[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / fur / int / leftpol / new / oneshota / russian / strek ]

/liberty/ - Liberty

Non-authoritarian Discussion of Politics, Society, News, and the Human Condition (Fun Allowed)
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


WARNING! Free Speech Zone - all local trashcans will be targeted for destruction by Antifa.

File: 1824fc19ebeba98⋯.jpg (642.64 KB, 765x1138, 765:1138, rothbard on being ignorant….jpg)

 No.71651

Hello everybody. Over the last two years, I've read a good deal of economics. Most of it was from the Austrian School, but I also tried the Chicago School (didn't like it), Marxism (oh boi) and a bunch of other stuff. What I'm still missing, however, is the less current stuff. So far, I think those are the relevant ones:

>Physiocrats

>School of Salamanca

>Classicals (Smith, Ricardo, Malthus etc.)

>Assholes (Keynes, Marshall)

Anything I am missing? And can someone give recommendations on the former two?

 No.71657

>>71651

Can't think of anyone worth your time. The German Historical school maybe? It'll be a complete waste of time, but it's there. Also, Marshal belongs in the Classical camp. He really isn't any more of an asshole than Smith, Ricardo and Malthus.


 No.71688

>>71651

Can you give me a run down about the Chicago School? Like what are the main differences between Austrian and Chicago?

The only person I really know from that school was Milton Friedman. I didn't really study economics in school I just read it recreationaly, mostly from the Austrian School so that's all I know about economics.


 No.71706

>>71688

Capital theory, macro in as much as it involves the State, some of them genuinely believe and want "perfect competition", which also comes with support of anti trust law. The way they use the "evenly rotating economy" is not how an Austrian would refer to it. Some of the Chicago crowd want to effectively "eliminate" profit and see it as a negative, and a flaw of the system. They somehow want to both have subjective value and at the same time everything to trade for exactly as much it cost to produce with the price being accurate. Some of them genuinely believe the welfare state, like the federal reserve is needed and can function properly. You'll hear some of them talk about maintaining a particular money velocity by means of government intervention. Not all of them want commodity currency as it gets in the way of the Fed.

Chicago school is pretty much low key SocDem.


 No.71709

Proudhon? :^)


 No.71738

>>71688

What anon above said. They're somewhere between the Keynesians and the Austrians, they want monetary control but not, like, too much, they acknowledge the public goods problem, and believe in the empiricist fad.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / asmr / fur / int / leftpol / new / oneshota / russian / strek ]