>>68037
Alright, I'm reading it. I already disagree with the methodology, though. Empirical methodologies in the social sciences don't work, or not reliably. At the end of the day, because of the sheer amount of variables and the fact that history is non-repeatable (unlike proper experiments), an empirical study that isn't crap will always resort to a priori reasoning. This is done by trimming down the relevant variables and picking your statistics according to what you find likely, and then you build a pseudo-empirical case around it.