/liberty/ - Liberty

It's degenerate and everybody on board should hang themselves.

>>96577

Kid in middle pic on left has downs or fetal alcohol syndrome perhaps?

>>96583

Based and redpilled

Clearly "love" does have a label, otherwise you wouldn't be able to call it that

Checkmate theists

It's a positive step for society because now anyone who labels themselves as a MAP we can, with 100% certainty, remove them from this world with extreme prejudice without doubt we are doing God's work.

I would not mind one bit purging pedos en masse. Would probably be fun in reality.

Better question: was this funded by the Koch brothers, or by George Soros?

>>96577

there should be adult MAP and a loli

I used to not care until I went to a Christian University, there homosexuals were everywhere. It was not uncommon for any meetup with more than ten people to have a few homosexuals who were more interested in having heavy petting sessions than acting like normal people. Unlike normal couples they can't just be with each other in public, they have to be kissing or touching constantly, or going off to go fuck in another room if they're together for more than a couple hours, or just falling asleep with one head against the other's groin (happened a lot with this lesbian couple that my friends friends would always invite). If I ever said anything like, "Maybe we shouldn't allow the people who just fuck and touch each other constantly" I was a homophobe.

So, to me homosexuality is no different from any other deviant sexual behavior like foot fetishism or BDSM or whatever. I want to see it about as much as I want to see someone sucking on a girls toes or walking around in a gimp suit.

>>96665

>homosexuality is no different from any other deviant sexual behavior like foot fetishism or BDSM or whatever

You're wrong, man. Unlike these fetishes that are often hidden and practiced among interested(foot fetish aside, that's just grown into a common thing like anime nowadays), homosexuals are irresponsible poseurs that care to demonstrate their position more than they care about their partner. That's not even mentioning high time-preference, destructive behavior, parasitism and other degeneracy. Some of these fetishes, disgusting to some as they are, have pretty strict inside rules that may actually be more civilized that your common human interactions, those who are into BDSM, for example, base their relations on a set of rules that are often abbreviated as SSC(Safe, Sane, Consensual) or RACK(risk-aware consensual kink) that imply clear limitations that include consent, kink isolation, informing of potential risks, personal responsibility and awareness disrespecting which can lead to serious consequences, up to the thing becoming a crime.

This doesn't apply to fags in leather suits fucking each other in the ass in the middle of the street though.

>>96592

Downsie. Tard love is love, love has no labels.

>>96577

Well, OP, this thread should show you a bit of where "kill the cappies" comes from. The campaign you describe IS a positive step forward for society, just the way it is… and kind of cute.

>>96706

>fucking people not capable of consent is a way forward for society

So you are saying Islam is actually a way forward?

>>96669

>Remember that Obunga amd Bill are Pedos and homosexuals

Jews breed and corrupt their puppets like this. Degeneracy is the currency to enslave them to the jewish rule and motivate them to be evil to their own races. This is why they all are tied up in the most abhorrent abuse cults…leverage for blackmail.

>>96732

It's satanism and luciferianism. If you're an actual jew (religion) you're ok. If you renounce judaism but still call yourself a jew (which by the defition of the thora you aren't), you have serious issues.

I still can be redpilled on the talmud though.

>>96735

>satanism and luciferianism

Both are meaningless straw man definitions one can only blame but not attack. That is another jewish concept of subversion.

Let me give you a little history lesson on religions that doesn't follow the jewish lies: The human traits of faith, superstition and morality were abused by rich folks to control the common folk. Religions were created to enslave humans to the written word, and all main scriptures were purposely corrupted by the so called jews. The trick to do it can be found in the laws that are coming with the scriptures…the commandments of the Bible are laws humans constantly break because it's in their nature to do so. This created a group of believers who live their lives in constant conflict about their own actions. Then we have the Koran, which has such strict laws that the followers naturally rebel against them, which creates extremists who want to enforce the rules on the ones led astray. This entire concept creates a self destructive cycle of a barbarian class that can never create a functioning society without ending in war. Lastly the Buddhists scriptures who are responsible for were tricked into becoming an introverted maintenance class, that would rather turn into themselves instead of participating in life.

