>>92508
> The sound quality is objectively worse
I think a lot of people view that as a selling point despite the fact that that only makes a difference when you buy a $15-$20 used record in decent condition from a hole in the wall used record store where they actually might carry some noteworthy records, as opposed to spending $35 on a brand new record from any current top 40 artist. I buy them because I like the packaging or because they're from a largely out of print artist that I really like.
Bottom line, when it comes to vinyl records always go used, otherwise you're likely being ripped off.