>>72666
You seem like your questions are honest.
>antifa, which I think is mostly leftist anarchists,
Mostly bashies, with a fuckton of honest-to-god alt-right.
There are anarchist and trot antifa, but honestly, it's a fucking shitstorm. Meanwhile, the thing as a greater whole has… some complexity.
>want to physically attack people for having marches or speaking at universities.
San Fransisco, for instance, is a key figure in the heroin trade, with the philipenes, and duterte, at the other end of it. How the hell are you going to fight a massive geopolitical war against a VERY unfriendly drug cartel, and say "fuck it, do what you want" at the same time, exactly? Antifa is USUALLY bashie shits such that one hopes both sides kill each other leaving everyone else, but in that case, was a very effective example of self-defense without governments. Said government, BTW, has been VERY tolerant of foreign manipulation and outright bombing, I might add.
>If property is theft who decides how land and possessions are used? Some sort of committee? How is this committee different from a government?
…because it includes literally everyone in the area, or everyone involved plus whatever noninvolved stakeholders were called up to mediate the thing, usually just by being around, depending on the scale of the matter. We are all Shanti Sena now…
Of course, you'll have a fucking anyeurism when we tell you that the rules aren't even binding, but…
>And anarchists seem to want to abolish prison too. So what happens to people who rape and steal
Restorative justice works. You may not like that, but it doesn't change it.
>sorry, "take goods not officially distributed to them by the committee" or whatever
There are two ways to get property on the left; make it, or be given it, which can include picking it up at the free box/free store/etc. "The committee" is not, in fact, on the list at ALL, unless they're the actual group of people that just made something. No bosses.
…and then you force dystopian succdem down the throat of an unwilling populace and whine about how people won't call it open-access MoP for your benefit. Ever consider that maybe you're just a fucking retard?
As for the rest of your questions, districting is usually done just to ensure that one literally can do anything.. and again, disputes are mediated, but none of the rules are binding.
>I never see any practical information on how it would deal with any issues.
Anarchist socialism currently owns a massive chunk of your economy, with names like State Farm and Vanguard, both of which at least nominally follow the construction of Proudhon. There's a good chance that a solid chunk of food in your pantry was cooperatively produced.
…so, being one of the larger chunks of your economy and owning fucking everything pretty much absolutely debunks…
> It all just sounds poorly thought out, impractical, and inconsistent with human nature.
>that. About 10% of the world's 50 largest banks are run on mutualist socialism, and thanks to vanguard ALSO being a mutual fund, if it's not ansoc, it's ansoc-owned.
A bunch of shitty helicopter posters can't and won't do shit in the real world. We, on the other hand, have already outcompeted you. How can something "not be possible" and still be happening?
>>60202
>Okay, if you don't think we're anarchists, call us rothbarianists or voluntaryists or free-market-libertarians. no one will dispute it because no one will care.
Most ancaps are WAAAY to the authoritarian right of Rothbard, though.
<Rothbard : "I have the minimum technological unit required for my previously-established use."
<Ancaps : I have borders, taxes, a police state, and murder political dissidents.
…so no, we can't call you Rothbardists honestly, and it would be a damn step up if we could.