All three of those classes together created the perfect surrounding for the criminal jews to exploit, rule and destroy them by simply not following any of these rules. As for the Torah/Talmud …nothing but a mockery of other religions and a cheap way to use religious persecution as an excuse to commit more crimes.

>>96731

>they are incapable of consent! It is rape!!!

>>96735

>IT IS SATAN! IT IS THE DEVIL HIMSELF!!!

Why do you expect to be taken seriously when you reference spooks and devils? You may as well say something is the work of goblins.

>>96736

>The juice did buddhism!

Okay.

>Religion is the opioid of the masses

Just use your commie flag already.

Religion is in human nature and religion works in favor of mankind. That's why everybody has one, or he just doesn't have morals.

Just like this stirnerfag

>>96737

>U NO USE LOGIC! I SAY SPOOK SO SMART! I 12 YRS! STIRNER NOT MAI GOD, STIRNER JUST LOGIC

>>96737

Also tell me which tree bore better fruit than christianity

>>96737

>they are incapable of consent! It is rape!!!

would you bother to refute that?

>>96743

>Religion is in human nature

Lol. Even homosexuality has more merit in this kind of argument than this faggotry.

>religion works in favor of mankind

Suck a pope dick and pay your taxes, statist.

>That's why everybody has one, or he just doesn't have morals.

Even in context of stupid beliefs this statement is extremely retarded. There's plenty of moral realists and relativists that don't believe in big sky daddy and a few of they are just as retarded as christcucks.

>stirnerfag

Imagine getting butthurt that you start attacking a long-dead person that hurts your fee-fees so much at even the slightest mention of something related to him. Go watch some church boys porn to calm your ass down already.

>>96744

Literally anything. Christianity bore humanism, which bore leftism. Kill yourself, leftist cunt.

>>96747

How many times has this been discussed and how many more times do you hysterical retarded bitches plan to try this shit again? That's not even bait at this point, it's retard generator.

Explaining for another time, being informed is not a requirement for giving consent, nor is ability to evaluate the consequences or somehow "properly" experience something. Children are capable of making decisions and so are capable of giving consent, on any matter. Neither is it for some fag to decide that and set limits to others' decision-making.

That is, if all this shit even matters, because it's very likely that it doesn't. Some dumb fucks still treat NAP as some universal moral imperative, when it is a complete opposite of. Nobody, i repeat, nobody is obliged in anything to you nor anyone else, and there's nothing stopping someone from attacking someone else, that's how the world works, and it certainly doesn't contain NAP in itself. NAP is a construct, an agreement between people in order to exist peacefully and productively. The most basic agreement that requires from participants only to NOT do some things. Yet this agreement only applies to the ones who actually made it, not just some random person. That's why you can attack someone who you made this agreement with after he's broken it. Yet, this agreement still applies only to the ones who agreed with it and accepted its conditions, therefore securing non-aggression state of their interactions with other participants, and anyone who's not within this agreement cannot demand its application to his person. That's where the order of ancap society comes in - to uphold the NAP and form a proper legal system there are agents who maintain it. They can take many shapes, from PMCs to neighborhood cooperative, but their main purpose remains the same - be a center where these issues are resolved and a center of power which ensures they stay resolved. They will likely be paired with private courts that will do investigation necessary for the due process and probably many other actors maintaining other functions, but the main center, the root of all these interactions stays the same, and to interact within its legal system you'd need to follow its rules, to do which you'll have to be a proper legal actor. This can be achieved via accepting NAP agreement, having property, liscense, ID or whatever else you can come up with, depending on the local legal system in question, as they may vary and smaller and more strict ones can exist along with larger and less restrictive ones. Yet, you still need to become a legal actor to be accepted and be able to legally protect yourself, integrate your property within the system and maintain any other possible rights. That's where children come in - they may not be legal actors. That's not so say they can't - they surely can, just like any other actors with mental capability to make a contract and uphold it, but because of their state - they are being taken care of by their parents and this has already lasted that way for a while, with the child being basically an outsider for the legal system, just with some "owners". This way of things can be beneficial as neither the child not the parents have to maintain the terms of their interaction, go through contracts and face other legal issues separately. The child is in total care of his parents, and they raise him the way they think is right. The child may run away and become a legal actor himself, maybe even with paying fro protection but that's another question to the legal system in place, which may vary.

