[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / arepa / ausneets / tacos / vg / vichan / zoo ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


WARNING! Free Speech Zone - all local trashcans will be targeted for destruction by Antifa.

File: 4a8fbe750b75314⋯.png (86.76 KB, 255x234, 85:78, 3891cd09302738c1899949112e….png)

 No.87113

Could this possibly work?

This system would have mix of private and collective ownership.

It is based on local communities.

Example:

We have a community (village, small town, neighborhood i.e.).

In that community everything that benefits all residents (schools, roads, hospitals) will be funded collectively, with each member paying his part.

Other things, like shops and companies, (basically stuff that is for profit) is in private ownership.

Out-of-community roads, like roads between cities, will be maintained by private companies paid by communities that benefit from the road.

If someone doesn't want to pay for collective services they can turn to private services, if they are available.

This is anarchist scenario.

If you have questions, ask, if you have something to add, see some loopholes, fallacies or just think that this can't work post it in reply.

I'm new to all this and I'm just testing theories.

 No.87119

Well, yeah. This is basically what a majority of ancaps advocate; cities 'governed' by covenant communities maintaining common infrastructure, private corporations taking care of most of the rest, some charitable organizations to fill in the gaps.


 No.87121

Public education is codeword of forced indoctrination.


 No.87126

>>87119

Guess I am ancap now.


 No.87130

>>87121

It can be a private school, point is that it will be funded by all those that use it in given community, rather than individually


 No.87137

File: dd1de48154a5b5b⋯.jpg (625.43 KB, 1521x900, 169:100, Asimov-Robot-Visions.jpg)

>>87126

tfw you believe in something before you even know its a thing


 No.87194

>>87137

I used to be "anti-government socially-liberal economically-conservative Republican" before I knew what a libertarian was


 No.87196

File: b7c71500cb079af⋯.jpg (29.09 KB, 442x475, 442:475, e72781114473c7db36eba8ef3f….jpg)

>>87194

>socially liberal


 No.87197

>>87194

>>87137

OP here, before this I thought I was left wing anarchist.

When I first got into politics I was soc dem (ind4 ugh), but I soon moved much to the left and much towards anarchism. I tried every possible form of left wing anarchism and I disagreed with every one of them, so I made my own theory. As it turns out I was right wing libertarian the whole time, I wasted 5 months on the wrong side of spectrum.


 No.87208

>>87130

i dont get it


 No.87209

File: d96b8eb8f936706⋯.jpg (143.95 KB, 780x780, 1:1, LJrLr0L.jpg)

>>87197

heh, I spent 10 years (since I was 15) thinking I was a socdem, communist, left-anarchist, etc…

Eventually I realized that I'm not against private property or profits or any of that, I was just mislead by leftist propaganda that took advantage of the fact that I was pissed off about being poor.


 No.87220

>>87208

A private school funded by everyone that uses it pays for it as much as they can.

Like instead of everyone paying for themselves, whole collective pays together.


 No.87226

>>87113

>collective ownership

Stop eating memes.

>funded collectively, with each member paying his part

Sick criminal gang you've got going here. I can see it now, we can have a president and a senate too. Throw in a king and a parliament while you're at it. Maybe an Ayatollah or a Pope or something too just to stack on the authoritarian shittiness. After all if everyone has to "pay their part" then there's bound to be a taxman and there's no use in stealing all that money if you don't inflate the bureaucracy surrounding said taxman.

>>87220

What you're saying doesn't make any sense. If it's paid for by the people who use it, it's not "[communal] rather than individual" it's individually paid for. If it's paid for by a "community" then the poster you were disagreeing with is almost certainly right and you're wrong. If it's voluntary you'd never expect a "community" of individuals to pay for it. Why would someone pay for something they make absolutely no use of? They wouldn't. So you'd have to steal from them or extort them to make it "communal". Sounds like something a tyrannical government would do and while they're involved you're sure to see indoctrination and are already seeing force.

Collectivism is authoritarianism. You can voluntarily associate with a collection of other people but the moment we all "pay our part" is the moment we've gone from voluntary association to aggression. Who decides what is paying a "fair share" and who enforces payments?


 No.87238

>>87226

>why would someone pay for something that they have no use of

They wouldn't pay for it if they don't use it, only those that use school would pay for school




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / arepa / ausneets / tacos / vg / vichan / zoo ]