/liberty/ - Liberty

>>63472

Last and only one I really cared about was Julie Borovski. Maybe Molyneux, but I never had that much sympathy for him. Nowadays, I almost only care about libertarian personalities that are intellectual. Doesn't just mean professors and so, I also like Ron Paul, who's about as activist as it can get.

Here's the abridged version.

>>63620

>analytic philosophy

Can I have a bullet to the knee instead?

>>63620

Autism kills

>>63622

I think he's trying to argue against it, or at least strawman all opponents of Marxism as devout Popperians.

I'd like to see him go up against formal logic man in a chain of posts, so that nobody talks over each other

>>63624

He's going to do the exact same thing he did while talking: ignore what he doesn't like and keep repeating his shit over and over without addressing it. If you truly want someone who is sort of still alive today and can shit on Das Kapital like no other you'll need to call Sowell. No extreme esoteric detail or obtuse word salad can get past him. Too bad unlike all of us regularly screeching back and forth with NEETs on the internet, he has better things to do during his last years.

>>63622

Do you even know what analytic philosophy is? All your libertarian """thinkers""" come from analytic schools.

>>63625

>not letting the opponent move the goalposts is somehow bad

Why are you still so butthurt, Academic Agent? Just end your suffering already.

>>63632

>Do you even know what analytic philosophy is? All your libertarian """thinkers""" come from analytic schools.

That would be news to me. Libertarianism is neither wholly analytic nor continental, not to my knowledge. Mises had very strong continental influences due to Max Weber, for example.

The reason why I don't like analytic philosophy is because the philosophers that make it their main gig, like Rawls or Nozick, are shit. Half their books are autistic navelgazing and pedantic attempts to express philosophical problems in mathematic or formal-logic language instead of actually solving them.

>>63625

>during his last years

Don't remind me. I got nervous when he announced his retirement, but yet I see he is still putting out a few columns here and there. It will be a horribly sad day when he leaves us.

>>63639

Currently reading A Conflict of Visions. The man has a lot more to him than Economic theory.