/nofap/ - Fappers Anonymous★

>Some notes I should make;

1. I have a girlfriend of 10 months.Told her I'd be abstaining last night. She was disappointed, but accepting. I will see how she takes it going forward. Don't care much if she leaves me as she's 26 and would want kids way sooner than me.

2. I have nofapped up to about 40 days before, felt great but broke that streak with current gf.

3. I already feel free from the "need sex" paradigm by shifting my goals into the serious long-term. Any temptation seems very small and insignificant in the face of the years I am aiming for. I also already feel I can do whatever I want just from being free of the "but would that make me unattractive to girls" mindset. I feel like I have a full decade to invest into self-development before I need worry about that again. So I think I will be able to take bigger risks.

>>11378 (OP)

I made a similar thread. Plenty of discussion here >>10619

But yes I agree. I was raised wrong too. Was told sex/masturbation was good for you and I grew fucked up with fetishes that made me a total degenerate and depressed me. What upsets me is so many more children of the world falling for this science who will end up as the same distraught broken victims of sexual/fap addicted degenerate fetishists.

I swear all jews and marxists will pay for what they have done to the world post 1950s.

>>11380

Thank you, I read your thread and it inspired this one. I thought it would be useful for me and others to have a diary of long term monkmode.

>>11380

I have time to respond to you properly now.

>What upsets me is so many more children of the world falling for this science who will end up as the same distraught broken victims of sexual/fap addicted degenerate fetishists.

This is what enrages me the most. When I see girl-children, I wonder what will become of them by the time they're even 18. How many horny teenage boys will have pressured and used them to feed their porn-induced fantasies, before dumping them for the next conquest? And who can blame the boys? They are all addicted to hardcore porn by the time they're 14, if not earlier. They are being conditioned to see their peers as nothing but potential sluts. I'm guilty of this myself, corrupting my 16 year old girlfriend (when I was also 16). Was the fact I was myself corrupted by porn my fault? Considering I discovered it at 11, I'd say it was a child protection issue and a failure of my parents. They assumed I'd 'just know' right from wrong so didn't bother telling me not to use girls. I still carry the guilt for the innocence that was lost because of me though.

And I saw the same thing happening around me all the time growing up. 16, 17 year old girls with no idea about life or consequences doing anal in the woods and all kinds of other crazy degenerate shit just to impress their boyfriends. In my opinion teenage boys are completely irresponsible and stupid, and should be kept away from girls their own age. I think there's a good reason traditional schools were segregated by sex, and girls traditionally married older guys- men are capable of guiding and looking after a young woman properly; horny boys are not.

Ultimately, it is our own responsibility to fix ourselves, and this mess. Most modern women are sluts because the majority of modern men want them to be. Girls learn in high school that their boyfriends want them to be dirty, good at sexual acts, dolled up, and easy, because the boys are conditioned to want to recreate porn. Innocence dies out.

I don't even blame my parents for failing to protect or guide me. They themselves were raised in the same way. So were all my peers, and their parents. The girls being used and corrupted should be protected by their cucked fathers. We all know what the true (((source))) of the degeneracy of our society is. And their primary weapon is porn.

(Day 7)

>>11380

>post 1950s.

more like 2000 bc

>>11404

>And their primary weapon is porn.

I'd argue their primary weapon is influence in the scientific fields and ability to fund studies promoting these debased acts. People figure out pretty quickly porn is bad for you. But then they are bombarded with (((scientific studies))) showing how masturbation is good for you. And then end up going back to porn.

>>11423

Jesus's verse on adultery makes any recommendation for masturbation impossible. Imagination itself is sin. Catholic pope forbid masturbation in 1950s, just around the time when it started being accepted in science.

http://www.beginningcatholic.com/catholic-teaching-on-masturbation

>>11430

That's true, but only for the people who are awake enough to think twice and bother researching it a bit. For your average lemming who only cares about football and drinking beer with his buddies, regular porn consumption and masturbation are completely normal. They wouldn't even think to question it at this point, because "everyone does it. It's normal."

Day 14, had some crazy fantasies about my gf's aunt running through my head last night as I went to sleep, and a persistent hard on. Expecting the next week or two to be the hardest, as I seem to be getting over the flatline now. The most helpful things I keep remembering to get me through:

>One ejaculation contains as much protein as a steak and 3 eggs

>(Regarding getting over porn addiction), "The neural pathways must be starved."

Something about that sentence just toughens my resolve. In previous nofap streaks I have regularly resorted to porn and edging, which always broke me within a few days after I first looked at porn. Deliberately starving the neural pathways feels like a direct counter to that temptation to "just have a quick look".

The fantasies are starting to be very pervasive, though. Hoping if I just ignore them for long enough they'll reduce and fade away.