No.86191
The support for the obviously mentally ill Patrick Little is too much for me. I can't comprehend how intellectually stunted someone must be to legitimately think going out on the street and harassing random Jews is going to sway popular opinion in your favour. Then the guy wins 1.4% of the vote and claims he would have won if not for voter fraud.
This is so obviously insane yet any criticism is immediately shut down by 20 fags spamming "shill". It's over and it's done. These mindless retards deserves nothing but mockery.
No.86193
The few years of magapedes we have had didn't clue you in? Fuck off to /leftypol/ as you are clearly still not capable of independent thought.
No.86195
AYYY Mr. Bond posted he was supporting him but now he deleted it. Much like he made songs for the alt-kike and now berates them as traitors. https://www.minds.com/Mr_Bond "A kike mass graves is a white man's garden."
The lad is fuhrer material.
No.86196
>>86195
Isn't that like most of /pol/?
Support something that's controversial then when the tactics switch to berating/mockery instead of hating, you ditch all support, call it a Jewish psyop and say you never supported it.
No.86197
>>86191
> I can't comprehend how intellectually stunted someone must be to legitimately think going out on the street and harassing random Jews is going to sway popular opinion in your favour.
Get a load of this untermensch, worried about "scaring the normalfags". The only 2 things they doing wrong is only harrassing instead of killing and only kikes.
No.86198
>>86196
Unless you talking about (((neo-/pol/))) you are shitting
No.86199
>>86191
> I can't comprehend how intellectually stunted someone must be to legitimately think going out on the street and harassing random Jews is going to sway popular opinion in your favour.
lmao you are the kind that gets the oven, weak faggot. (((Democracy))) will never solve shit, all good things have been conquered with violence.
Can't wait for the time being right to go on the streets and solve this shit. Time for the strong men bring in the good times.
No.86202
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>86199
Show them your power.
No.86203
>>86191
I used to be a /pol/fag, until I woke up one day after reading "Thus Spoke Zarathustra." The truth of the matter is that, As Nietzche said, "Gott ist tot." What does this have to do with /pol/? We Europeans have moved into an era that has transcended God, and with that comes ideologies (National Socialism, Communism, Multiculturalism, etc.) all vying for the right to call themselves absolute truth. None of these mass movements have more than a grain of truth, because they hook themselves on to man-made values and ethics, which are fallible.
National Socialism is a mass movement that Nietzsche (whom the NatSocs loved) would actually speak out against, in regard to guiding his "Overman." The truth is that we have to disregard ideology, and follow logical and human psychology truths, ideas like the free market, the NAP, your right to self-protection, governments always end up poorly organized and ruthless, etc. As a critique of /pol/, they use their boogeyman of "the Jew", who watches them wherever they go. The truth is that commercials where a black man fucks a white women in the ass while advertising Kellogs cereal, is not because of "Jews", but because this is what marketing agencies have determined will net them a large profit. If something is unprofitable (lgbt rights, interracial sex, etc.), businesses would not attach themselves to it. When you have to argue that everything, absolutely everything, is "Jewish", you are not using logic. Calling everything a Jewish plan (capitalism vs. communism, shapiro vs soros) means that they have no argument. If Jews are truly bad, why are there right-leaning Jewish men? Why are there constitutionalist Jews? /pol/fags have been led astray in an era that embraces hedonism and decadence, and they think that clutching at the remains of a political movement from 70 years ago is the answer.
No.86204
>>86191
Where you absent from /pol/ the last 10 years?
No.86205
>>86191
>Then the guy wins 1.4% of the vote and claims he would have won if not for voter fraud
To be fair he was polling in second place the day before the election.
No.86207
>>86203
>If something is unprofitable (lgbt rights, interracial sex, etc.), businesses would not attach themselves to it
No.86213
>>86198
>banning abortion is statist
>you need a state to discourage race mixing and homosexuality
>privatized defense isn't something that dozens of ancaps have spent hundreds of pages writing about.
Shit tier lefty meme.
No.86219
>>86197
>Taking inspiration from the quotes of colossal failures in every objective metric.
Proving OP's point.
>>86199
It's not worth it, anon. The media is deciding not to name school shooters anymore. Your legacy will not be cemented.
>>86203
Right-wing Jews are "controlled opposition" or "playing both sides." It's Schroedinger's Kike, the world they've created is helpless to defy the invincible Jew.
>>86207
What happens to the companies that insist on promoting unpopular themes despite consumer preferences? Just because it's not happening fast enough for you doesn't mean it isn't happening. Disney is losing money with fucking Star Wars, which used to be an IP you could print money with using a bag of dog shit labeled with a vector drawing of Darth Vader's helmet.
