/k/ - Weapons

>no info besides a single picture

>failed to red text

>a thread died for this

>>>/cuckchan/

https://www.news-press.com/story/news/2018/03/07/lehigh-man-destroys-semi-automatic-rifle-solidarity-parkland-students/387312002/

>>562535

BATFE would be doing absolutely perfect in terms of PR if they actually went after the bad guys instead of people who believe in the constitution. That Washington bitch, the other guy with the AR, this jackoff. If they murdered the families of these people instead of humans it would be much harder to hate the BATFE.

>>562538

I'd still hate them, but at least I could laugh about it if they actually did their job instead of just shooting my animals/taking away my rights.

>>562533

he actually sounds retarded.

>>562552

You read the part about the 20 gauge and the single action for carry? The man is Fudd Jesus.

I saw the video it might be only be an auto ordinance

I take solace in the fact this fat, bumbling ape will be dead within my lifetime.

If I could kill him with my own bare hands nad get away with it I would, but old age and high cholesterol will have to do the job for me.

Something tells me I will die very old and very bitter, why can't god take me now?

THANK GOD FOR SHINGLES

410,757,864,530 DEAD BOOMER

calm down, it's just a Universal. and he's a downie.

downies against frownies! socialist tard revolution!

loved how he got winded from swinging the hammer just a couple times to smash the magazine.

>>562597

>>562570

Whether it be from old age, falling from helicopters, or hanging from ropes, odds are we're gonna be there to spit on their graves. That alone is something to take solace in.

>>562601

*proto

>>562601

go google old photos of leftists from the spanish civil war and the soviets. most party leaders have faces like today's soyboys. physiognomy is real.

>>562601

What a faggot

>>562507

>Retarded Boomber destroys of a weapon in an unsafe manner

I see nothing wrong with this. Get more of them to do it. Maybe it will cull their population a little.

>>562533

>the magazine is the most dangerous part of the gun

Yeah, just think of all those murders committed by magazines…

>>562600

>>562597

>>562570

Human Beings weren't meant to and really shouldn't live much longer than 60 years.

For every semi automatic gun they destroy and show to the world so it cannot be used again, we must create fully automatic gun and hide it so it can be used one day.

>>562651

Yeah, stacks of more than ten magazines should be banned. 30 mags stacked on top of each other is clearly a falling hazard, and could easily trap a toddler or small child if they fall over on top of them.

Plus, old magazines are a fire hazard. And think of all trees killed to print a single issue of one.

>>562507

>m1 carbine

weak piece of shit rifle deserved it tbh

>>562686

Completely and whole-heartedly agree with you, but

>implying boomers are human beings

>>562601

>>562585

Dykes are Soyboys of women?

>>562515

>doesn't matter

A cool grand for one in decent enough shape to actually take to the range, Dundee.

>>562585

>inverse life rune

>funded by the soviets

>wow, if everyone was paid by the soviets to shoot dope, smoke weed and get STI's world would be so great

I fucking hate boomers and hippies.

>>567696

i think it's desperate need for attention combined with severe retardation. like retards eating tide pods

>>567696

The Gun Goblin says "U MUS GIBB GUNS!"

>>567699

SHOO SHOO, GUNS GOBLIN

>>562557

Destroying a weapon doesn't create an incentive unless the person intends on buying another gun, or intended on selling it cheaply to a person who intended on buying another. It's essentially wasted resources; destroying so that you may create is keynesian voodoo bullshit.

>>567880

>buy object with intent to destroy it

>market demand for said object is driven up

>destroy object in protest

>market demand for said object has still been driven up

No matter how you look at it, it's stupid. If they wanted to make a point, they'd boycott firearms. Unfortunately for them, they've already been doing that for decades and it's not working, so they've resorted to sperging out instead.

>>567880

>selling it cheaply to a person who intended on buying another

The firearms market right now is pretty tight and light carbines like the M1 carbine and the AR-15 are in high demand. It's probably pretty safe to assume there would be a buyer if he offered to sell.

> It's essentially wasted resources

Also true. He's literally destroying wealth. It's bad for the overall economy, but it's good for gun manufacturers. So he's basically funneling resources from whatever else might have been created to the weapons sector. The exact opposite of what he intended.

>>567884

Fuck, I forgot about the manufacturer's incentive, still a goddamn waste.

>>567885

This does make me chuckle that these dumb cunts get the exact opposite of what they want.

>>567696

>I wonder what causes a man of that age to wake up one morning and decide to become a massive faggot?

