/pnd/ - Politics, News, Debate

Because the game was rigged from the start. Liberals (or whatever you want to call them, changers, leftists, organizers, Jews) have always hated conservatives (or traditionalists, or whatever you want to call them). The big cities are, and always have been a breeding ground for big liberal elites who want to change everyone elses way of life and the rural areas have always been for the conservatives who want a slow moving society.

The big cities would get their way because they can organize, they can protest, they can march. They can be out there on the streets changing the minds of the entire cities with marches and protests. Rural folks never had that luxury.

Then came the internet, it was a new way to protest, people could debate online in forums, chat rooms and boards. But once conservatives started getting a voice, the liberals who ran the system had to censor them.

This is where we are at now, it isn't illegal to protest, it just isn't effective for our side anymore. You cannot protest without the consent of mega corporations like Google, Facebook and Twitter. The peaceful and right thing to do right now is to go old school and organize a letter writing campaign to get our members of congress to regulate social media so protesting is open to all again.

>>133656

>it isn't illegal to protest

What we have now is even worse. If you tell the truth about race in public, even peacefully, you risk being brutally beaten by a mob that will never face justice and will probably be praised as heroes.

>>133640

Is anybody organizing? I can't even find Republican groups in my area and I live in a red state. People are made extremely apathetic by modern technology and the government's promises of protection. For one, there is no way for race realists (etc) to meet each other online without attracting feds who can charge you just for your political views these days, but otherwise I have tried handing out the Red Team Planner text door to door and people just do not give a shit. They have their 401k and their kid's soccer game at the end of the week and they do not want to hear that society is on the brink of collapse. I wonder if I would have had more luck calling them cowards whose anscestors would be ashamed of them.

But to put this into perspective, after the JFK assassination, surveys showed that 80% of Americans believed that the government wasn't telling them the truth. 80% of Americans thought that the government itself might have played some part in the assassination of the POTUS, and what did they do? Nothing, and society has only gotten comfier since then. The NPC meme is real.

“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?… The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If…if…We didn't love freedom enough. And even more – we had no awareness of the real situation…. We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward.”

Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn

We are rapidly approaching that moment. I hope the evil ones are met with a hurricane storm of hot lead

>>133694

You need to challenge their happiness anon.

This is the weak point of the system since it is all based on hedonism. Focus all your effort on destroying their happiness illusion.

>>133672

>What we have now is even worse. If you tell the truth about race in public, even peacefully, you risk being brutally beaten by a mob that will never face justice and will probably be praised as heroes.

I don't get how people don't see parallels between what is going on now, and the Klan intimidating black voters in the 1960s.

If the government isn't protecting your rights from a hecklers veto, they may as well not protect them at all.

>>133761

We need a non-violent white civil rights movement, all the legislation is in place, we just need enforcement. We just need one WN president, someone more radical than trump. Like a Jared Taylor type.

This is an issue that can easily be solved by one sympathetic president.

>>133640

>If this is a political board, why have no meaningful attempts at peaceful, political action been made?

There have been - you either do not seen them, they are ineffective, or they have been crushed. The bigger problem is that people have a tendency to look only at flashy examples and not at actual effective practices - because the latter are very uninteresting on the surface.

Look into Phyllis Schlafly. Her organization was the origin of the whole "Pro Life", pro-woman, and pro-generate efforts that bought America 30+ years of effective resistance against the ongoing leftist corruption. She was at the head of one of the most effective Conservative-wrangling efforts in the 20th century, and barely anyone talks about her because her methods were not flashy despite being effective. What she did was form networks with influential people who controlled organizations, political positions, and social positions that were able to subtly pull strings and "make things happen". Combined with excellent propaganda and language tricks, she basically did what the leftists do today with the kinds of people you and all of us have been taught are incapable of organization.

Preferring the flash over the tilling is universal in humans. It's because we attribute cause to the most immediate, most apparent observations. For instance, most people would say that BLM happened because of George Floyd, when in reality BLM happened due to decades of Marxist planners, infiltration, organization building, and influence network building that has manifested in many more ways than just race riots. A common fool would then say we just need a [insert any white person brutally murdered by non-white] to then spark the counter-motion. Obviously if it was that simple there would be no more Blacks, Hispanics, or Jews in this country decades ago. That isn't the case, is it?

tldr; The actual efforts to create effective organizations are largely subtle and boring compared to the fruits of those labors. Therefore people suggest copying the flash without the substance and are astounded when it doesn't work.

>>133957

>Preferring the flash over the tilling is universal in humans.

You have to find a way to equate self preservation with tilling. People only till when they can see that they will reap a reward. Right now the overwhelming political narrative is that the result of tilling is murder. People have little incentive to till if they are going to be murdered for it. This is one of the many ways they will implement communism and the total destruction of Western European Civilization. People have to have a protected space to make farming (or any tilling worthwhile) that is why Africa will never succeed or develop civilization. When they till and work the fields bands of their own people come and strip the harvest right in front of their own face. Thus they are incentivized to starvation and poverty.

Isn't incentivizing people to poverty and starvation what communism is all about?

The jew is actively trying to completely unwind civilization. So a planet of apes is what they desire they do not want human progress and are against it completely. They are choosing ideologies that will suit their own agenda (the total destruction of humanity by unraveling all of the progress humanity has made over the last 10,000 years).

This is the 'goal' if you look at communism, when it comes to the advanced state of humanity, these pics are the end goal of communism.

<do not have personal property

<do not develop technology

<do not have home or community

<wandering people with no land or nation

<people who can only own what they can carry

>>133960

>You have to find a way to equate self preservation with tilling.

That's what mature religions do, among other things: To get people to behave in a tilling fashion even when they don't understand directly why they should. Depending on the religion there will be different behaviors encouraged - many cults ultimately fail because they produce self-destructive behavior.

>Isn't incentivizing people to poverty and starvation what communism is all about?

Communism is all about getting people to decay the foundations of society that stand in the way of the controller's own power. This decay process releases power and resources into the command of the controllers, but once the decay reaches a certain point the system collapses catastrophically and destroys the decayers as well as many others. It's a parasitic process, and the parasite cannot help but weaken the host more and more in an attempt to command more and more of its resources.

>So a planet of apes is what they desire

Preferably they would have a high-functioning, highly productive, and highly obedient slave class that could never threaten them yet still produce all the wealth they would ever want. The problem is that such highly-productive nations are so precisely because of the institutions they produce to create that productivity (religion, security, culture, etc), which shuts out the parasite's influence when healthy. The parasite destroys those things to get at the juicy marrow of productivity, and in so doing ruins the productivity. The parasite either does not know this or does not care, because destroying the host is too enjoyable and too profitable in the short term to prevent the inevitable result.

>>133962

>Uh, no. It did literally nothing.

It failed because more non-leftists didn't study Phyllis and instead clung to false, flashy notions like The American Revolution being a bunch of angry farmers getting collectively mad enough to overthrow their overlords or other false notions of how political power actually works.

>>133640