No.86222
>>86203
>If something is unprofitable (lgbt rights, interracial sex, etc.), businesses would not attach themselves to it.
This is my complete lack of surprise at a Nietzschefag showing how completely retarded and out-of-touch he is. This meme has been disproven in recent years; when SJWs take over management in business, profit takes a backseat to ideology.
>Star Wars
>Marvel
>Mozilla
>Starbucks
>Cliffy B's company
>Ubisoft
Just to name a few companies that have doubled down on anti-profitable business practices. This is why libertarians are often ridiculed; they think of everything in terms of economic or mathematical models, but cannot grasp that people are fundamentally irrational and have ulterior motives that often conflict with the models.
No.86223
>>86199
>Time for the strong men bring in the good times.
You arent one of those strong men.
No.86227
>>86222
But none of those companies are engaging in unprofitable practices. LGBT activism, racemixing, and whatever else are at an all time high in popularity. You're the one who's out of touch if you don't see these guys pandering to the lowest common denominator and reaping wild returns as a result. Maybe the atmosphere is starting to change a little, but that doesn't mean that these companies didn't have their finger right on the pulse of what the sheep like at the time that they did their marketing research.
No.86229
>>86227
You won't convince these retards.
>I don't like something, therefore nobody likes that thing and companies pushing that thing are failing! Facts? What are those?
The reality is that only a tiny fraction of business is ever going to be lost due to progressive pandering. When it comes down to it, it's usually the case that the majority of consumers support the progressive message, the largest minority are indifferent to the message, then some people are upset by the message but not enough to boycott then there's the absolutely tiny group who will boycott based on progressive politics.
The reason why companies love pushing certain political agendas is because being able to predict the future is EVERYTHING in business and if everyone is heading in the same trajectory and you stabilize that trajectory then you know how to bet your money. If you can push everyone into cities and have a global culture forwarded by popular media then you can reinforce the trajectory. If you can encourage an ideology of acceptance, tolerance and complacency above all else then you've got a population ready for consumerism. Some people are aware of this and push it while other businesses just ride the wave.
Progressiveness is NOT hurting sales, it's developing more devout customer bases:
1. Star Wars is larger than ever. The Solo film isn't doing Star Wars blockbuster money because don't want to see another new star wars movie every 6 months, especially not some off-shoot thing.
2. Comic book movies are doing better than ever. DC's diversity is working just great while Marvel just sucks.
3. Mozilla is larger than ever.
4. The greatest thing to harm Starbucks recently was the controversy about the racist franchise manager.
5. Mockery of Cliffy B may have contributed like 5% to his downfall. The reality is though they kept trying to
6. Ubisoft is doing better than ever.
No.86240
>>86229
Print comic books are floundering, and DC's attempts at movies are all falling flat.
Mozilla is a non-profit.
And the drug needles homeless people are leaving in starcuck's open to the public bathrooms don't matter?
A profit focused business will only pander as long as it's profitable, and sjw run companies can't do anything besides pander right.
No.86251
>>86229
1. The Solo movie drastically underperformed expected earnings. TLJ also drastically underperformed (instead of the expected 80% earning of TFA, they only ended up with around 66%). Also keep in mind this is backed by the Disney marketing machine, which is much bigger than LucasFilms' was.
2. The only thing that really supports your argument is Black Panther, but it can be argued that Black Panther's success was largely due to hijacking BLM (for repeat viewers) and the memetic ineptitude of /pol/lacks and cousins who thought it would be funny to support a movie about black nationalism because it happened to have some color of nationalism in it (not to mention that most normalfags are some type of civic nationalists). Wonder Woman also appeared to only succeed as much as other superhero movies with fewer female leading roles, which is an indication that GRRLPOWER has, at most, negligent impact on profitability.
3. And Mozilla is hemorrhaging their user share in the browser market. Most of their earnings come from royalties (search engine partnerships and such deals), which is really easy to build up when your company has brand recognition. It's very hard to fuck that up, short of walking into the offices of the search engine CEOs, dropping your pants and taking a big shit on the carpet. Looking at the trend in user share, however, there was a dip during the time they fired Brendan Eich for supporting that one proposition that they haven't recovered from in four years. Are they just not pushing faggotry hard enough?
4. Not just the controversy, but their reaction to it. Now every time you go to a Starbucks, you get a lecture on racism from someone making nearly minimum wage! That'll be fantastic for business.