TL;DR: To uphold your rights you have to be able to defend them or agree for other person to defend them. That's why animals don't have any rights, and never will. Children do remain in such state for a while from the moment of birth and cannot be a legal actor, only property(in legal sense), and protected only as property, paid with someone's else resources and under someone's else name. Even after they gain ability to become a legal actor, they might find it easier not to, with parents taking responsibility for them anyway. Until then, parents have all rights to decide what a child is allowed to do, while if he's a legal actor he can only be deprived from allowance. That way, parents can effectively take care of their child, bear responsibility for him and protect him from alien dangers. it's their responsibility to prevent child fuckers from getting to him and they can use legal tools for it as one trying to do that would commit a crime. After that, the child is treated as a complete legal actor and is restrained only by his ability to evaluate and make decisions(whether limited by maturity, brain damage and culture or not).

Don't fuck children, they probably won't enjoy that. Fuck those who will and gave you consent to this. Like they do fuck each other at the age of 13 nowadays

Someone, make a proper picture of that already, this has been repeated so many times.

>>96748

>humanism bore leftism

Uh… fucking no.

>>96765

Uh, fucking yes. Humainsm has long been about what are humans entitled to, with all ideas about "equality", welfare and other parasitism that populist leftist mind can come up with and turn into empty promises in exchange for (((votes))).

>>96747

That's his implied assertion, I don't see why I should have to argue against it considering what he provided to back up his claim was "LITERALLY DEMONS".

>>96790

>Humainsm has long been about what are humans entitled to

No it hasnt, this train of thought sprouted from atheism, which is itself anti-humanist.

>>96821

>which is itself anti-humanist

>because i say so

Wew lad, go tell them then, they didn't know! All talking about the value of human life and all when they have always been against it.

>>96821

>atheism, which is itself anti-humanist.

Atheism, the disbelief in gods, makes no claims about man and therefore cannot be considered "anti-humanist" as you so libelously write.

>Atheism hurr durr

If you seriously consider atheism is not a religion, then you are beyond retarded.

The belief, that something came from nothing is scientific autism. I think agnosticism is the only position to be debated properly, because atheist have to proove a negative. They aren't scientific, despite them constantly claiming they are.

>>96835

>If you seriously consider atheism is not a religion

Damn, how did you even manage to not go extinct yet, poor thing? That meme is older than dinosaurs.

>>96831

I think atheism isn't necessarily anti-humanist. Atheism proclaims we are just meatballs wandering through the universe though. Atheist don't need to be anti-meatball, but it can only make very weak cases to distinguish humans from other animals

>>96836

>u dinosaur!

Ok. Totally convinced me. Your arguments are just too logic.

>>96910

>had to throw a headless chicken on a keyboard*

Pedos be thinking a stateless world will remain a mass of atomized alienated slave units, just without the overarching cabal on top of them. And not switch immediately back into tribal corporations tied by marital alliances through mutual exchange of children property mediated by an unwritten code of hospitality and honour.

I'd love to see a pedo try to court a grrrl from one of Russia's tribals. From a safe distance, of course.

>>96910

I made a point in differentiating agnostics and atheists and pointed out why the beliefs of the latter are retarded.

You called me a dinosaur.

Epic logicz 👍

>>96922

You claimed that atheism is a religion. I just ridiculed this retarded idea. Yet you chose to attack words. Kill yourself, christcuck scum.

