[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / arepa / ausneets / tacos / vg / vichan / zoo ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


WARNING! Free Speech Zone - all local trashcans will be targeted for destruction by Antifa.

File: 3ed5a65b05ac1a0⋯.png (713.99 KB, 675x850, 27:34, ClipboardImage.png)

 No.85502

WILL THIS BE /liberty/'S MASTERPIECE?

 No.85505

>>85502

Nothing good comes from (((Hollywood))) anymore. It's all kike propaganda nowadays.


 No.85514

>>85502

Why would anyone convert Ayn Rand novels into movies? They're bland and shit. Why is /pol/ obsessed with attaching Ayn Rand to libertarianism when the link between libertarianism and objectivism is cold, unwanted, and cruelly calculated as a means of "big tent" efforts at best? Fucking Neocons are more likely to read Rand's shit than any libertarian.


 No.85530

>>85505

is everyone there a Jew?


 No.85537

>>85505

Most likely it'll be a smear piece of libertarians, not that we're not heavily smeared already.

>>85530

They're mostly (((zionists))) and (((cultural marxists))) who got into high positions within the industry through nepotism. Film was a new industry in the 20s, and was one of the few industries where jews could get jobs. They became rich and lobbied the government to subsidize Hollywood in exchange for pushing propaganda to keep the industry centralized.


 No.85539

>>85502

Probably not.


 No.85547

>>85514

>Why would anyone convert Ayn Rand novels into movies? They're bland and shit.

The first Atlas Shrugged movie was alright, actually. More streamlined than the novel, and livelier. The characters even seemed like actual, living people.

The downside was that they took out what few memorable moments the novel had, or they made them extremely boring. D'Avenconi, or what his name was, destroying a copper mine by adopting socialist policies, and so on. In the movie, none of it was shown, we only had a blandly acted dialogue between him and Dagny.


 No.85551

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>85547

The only really interesting part is the very end of the novel when everything goes to shit. Kinda funny how the main characters go to live in a hardcore version of "AnCapistan", yet Rand would freak the fuck out if you ever point that out.


 No.85592

>>85537

>and was one of the few industries where jews could get jobs

prove


 No.85617

>>85592

did you just ask someone to prove hollywood is controlled by jews?


 No.85632


 No.87893

Any successful promotion of libertarian ideas would probably get a man blacklisted or similar in modern-day hollywood, so probably not.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / agatha2 / animu / arepa / ausneets / tacos / vg / vichan / zoo ]