5. The reality is that instead of trying to make a good game, Cliffy B doubled down on his progressive virtue signaling because he thought that it was some kind of magic incantation to bring in profit, but as it turned out…
6. Okay, looks like /v/ really over-emphasized how much the diversity was being played up in AC:Origins.
So overall, you really only won on one point.
No.86253
>>86229
>The reason why companies love pushing certain political agendas is because being able to predict the future is EVERYTHING in business and if everyone is heading in the same trajectory and you stabilize that trajectory then you know how to bet your money.
So given how profitable porn has turned out to be, why isn't there more of a push to have sexy girls in games? Why are they flattening tits and asses, and introducing more fat women? Why aren't we being flooded with raw sex appeal in games? Why aren't the big money studios opening branches to do porn games? Seems like such an obvious business move for a quick cash grab, but they're not doing it.
No.86297
>>86222
What you're arguing:
>Sholom rabbi rosenberg!
>Oh, hello there rabbi goldblat
>Is out Kellogs campaign showing a white women kissing her black husband, while she feeds her mulatto children frosted flakes, going well?
>Oh yes rabbi rosenberg, it's working out great!
>What are your quarterly earning?
>They're in the toilet, we've lost thousands of dollars in revenue rabbi goldblat
>Oy vey, the Goyim don't know, the plan is working!
No.86298
>>86297
Nice strawman. Next, you'll be telling me that Kellogg advocated for circumcision. Oy vey?
No.86299
No.86300
https://betanews.com/2018/06/07/google-proud-lgbtq-youtube/
>turning down opportunities to make money because of political ambitions
<b-b-but it's just a ploy to somehow make more money by alienating half their customer base!
So tell me, /liberty/, why doesn't Google just stay neutral and make money off advertisements from both sides?
No.86301
>>86297
Your argument:
>oink oink hello fellow pig-faced /leftypol/ caricature of business executives!
>oink to you too!
>shall we alienate half our customer base to make more money?
>oink! What a brilliant idea! Being neutral and making money off both sides of the issue is pleb-tier!
>oinkoinkoinkoink
Strawmanning sure is fun. :^)
No.86302
>>86300
Because there is no such thing as "neutral." Playing to both sides is a physical impossibilities, and businesses know this, so they choose to side with the platform that will generate maximum revenue (business 101). If a business says "fuck faggots", they lose 50%. If they say "we love faggots", they lose 50%. If they say they "support both sides/free speech", they lose 50% of mostly leftists. If they say absolutely nothing, then commies/leftists/socialists ask them to assist in the cause. Ignoring this loses 50% as well. You might say, doesn't each alienate 50%? Yes and no. 50% of leftists + x% of right-wingers support lgbt rights, interracial marriage, civic nationalism, etc. So, it makes logical sense to side with leftists. Think about it, you have:
>CNN
>MSNBC
>Almost all democrat senators
>barack Obama
>Steven Cobert and the like
>hollywood
All of these institutions are leftist. This is the cultural bedrock and new makeup of America. Would you alienate this group of people? It's logical to assume that Google and other companies maximize revenue by appealing to leftist/statist causes, end of story.
No.86303
No.86304
>>86302
Exactly. See Steam controversy currently for an example of what happens when you decide to announce neutrality.
No.86307
>>86302
>replying to a leftist
How about you shut the fuck up and stop giving them (you)s.
No.86311
>>86302
>using loaded examples like CNN
You're a real dumbfuck.
>what is Trump
>what is Republican-controlled Congress
>what is America's obsession with guns
>what is Proposition 8 being voted for by a majority and then overturned by judges
And then there's the rise of nationalism across the globe, especially in Europe. Why risk being killed in the future because the nationalists take over (and we know they eventually will: this is the cycle of history) and decided that your faggotry needs to be bogged?
Also, /pol/ is always right when it comes to pointing out a certain flavor of (((corporate nepotism))), which is completely unsupported by "just like, make money!"
Kill yourself /leftypol/, just kill yourself.
No.86313
>>86304
>removing porn games in the first place
Why give up that kind of profit? Could it be that things other than profit play a part in what motivates business behavior? Naaaaaah…. they must be pandering to soccer moms for that sweet soccer mom dosh! :^)
Y'all fuckers are retarded.
No.86315
>>86313
Why doesn't CNN just host porn in between breaks to make money?
Look how business-savvy I am.
No.86316
>>86313
>Y'all
Nigger spotted and reported for socialism. Go spread your AIDS somewhere else.