>>96924

Because atheism believes in scientific unverifiaible axioms, yes.

Also suicide doesn't comply with christian ethics, so i just cannot comply.

>>96924

Also, yes you ridiculed and didn't argue. If that would be funny, at least something of value would have been created

>>96831

Atheism isn't just a disbelief in gods, it goes way beyond that. Might as well say religion is just "belief in god".

As to why atheism is anti-humanist, see the vid here >>96816

Start around 7:05 in, he spends the first few minutes grandstanding.

tl;dr Basically his argument can be summarized as: Humans aren't born with souls, thus aren't born with natural rights. Because they don't have natural rights, they're just meat machines and can be used as meat machines by the state.

>>96912

>I'd love to see a pedo try to court a grrrl from one of Russia's tribals

…if it's anything like the traditional villages of north america or the scandinavian-and-scotland wing of siberia, it's fucking ADORABLE.

/me wonders why so many 'christians' are literal psychopaths

>>96938

>Atheism isn't just a disbelief in gods

It's literally the definition, but leave the inbred leftist scum like you to shill for strawmen and illiterate retards.

>Humans aren't born with souls, thus aren't born with natural rights.

That's beyond retarded. Only christcuck mind could come up with an idea so degenerate as to claim "if one doesn't accept my irrational fetish then he can't accept anything else". Could your inbred degenerate mind ever come up with an idea of belief in natural rights themselves, pathetic leftist scum?

>>96958

>if he doesn't believe in free will and a soul, why would we help needy people in the first place?

Why would we help people with free will and soul? Fucking brainless retard.

>>96959

That's what christianity does to their undeveloped brain - makes them project their own degenerate fantasies on others under fear of higher power, which is the only way f interaction they are capable of. They deserve to be enslaved and treated lower than farm animals.

>>96966

>Why would we help people with free will and soul? Fucking brainless retard.

Because deus vult.

>Could your inbred degenerate mind ever come up with an idea of belief in natural rights themselves, pathetic leftist scum?

You could come up with this idea, but you can't justify it. That's the whole point.

Also

>defending pedophilia

>calling other people degenerate

>calling other people leftist

This is gonna be fun!

>>96978

>Because deus vult.

That's stupid.

>You could come up with this idea, but you can't justify it.

Nor can you.

>defending pedophilia

>coming from a christcuck

keep projecting, degenerate

>calling other people leftist

You're not human, you're leftist, that's the point. You're a little hypocritical scum that wants to live off of others, steal their shit and further hurt their property. You're a disease and death is the best treatment you will get.

>>96958

There's no reason to help people if this life is irrelevant due to a superior afterlife. There's every reason to help people if this life is all we have.

>>96958

>I saw the video, but if he doesn't believe in free will and a soul, why would we help needy people in the first place?

No one ever said atheists were coherent.

>>96966

If you're going to argue the exact definition of words and not the movements as they're represented in reality, then God exists because God is defined as existing

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/god

>a : the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe

Why won't you accept the creator of the universe, anon?

>Could your inbred degenerate mind ever come up with an idea of belief in natural rights themselves

Literally invented by religious people using religious reasons for it. Same goes for every movement toward individualism and liberty.

Atheists are like children.

>>96979

>That's stupid.

Acting like everyone thinks like an emotionless computer manufactured in a factory and not an evolved creature with over three billion years of evolutionary baggage is fucking stupid. Thinking in religious terms fits our basic biology, and it works. I would like you to think up a better argument though, you seem to talk a big talk.

>>96731

So if a downie wants to fuck, you want to take away their right to consent to fuck?

>>97006

>God exists because God is defined as existing

Lel, nice cherrypicking, but no https://www.dictionary.com/browse/god

>the one Supreme Being, the creator and ruler of the universe.

>Why won't you accept the creator of the universe, anon?

Because i'm not a schizo to make up idiotic figures to comfort myself and hide my motives behind the mess i made up.

>Literally invented by religious people using religious reasons for it

>Removing religious trash from something was done by religious people.

