change

Agreed.

>(((they))) will play no part!

Also agreed but irrelevant to the discussion at hand.

Count: 642

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as (but not limited to) TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand a legal framework be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3) #WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede non-legally binding agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

==============

622 Characters. Winner Winner Chicken Dinner

==============

corporations and legal are ALL Public

if corporations are allowed at all - they MUST treat in the Public unless they infringe on Man's rights.they do - then TRUST hammers em!

TRUST LAW protects the corpus

>>573708

Trust but Verify, hence encryption, you're not going to convince me the internet doesn't require encryption.

>>573717

>>573669

>>573702

should the present system continue?

so it can then be manipulated by (((them)))?

and they do exactly the same thing all over agn?

go to the root!

>>573759

What you are discussing is outside the scope of the current discussion, we're here to hash out less than 800 characters of what needs to be said, not establish in 800 characters the manner in which we should dictate ourselves now and in the future. Stick to the task at hand.

>>573669

good points.

That petition is getting real sharp. See if you

can sharpen it a bit more, not sure u can, but

see/try.

Get #InternetBillofRights in there somehow,

or good reason to leave out.

Maybe something simple/quick:

Original #BillofRights extends to an

#InternetBillofRights.

>>572664

It's good for sure.

root? "Original #BillofRights extends to an

#InternetBillofRights."

>>573806

Jurisdiction - who has the POWER to take away the rights that GOD gave?

>>573801

that looks more than 800 chars. Is there anything

you see specific that should for sure transfer

over?

>>573822

Who claims that power?

>>573782

I will sleep on it and of course get Eurwtf@g's input when they return. I hope they understand that the BoR doesn't apply to non US citizens but if the US has a free internet then they have access to a free internet as well.

This Declaration shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

============

Char Count: 611

============

"God inspired the original #BillofRights, which

extends to an #InternetBillofRights."

>>573828

whomever claims that power will answer to God. Simple

>>573847

HAVE FAITH

>>573822

howbout:

"God inspired the original #BillofRights, which

extends to an #InternetBillofRights."

>>573314

this is pretty good.

Do we want to try and get it all in one swoop and declare our reasons?

I'll repost this and see what you want to combine:

New attempt.

1)"#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United State of an ongoing conspiracy to deprive citizens of their civil rights both natural and explicitly stated under the Constitution. Our freedoms of speech, free association, belief, spirituality, privacy in the home, etc. have been conspired against using algorithms across multiple platforms. We have evidence of this and it will be made available in full to the relevant offices and people.

Our natural rights extend to whatever medium may be used in their expression and enjoyment thereof. Accordingly, we demand to be made whole, and the force of the Original Constitution and Bill of Rights recognized to apply to all levels of society, including the utility we call the internet.

(((Corporations are people, right? Our government is made up of people. These corps bought influence with money from other members of government, right? Therefore the government DID deprive us of our rights.)))

2) #WeThePeople, demand our to be made whole, and that Our Government investigate this conspiracy, however deep it may go, and prosecute within the relevant legal framework.

3) A contract is unenforceable if one party does not understand, and also it must be an even and fair exchange between parties. Selling our data to third parties, censorship, violations of privacy, spying, and even physical violence in the form of "doxxing" and "shame-mobs" extend to the physical world, and have gotten people killed. As the internet is thoroughly embedded in the fabric of our society, and required in all aspects of our lives, the contract terms are no longer fair, and are very onerous. Accordingly, all parties are hereby on notice that all contracts in whatever form are hereby dissolved with relevant parties.

4) Therefore, #WeThePeople demand Our Government apply all relevant legal mechanisms to ensure a Free and Neutral internet

>>573857

perhaps the use of the wird 'usurped' within txt … then define 'usurped' in definitions doc?

wood meeen we can expand within definitions doc at will

>>573854

Asking our gov't for god given rights doesn't sit right with me, they're our rights, I'm telling my govt that they're my rights and that I'm willing to defend them. I'm not asking my gov't for my god given rights, god gave them to me, I have to ask nobody as there is no higher authority.

>>573857

It's too wordy, the nice thing about IBOR is everybody has their own reasons IBOR should exist and I think that discussion will help us get the signatures we need rather than define why we think we need them.

>>573857

>(((Corporations are people, right? Our government is made up of people. These corps bought influence with money from other members of government, right? Therefore the government DID deprive us of our rights.)))

corps are fiction - color of law - we want nothin to do with fiction entities.

corps created by sleight of hand - corrupt

submit them to Private Trust Law - they fkd

This petition needs to be as agnostic as possible to have a chance at the furthest reach, nothing matters more than getting this infront of someone who can help us realize this goal.

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

====

Chars: 608

====

>>573887

"God inspired the original #BillofRights, which

extends to an #InternetBillofRights."

Where is it asking? It is stating.

Be careful if leader, not to get others words

wrong, or they feel u are not LOOKING at their

words.

>>573906

corrupt corps wi more influence thn gov - why we get lobbyists and flks like Shillry

>>573906

agreed. just uses their fiction against them. Trump's good a that.

>>573921

maybes we neeeed clarification frm abv on what was granted?

