>>93611
>When I speak of Utility I don't mean so in religious terms or Moral terms but more in its Material Utility and its ability to progress society
>Our moralism is not moralism because we'll call it "material".
>That's actually completely fine
HOW DARE YOU !1!!!!11 OPPRESSUN!!1!
>Their is literally no contradiction in a socialist society attempting to limit Parasitism and Corruption
>An embodiment of parasitism and corruption fighting against corruption.
Go on, i haven't had such a good laugh in a long time.
>>93616
>We'll Landlordism would be almost simply logistically impossible to keep enforced without the state
>Keeping a house is possible but renting a house immediately requires a state.
Communism really eats your brain, huh.
>One could logically produce profit using their car as a Taxi on a small scale
So basically you already lost an argumant and now only try to make a mess. Oh wait, it was your only purpose from the very beginning.
>Large hire car firms like Uber and the like would be impossible
Baseless claim, the only one you are capable of.
>Without a state to codify the singular currency meant to be used within a territory a very cash based Buisness like Taxi driving would become difficult
You still don't get what money is, brainlet? He'll get paid in gold, if anything, without a state.