No.86317
>>86313
Yeah but Steam reversed their position and allowed porn games because they came to their senses about how much money they would lose. Free market wins again.
No.86319
>>86315
Well, that certainly would get a lot more non-liberal men to watch CNN. But they don't even use attractive women as anchors, just horsefaces. You'd think sex sells, especially among the degenerate Left.
No.86321
File: 6d83b9ef31b4e40⋯.jpg (Spoiler Image, 65.21 KB, 1148x849, 1148:849, 2608799 - Christ-chan Chri….jpg)
>>86315
Because Rabbi Yeshua said that naked girls are bad, so G-d fearing Americans get offended by a little skin and their children turn out gay.
No.86322
>>86317
Your theory still doesn't explain why they made that move in the first place. From a purely profit-oriented viewpoint, it makes no sense since they were already hosting these games. It takes time and money to do the removals.
No.86323
>>86316
>only niggers say y'all
>>86322
Because they thought it would please their customers.
No.86324
>>86323
>sharing a language with niggers
Fuck off, racemixer.
No.86325
>>86323
What customers? How does that even make any sense?
>please the customers who already buy your games by… removing games they weren't going to buy anyway?
>alienate the porn addicts instead
How the fuck does this even make sense? I think I see why OP gave up on /pol/, he wasn't tall enough for that ride.
No.86327
>>86191
>I can't comprehend how intellectually stunted someone must be to legitimately think going out on the street and harassing random Jews is going to sway popular opinion in your favour.
See, OP couldn't comprehend why this makes sense in a country that is rapidly growing "antisemitic". By the logic expressed by the niggers that post here, Patrick Little is just doing a bit of "pushing" along a narrative for potential future payoffs like these businesses with totally (((not noteworthy))) executives like to do. OP really couldn't handle how right /pol/ is.
No.86328
>>86324
I bet I'm whiter than you are.
>>86325
By removing games they presumably did not want to share a platform with. I've seen a handful of people complaining about VNs on steam before, so it wasn't entirely unfounded
No.86356
>>86328
Weebs make an already shit platform even worse
No.86357
No.86359
>>86356
Weebs are the masterrace.
No.86413
>>86195
"but where they allowed"
around 1:01
>>86199
"most shitty things have been conquered with violence."
FYP
>>86251
I've yet to see the movie. Does she have Wonder Breasts?
>>86315
legacy media, legacy rules
No.86416
>>86315
They've already lost nearly all credibility. Hosting porn would not help. The best they can do is put up a slideshow of Trump between breaks as they have nothing else to report on anyway.
No.86455
>>86203
>right wing Jews
I actually like Ben Shapiro. He's insanely smart and genuinely enjoys calling out faggots and Marxists for all their faggotry and Marxism. But he's a Jew and, worse than that, a Zionist. So it doesn't matter how smart he is or how much I like what he does, he and I can't coexist. Zionism is an explicitly anti-white ideology as is anything else pro-Jewish. According to you, however, apparently Jews are just smart businessmen and white genocide and Western subversion are profitable endeavors. Pure coincidence I'm sure. They just saw a good deal and took it, nothing deliberate or constructed about it.
No.86458
No.86463
>>86458
Lurk moar before posting, faggot.
No.86485
>>86463
Now why would I want to waste time like that?
White genocide? Where are the concentration camps, nazi garbage?
No.86490
>>86485
(a) Killing members of the group;(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
— Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, Article 2
Especially C & D
No.86493
>>86490
>(a) Killing members of the group;
So when a mad gunman shoots up a black church it's Right Wing Christian genocide against Black American Christians.
>(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
ditto
>(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
You talking about the lower white birth rate? Are you advocating that white women be breeding machines for the race and not free agents who might not want to have children (or as many)?
Note: the same is happening in Japan, South Korea, and China. Can't find a white woman who's willing to bear your children? Maybe a non-white might—though nazis and alt-rightists might find this difficult given that non-white women might feel the formers' hatred of non-whites.
>(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
What Chinese-style one-child-per-family policy is going in white-majority countries?
>(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Oh, you mean all the 100 000s of white children being forcibly removed from their families and be adopted by non-whites or raised in residential schools where they get beaten if they speak English or talk about their Christian beliefs during recess?
and of course if the alt-media dredges up some exception in the 300-million-plus-American population, you can be the farm, it's a rule.
No.86504
>>86493
The argument is that white people are being displaced in traditionally white countries by massive waves of non-white immigrants, refugees staying indefinitely, and guests avoiding deportation who are also outbreeding them. The United Nations in deliberations on the subject of genocide have in the past concluded that deliberate displacement of an indigenous populations with colonists of any description in overwhelming numbers is de facto genocide.