>>572842

>>563806

Not trying to redirect but had to share… If you go to YT and type in Hillary Clinton 315 (due to the amount of plus signs available in the Q post) you will see a video by Obama speaking to HRC's emails on the Washington Free Beacon. If we can find the raw video of that… then we have another crumb for baking. Just a thought…

>>573943

internet rights are fiction - jst like inet

>>573952

Man has body - fictn is bits o papr

>>573959

produce the internet as a witness - hmmmmmmmmmm

>>573967

Corporatios are prob - so we move ALL to private trust law

Worry about all that later. Get the people and the force of law involved now.

I stood in a court and asked ACC (a council) to answer - a lawyr stood up - but not for long

ACC didnt appear!

>>573978

NO LEGAL - ONLY LAW!

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

====

Chars: 608

====

Who has problems with the soundness of these demands, if you want to talk about something that does not have anything to do with IBOR, make a new thread.

>>573992

magik - why they wear blk?

>>573998

if u want to spend ur time on legal shit - feel free!

>>574000

numbers tell

Who created Lawyers?

What is the B.A.R. Association?

Who runs the BAR Assoc.?

What color robes do they wear?

Why?

What is Public Law?

What is a code?

Who are subject to the code?

What is a Corporation?

Public or Private?

Who owns ALL Corporations???

What is a Register?

What is a Record?

What is the difference?

>>574096

What is a MOTU PROPRIO?

Coincidence?

>>574020

Not trying to slide, genuinely curious as to nature and purpose if I'm undermining the effort.

Am I misunderstanding the point of all this? I worry I am.

The entire point of petitioning is to establish law and set precedent.

Are the rest of you seeing this as just a general "Hey, I'd really like it if the government would just install a free internet"?

Truly asking.

Because if you look at the https:// petitions.whitehouse.gov/about it sure seems like they want us to show them which direction to go as far as a policy change. So if we mention we want them investigated and enough people sign it - there's a excellent chance Trump is going to push in that direction. And since we know the Dems are going down, It has an excellent chance of passing.

>>The right to petition your government is guaranteed by the First Amendment of the United >>States Constitution. We the People is a platform that empowers the American public to take >>this action like never before – it’s a way for anybody, anywhere, to speak directly to the >>government and become an agent for change.

>>With We the People, you can easily create a petition online, share it, and collect signatures. >>If you gather 100,000 signature in 30 days, we’ll review your petition, make sure it gets in >>front of the appropriate policy experts, and issue an official response.

>>Petitioning has the potential to enact real change,

>>574116

We have another 192 characters if we go with what I already rolled to talk about investigating and enforcement but I thought that particular aspect was outside of a straight 'internet bill or rights'.

>>573911

This one my fav so far.

>>574112

What is Government?

What power does it hold?

Can Government wield more power than the individual?

Can you give away something you do not have?

Can you kill people?

Can the Government kill people?

Why are Governments wielding power they do not have?

The people are asleep.

How do we wake them up?

THE TRUTH SHALL SET YOU FREE!

>>573998

this one my fav so far.

>>574116

why beg?

a petition is a begging prayer!

I'm going to bed, see you all tomorrow.

Who gives the Government power to do what they do?

Should those who give power to Gov. beg for 'stuff'?

SLAVES BEG!!!!

>>574182

gn anon and GB

>>573911

This petition needs to be as agnostic as possible to have a chance at the furthest reach, nothing matters more than getting this infront of someone who can help us realize this goal.

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

====

Chars: 608

====

Then this is excellent.

>>573998

Eurt check this one out.

Hope ur coffee gd in morn. Gn.

>>574170

Using the old form I learned in civics class. Enough people petition together it's a demand.

>>574184

The Government cannot exist without the WILL of the people.

The poeple give it its power.

You cannot give away something you do not have!

>>574208

DO NOT CLAIM RIGHTS FROM GOD AND THEN IGNORE HIS WILL!

>>574208

"Then this is excellent."

agreed.

>>574222

What is a Will?

Last Will n Testament?

What about THE LIVING!

Do living people not have will?

Is there such a thing as a 'Living Testament'?

>>574270

legal can only deal with the dead!

>>574276

conclusion - u wnt to be dead - agree wi anythin legal.

This anon and associates KNOW BETTER!

>>574237

You are letting perfect be the enemy of good enough. God knows my heart and intentions and it's not up to you to decide otherwise.

This needs to face the reality on the ground.

I understand what you are discussing, I do.

God given rights, were also called "Natural rights" That's why I phrased it that way. It passes both tests for both audiences. "Universal rights" is also similar but not as good.

We are dealing with brainwashed people, unless we can rally every older religious person to do this and get through the noise in the next few days, we have to craft for a wider audience. I don't know the timeframe but everything feels rushed to me now.

Throw two out there. Push one with God and One not. See how it does? Then we know which way to go if it fails.

>>574296

I KNOW Q would give support to this position!

>>574319

if the message is corrupt - what outcome should we expect?

do not think for one moment that TPTB are looking for help from anywhere possible… they are DONE!

the SIGNS have already been given!

>>574155

>MOTU PROPRIO

Sua Sponte.

Go on, I'm listening. I can feel you may be onto something. I'm just too fried to follow.

>>574405

kno the feelin too wel anon - GB <3

Q asked we bld a map - it shows corrpt structr

it is asupported by corporate fiction!!!!!

remove the foundation - what happens?

>>574432

corporate is all legal - not law - legal

WE RETURN TO LAW!

>>574306

>You are letting perfect be the enemy of good enough. God knows my heart and intentions and it's not up to you to decide otherwise.

