>>72436
>Wouldn't AnCap be mostly Oligopolistic in nature because newly privatized industries like defense and forensics companies would still have barriers to entry like paying for expensive equipment or employing highly trained people.
Are you the same OP who asked that anarchocapitalism cannot deal with water property? Yes, this sentence sounded nonsensical, but it captures the essence of hiding definite statements behind questions.
Anyway, barriers to entry exist in any industry. You always have to pay for capital up front, and then find your place in the market. This is the triviality you're expressing here. What's more interesting is what you do not spell out: Your two premises, that the barriers to entry would
>I feel like for a group that loves to berate the left for "being economically illiterate", hardly ever talks about real economic concepts such as this.
Nigger. Murray Rothbard wrote two books on pure economics with more than a thousand pages each. Did you read them? I know people that did. Plenty have read Mises' primary work of a thousand pages, too, including me. Don't start a pissing contest, unless you have a masters degree and have read at least one of the books I mentioned.
>Many Libertarians and AnCaps have this view that everything under Anarcho-Capitalism would just be perfect competition where anybody could enter any industry at any time and start a business.
Actually, we don't care about perfect competition. Mises debunked that concept in Human Action, and none of us are too keen on reviving it. The only thing you've demonstrated here is that you don't even know our lingo.
>There is also the fact that oligopolies exist in unregulated markets like video games with a few firms like EA, Ubisoft, and Activision. Who, own their own, can do enough damage to cause the industry to crash.
Oh boy. These are big firms, they're not oligopolies. They cannot crash the market on their own. They're the only ones producing AAA-titles, sure, but these titles are still competing with literally tens of thousands of others, made by over a hundred studios.
>I could picture a scenario where a DRO might end up in conflict with a forensics company over rights over a crime scene or evidence in a terrorist attack kind of how video game developers and publishers will often squabble over various game project rights and deadlines.
And I can imagine a conflict between the local police department and the FBI. I can also imagine them not even doing their job in the first place because they'll get paid anyway.