My dear fellow, the man didn't turn into a faggot overnight. He's a boomer. He's born in faggotry. Molded by it. At the very best he spent the most formative years of his life in, around or under a shroud of constant faggotry. He heard faggotry from the people around him. He's seen faggotry pushed by the people he went to school with. He breathed in an atmosphere of constant faggotry. He's tried, to the best of his almost non-existent mental ability to concile the idea that he has the right to own an inanimate object with the faggotry of the new hip cool kids on the block, and he failed (predictably). His entire life was probably spent on keeping up with, and sucking up to the newest 'hip cats' in town. He kept hearing that certain mechanical contraptions are inherently evil and vile from people selling him faggotry, and although his mental ability was not up to coming up with a counter-argument even good enough to convince himself otherwise, deep down inside he had a vague, almost child's conscience-like voice telling him that even though these mechanical contraptions are somewhat evil, he can probably own one without giving in to its evil, One Ring-like nature, and it's probably not that much against the principles of faggotry that much to own one as long as he himself doesn't do any evil with it. Now come CY+3 and the newest hip kids on the block say that it the mere existence of said contraptions hits the very root of Faggotry (with a capital 'F'). What do you think the boomer faggot does?

>>567893

Logically it's far more incentive to the manufacturer than one may think, since a destroyed gun cannot recirculate in the market later. The vast majority of firearms are sold to people knowing they can potentially get the same gun second hand, in effect it drives the industry which produced it to double the extent of a regular sale since it doesn't dampen its own value on the aftermarket later. It is a horrific waste though, that said they probably threw the gun in the rubbish and some hobo is busy restoring it for crimes right now.

>>567896

>/k/: Guns, liberty, austrian economics

>>567929

>david niose

>name is literally a jewish king and the word (((nose)))

That's extra heretical.

>>567929

Time to find a Star of David on public grounds and sue to have it torn down.

>>568038

>destroy military graveyard and disrespect the dead

>claim moral high ground and scream "you're disrespecting the dead by caring about it"

I think driving a car through a graveyard is a little more disrespectful than caring about commies destroying graveyards.

>>568038

What the fuck is it with anarchists? Their entire belief system is like the flat Earth of ideology.

>society can work on a large scale without government, guys

>that's why it's never happened at any point in recorded history and the only time we lived in anarchy was over ten thousand years enough when humans couldn't ensemble in large enough groups to form nations

>>568068

It depends on which ones you're talking about. People stupid enough to march around on the street, demand weapon bans, etc aren't really anarchists but larpers which happens when you have something cool and edgy but not fun enough to actually look at. Anarchists, as far as I know, are more for repealing government as much as humanly possible, not no government at all. It's why the A is in the O, anarchy under order. If it is not ESSENTIAL to the group's survival then the government shouldn't have a hand in it, supposedly.

>>568068

Anarcho communists (you can tell this one is ancom because of the red/black flag) aren't anarchists in the sense of any coherent ideology. They're hysterical and stuck in a daddy-issue "rebel against EVERYTHING" mindset, and as such reject anything resembling authority, tradition, and morality. Because in their minds the government is the ultimate representative of these things, saying they want to violently tear it down is them being as edgy as humanly possible. There do exist ancaps and other anarchists who don't support the government because they believe law, order, prosperity, and tradition will prosper just fine without the state apparatus, but practically speaking they don't have anything in common.

>>568081

This is a more eloquent way of what I was too uneducated to say. Not every leftist is a gun grabbing bourgeoise larping with daddy's credit card, military service is respected by me and a lot of reds I know, we typically understand people are just fighting for those they love, but see their fight as being exploited by the government or corporations. To step on the graves of the brave is a gross offense and I don't stand for it.

>>568068

Snekman minarchist here. The only government that can be held to be moral is one where it is both able to be formed and left freely by the people by hiring it- your property is your own little country, and you hire the government to protect you and your rights and provide a place for a court of law. Notice also that this is the barest minimum of government quite a few ancaps will accept since this is essentially an enforcement organization.

Anarcho-communists view property as theft and wages as slavery (proudhon)- trading your life and labour freely is morally wrong, strelok.

>>562597

>year of NEETdom is almost over

>parents are pushing for me to go to JC

>don't wanna

>would rather pick up a trade

How anon?

>>568207

Just tell them that you want to learn a trade instead. I don't mean saying "Oh, please can I learn a trade instead of going to JC?" - I mean you tell them "I'm not going to JC. I'm going to learn a trade". They won't listen otherwise. Boomers are all still stuck in their little fantasy world where everyone can get a cushy no-effort white-collar job for life and retire at 60. Realising how badly the world is fucked up means realising how badly they fucked the world up, so they refuse. Good luck.

>>562761

That is just collectorfags inflating the price, there are literally millions of them.