They are just sliding this thread.

All corporations abolished already - by Pope!!!

were they warned?

you think Pope wrote his Moto Proprio just cause he felt like it?

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

===

Chars: 608

===

>>574432

Classical anarchy. Not Antifa-style. Cooperative existence based on a person's integrity. Chaos. qresearch.

Now how does that apply to this internet bill of rights? I'm missing where you are going.

1st covers it brah

Say hi to Malta

😘🎻🦉

UNDERSTAND!

The battle for Earth is over!

Now we in clean up ops.

Bad actors still here - but ops in hand to rmove.

The people need to see how they were decieved - if they SEE it - they will become angry - we need a gradual change to prevent riots etc.

Hunt for red October

https:// wikileaks.org/gifiles/docs/21/2113288_-os-canada-china-russia-mil-hunt-for-red-october-military.html

https:// www.networkworld.com/article/3260784/lan-wan/submarine-cable-boom-fueled-by-new-tech-soaring-demand.html

>>574464

What rights did God grant?

Those are what anyone can claim - what Jurisdiction are they under?

>>574530

REALLY IMPORTANT!

How many 'forms' of law are there?

What is Jurisdiction?

Are there 'levels' of law?

What is a Statute?

Who does it apply to?

>>574534

Free will.

Ah.

So just declare oneself free and it shall be? How do you work that into the format? By placing God in the format. Son of a…

You're right. God has to be in there.

>>574549

Who creates Statutes?

What is a Rule?

What is Color of Law?

What does this imply?

What is a Man?

Where does he live?

Does he have an address?

Does he have a 'title'?

Who confers 'Titles'?

Where do they get their POWER?

Who does the BAR assoc serve?

Where is the BAR based?

Who controls that place?

>>574592

BAR = BLACK MAGIC!

>>574607

the earthly part of the map is infused with their energy

but tha must change

>>574622

its the web that connects everything

>>574634

legal jiggery pokery

>>574643

wht u think they do wen the Real JUDICIARY show themselves?

>>574650

timing is so important - ask Q!

sending loving energy to the cherubim - and heading for some sleep. God Bless this bread and ALL who partake of its Wonderful Goodness! Where we go one, we go ALL.

<3

>>574566

>>Who creates Statutes?

Legislature and executive in the Republic.

>>What is a Rule?

Power/Authority

>>What is Color of Law?

Pretense of a right.

>>What does this imply?

All force exercise is a pretense at a right.

>>What is a Man?

Free will.

>>Where does he live?

Where he chooses.

>>Does he have an address?

>>Does he have a 'title'?

If he chooses.

>>Who confers 'Titles'?

Those who assign it.

>>Where do they get their POWER?

Allowance of their decree.

Thank you for that, I had been flagging.

The Bar serves lawyers. So, like public sector unions they serve themselves. And they're government granted.

So by playing the game we allow it occur.

Throw God in and it nullifies it's sting. So Push the original BOR under God. That's what I was pushing hard last night. Board decides, but I agree with you. Your logic is sound.

>>574658

magikal bro <3

>>574724

no homo lmao

>>574699

>>574550

We're writing a petition where we require 100k signatures, this is not a law, no magic wording will somehow 'free' us. The petition MUST be agnostic for reach.

>>574455

#2 is bad. We don't need a petition for net neutrality

I'm confused why the petition needs to have all the details

The petition just needs to light the fire.

The board here provides the ideas.

Sign and push the petition that is started.

Put your ideas here and stop CIRCLEJERKING over 600 characters or less

Stop unnecessarily constraining the situation and dont slide the petition that is now out there

https:// petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2

>>574699

great stuff anon!

keep it up!!!

GB <3

now bed - could not let the amazing effort go unacknowledged!

>>574734

Respectfully disagree. I've been real deep down the rabbit hole and Belief and Faith are a real, actual, rule set for this world. Beyond our common phrases. Free will is the natural state of things. Violations of free will are the worst karmic reaction.

I'll tag out though if you think it's sliding. Good night all.

>>574734

PETITIONS ARE BEGGING - WANT TO BEG? FINE - GO AHEAD!

>>574762

Oh - fired a few neurons! ty!!!!

These aren't Sovereign Citizen rules we're playing by, if it were, we wouldn't have Soverign Citizens.

>>574744

You don't know what net neutrality is if you think #2 is net neutrality.

>Conservative voices on many large public website platforms are being censored, based solely on a differing opinion.

Wow, way to alienate half of your potential signers.

You want 100k sigs on this you'll have to get it on The_Donald, this won't move through tech forums of which there are thousands, your political ideology is irrelevant to IBOR.

>Put your ideas here

As was done.

>and stop CIRCLEJERKING over 600 characters or less

It's 800, and before it was nearly 1500 characters, (ineligible for submission).

>Stop unnecessarily constraining the situation

You need constraints so you know what you're asking for, that petition asks for nothing and doesn't attempt to solve the problem or open negotiations in a manner that shows the other party you are serious about solving the problem.

>and dont slide the petition that is now out there

It's doomed to failure for the aforementioned reasons.

>>574761

I'm not here to discuss a grand unified theory of legal theory and magic words that free us. qresearch afaik is THE place to be to follow Q and do what you can to help. We were asked specifically to make #IBOR a thing and I've packaged it in a manner that you cannot nitpick mannerism. Q brought up AT&T's IBOR document linked here:

http:// about.att.com/story/consumers_need_an_internet_bill_of_rights.html

Which includes your 'needless net neutrality' statement.

