>>2241894
Yeah, we are missing the items that Q called to our attention. That did not include time travel, aliens, CERN. You state "normies can't believe in what the imagine". You could re-state that different as " Normies don't believe in things from other people's imagination, until there is some credible evidence. Specifically, since "you" can "imagine" and :believe in" things, why should they believe you with out supporting credible evidence.
Maybe they should "believe you based on faith. "
I can "imagine" unicorns are real and "believe" they could exist.
Are you convinced yet?
Normies can also believe in quantum mechanics because the evidence has been made publicly available to anyone that has the skills to understand it.
Do you understand it or just believe in it? ( my guess is the math is too complex for you so you just "believe" in it.
I studied quantum mechanics long ago,and they only way one could "understand it" way via "brain-burning" mathematics.
If you could speak to me in that "language" I might be convinced but not just because "believe. That is more of a faith-based pseudo-religio. Logical arguments are more persuasive the flowery prose, that "conveniently" leaves out illogical contradictions therein.
No offense intended, just some insight into how you could be more credible and believable. I am just a normie who is visiting here.