Eden decoded
God cursed humanity in the Garden of Eden, the man to work and the woman to submit.
Feminism teaches women to rebel against the patriarchy and go to work instead of making a home for the children.
What feminism forgets is that if woman does not submit, neither does man work. Then [snakes walking on two legs] whisper the knowledge of good and evil into matriarchal ears, and God in his wrath banishes humanity from the land of plenty once again.
https://imgur.com/ggG58t6
In that day, ye shall surely die, saith the Lord.
Bonobos have no patriarchy, and no territory. They forever wander, depleting the resources and then moving on.
Bible pedants
seekingTRUTH93 wrote:
> no. not women submit, wives submit.
> Ephesians 5:22 (ESV) Wives, submit to your own husbands, as to the Lord.
This response is unfortunately representative of the right-wing Christian reaction.
Paraphrasing of scripture is a common rhetorical technique used in the Bible. Raising sophistical objections designed to inhibit rhetorical communication severely irritated more than one Biblical character. It is not clever to impute heretical meanings by nitpicking (woman vs wife) or (work vs toil), but obnoxious.
My diction was deliberate:
1. At the time of the story, there were only two humans, and thus the names for wife and husband did not exist. "Man" and "woman" fits the theme of feminism vs patriarchy.
2. "Work" is used to emphasize the distinction between "going to work" and staying home.
For those who wish to learn how to read in context, standardized test prep books teach this valuable objective skill. It corrects many sophistical errors of the scribes and the pharisees.
The Bible is obviously corrupted by conflicting agendas, some of them evil. As the Bible grows increasingly obsolete in the face of the dawning new age, its adherents retreat into fortresses of rigid doctrinal illiteracy, sacrificing mental flexibility in favor of memorizing and reiterating orthodoxy, in a desperate attempt to keep their breeders committed, as bonobophile wolves feast on their hapless flock. The result is that I can find no Christian right-wing forum that will hear me interpret the deeper truths of Genesis – a pity. Good luck going the way of the Mormon.
I have personally witnessed how lambs are lost to the Left. Sociobiology offers gentle red pills to inoculate against postmodern pozz. But since Christians will not hear it, let them stick to their false idols, their deaf and blind dogmatic trivia, and see how far that gets them with the ladies. I suspect girls will continue to prefer astrology; you have to admire their intuition.
Retvrn to the Reich
Christian conservatives were the last redoubt of relative sanity in America; they are unable to intellectually adapt to the times. The whole culture is rotten; one must start over. The question is, with whom? The Weimerican petrodollar thalassocracy has infected the West with globohomo, and the hoeflation is real:
https://www.statista.com/statistics/248856/average-number-of-sexual-partners-in-selected-countries-worldwide/
Perhaps American bachelors should seek a girl from rural Germany, since the body count is the lowest of any White country I can find. Pastor Steven Anderson did well with that, meeting his wife Zsuzsanna Tóth in Munich. They now have many White children.
Telling your sons not to marry an American woman, but to get a good girl from rural Germany, will sufficiently impress upon the females of your family their replaceability should they misbehave. The arrogance of the Sisterhood coven is immediately undercut when a demure scab crosses the picket line of screaming topless whores. Tacit dread is how you negotiate with a woman.
Identifying a quality woman is easier than you think. Just filter red flags and select for IQ. It is the master variable, severely undervalued, a market inefficiency the wise exploit. Looks are correlated, and health, and morals.
Let's not forget the South African farm girls, either. Dicklifting them away from the savage Bantu hordes is practically a racial duty. To arms!