Is Socialism a symptom of failure of the republic and demolition of Monarchy/Feudalism?

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File	Select/drop/paste files here
* = required field	[▶ Show post options & limits] Confused? See the FAQ.

Embed	(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options	Do not bump (you can also write sage in the email field) Spoiler images (this replaces the thumbnails of your images with question marks) Hide country (this board displays your country when you post if this is unchecked)
Password	(For file and post deletion.)
Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf, pdf Max filesize is 12 MB. Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000. You may upload 4 per post.

File: bd780a64d8996e8⋯.jpg (18.24 KB, 650x650, 1:1, Sword.jpg)

Is Socialism a symptom of failure of the republic and demolition of Monarchy/Feudalism? Anonymous 09/24/16 (Sat) 07:10:00 f35f41 No.435

What do you think? If so how did it cause people to create it?

Monarchy or Feudalism provided what a Republic/Modern Capitalism can't today, Security and Stability. So I noticed what Socialists are looking for is essentially the same thing as what Monarchy offered in the past?

If Monarchy/Feudalism was updated to be a modern ideology and seen as an option rather than a 'thing of the past'. Chances are many would be Monarchists?

Absolute Monarchy and Feudalism was the original planned economy. The king set the prices on goods, everybody had a role to play in society thus a job/home assigned to them by nobility etc.

Anonymous 09/24/16 (Sat) 19:27:16 f35f41 No.436

I'm not sure I can agree. If socialism is a natural reaction to the instability of not having a monarchy…isn't the Russian revolution a natural counterexample what with the bolsheviks fighting against the czar directly?

And even today you still have Maoist rebels fighting against the king of Bhutan.

Unrelated, but when you say Republic, are you including constitutional monarchy under that label?

Anonymous 01/29/17 (Sun) 22:59:45 f35f41 No.456

>>436

In the case of Russia, communism emerged in many respects as a response to the need for the country to further industrialize. Many people signed onto the communist movement particularly because of its promises to modernize the country.

This is actually a trend we've seen for some time. Marx had predicted that the revolution would start in the developed parts of the world, namely the West, but in contrast, communism took power in the relatively more "backward" parts of the world that felt threatened by Western capitalism but were not themselves developed enough along capitalist lines to combat it.

Anonymous 02/04/17 (Sat) 03:44:03 f35f41 No.471

>>456

How does that support OP's argument?