They usually think that the Jews are playing both sides of mainstream left and right to flood white countries with non-whites and therefore going out of their way to slowly inflict white genocide. The incentives, however, do not require Jewish malfeasance to work or even to succeed well, and I'm especially credulous of it considering that Jews have voted 1 in 4 for Republicans since the 1960s which is on part with other ethnic minorities except blacks. There is common ground in establishment parties to welcome mass immigration with leftists who want a brown tide to assure them unbroken political power for several generations and rightist donors who want cheap and abundant labor and think they can bribe the dominating leftist parties to lay off their economic endeavors.
No.86514
>>86493
You have shit taste in women.
No.86539
>>86529
OH NO NO NO NO!
You got me.
No.86613
No.86625
I don't support him because he's pro-Jew. not because he got arrested by the British Caliphate, which unless the Saxons get angry there again, its not going to happen. talking with most Britbongs they hate the poor and think "gunz r evil" so fuck them.
No.86626
>>86529
I'm a misogynist who loves lesbo porn so I dunno.
No.86628
>>86626
Don't Nazis consider porn—I suppose particularly lesbian porn—degenerate and part of the so-called "white genocide?"
Shouldn't you be like fathering 10 children or the like?
No.86670
>>86199
>Can't wait for the time being right to go on the streets and solve this shit. Time for the strong men bring in the good times.
What, is that some day of the rope shit? Do you really think /pol/ is filled with enough brave and powerful people, or even enough people at all, to cause a revolution worldwide? Most of the people I've met on /pol/ are depressed over their waifu not being real and the only real attacks they give groups they hate are angry comments online. It's more likely for someone to die of old age than to actually die from rope day or whatever it is. Whatever kind of genocide you have in mind, it's not going to happen.
No.86731
>>86670
It's the reactionary version of the Beta Uprising.
No.86740
>>86670
Yes, i'm sure the uberchads of /liberty/ will save the west.
No.86742
>>86740
How many people on /liberty/ do you see unironically LARPing about the day of the rotor, compared to /pol/? It comes up from time to time, sure, but even then rarely in a serious light.
No.86743
>>86191
America is 56% white or lower at this point. Unless you are going to go full 1488 then its too fucking late for this country. We are probably going to have a civil war in the next 3 decades because of racial tension.
No.86748
>>86740
There is no grand scale Libertarian agenda. "The West" can bury itself in its own shit for all I care. The best that can be done is to secure a small piece of land somewhere and live in peace while everyone else flings shit at each other for the rest of eternity. Libertarians should take no part in that.
No.86752
I don't see what's wrong with being mentally ill, we're literally ubermensch.
"gays are oppressed" sure, ok, then why can a tranny get a gun permit but someone with autism can't? harming yourself because of an identity crisis is way more mentally ill than anything autistics have done. besides, school and workplace shootings get rid of roastie bitches. women out number men 10 to 1, and don't forget the 80/20 rule. it just works, and evens the numbers out. besides Patrick Little did nothing wrong (stepping on an Israeli flag doesn't make you mentally ill, it makes you intelligent) know who controls you.
No.86852
>>86203
>ideas like the free market, the NAP,
No.86883
>>86852
Your cuckchan post is really inspiring and convincing. I'm glad you made it, I'm sure you're proud of it and I know everyone else appreciates it.
No.87568
>>86203
Jews create markets for degeneracy through social programming.
Some beta male learns about transexualism in a mandatory college social science class by Prof. Rosenstein, then he feels it's okay to become and tranny and then Dr. Shekelsburg can sell him HRT pills, and Head Manager Greenblatt can sell him a rainbow-colored smoothie at Cuckbucks.
No.87572
>>86493
Tibet is literally being racially, culturally, and politically subverted by millions of Maoist Chinese immigrants, who vote for leftism and dominance of their own race over the natives. It's being officially supported by the Chinese government.
The USA is literally being racially, culturally, and politically subverted by millions of socialist beaner immigrants, who vote for leftism and dominance of their own race over the natives. It's being officially supported by the Mexican government.
Europe is literally being racially, culturally, and politically subverted by millions of socialist Arab immigrants, who vote for leftism and dominance of their own race over the natives. It's being officially supported by Muslim imams, and the Saudi government.
No.87736
>>86227
>But none of those companies are engaging in unprofitable practices. LGBT activism, racemixing, and whatever else are at an all time high in popularity.
Where's the root of their popularity?