[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1piece / agatha / hkpol / leftpol / mai / vg / vichan / ylisla ][Options][ watchlist ]

/qresearch/ - Q Research Board

Research and discussion about Q's crumbs
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

First time on 8chan? First time on /QResearch/? Click here before posting, newfag.


File (hide): 4ee9d3e2973127f⋯.jpg (32.79 KB, 403x236, 403:236, clark-kent-superman- 3.jpg) (h) (u)

[–]

39417b (6) No.1813842[Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

This is knowledge for all walks of life, not just research.

Everybody has a key strength. Your strengths, abilities, capabilities, skills, knowledge sets, etc will NEVER be the same as anyone else. So first rule:

1) Stop comparing yourself to everyone else.

Some people are good socialites, some are good artists, some write good code, some are inventive; some are all-rounders who can bridge gaps in knowledge. Even where you're located (local knowledge) is a skill that others might not possess.

Don't copy others, identify and improve your own. Which brings the second rule:

2) Your natural strengths are what you already enjoy doing in your spare time (hint: hobbies, those weird experiments in MS paint, that fanfiction you once wrote etc), what you're already curious about (curiousity is a VERY strong motivator - use it).

And if you're not good at something you enjoy, take heart:

3) Some skills, knowledge etc require time, effort and practice to master. You might not be good at it… yet!

Being unable doesn't mean it's not possible, it just means it hasn't had the proper investment of time and resources. By skills and talents, I mean learned abilities. If you're physically predisposed against muscle development, then that's not going to change, but mastering new art techniques will help you to improve, learning that software tool better will help.

4) Don't focus on areas you're demotivated in (or don't have interest in). Ask yourself instead 'how can I use my skills to help?'

For example, if you like doing art, don't try to do research if it makes you unhappy - focus on creating excellent visuals that demonstrate the research clearly. Likewise, if you like researching, dig it up for others. If you like organising, sort that research out.

5) Denial of opportunity is a temporary obstacle. There's always 'another way'. Even if that involves asking other people for help.

Sometimes you need to present what you've got and what you're having trouble with before someone else can step in to help:

6) Other people help complement and expand your skills. Different parts of the same machine; work together.

In my experience of improving systems, there's never been a 'useless' skill, just one misapplied (writers made to clean, inventors made to do tedious work, people who like simplicity made to do complex tasks, so on and so forth).

7) Never assume what you know or do is 'obvious' or 'trivial'. People have no idea what you're capable of or thinking, and that obscure piece of 'trivia' about Arizonian slang might be crucial to cracking a case.

8) Always openly share your knowledge, it will help other people develop their own skills.

9) Ideas/thoughts, if well conceived, can be more powerful than multiple inefficient actions together, but…

10) You must endeavour to take action.

If you're reading this, you already have a very powerful toolset (EG a computer) at your disposal. There is, in my opinion, no such thing as a 'useless person'. Even your computer or computers can help.

Feel free to add your own experiences and suggestions for getting the most out of individual and group strengths.

46d453 (1) No.1813929>>1814248

File (hide): 8904a275fa9e815⋯.png (1.29 MB, 1280x854, 640:427, ClipboardImage.png) (h) (u)


39417b (6) No.1814087

Rough guide (do not take this as absolute):

Socialites: befriend people, win them over, communicate and talk about the subject at hand. Encourage them to sign petitions and the like.

Artists: Build passionate custom images that convey the sense and feeling of a given topic. Don't be afraid to be creative or give an 'artist's impression' as this is used by all the major organisations a lot of the time.

Inventors: Propose new ideas that can be implemented by other members.

UI/UX designers: Propose improvements to the user interface/board design/forum/other related websites in order that the user might get the most out of their user experience.

Security/paranoiacs: Suggest to people how they can stay safe, keep secure. Recommend best security practices and the like.

Locals (to given regions): Explain cultural customs, norms, lanuage (slang, lingo), as well as what is 'customary' and 'normal'.

Video editors/vloggers: produce videos on the topic.

Well spoken/voice actors: produce audio commentary, soundbytes, clips etc (ideally to be utilised by said video editors, ideally creative commons).

Musicians: musical pieces that convey feeling (ideally creative commons) that can be used in said videos.

Comedians: caption the absolute hell out of those images.

Programmers: implement the various concepts suggested by designers, inventors etc in whichever language you specialise in.

Financeers/stock traders/business people: Donate towards organisations that intrinsically support the goals (for a totally bias example: Project Veritas).

Philosophers: Submit counter-arguments and arguments that refute emotional kneejerk cliches.

Data organisers: organise that data together! Info-dump and present in a way UX/UI designers suggest.

Lawyers: Offer anonymous legal advice (note: most people will have ZERO legal knowledge, so even 'inaccurate' legal advice is better than none - apply usual disclaimers).

Police officers: Try to prompt or provoke investigations for crimes that happen to fall within your jurisidiction.

Activists: Lobby the heck out of your politicians, coordinate with socialites to get others to do the same.

Writers: Write some awe-inspiring articles and knowledge in a digestible format (the info-dumps will often be very substantial information that needs to be broken down into well-written summaries).