>>568068

>muh state

>>568207

Depending on the trade you want to get into, it could be as simple as getting a job as an entry level laborer. The key is to ask the tradesmen what they are doing and why. Always try to learn everything you can. Let the foreman/boss know that you want to learn x trade. Take initiative, not many people do anymore and they will be impressed. I'm a machinist although I've moved into QA but if that is a trade you're interested in then get a job as a machine operatorbutton pusher and do the same thing as I outlined before.

>i hate men with guns and want to get rid of them. Therefore i am going to disarm myself.

>a guy at the bar beat me up and i want to get back at him. So im going to stop working out and fast as much muscle off my body as possible

Are these people genuinely retarded.

>>570128

>someone somewhere got raped better self castrate on the internet

>>570132

#banassaultballs

>>570134

>no ones coming for you balls

>look I produce sperm, i produce hormones but these types of testicles only exist to enable rape

>when the founding fathers wrote that you have a right to your body parts they didn't invision organs that could produce millions of spermatoza in a day its just a fact.

>>570128

Faggotry is like heavy metal poisoning, it destroys your brain over time

>>568319

>their little fantasy world where everyone can get a cushy no-effort white-collar job for life and retire at 60

It's not that hard to retire early. Invest what you make until you can live on dividends.

>>562597

Many of them will be discarded into some dreary nursing home by their children, where they will spend their last few years becoming increasingly senile. They will be cared fortormented by the 3rd world trash that they imported, who already have been observed torturing, raping and murdering their charges.

Sure, some of them will die in relative peace, having leeched off of social security for ages, but others will be forced to lie in the bed that they made, and I'll point and laugh.

>>568081

Seconding this. Also you can see ancoms at leftist marches and events advocating for greater government control, at best they are tactical anarchists. They preach the end of government but are more than willing to help perpetuate it if they think they can get leftists into power. If that leftist government fails, they claim that it's because they should have been anarchists, but they will never oppose existing ones unless they believe it is already collapsed.

>>578363

>at best they are tactical anarchists

This seems like a fairly accurate analysis. Having talked to a few of them at university, asking about the sort of society they hope to build, they're the sort who will call any authority of power 'unwarranted', 'unjust', and 'evil' … right up to the point where they get the chance to sit behind the big desk.

<tl;dr: They're not 'the state is evil, capitalism isn't working', more 'the state is evil unless it's doing exactly what I want! Also, Daddy, can you pay more rent for me, I want to move in to a bigger apartment!'.

>>578652

In short, they're too damn lazy and weak to govern themselves. It would be of no surprise for me if it is the same on the other end of the political spectrum. Damned parasites.

>>578656

>>578656

>It would be of no surprise for me if it is the same on the other end of the political spectrum

>you know who's just as bad as lefties, righties! political horseshoe theory bullshit dot jay peg image

Heil hitler, faggot

>>578680

You do get a fair few voices at least describing themselves as far right saying "Welfare and unlimited handouts for Whites (like me) only! The state should pay all my bills because I'm the Aryan superman!". Not as many as you'll find in the movement where the non-racial version of that is standard doctrine, but pretending they're not there is daft.

>Initiate 'Scotsman Verification Algorithm'

>>578702

>Welfare for Whites only!

>that's a bad thing

Yes, we should also throw our elderly to the bears and these lazy bum war veteran legless cripples should better find a handycraft, fucking leechers!

>>578710

I have no intention of letting NEETs and lazy assholes suck the money out of my paycheck to fund their self-indulgent lifestyle, whether or not they're also white.

>>578718

>t. cuck

>>578722

Hitler is dead, he fucking shot himself. How long are you going to idolize and venerate a complete failure, a hunnic genetic reject not worth the title of Fuhrer? There are far better idols in the same damn war, Rommel is one.

>>578769

>Rommel

And why exactly? That fucking loser is dead too and he fought on losing side like a loser he was. Losers do not deserve to be idolized.

>>578775

Finns lost both winter and continuation war.

>>578773

Rommel wasn't the guy in charge, the responsibility for the loss of WWII rests squarely on the shoulders of Hitler and the party. They were the ones who decided to fight a war on… what? A dozen fronts? Poland, france, czechoslovakia, soviets, yugos, egypt, greece, denmark, norway, belgium, luxembourg, netherlands, hungary. Thirteen, yeah. Remind me if I missed any

Hitler didn't wait a single fucking time to consolidate a win, he just kept moving. Sure that surprised and unbalanced everyone, but it was surprising because it was dumb. You can't keep land you don't consolidate, period. If you invade and keep going all you do is turn a country into a highway - a treacherous highway at that.

