>>1823796

The pic is for sure POTUS. It's taken so surreptitiously, it makes you wonder… Maybe just a pic off of a tv?

>>1823993

The fidelity is to high to be from a screen. This is in person.

>>1824976

Might be a photo of a photo, tbqh. I don't even have doubts nor need more confirmation on the direct connection between Q and POTUS, but I don't see how this qualifies as proof.

>>1829772

I agree. This doesn't answer if this is a repub operation, are we being told fish stories about winning, is there a plan for freedom or just a plan to get 2020 votes? Etc. I won't even get into the Zionism thing.

Or is it a legit photo?

It's Trump. Just hard to verify if it's a pic of a pic, then was it clipped?

My bigger question is, if Q is being investigated by the F.B.I, how does a photo like this not stir up that investigation? Seems enough to warrant some sort of questioning?

>>1832328

Q made the claim they were being investigated by the FBI. This was not independently verified (to my knowledge).

Trump posting incognito on a forum isn't grounds for an FBI investigation either. The only *valid* grounds is reasonable suspicion of breaking the law (although some FBI agents seem to need to be reminded of that fact - some seem to think it's 'reverse justification with frame-up').

Even if a 'photo of a photo', you'd need to explain how Q has photographs of the signing of Executive Orders (conveniently covered up for the photo shoot) or indeed the inside of Marine One (photos that weren't originally public).

The real question you'll want to ask is if the smartphone is in the picture - why isn't Trump mirrored?

(The only way to photograph yourself AND the smartphone is via a mirror)

He said BOOM