There is such an endless list of possible roles, capabilities and knowledge I fear I will not be able to encompass every rough guide or suggestion. Only you will fundamentally know, but hopefully the list will guide you.

If your skill or role isn't mentioned, it's simply due to time constraints and space. All parts are necessary.


39417b (6) No.1814248

>>1813929

Maybe I'm beating a dead horse (your image seems to express a 'really?' type feel to me), but at the moment it strikes me Qboard is mainly dedicated to research with meme propagation as a secondary consideration - 'but of course!', the TF2 Spy might say.

The problem with that model is people will assume those are the only valid methods by which to contribute, and a highly talented musician might not be a very useful researcher, for example.

A highly talented musician might however be very good at emotional heart-tug musical pieces. I personally couldn't write a music piece to save my life.

Keeping the Q stuff within the boundaries of 'research and twitter memes' narrows it's possibilities substantially, to the point it can be easily crushed (twitter I think auto-blocks Q related stuff, for example).

It's attack pattern must become multi-faceted if it's to generate any sort of momentum. The children separation story is an effort to tank republican support prior to the midterms, so Qboard has to become an optimised, well oiled machine.

Best way to do that is help people unlock their own personal potential.


5bc51e (2) No.1834392>>1834602 >>1834656

I know the v/pizzagate crowd are mainly researchers/detectives (take what we know and make deductions based on the findings).

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2599557

As an example of what OP is talking about, we could use some artfags, memefags, and infographfags to make material for dispensing red pills. Paying primary attention to parts 3, 4, and 5 for those have the most current evidence and research.

Been on this case for 5 months. I will not rest until the people responsible are brought to justice. Spielberg deserves a one way trip to the shark tank for this.

I believe this is the case that can bust open pedowood to the masses. If they find out that such a beloved child actress was raped by Hollywood pedophiles, they'll awaken and be HOWLING for blood.

If my deduction is correct, taking down pedowood will be a severe blow to "their" propaganda machine (a take down of Spielberg should be the killing blow to pedowood).

Anyone know any white hat LE fags to send this information too (includes potential witnesses to the incidents in questions)?


39417b (6) No.1834602

>>1834392

I find whitehat LE keep on my tail (pulled my arse out of a few frame-up attempts so I owe em).

What they always need is a legally valid breadcrumb or thread that can 'crack open' a case (or be grounds for 'reasonable suspicion').

WHLE play by the book, and shitty scumbag lawyers try to discredit witnesses (usually by harassing, digging up dirt, slandering or making the court case so unbearably horrible that the victim rescinds or makes mistakes).

WHLE are only good when you've got clear cut proof. I know them, they never stray from the book.

Grey hat LE however are more what you're after. They're the kind of guys who know how to exploit legal technicalities (and they'll frame-up the actual bad guys) and can move laterally in such a situation with sparse evidence and a poor prosecution record.

However for the grey hats to 'drop by' you need to convince them beyond reasonable doubt (and not just public hysteria or speculation) that a person is fundamentally evil.

Contrast:

Facebook gets wrecked.

Apple doesn't.

Why?


39417b (6) No.1834656

>>1834392

Regarding of where or how, they've got surveillance tools, won't matter where you post it (the more public, the easier it is for them to use as 'open source intel').

Rather than linking to individual, essay sized theories or threads, what they're after is:

A summary (ideally of the most serious crimes or accusations).

A concise descriptor of each crime (the shorter, the better).

Links, articles, or photographs that serve as proof.

The more evidence orientated it is (ideal format: a slew of links with only a basic title descriptor) and the less opinionated it is, the better.

They prefer to form their own opinions, and reasonably so: they have to make the facts fit whichever law their going for.

Remember what happened in Arizona: the child pedo advertising site got taken down on tax evasion laws in, err… California.

Grey hats are always open to suggestions, note. The more legal, the better.


5bc51e (2) No.1834708>>1836142

Interesting stuff about Grey Hats. Perhaps the memers and infograph guys are most needed to get the word out across public media.

https://voat.co/v/pizzagate/2562727

Presenting info on the Heather O'Rourke case for similar purposes of red pill spreading and public awareness. Alas I'm pretty shitty at this sort of meming.


39417b (6) No.1836142

File (hide): 43b9fd3a756af5f⋯.png (1.21 MB, 1200x800, 3:2, rememeable_wood.png) (h) (u)

File (hide): a0e7b339aa74aae⋯.png (1.12 MB, 1200x800, 3:2, p_wood.png) (h) (u)

File (hide): 9797b72cf84fdfe⋯.png (1.55 MB, 1200x800, 3:2, NeedsMoreMeme.png) (h) (u)

>>1834708

Unfortunately, I'm not in a position to read through your theories in depth, but I've made you a generic meme (feel free to modify it).

Couple of templates. Hand off to whoever for further modification.

Needs a caption, like 'lets give these guys something to be REALLY happy about (jail)'.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Cancer][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
8 replies | 2 images | 3 UIDs | Page ?
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / 1piece / agatha / hkpol / leftpol / mai / vg / vichan / ylisla ][ watchlist ]