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the unalienable rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our unalienable rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

===

Chars: 608

===

You can get liberals to sign this, lol. This version is agnostic-ally memeable even.

>>574858

So call them natural rights. It means the same thing as God. Which is why they were phrased that way to begin with. That make it agnostic. if they believe they see it. if they don't they won't.

See? Satisfies both requirements.

Do as you will. Love to you all.

>>574916

I have no problem calling them Natural Rights if such a notion must be included.

This Petition shall serve as a reminder of the Natural Rights granted to each and every American through the Bill of Rights.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our Natural Rights in the modern age.

2)#WeThePeople hereby demand all communication traffic to be treated equally and prohibit throttling, discrimination, or degradation of performance based on content.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

=======

Chars: 599

=======

>>574951

Beautiful. Thank you.

I'm for.

It was 'unalienable rights' because it came from the previous anon. They were saying it because Jefferson referred to the Bill of Rights as 'unalienable rights'.

>>574970

That also means the same thing as "natural" or "God given".

Alienable - other able

Un-alienable no other may possess them.

God and self. Free wil

>>575004

Let's sleep on it, no rush.

I have little knowledge of law, however here is how I would write a petition for an IBOR. Not the IBOR itself but just the petition.

Petition for Internet Bill of Rights,

In order to secure our rights and preserve our more perfect union in this technological advancing world, WE THE PEOPLE demand that the our rights provided by GOD and the protections from government provided by our constitution be clearly and concisely written and secured to ensure that the rights of each and every human apply in large technological networks such as the world wide web, also known as the internet, and we demand the application of those same protections from government and those entities serving the public good.

Only when our rights are established and protections secured can WE THE PEOPLE prosper in a free and ever advancing society.

Quit with the internet bill of rights. AT&T has already written it. It is a big corporate push for net neutrality.

The Digital Bill of Rights

1. Freedom - digital citizens have a right to a free, uncensored internet

2. Openness - digital citizens have a right to an open, unobstructed internet

3. Equality - all digital citizens are created equal on the internet…

http:// www.keepthewebopen.com/digital-bill-of-rights

This is from Congressman Issa, 2012. He is retiring this year.

Is this the AT&T version? Who knows? But you are in way over your heads when you start to write language to restrict how people can use the internet. That what the Internet Bill of Rights does, restrict the internet.

Q did not advocate this. He provided a link to AT&T and said careful who you follow.

AT&T is in merger talks with Time Warner, who owns CNN. You are literally shilling for Soros.

This will be opposed by newsrunners on the socials. It is hijacking the board by activists.

>>575537

>>575304

>>574951

A bill of rights, sometimes called a declaration of rights or a charter of rights, is a list of the most important rights to the citizens of a country. The purpose is to protect those rights against infringement from public officials and private citizens.

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Protection of rights from governments and private citizens from prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech and the ability to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

It seems they have already broken our 1st amendment rights and we need to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Redress - remedy or set right (an undesirable or unfair situation).

What if it is not a Internet Bill of Rights

but Internet (Bill of Rights)

As Americans our 1st amendment rights are guaranteed by the Constitution but being trampled on by these private citizens and corporations.

We petition for redress.

If it's serious, where's the freaking link? Should be posted everywhere. First post at the top, bottom and in the message. Don't make people work to find something important. Force it in their face where they can't ignore it. POST IT EVERYWHERE

>>572664

Sophomoric. Plus, I don't use twitter or face book. Now, will you please release me so that I can return to the #710 thread I was so greatly involved in reviewing?

>>575537

That was my thought too and why I didn't push for this on twitter. I don't recall AT&T having my best interest in mind when they were throttling my unlimited cell phone plan.

"Mar 06 2018 11:14:45

Anonymous

567610

Drop the video! Play it in times square.

Mar 06 2018 11:17:11

Q

!UW.yye1fxo

567637

>>567610

Stage set?

Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc are regulated?

MSM is controlled?

Use logic!

Trust the PLAN.

Q"

Indeed. Do any of you remember when AE911 played a video in Times Square depicting the smoking gun?

https:// www.villagevoice.com/2013/10/15/times-square-billboard-calls-for-independent-investigation-of-9-11-and-the-people-speak/

Yes, best to trust the plan.

FreedomWorks has some good pushes and that's an extra 1/2 million people. They have a digital bill of rights section: http:// www.freedomworks.org/issue/digital-bill-rights

>>577087

Being brainwashed since birth, most cannot expand their thinking and find a red pill such as this, hard to swallow.

To get the message to masses in acceptable form requires familiar delivery thru trusted sources. Am I advocating takeover of MSM?

Why was Hitler loved and held in high esteem by the entire world? What was Hitler truly fighting against? What happened once the world flipped?

Why is DJT pandering to Netanyahu and Israel?

Good day and God Bless to ALL anons <3

few thoughts following IBOR stuff - the doc being petition is OK - just meme no sign it!!

also a thot - jugde nana nov reiceiger kalasa

>>577163

ask her to draft

>>577151

These questions taken together, provide the answer to the last.

>>577168

make sense?

>>577163

she KNOWS TRUST LAW!!!

and thats what we need!

>>574951

Thank god people finally are paying attention to the length.

