/qpatriotresearch/ - Patriot Research

If we were in a dome, atmospheric pressure would not remain at 14.7 psi. It would continually rise due to inability for gasses to escape.

>>7814

Just for the sake or argument here (I'm not a flat earth fag/bubble fag/Van allen fag).

But if we are to assume we lived in a bubble, no additional matter would be generated - first rule of physics is that the sum is always 0 - no such thing as 'wasted energy', 'wasted matter' or 'generated energy/ generated matter.

So if gases were to accumulate from existing matter - ie expanded solids/liquids, this would result either in pressure changes within the bubble, temperature changes in the bubble - I don't see why this would be viewed as not possible. I mean, when you excite and energise a particle, it expands/contracts, that is just what happens.

An atom is in a sense a 'bubble' of its own, I always think of how an excited metallic atom moves around an electrical circuit - as it heats, it expands slightly. As it expands, the resistance of the circuit increases due to all of the atoms expanding and finding it more difficult to move around the circuit as freely as they did when they were cooler.

The point is, I do not see why expansion/contraction should not work in a pressurised environment.

But having said that, I'm not a bubblefag either.

>>7799

The fundamental substrate of our reality is consciousness.

Mainstream science has shied away from the truth. The avoidance of this subject is one of it's greatest failings and misdirections.

It is a religion in itself - Scientism.

Any Expert that has deviated from the scientism narrative is usually 'excommunicated'.

See Kary Mullis, Peter Duesberg and other top experts treated as 'denialists' in the well argued, now retracted (by the publishers not the author) paper below about the uncertainties of the HIV / AIDS definitive causality link.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4172096/

Below is the publisher's retraction article, again using the old AIDS denialist label. There is no denial of AIDS in the article, only well reasoned arguments that HIV may not be the fundamental cause.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6830318/

If you read the retraction you will note that this came in 2018, 4 years after the original publication.

I quote -

In September 2018, Frontiers appointed a new Field Chief Editor to Frontiers in Public Health, Dr. Paolo Vineis of Imperial College, London. Since then, we have received new complaints, and we reopened the evaluation of the publication of Dr. Goodson's article. Our conclusion today is that the continued attention that this article garners of which almost none consider the necessary context provided in the critical commentaries itself presents a potential public health risk by lending credibility to refuted claims that place doubt on the HIV causation of AIDS. For these reasons, the editorial office of Frontiers and Field Chief Editor of Frontiers in Public Health retract this article. The author disagrees with the retraction.

Note that this came in the wake of a new Chief Editor appointment - Dr. Paolo Vineis of Imperial College.

Where have we heard so much of that lately?

Neil Ferguson, Gates funding, need I go on.

Now just to compound it all this from Huawei

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8326919/Huawei-seals-5m-deal-Imperial-College-help-build-new-tech-campus-London.html

'Imperial' ( - relating to a government or country that controls or rules other countries) College - what an appropriate name.

What has IC's terrible modelling done? The ultimate global control.