By the authority of the Crown, if a women inherits the throne… so be it.
>women? don't you know they're like children!
I would tolerate child monarchs as long as there is a regency involved. The point is to be loyal and respect the stability of the government, the natural inheritance, and the rightful succession of inheritance. Whether it is ideal to have women as monarchs is another topic, then you should have done something about it in the first place. Monarchy has always been about the responsibility and office rather than the individual monarch. Although the individual monarch has a fundamental role, the duty of the Crown and family far outweighs her personal image as seen with republicans.
>what about autists/defective heirs
If they cannot hold the responsibility, they are unfit.