These needs to be at a 9-10th grade reading level

#2 was written by clowns and you listened to them. This makes it illegal to stop them from DDOSing you. Think about this some more.

You have nothing to prevent them from stealing your privacy here.

>>577181

my interp ws a bit too confined cause aye like CANNON LAW best!

>>577213

aan if ye went a shot herd - canon is best round the world

>>577217

cannons r LOUD

>>577220

VAT man uses cannon law all the time tick tock

cannon law = devine principles

>>574858

>You don't know what net neutrality is if you think #2 is net neutrality.

#2 is net neutrality. Best way to convince someone you know what you are talking about is to directly attack their intelligence, right? How very shill like of you.

>Conservative voices on many large public website platforms are being censored, based solely on a differing opinion.

>Wow, way to alienate half of your potential signers.

You don't seem to understand what alienation is. Conservative voices are being censored, this is a fact. Are liberal voices being censored? No. A valid example of Alienation would be if it was stated that conservative voices were more important, or attempted to blame liberal voices for this censorship. Nothing alienating is written. You seem to have a problem with the use of a word in our petition. A good analogy here would be if the term mankind was used in the petition, to which the above argument from you would be… way to alienate half of your potential signers? I think not.

>It's 800, and before it was nearly 1500 characters…

Proceeds to circlejerk on 608 characters.

>It's doomed to failure for the aforementioned reasons.

I disagree anon. You are welcome to launch another petition, but stop shitting on the petition that is currently there.

>>577241

uses there oan tools agnst em :)

very apt :)

>>577247

>>577204

>#2 was written by clowns and you listened to them. This makes it illegal to stop them from DDOSing you. Think about this some more.

Not all speech is protected speech. If you think AT&T doesn't use firewalls I don't know what to tell you. If you think service providers don't use firewalls I don't know what to tell you, if you think firewalls are forced to discriminate on content, I don't know what to tell you. There's plenty of other criteria to ban traffic by like rate of accessing said service.

>Conservative voices are being censored, this is a fact. Are liberal voices being censored?

You're a dipshit if you think this is still Conservative vs. Liberal. I'm a liberal, I'm here, and your point is moot.

>Proceeds to circlejerk on 608 characters.

Proceeds to not understand character limits.

>I disagree anon. You are welcome to launch another petition, but stop shitting on the petition that is currently there.

Where's the memes? I frequent this board and guess what, you have no momentum. Your petition is DoA.

If you want to argue communists don't get censored then great, I agree. But communists don't give a fuck about IBOR or the Constitution.

And you are ultimately missing the point. A lot of programmers are liberal or simply dont give a fuck(anarchists, technocratics) so by raising the bar in your Petition to only include Conservatives immediately alienates a large portion of your potential base that WOULD care about IBOR even if they don't agree with you philosophically on other issues.

>>577283

So fast to respond anon

You must always be here

I have no further argument for you to consume, enjoy victory on your character limits.

the corrupt legal system s the web of the spider

>>577328

cannon law only used within VAT - so they can keep all the secrets!!

think Big

think BiGGer

THINK BIGGEST!!!

>>577337

cud hv sm grate cannnnon memes

cannon law - setting you free!

who aint gonna wanna sign that??

>>577366

and sets the scene for the next act

thts me thots - gon 2 c wht they up 2 - bbl

<3

>>577321

No please keep going, it'd be helpful to compile every possible argument against it so that it can be further refined.

>>577421

Because if we don't they will.

>>577312

Luke 14:26

26 “If anyone comes to me and does not hate father and mother, wife and children, brothers and sisters—yes, even their own life—such a person cannot be my disciple. 27 And whoever does not carry their cross and follow me cannot be my disciple.

#2 just doesnt work with the term throttle. there are too many other ways to break this. they could misdirect packets,, drop packets, send fake server messages and insert fake packets. the equal treatment of data prevents regulation of spam, viruses and ddos. it would be better to treat the wording of number #2 as if we were protecting free speech (because we are) rather than regurgitating from net neutrality, which potus has already said to be bad. there is also no privacy clause. you can fix this with forcing an opt out for personal identifying data protection

>>577902

specific board to drop this?

>>577982

a gentle reminder - we are not here to apply sticking plasters!

>>578027

God Bless ALL who serve <3

>>578027

very sn UNITY and magnified POWER - tick tock

POWER TRUTH LIGHT

>>577876

I tried to specify 'deserialized format of data structures' as free speech but I was told it's too complicated.

>>577876

Also SCOTUS has to be convinced that whatever we're calling 'free speech' is actually speech. They're kind of assholes like that.

https:// www.supremecourt.gov/oral_arguments/argument_transcripts/2017/16-111_f314.pdf

Here is the oral transcript of a recent 'free speech' case the SCOTUS heard. You will find they argue that creating a cake is not considered speech and the individual representing the MASTERPIECE CAKESHOP, LTD. must argue that it is speech and that the individual cannot be compelled to speak.

>>577876

Ok I've thought about this for a while.

"#WeThePeople hereby demand that our data, in its many forms, be recognized as an expression of our first amendment rights, and provided the same rights and freedoms from interference and obstruction."

This allows us to leverage everything already in the first amendment which is really what we are aiming for.

>>578578

I really like this. I'm not married to #2.

