Recently published books
"THE TROJAN QUESTION AND THE IDENTITY OF ROMANS AND LATINS; Egypt and Greece, A Correlative History; and the Identification of Northern Europeans as Scythians and Thracians According to Greek Sources"
The first book addresses the question of whether Aeneas and surviving Trojans founded Rome and gave rise to the Latin people, as Virgil and Livy wrote in the first century bc, or if Greek colonists founded Rome and were the ancestors of the Latins, which was the position held by Dionysus of Halicarnassus and other historians around the same time. I consider the fact that, as both Trojans and Greeks laid claim to founding Rome and to being ancestors of the Latin population, as is evident from the dichotomy between writers in the first century bc, such as Virgil and Livy who held opposing views to Dionysus of Halicarnassus, the civil unrest in that century, which consisted in multiple civil wars which toppled the Republic and brought forth the Roman Empire, must have had that ideological dichotomy underlying the political turmoil at the time. Ancient historians, thus, either attributed the foundation of Rome and the Latin people to the descendants of Aeneas, who was said to have escaped from the conflagration and destruction of Troy, or to Greek colonists, including Odysseus, who were also credited with founding Rome and many other cities in and around Latinum, contrary to the previous perspective. I trace parallels between the conflicts in primarily early Roman history and those of the Trojan War– putting forth the claim that The Rape of the Sabine Women and the Rape of Lucretia were intentional acts of instigation by conscious agents of the prior instigation, The Rape of Helen of Sparta, that started the Trojan War.
That book is provided in a pdf version in the following link:
https://archive.org/details/pdf.-the-trojan-question-and-identification-of-romans-as-greeks-a-history-of-the/page/n1/mode/2up
Also, two rigorous philosophical works