Hitler failed every test of leadership, from strategy to loyalty. Even in the end when a good leader would stay alive to at least deflect some of the hatred his followers would have to deal with… he fucking took the easy way out and left the rest of the party to take responsibility.

If Hitler was brave enough to not eat a bullet, he could have stood up in nuremberg and said "it was my fault, i forced them to do it" and then the entire party would continue on and still be alive today. They might even have taken over Western Germany in free elections during the cold war, history would be completely changed.

And that's just one thing he could have done right. If he did half the things right, something a fucking parrot could statistically do, there would be a union in Europe today all right… a union of Aryans.

I am utterly disappointed in the man and can't see why anyone would lionize an inept coward.

>>578710

You forgot about existence of a certain institution that's called family that does just that.

Soldiers unless dishonorably discharged should get their salary from the government until death.

If someone is a such a tremendous failure that in their entire life they didn't make anyone care about their continued existence they should just go die in a ditch

>>578722

>If i shape enough snack bars into a swastika, Hitler will return and make another deal with zionists to fight marxism, but then will also align himself with communists to get back land that germany took on the very compelling, noble and fair claim of "might makes right" made by a Francophile fag buried with his dogs on death

>>578787

>there would be a union in Europe today all right… a union of Aryans.

I'm not 100% sure if Ayylmaos are taught that at school, but the non-cucked Union was called the Heksagonale created originally as Quadragonale by Italy, Austria, Hungary and Yugoslavia (pentagonale with Czechoslovakia, Heksagonale with Poland being the last member) it was meant to serve as a counterbalance to Russian Imperialism and Prussian Autism and inferiority complex but out of nowhere Yugoslavia was (((balkanized))) with help of German funds as krauts just couldn't help ruining everything for everyone.

>inb4 all those countries aren't white/aryan

>hating jews for jewing

Not that it's incorrect but.

>not hating jews for impeding "progress"

Try it, 1488 larpers, that way you could've killed 50 million of any ethnic/religious group and you'd get friend invites from top celebrities on top of free money from the West

>LITERAL FUCKING SKULLS AS SYMBOLS

try using something less invoking the image of death, like stars (cool thing to look at) or tools (invoke thoughts of noble workers doing their best)

Swastika was too exotic.

>>578789

I thought it was called the intermarium?

>out of nowhere Yugoslavia was (((balkanized)))

PROTIP: That was done by Soros specifically to aid his 100 year plan. If Yugoslavia stayed intact, the balkans couldn't become an avenue for mass migration and crime.

>not hating jews for impeding "progress"

>LITERAL FUCKING SKULLS AS SYMBOLS

Can't wait for some brain dead useless idiot or a shill to say "muh PR". The Jews conquered the western world simply by using PR, they did not use bullets or weapons of any kind. But for some reason white people shouldn't use the most powerful means of conquest….

>>578702

>"Welfare and unlimited handouts for Whites (like me) only! The state should pay all my bills because I'm the Aryan superman!".

If your ancestors 500 generations back hewed a country out of wilderness why shouldn't you get to tax some recent 0-3 generation immigrant? These fuckers are using water aqueducts, roads, and sum total knowledge about the country and the world that your own people discovered, and on top of that you pay them!!!. In what fucking universe is situation B alright but situation A some kind of sin?

>Initiate 'Scotsman Verification Algorithm'

>no one has established residency via bloodlines in the history of the world!

>BUT DNA IS HAAAAARD!

Dumbass.

>>578798

>I thought it was called the intermarium?

Two different things, Intermarium was meant to be an ethnocentric union of European ethnic groups as part of Piłsudski's plan to get rid of minorities from Poland without getting fucked by (((League of Nations))) back into nonexistence, simply by making their countries of origin exist independently from Russia/Germany/Anglo and not be shitholes due to cooperation between member countries

Dmowski being either retarded (he was an unironic democrat in Poland) or an enemy combatant had the brilliant plan of

<ooga booga lmao just kill them all xD and jews too! Poland for Poles"

Quadra>Penta>Heksagonale was a plan for a post-Yaltan European Order that didn't involve Germany and Russia as the major players, since considering their track record any alternative would be welcome.

>>578840

Because you yourself didn't accomplish any of that nation hewing but still demand payment for it from the wallets of other men who performed work themselves to obtain that money. Last I checked, /k/ doesn't support welfare queens and GIBS ME DAT hoodrats.

>>578843

Yeah but then you get buttfucked by Germany or Russia. Your best bet is culturally invading one of those, and converting them.

>>578846

My kid accomplished fuck all but I'm leaving him the guns. You're saying he has no right to them…. Are you arguing for a complete abolishment of inheritance?