There still also needs to be a data retention clause. We cannot allow them to retain our private data without permission

>>578583

That can be fixed via competition imo, I'm not sure that is actually enforceable in the modern age. Things like metadata are required for internet protocols to exist. There are also data retention laws.

"Providers of a Public Internet Forum or Service must allow users to opt out of personally identifiable information data collection."

We need something like this. Facebook,Google and Twitter use this against us for censorship.

"personally identifiable information"

This is a legal term meaning uniquely identifiable to a person.

1)#WeThePeople hereby demand an #InternetBillOfRights be established to protect our Natural Rights in the modern age.

2) #WeThePeople hereby demand that our data, in its many forms, be recognized as an expression of our first amendment rights, and provided the same rights and freedoms from interference and obstruction.

3)#WeThePeople hereby inform the Government of the United States of America that our rights as citizens supersede agreements such as TOS, EULAs, and other non-legally binding stipulations.

Still need a data clause, but as it is this is pretty good.

>>578644

I like it, have to think about the data clause some more. PII is a good idea, it's already defined and it's already protected in some instances.

>>578644

Looking sharp. How about at the end of 3 - something to the effect "all data is property of it's owner in perpetuity with all rights attached".

yep looking sharp.

didn't like to see some of the bickering

to get it here, but prob was necessary.

Try b nice to each other, we have so few

helpers. If one leaves, who knows what

could have been?

Q uestion? Does this draft prepared help this:

Stage set?

Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc are regulated?

MSM is controlled?

Use logic!

Trust the PLAN.

and how?

https:// www.wikihow.com/Write-a-Bill-for-the-United-States-Congress

.

>>579203

>>579274

TY good info,

>>579372

I just took some pictures of what I thought was the most relevant. The full article is 35 pages.

>>579201

To set the stage you need 100k signees, to get 100k signees you need an agnostic petition(memetically, politically, religiously).

>How

Dunno, Q said to do and then said to trust the plan, here we are. Round 2 is doing poorly and alienates a bunch of potential signers.

>>579203

Are we actually trying to write a Bill? Not enough characters methinks.

>>579274

Oh boy, if we're trying to include PII to include signals and other things emitted naturally in everyday life to try and combat video surveillance as well…well shit, it's a good idea but doesn't necessarily fall in the scope of this but I don't know. I don't actually know how to beat facial recognition tech without deliberately tricking it or wearing a mask. The tech isn't going back in the proverbial box so it's something we'll have to deal with.

Wow, who knew, writing up a petition for IBOR isn't easy or straightforward. /s

>>579274

Biometrics?

https:// psv4.userapi.com/c834700/u454527938/docs/d11/4daa219eed9a/National_Geographic_USA_February_2018.pdf?extra=vKWwS40kHYKyUORlRJbwl0IhB_JIMu8-hHu9-TLt9RXF_ZEXX3ZfiQ3FPzYfPfDJOC0E0_wqvPerNQ3c5sBkhVAhtLPuGbXtmGfsGes5HEQXzjjPKN1tuAnGYZRv0A

Here's a link to a pdf of the issue.

New Q post., PUSH for the #Internetbillofrights

do we have any meme soldiers here?

we NEED #internetbillofrights trending now

>>579480

Agreed. Who can arm the memes?

I am ready to post like a madman

@Snowden

We are going LIVE -24 [comb your hair].

Re: IBOR

This scares them more than anything.

Loss of control.

Use logic.

Nothing to do w/ AT&T.

Must be regulated to prevent censorship & narrative push.

Q

https:// 8ch.net/qresearch/res/579039.html#q579914

if these are shit let me know

>>580034

money right here. locked and loaded

>>579970

its good, add

#InternetBillofRights

and twt it

always include:

#FreeTheInternet

#QAnon

#InternetBillofRights

TY @POTUS

or let me know i twt it for you.

sometimes attacking fb might get person

banned, so try stay back from the ban line.

what good are we if we are banned?

WOW… this place filled up FASSST.

hi anons.

>>580073

noted.

wb eurt, q post #.

we are about to twt storm, i think.

>>580082

Hey Eurt, we're refocusing on Petition #2. #3 is in the bag if we need it.

These liberals might be interested in helping us out.

https:// medium.com/@mayoredlee/fighting-for-open-and-equal-internet-dc27bca1485f

load all your IBOR memes into quiver.

Slowly gracefully twt them not fast, not slow,

through out day.

Add some truth or cool links, pertinent to our

cause.

always add:

#FreeTheInternet

#QAnon

#InternetBillofRights

TY @POTUS

to your twts until you hear different.

>>580106

"https:// medium.com/@mayoredlee/fighting-for-open-and-equal-internet-dc27bca1485f

"

what are their major ideas, mayb there is a

gem, and if we include, more support.

>>580200

They want free and open internet, which is basically what we want. They're still assmad about Net Neutrality so if we can convince some liberals to ignore the Conservative victim bullshit in the petition it could spread far enough on both sides.

It's not hard to convince a liberal they're victims.

>>580169

humbl suggestion.

"by writing into laws that govern the internet and

protect users."

add #InternetBillofRights

twt, ask for RT from your frens and fam.

>>580201

not #IBOR

#InternetBillofRights

>>580240

Ok.

<Would it have fucking killed you all to pick a shorter hashtag.

>>580223

if we can use their words exact , because its so much

like our words, then sometimes make frens.

jus a miracal shot, but sometimes they work, lol

>>580231

i dont have a ton of followers.. maybe 100

i can add internetbillofrights

>>580243

save us some work, add the hash to the

graphic and make it huggeee.