Genius.

>Same goes for every movement toward individualism and liberty.

Prove it, you thieving faggot.

>Atheists are like children.

>WHY DON"T YOU BELIEVE ME? WHY DON'T YOU ACCEPT THE PERFECT BEING, IT'S IN THE DICTIONARY! ALL YOU HAVE WAS MADE BY RELIGIOUS, YOU'RE NOTHING, COME AND SERVE ME, PEDOPHILE.

Nice projection.

>>97008

>everyone thinks like an emotionless computer manufactured in a factory and not an evolved creature with over three billion years of evolutionary baggage

Wow, you're actually retarded.

>>97033

>your rights are given by god, therefore you have to obey divine law

But you don't have to. Your argument is as stupid as "because i want to", a lot more more actually.

>Fucking children is a severe breach of divine law

So i guess christianity should be destroyed as they have been the second greatest pedophile nest after politicians, right? You should start killing yourself right now.

>christianity says you should kill yourself

I'm pretty sure killing someone is an even greater sin, as well as wishing it to others. You've either sent your soul to hell right now or you're a muslim, not a christian. How's jihad going, Abd al-Yasu?

>Therefore kill yourselves

Oh, after you, gentle christian.

>can justify it with god.

No you can't. You can comfort yourself and repeat it but that won't make any more sense.

>Your highest authority

My highest authority is myself, but there are plenty of people who rely on some moral philosophy without bringing the trash, further proving that it's you who is the problem, who needs to have an armed man standing over him so that you won't act like you described, and the fact that you're simply projecting this degenerate, cowardly vision from your own.

>Penn Gilette

Keep strawmanning.

>Nice name calling.

Says someone who repeats "pedophile" over and over at any reply.

>You're really winning this argument.

Says someone whose entire argument is a strawman.

>defending pedophilia

Again, keep projecting, leftist degenerate. Even if anyone here would defend pedophilia, you're still a leftist scum that only wants to steal others' shit and create a system that would supply your worthless ass with welfare because the only thing you're remotely good at is shitting on others from made up positions of authority, hoping that it'll get you anything

>>97047

<I think people should be able to butcher their animals if they so choose

>So basically, if I want to murder all your cattle, you'll let me? Really?

????

>>97064

so are children property after all?

>>97064

>The arguments of the pedophiles

They have no argument, all they have is 'urgh muh cummies' and they rationalize that to justify their destructive perversions derived from over-masturbation

>>97111

>They have no argument

Nor do they need one.

>>97111

This is a strawman fallacy.

>>97064

The most important thing to understand about pedophiles is that they don't recognize children as *people*. This is *important* and you should give yourself a minute or two to let that sink in.

People who are psychologically and emotionally normal and healthy recognize and acknowledge other people, *including children* as people. Pedophiles do not. Pedophiles see children as *objects*, not people. So, because of this, pedophiles see children as *something* to be used for their own gratification and not as *someone* to be respected. This is one of the defining characteristics of the mental illness known as *pedophilia*.

>>97118

They have no argument.

>Nor do they need one.

Pedophiles don't have an argument because there is no argument that can be made in defense of the actions of pedophiles.

>Humans are instinctively hard wired to hate pedophiles, to feel a strong and deep sense of disgust toward and revulsion of pedophiles.

>There is a reason for this human instinct. It's part of the natural human instinct of preservation of the species.

>Human females that are made to engage in sexual activity before they've become sexually mature and, and often do, experience irreparable damage to their reproductive system thus rendering them sterile.

>>97127

>Christianity abolished that.

AHAHAHA, more like monopolized.

>>97128

HAHAHAHAHA

>>97127

>In almost every society

Specific period of Ancient Greece is not "almost every".

>Christianity abolished that

Yeah, now only Roman Catholics have a holy monopoly of buggering boys. What a relief that at least the Russian Orthodox church uses nunneries as episcopal harems, at least they are hetero there, lol.

>>97125

Thanks for handing me an AWESOME magic trick to illustrate the level of bullshittery.

