/liberty/ - Liberty

Absence of money? Full Communism achieved.

>>74481

> Venezuela was doing just fine before Trump took office

There's no way this guy is serious.

>>74505

>le Venezuela is socialist meme again.

This the only True Socialism is a Volkish socialism, not this Jewish degradation state or the unfeasible Robots do it all for us nonsense

>>74481

I wonder what he'd say if Hillary was President and Venezuela was sinking as usual

>>74505

As i explained in another thread, this is why "not real socialism" became a meme. Months before the various crises in Venezuela became too obvious, I've had lefties tell me that the country was a beacon of socialism in a sea of capitalist oppressors. It was the same with the USSR, too: Wonderful socialism until it stops working, then it's capitalism again.

>>74525

No, the neetsocs are right.

There is no point in an utopia, where everyone is a fucking nigger.

The individual is precious, but his clan/blood is even more precious.

>>74526

> but his clan/blood is even more precious

Sounds like what the inbreeding rednecks from the Ozarks and Appalachia were thinking.

>>74527

And monarchists and pretty much old people.

And they would be right considering how disgusting half-breeds look nowadays.

>>74526

>we're discussing economics

>he starts talking about niggers and racemixing

If you're a high-IQ white man, at least try act one and stay on topic. Nobody said we like niggers, I hate them, I would genocide every single one of them if I could, that doesn't mean I should let some NEETsoc commie faggot steal my money. Living in a country without niggers is not something exclusive to NEETsocs.

Me, I want to keep my money and my private property, and I want to live in a country without commies, socialists, jews and niggers. You are all cancer.

>>74529

Economics is but a tool, blood is literally life.

Never let economics dictate who you are.

>Living in a country without niggers is not something exclusive to NEETsocs.

It is exclusive because we put race first, unlike you who put economics first. Economics doesn't give a damn if you are white or black.

>>74534

You make fun of that now, but when you look at how half-breed fucking look, like De Niro fucking kid.

>>74536

Don't do this to me man.

>>74533

>I don't know anything about economics, so I'll just change the subject to race

Wew, sucks that we're not on pol, here we actually have to argue with people instead of calling them shills and asking the imkampfy nigger to ban them.

>if you don't accept communism and a soviet union for whites then you don't care about your race

But incidentally keeping my race caged like animals and having the socialist state leech off them like a parasite is somehow "putting race first", no thanks, fuck that, this isn't an either/or situation, you can actually have both a good capitalist economy where white people aren't living like Russians AND a racially homogeneous nation without niggers and kikes. However if I had to pick one, race will always come first, you can be fucking sure of that.

>Never let economics dictate who you are.

And lmao at how you're trying to sound wise or motivational or something, THIS is something exclusive to NEETsocs, leftypol doesn't do this they're more Lenin-ish like "Communism WILL win".

I bet the next thing you're gonna say is something cringy like

>you won't find national-socialism, national-socialism is something that finds you

>>74539

I don't see how I'm shilling for communism when I fucking hate that shit because it's a materialist ideology.

All I'm telling you is your race is first, your property is second.

Communism, capitalism or even your property give no shit about your race.

Even if you are the richest man on Earth, you are gonna be a sad son of bitch when your race dies out.

>However if I had to pick one, race will always come first, you can be fucking sure of that.

All I need to hear.

>>74540

>you are gonna be a sad son of bitch when your race dies out

Race means nothing. It meant nothing in the 19th century when Irish and Italian immigrants were treated like shit. I suppose you are trying to argue about culture perhaps? In any event, I would take any one person with integrity, regardless of race, over neetsocs and /pol/ larpers any day. One Thomas Sowell is worth more to society than the entire toilet that /pol/ is.

>>74544

Classic race traitor right here.

Race has always meant something, the fact the barbarians were treated like shit by the romans, and so on and so on, does not mean their race means nothing.

It actually means race means everything, because it is those races that define them.

>>74525

If you are not using it, we're taking it.

>>74509

This is why "not pure capitalism" became a meme. Months before the various Crisis and regime changes in America, Cuba (before castro), Vietnam, Chillie (before Allende) became too obvious, I've had Righties tell me that the country was a beacon of capitalism in a sea of Communist aggressors. It was the same with Hungary; Wonderful capitalism until it stops working, then it's capitalism again.