>>572664

>>573065

>>573301

>>573400

>>573497

>>573507

heavy shilling here, who let the roaches in?

thank you for your input. sorry i.m late. personal issues.

DAMN had a LOT of reading to do.

PROUD OF YOU ALL ANONS!

>>580282

Doesn't matter amnt followers, that will grow.

Provide them truth, with sauce and they will

be informed.

Ask for help, and some will help, just ask

them to RT.

Sometimes RTs get RTd by bigger fish

down the way.

>>580301

Ty for graph, please post graph every 20 min,

if you would.

>>580325

nice one, TY

>>580370

lil to much black panther, to old, current plez

>>580396

noted

have read all your text variations very proud

and have arrived with a gift to make our life simple.

Look what i found:

Universal declaration of Human Rights.

Art. 19: >Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

========

simple huh? how about we steal it and stick it into our text?

we have this:

(1)

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

(2)

"all data is property of it's owner in perpetuity with all rights attached".

(3)

Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers.

(4)

If there is a bit of space left, a bit of introduction.

is 663 max caracters allowed????

>>580413

We're pushing #2, Q said to push it and since ours isn't done he's obviously referring to #2.

good coffee, hope urs is too.

I have not decided which strategy i like best,

petition wise,

but I am pushing hash #InternetBillofRights

>>580494

cute, but make the graphic pertinent to hash.

>>580106

>>580103

>this is ibor2, right? the one you are currently pushing?

GREAT hash exposure,,, but the text of #ibor2 sucks.

ppl dont understand this:

—-IBOR2 text—

Internet forums and social networks which provide free access to the public are a digital place of assembly, and individuals using such methods for public communication should not be subjected to censorship due to political beliefs or differing ideas. Conservative voices on many large public website platforms are being censored, based solely on a differing opinion. Some of these platforms further employ tracking mechanisms for monitoring an individual's digital history, which can be used to censor the individual's public communication through various censorship practices, sometimes without knowledge or awareness. These actions directly violate personal liberty and stand at contrast with the bill of rights.

We the people demand action to bring our digital future into the light.

——————————-

drafts for #ibor (NEW) are far better and to the point.

Let me try and mix up the thing you made and ask your feedback. pls gimme a sec.

WOW did Q tell to push it again?

damn . we're honored. sorry took so long, my sweet cat died yesterday evening at the vets and i guess we're a bit of a wreck here every now and then. everyone has it "stuff in the basement " huh? haven had a chance to read up on Q, came str8 here/

>>580528

It's too late to change it until #2 has expired, when it's closer to that time we'll reconvene and get our shit together, until then we have to focus on #2, I don't like #2 either but it doesn't matter what I like.

Here's some shit for the furfags. Trying to make memes that go to other fandoms and shit. Might have to make R&M memes too.

>>580528

not to worry, when u r busy ppl around here

picking up slack. They can b harsh but they

can also think great thoughts. We need all

help we can get.

>>580548

whoa spot on, TY, using that.

>>580548

ok now put some current news on it like a

good trump twt or something ppl should know.

>>580625

It can't be too busy.

>>580610

Hmm no, need graphic to match hash better,

unless I'm not seeing the connection.

>>580643

who says?

>>580654

Says the short attentionspan of the population and the general effectiveness of memes. Meme's != infographic

The rise of the digital frontier has radically transformed human society in ways never imagined even a generation ago. The internet is now the main avenue for human communication and commerce. Websites such as YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter have become the public squares of the 21st century and Amazon and Alibaba have become our marketplace. These corporate institutions now wield tremendous power over activities vital to the functioning of society. This power must come with the responsibility of upholding the rights and principles that America was founded on. We the people call for an Internet Bill of Rights to safeguard our freedoms in the digital world against infringements by corporations and other private institutions

Such a bill of rights should:

Guarantee the freedom of speech, religion, the press, as well as the freedom of assembly upon any public online forum.

Guarantee the free flow of information by requiring algorithms and other filtering methods to be disclosed to the users of a forum. The user should be given control of what they are allowed to see.

Limit the ability of private institutions to track citizen’s online presence outside of their own domains.

Safeguard the private communications of citizens against data collection and data mining by private institutions offering these communication services.

Provide legal recourse to those whose natural rights are infringed upon by these private institutions.

Etc…

here's something I wrote. Framed it as safeguarding the natural rights of the people vs. private institutions. hope some of it helps

>>580768

nice one, imo add a link that informs the

audience some good news with a pic like that.

>>580803

Literally stop giving meme advice.

>>580671

Nobody is reading this.

>>580843

"Nobody is reading this."

lol i bet u did.

I know others who have.

>>580862

i read it

>>580872

TY

—-

Hey Eurt, I have errands. Watch out for this one:

>>580843

might be a divider.

Do you recognize them? I don't.

Lots of disrespect for some1 we don't recognize eh?

>>580905

>Recognizing an anon

>Making claims based on feelings.

What the actual fuck.

>>580671

No humor.

No aesthetic.

No theme.

Looks generated tbh.

>>580940

That has been a consistent problem throughout the Q-event.

Why not sign an Executive Order to accomplish what IBOR would? Not trying to blackpill but it's obvious the petitions will go nowhere, and the hashtags will just be censored or shadowbanned. 9/11 and PG showed that no matter how much we signal, those with power don't give a fuck.

