[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ][Options][ watchlist ]

/pnd/ - Politics, News, Debate

and shitslinging
You can now write text to your AI-generated image at https://aiproto.com It is currently free to use for Proto members.
Email
Comment *
File
Select/drop/paste files here
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
Archive
* = required field[▶Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Expand all images

Rules Log Spot Those Who Glow Protect Yourself
Use promo code "PSYOP" at checkout!

[–]

07a4bc (3) No.372406 >>372407 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]

In a surprising turn of events, a young mother by the name of Natalie James recently decided to return her newborn baby she had recently delivered at a local Los Angeles Hospital. Her reason for doing so has left the nurses in shock.

According to reports, James returned the baby to the hospital after possessing it for less than 72 hours, claiming that it was “ugly”. James expressed that she could not bring herself to name the baby, let alone bring it into her home due to its unattractive appearance.

The doctors and nurses were taken aback by James’ reasoning for returning the doll, as they had never before encountered a patient who returned a product for this particular reason. It is important to note that this particular Los Angeles Hospital prides itself on providing high-quality babies to its patients.

James’ decision to return the ugly baby has raised concerns about the expectations placed on babies and the pressure placed on young children to conform to societal beauty standards. Additionally, it raises questions about consumer behavior and how the perception of a child’s appearance can impact decisions.

The Los Angeles Hospital has expressed their willingness to accept the return of the baby and has promised to provide James with a full refund for it’s birth. The hospital also remains committed to providing quality babies and customer satisfaction to all of its patrons.

The recent decision by Natalie James to return her baby due to its perceived ugliness has sparked conversations about the societal expectations placed on toys and the impact of appearance on consumer behavior.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

e71c31 (1) No.372407>>372441 >>372442

>>372406 (OP)

Well, she ain't wrong. That is an ugly baby. Glad she was able to get her money back without too many problems.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

07a4bc (3) No.372441

>>372407

What did she expect? Just look at the father

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

07a4bc (3) No.372442

>>372407

And in all fairness, she wasn't much of a looker, either…

What can I say about Missouri? Inbreeding is more than just a way of life, it's a goddamn family tradition. Just ask Killcen

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Screencap][Nerve Center][Random][Update] ( Scroll to new posts) ( Auto) 5
3 replies | 2 images | 2 UIDs | Page ???
[Post a Reply]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / random / 93 / biohzrd / hkacade / hkpnd / tct / utd / uy / yebalnia ][ watchlist ]