/pone/ - My Little Pony★

>>294174 (OP)

Check the startpage or spike el cloppero if that shit has a paywall

https://exhentai.org/g/1081088/5e1df0db52/

http://multporn.com/comics/clutter_crash

>Cluttershy

>not Klutzershy

I would blame that error on Anibaru not being a native English speaker, but klutz is not even an English word.

>>294194

Klutz is yiddish.

>>294177

Thanks

>>294218

It's also English

>>294220

In the same way über and schadenfreude are english words. While you will find them in english dictionaries, they are nonenglish words that english speakers have adopted from other languages. Like klutz from yiddish.

>>294221

Nigger the vast majority of English words are loan words. Less than 25% actually come from Old English.

>>294222

All words are adopted ultimately. Yiddish is nearly entirely composed of recent adoptions and adaptations. Klutz is still not an English word, just like "beaucoup," "gung-ho," and "ciao" are not English words despite being regularly used by English speakers.

>>294224

>Klutz is still not an English word

Then neither are any of the other countless loan words. Dum dum.

>>294228

I know you have a hard time grasping logic and are just pretending to be a retard, but you are just arguing your own subjective interpretation should be used as an objective truth.

Its like arguing that since the word "recent" doesn't technically refer to any particular length of time, you can factually state that dionsaurs only recently went extinct. But very few people would ever agree with that interpretation of "recent".

>>294228

That's right. "Comprendé," "al dente," "en masse," and the chan favorite "sage" are not English words either. What differentiates words that have been adopted into the English language from words that are not English is the etymology. Adopted words underwent some transformation over time. "Klutz" still means the same thing in yiddish.

>>294237

Look, don't waste your time. He's just pretending to be retarded by acting like he's incapable of grasping the context and use the concept of a loanword and instead uses a literal interpretation that makes it functionally meaningless.

He is trying to argue that the abstract part of the concept of a loanword, that it is a recent adoption from another language, is irrelevant. Since "recent" is a subjective length of time, he just assumes that "recent" must mean "in the last trillion years or so" instead of "in the last few dozen years" like anyone else would in the given context.

He thinks this leap of logic makes him smart, despite him acting like a retarded kindergardener.

>>294260

>remember the 6 million

Literally who?

aryanne.jpg

>>294264

>not knowing how thread IDs work

>image macro from halfchan

You have to go back.

>>294265

Thread IDs can be easily evaded by switching to your phone