>>580966

If it's censored then I'd think they've seriously crossed the line on our right to assemble. Someone said that playing favorites like this would lose them some kind of legal protection. The libs were able to protest Net Neutrality and if we are unable to assemble for IBOR that's kind of a smoking gun imo.

>>580366

C-link re: The BRIDGE?

Now dropping opposition to IBOR after very clear guidance from Q.

>>580729

This is nice, anon.

The Constitution Bill of Rights is plain language. The plain language invites people to support it, to hold government to it. Its written for the people.

The text here is plain like this as it gives guidance, not precise instruction. We expect government to fulfill what is written, now lawmakers interpret it into law.

>>580966

Perhaps anons here should write the thing (I was wrong), plainly readable, then demand government and industry follow it. Pass it around, make it viral, then if violated its WTF from we the people. Like we get pissed off over being searched without a warrant, because the Constitution says.

>>581010

They just censored (thousands?) of right-wing Youtube and Twitter accounts last week. They said "oops it was a mistake" in the news and everyone shrugged it off. No doubt it was on purpose.

As someone who was part of the largest public protests in history (2003 anti Iraq war) I learned that protests and this type of organization doesn't. fucking. work. When MILLIONS of people around the world stood up, it had NO IMPACT AT ALL. There's no way that an online petition is going anywhere if MILLIONS IN THE STREETS didn't do shit.

So yeah…why not an EO?

>>581225

>2003

You mean a Pre-Trump era.

>>581240

Because a Bill of Rights from an EO is a dictatorship, duh. It's Congresses job to legislate not POTUS.

>>581251

OK then, GL with that.

>>581270

Thanks, see you at 100k.

>>581225

Who was in control then? Our voices didn't matter then. The power is back with with We the People and the Patriots fighting for us.

>>581251

>a Pre-Trump era.

as if congress is any different today than in 03.

Clearly the 4th Amendment states the people shall be secure and free from search or seizure in their houses, papers and effects….. which would extend to the use of the Internet, our computers, cell phones, etc. perhaps just a petition for the Supreme Court to make it clear to the public, Congress and Law Enforcement so violations can be quickly charged and litigated.

>>581284

>Someone didn't watch SOTU

>Someone didn't listen to the USA chants

>Someone didn't read Q's post about those who were chanting being free.

>>581294

4A is underrated for sure. Encryption enforces 4A on networks you do not control.

Trying to find the hashtag graph but having zero luck. I see the 'The hashtags on airplanes.." and all that, but…which airplanes?

well I didn't know they were collecting 'em in the war room. I just posted several of mine in Memes14 here

>>581331

>>581335

>>581317

Where do you want them posted? I have 22 more that are in Memes14. Do I have to post copies of them here?

>>581475

Shit, post 'em both places. Maybe we need an IBOR specific meme thread.

>>581511

>>581508

>>581518

>>581525

>>581538

>>581542

>>581551

>>581556

Excellent work anon. Just excellent work anon. Today you have picked up the slack, tomorrow I hope I can do the same.

Sigs have gone from 900 to 1700 in 3 hours! WE CAN DO IT!

Reddit and Voat can be running their own push campaigns as well. Are they?

Need link to IBOR petition…can't seem to find it.

>>581761

https:// petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2

>>581782

Thanks, Anon!

This is what IBOR2 says FYI

https://

petitions.whitehouse._gov/petition/internet-bill-rights-2

Internet forums and social networks which provide free access to the public are a digital place of assembly, and individuals using such methods for public communication should not be subjected to censorship due to political beliefs or differing ideas. Conservative voices on many large public website platforms are being censored, based solely on a differing opinion. Some of these platforms further employ tracking mechanisms for monitoring an individual's digital history, which can be used to censor the individual's public communication through various censorship practices, sometimes without knowledge or awareness. These actions directly violate personal liberty and stand at contrast with the bill of rights.

We the people demand action to bring our digital future into the light.

Once again cross roads, support this or

support what ppl have made here.

I don't care either way as long as the overall

cause supports this:

"Stage set?

Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc are regulated?

MSM is controlled?

Use logic!"

"#internetbillofrights"

and keeps this in mind.

"Free speech does not apply in a private co setting.

The risk?

Loss of revenue.

Backstopped by the circus.

Learn.

Social media control is everything.

The age of the MSM is over."

Also keep in mind:

"Careful who you follow."

How r treated now is how you will always be

treated by those that you follow.

>>582020

"How r treated now is how you will always be

treated by those that you follow."

Which is why I don't follow mean, pushy, assholes.

I follow humble respectful smart leaders.

>>582020

Q said to push it today and #2 is the only active one, it's also grown 1.3% in the last few hours meaning we're growing.

To #2 anon, maybe this will work, I said it wouldn't but looks like I was wrong, apologies.

>>582070

we already move numbers here,

we already know how,

proven by graphs made weeks ago

and today,

if you watch and see,

out method is easy.

u could be a great help, or you can clear the

room.

How goes the things with the #IBOR?

>>582138

"you can clear the room."

some ppl so negative, they can clear rooms.

We don't get much momentum in this rm

so we are fortunate when we see, but if

filled with hate and negativity, who will stay,

be supportive, not overly critical, learn who

has been in this room for 4+ rooms.