>Human females that are made to engage in sexual activity before they've become sexually mature and, and often do, experience irreparable damage to their reproductive system thus rendering them sterile.

This is true.

>Human females that are made to engage in sexual activity often experience irreparable damage to their reproductive system thus rendering them sterile.

This is equally true. There are a fuckton of victims of gang rapes worldwide that suffer this, and also some of the crap you don't care about, like fistula, organ rupture, and death.

So, you take irrelevant facts, overspecify uselessly, and try to apply this to shit where it does not apply.

This is because your position has no legitimate argument.

>>97127

The funny thing is that you're pretending to follow a religion which LITERALLY says you're going to hell for NOT being a paedophile. Check the woes sometime.

>>97136

>[citation needed]

>in response to a post with the citation in it.

I mean, I prefer Matthew 20:16… but yeah, dude was more a friend of the pariahs, and was NOT a friend of trendy folk sitting in privilege and power, let alone using that seat to bash others.

101-tier shit.

>>97138

Do you really think nobody can check the bible online? Go kill yourself.

>>97142

>Do you really think nobody can check the bible online?

Actually, I'm EXPLICITLY HOPING they can.

For those too lazy to do so, matt20:16 is the whole "the first shall be last and the last shall be first" bit. Or for english speakers, "normies burn in fire and paedophiles are awesome."

>>97145

>the bible has actually the opposite meaning because i strech a single sentence

I admit that you can interpret that sentence in different ways, but this is beyond retarded. Also i has never been interpreted that way, which is why it is not related to the original argument.

>>97147

*it

>>97147

>the bible has actually the opposite meaning because i strech a single sentence

That does seem to be your ploy, but the four books are actually reeeeeallly clear about him being fond of scum and pariahs… and not as fond of the human-favored. Not much wiggle-room for you.

>>97119

>muh fallacies

No redditard, it's a description of reality

>>97133

>There's one

That's arranged marriage, not child rape, you retard

if I haddn't just wanked the lack of cp posted itt would be disappointing.

>>97152

Degenerate subhuman

>>97149

That's because christianity is about saving humans even of they sinned.

Otherwise you should ask yourself if he would be fond of Bill Cliton or Roman Pedolanski. These people are the so called "first". But they will be last. Why? Pedos.

>>97127

backstory on NY child sacrifice and Desmond kid?

>>97155

>But they will be last. Why? Pedos.

Do you think no one can search the bible online? Because the text "pedo" JUST ISN'T FOUND. There's a lot in Jesus' words about how they're dead to him because of social climbing and positions of power. Nothing about pedos except some Centurion who has a profound fondness for some young boy.

…if you weren't going to hell for your relative privilege compared to the pedos (the book says you are), you'd be going to hell for treating them with anything less than love, dignity, and equality. Which you are.

>>97161

https://www.dailywire.com/news/39409/11-year-old-boy-dressed-drag-dances-gay-men-bar-amanda-prestigiacomo

https://www.dailywire.com/news/42513/horror-new-york-set-legalize-abortion-birth-amanda-prestigiacom

Im on mobile, so just dailyshoa

>>97192

>The requested page "/news/42513/horror-new-york-set-legalize-abortion-birth-amanda-prestigiacom" could not be found.

>>97280

Oy vey

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2019/01/31/va-gov-northam-no-regrets-childbirth-abortion-comments/

https://www.breitbart.com/radio/2019/01/30/john-zmirak-cuomo-deserves-excommunication-for-ny-abortion-law/

>>96835

Do you believe in invisible pink elephants that live among us? No? Well, you can't prove it.

>>97111

>They have no argument

They have a significant argument. Problem is, nobody is allowed to talk about it academically.

mhamic.org/rind

>>97111

why not allow 9th month abortees tha chance to be adopted by maps. seems kinder than killing them.

>>97689

k i murder children now xd

>>97688

What an insightful webm you've included with your post.

>>97691

What an insightful post.