[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / arepa / chaos / dcfg / general / qsourcex / tingles ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


WARNING! Free Speech Zone - all local trashcans will be targeted for destruction by Antifa.

File: 50bb811593d8b01⋯.jpg (85.64 KB, 960x601, 960:601, let there be roads.jpg)

 No.92085

>sitting in adv. macro class

>Prof: the US enjoys much stronger fiscal policy than other countries because we have a lot more empty space to build more roads

Please stop the meme ride, I want to get off. We've gone too far.

 No.92094

I am trying to understand this. Is the professor a quantitative easing proponent? Or perhaps a City: Skylines player?


 No.92104

>>92094

>Is the professor a quantitative easing proponent?

He's a Keynesian, so yes. The reasoning goes:

>gubmint fixes recessions with fiscal policy when monetary policy "isn't enough"

>you fix recessions through stimulating consumption

>gubmint stimulates consumption through building infrastructure

>way to build infrastructure is to build roads

>Burgerstan has more empty space

>more empty space means more room for roads

>Japan was in a recession for 10 years because it's a small country with not enough room for roads

This is a 3000-level course, at a well-respected institution, and we're literally worshipping roads. Fuck it, maybe the West isn't worth saving and we deserve to be wiped out. Let the gooks inherit the Earth.


 No.92105

File: fced81d0c2f63b0⋯.png (857.11 KB, 1400x5552, 175:694, do not learn mandarin.png)

>>92104

Anon, i'm with you but please, not the gooks.


 No.92108

>>92105

Those are chinks, my friend, not gooks. No worries though, just loosely surround them, announce that they are besieged, and the chinks will scramble to eat other and prove their honor faster than you can say "Suiyang."


 No.92131

File: 2806ce3b62d5817⋯.gif (1.45 MB, 400x256, 25:16, destruction_of_history.gif)

>>92108

>t. history for brainlets

I wish you niggers would take a closer look at that siege, aaaaah. As you can see, things change with time.


 No.92158

File: 8098ee9cc7b0554⋯.png (466.72 KB, 700x467, 700:467, ClipboardImage.png)

>>92104

Doesn't China literally do this to inflate GDP?


 No.92223

>lolbert

>sitting in adv. macro class

pick one brainlet

>be euroland

>have 0 of the problems of burgerland

>have higher taxes

rllymakesuthink.gif


 No.92232

>>92131

Go get run over by a tank or starve to death you subhuman.

>>92223

What a disjointed post. Work harder next time.


 No.92234

>>92232

hes right tho, european countries are the richest in the world and this is with massive welfare states. there is an argument to reduce corporation tax but not to abolish the welfare / healthcare in order to cut income taxes for billionaires. only kikes and billionaires want that.


 No.92240

>>92108

It's nice to see a fellow /k/ommando.


 No.92241

File: b6c6655cf8afde0⋯.png (116.27 KB, 959x973, 137:139, States_Vs_countries_2014.png)

>>92234

If you look strictly at purchasing power parity per capita, only three European nations make it into the top 10 and America is above the rest except by CIA estimates (in which there are four European countries with a higher PPP per capita).

If you look at GDP per capita or PPP per capita and compare European Countries to US states, with the exceptions of Switzerland, Norway, Ireland, and a couple microstates that are used as tax havens which is why they have massive GDP per capita, most of the "rich" European countries don't even make it into the top 25, and the majority wouldn't even make it into the top 50. Actually if you remove the socialist hellholes (including the ones that make a lot of money) from the USA, the remaining states outrank basically everything in Europe outside your tax haven countries. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_between_U.S._states_and_sovereign_states_by_GDP_(nominal)_per_capita


 No.92244

>>92223

>europoor

>zero problems

You can only pick one of those my friend.

>>92240

I don't suppose you have the relevant screencaps saved?


 No.92249

File: 7ed1226d57638dc⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 824.92 KB, 1913x4041, 1913:4041, 7ed1226d57638dcc6f9b5aae21….png)

>>92244

I don't, unfortunately. Have Ghost Puncher as recompense.


 No.92266

>>92158

Why don't they just break all the windows?


 No.92309

File: 24f2d2f1dc4ac68⋯.jpg (35.34 KB, 552x355, 552:355, 1482708119109.jpg)

>>92266

Fuck breaking windows, why don't they just nuke everything? Why do they think Japan is such a comfy place after getting nuked twice + experiencing Fukushima?


 No.92325

>>92309

Is the Chinese government intentionally not cleaning up pollution so they can boost GDP solving the problem down the line?


 No.92326

File: 5b1b2d73d41a555⋯.jpg (1.81 MB, 3000x3672, 125:153, abstract_level_of_brackets.jpg)

>>92325

>Three Gorges Dam was fucked up on purpose

>Chinks wanted to create jobs fixing it

>Chinks were the goodest goy Keynesians all along


 No.92375

>>92309

you can fix things after a catastrophic event, but things will always stay bad if you don't clean out the infestation


 No.92376

>>92375

Like the difference between a bullet wound and brain cancer.


 No.92377

>>92326

Dammit Keynes! You're ruining that which is not seen!


 No.92378

>>92325

China is a weird mix of Jew-tier malevolence and Communist-tier incompetence.


 No.92382

>>92378

The same can be said about the Soviet Union.


 No.92420

>>92382

you'd have to change the tense


 No.93020

>>92241

Also, don't most European countries rely on US militiary spending to keep their welfare programs afloat?


 No.93049

>>93020

haha do you suggest that usa protects europe from flood of rapefugees?


 No.93050

>>93049

The US doesn't use its military to protect our borders from beaners, either (yes the rhetoric has changed recently, but I'll believe it when I see it). The point is that, because the US and muh world police are the de facto military of NATO, and as a result member states aren't obligated to maintain anything more than a token military force. As a result, euro countries have a lot more room in their budget for dumb socialist experiments.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / arepa / chaos / dcfg / general / qsourcex / tingles ]