>>74573

>Wonderful capitalism until it stops working, then it's capitalism again.

Wonderful capitalism until it stops working, then it's communism again.

>>74562

Sure bro, go ahead and take him.

He needs a place to stay since he got banned from /pol/ and I think he would be much more at home at /leftypol/ than here.

>>74577

Your property fag.

>>74579

Nah bro, you can have (((him))). Consider it a (((gift))) in ((((((good)))))) (((((((((((faith))))))))))))))))).

>>74580

Hi /pol/ak false flagger.

>>74581

We should really consider the offer to take him in. It's very rude to reject a gift, and besides, we can feed him grass until he gets #thicc then eat him with the rest of the tribe.

>>74585

kek

>>74591

But that's wrong, you fucking retard. For years before the 1991 crash, Marxian Economists were saying that the revisionist policies was revisionist and created Capitalist organizations (mafia, Corporations) and oligarchs that would pop.

>>74558

Looks like you are getting race and culture mixed up.

>>74505

So Noam Chomsky was a /pol/ false flagger now?

>>74593

I love how you didn't even address the point he made and went off on a tangeant about things that have nothing to do with anything. The point is that whenever "Capitalism doesn't work", it often happens when the state intervenes and causes errors in the market, not when the market is left to it's own devices.

>>74573

Capitalism is not a boolean value. It is variable. We do not say "not true capitalism" when something goes awry. We propose which policies were the causes for the crises.

>>74573

Are you 80?

>>74603

He's trying to mirror my arguments by replacing words in them. It's like replacing the word "Nazi" with "kike" in a history textbook to prove that actually, six million Nazis were gassed. I have no idea what went wrong in his childhood.

>>74509

Shit, we had leftist shitposters on /liberty/ going on and on about the great state of Venezuela I think a few weeks before shit started to really hit the fan for them.

Those from /leftypol/ who had thought that Venezuela is shit before would not have come here to complain about it, so it looks like they liked it before even though they may have not.

>>74536

Reminds me of that one movie with Dan Akroyd.

>>74595

I like your lack of reading comprehension.

I love how we have everyone here in this thread. Nothing brings people together from across the political spectrum like /liberty/.

>>74595

>it often happens when the state intervenes and causes errors in the market, not when the market is left to it's own devices.

This. Capitalism works just fine until the government reaches its hands in there and starts trying to turn the gears by hand - hold this part still, make that part go faster, make this bit run backwards, etc., and then the whole thing breaks. To be honest, the same is true for socialism. It works just fine until the government (or "worker's council", or whatever, if you want to get all autistic about it) tries to dictate how the economy operates, which is why socialism can never work and always fails.

>>74761

First one needs either a larger bust or more ass, and armpit hair. Ear-to-cheekbone ratio is off. She's beautiful but in the uncanny valley.

Second one is just flat out uncanny valley. She looks too Asian in her facial structure but too European in her bust/hair, and her shoulds are in the uncanny valley somewhere inbetween.

They're not ugly as they obviously take care of their appearance and are on the prettier side, but that doesn't mean they're pleasing to the eye. There's a difference between beauty and pleasant to look at.

>>74769

First one is Halle Berry and second one is Anri Okita.

>>74768

The only time I can ever see socialism working is on a small scale within a homogeneous group of people. Outside of that it would fail.

>>74771

I never knew Japanese women could be so thicc.

>>74772

>I never knew Japanese women could be so thicc.

Oh nigga you have no fucking idea. Japanese women are actually some of the thickest.

>>74774

The American diet on an Asian body is truly a beautiful thing.

>>74772

The Nordic Model is not socialist, has private property, and in some areas is more privatized than the US. Yeah you might have decent healthcare but you are taxed up your ass and have to deal with some of the worst nanny states around like Finland.

>>74771

Take the face described as the pinnacle of beauty according to science, and compare it to the face that is an average of thousands of peoples' faces. The former is certainly beautiful, but looks almost alien. The latter isn't necessarily beautiful, but it is very pleasant to look at. This is like the whole accuracy vs precision thing with science samples.