>>578848

>My kid accomplished fuck all but I'm leaving him the guns. You're saying he has no right to them…. Are you arguing for a complete abolishment of inheritance?

It's your choice to leave him those guns, the mere fact that you have chosen to do so suggests you think he "deserves" them on a certain level, if you believed your kid didn't deserve them (for instance, if he lopped his balls off, died his hair pink, and started declaring his pronouns) you could easily choose not to leave him your collection. This is family aid and it's perfectly all right. It's welfare, in which some lowlife demands gibs and support by the virtue of being born, whether the people holding the property he wants think he deserves it or not, which is the issue. And these kinds of lowlifes will make up the vast majority of any welfare system, ethnostate or no ethnostate.

>>578855

Inheritance doesn't always work by publicly declared choice of the dead person, otherwise everyone would have to sign a will the moment they earned anything just in case they died the next moment. We just assume that an ancestor who is dead wants to leave his property with his descendant, who will have use of it, that's the default assumption. The default assumption can't be that an ancestor wanted to leave his propertequally spread across the entire population of the state or nation, or world, or to specifically give the money to people who aren't his descendants which is what you seem to be going for. Because that would be insane.

> It's welfare,

Could have looked it up before using the word.

https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/welfare

>>578858

>The default assumption can't be that an ancestor wanted to leave his propertequally spread across the entire population of the state or nation, or world, or to specifically give the money to people who aren't his descendants which is what you seem to be going fo

No, that's not what I'm going for. The usual inheritance rules are just fine as far as I'm concerned, and make quite a bit of sense. My position is this: Any kind of welfare, by which I mean any state-mandated and state-funded transfer payments, "social safety nets," and so on, is bad for a nation both economically and socially, regardless of that nation's demographics.

>>578848

>Your best bet is culturally invading one of those

Africans unfortunately beat us to the punch in Germany (^:

>>578871

No need to go full expansionist though, just consolidate the fuck out of defenses and make yourself impossibly inconvenient to occupy. Uncuck the military and make sure it stays that way, give every able-bodied man not in active duty militia training, a service rifle to keep at home, along with ammo. Offer to replenish ammo for free if they train regularly to incentivize marksmanship. You might not have quite the natural borders that Switzerland does, but you could still follow their example and make your country an incredibly tough nut to crack.

>>578861

I disagree. You could have skipped a lot of confusion just by saying that.

>>578871

Then do it with Russia. They're slav so they're already halfway there, just spam their media with your television shows about how great the polish people are, how beautiful polish women are, etc.

>>578906

>I disagree.

You got an argument? Economics and public choice theory both have pretty strong arguments regarding the incentives welfare creates, and its degenerative effect on society.

>>578914

There's only one argument - anything else is theft.

When a sandnigger comes into my country and uses a road my father built, he is thieving from me. Simple as that.

If I go to his country and leech off of it, the same sentence of theft applies to me.

Either he should not be here at all, or he should pay duties to natives.

>>578918

>When a sandnigger comes into my country and uses a road my father built, he is thieving from me. Simple as that.

Sure. I'd argue that this claim would be more legitimate if this road were privatized–that way you and your father could allow or deny passage to whomever you want–but I don't disagree with the principle itself. But like I said in my last post, that's not the point of contention. The point of contention is welfare–specifically, this idea that "social safety nets" or other forms of socialism somehow become viable in white communities.

>>578922

Why does it matter if its public or privatized? The country was one less sandnigger before the road was built, why would it give him free use of it for no good reason?

>>568068

It can if it's capitalistic in nature.

:^)

>>578923

>Why does it matter if its public or privatized?

The way I see it, because taxed money was used to build the road, and taxation is theft, the property claim on the road isn't legitimate. I do agree with you that natives of the country have a far better claim to the road than foreigners. I just believe that privatizing this system would lead to the same outcome, but with greater efficiency and no coercion.

>>578926

Well ok we can agree on that, if in some better future we privatize more things, it would help.

>>578886

> give every able-bodied man not in active duty militia training, a service rifle to keep at home, along with ammo

That was sinister MoD Antoni Macierewicz's plan with the Territorial Defense Forces but ZOG ensured he gets removed for his insolence

>>578918

Not having state-provided welfare would ensure no sand nigger comes to your country to leech.

>>568068

ancaps also think that either Muh NAP or Profit are the highest axiologic value

>>579004

It's not fucking welfare stop calling it that. Holy shit welfare applies to everyone in society, as such even immigrants can get it. Immigrants wouldn't be able to get this, that's the point.

>>579055

Are you forgetting that jews and plastic surgery exist?

I like how you excluded domestic leeches, because obviously 100% of your society will be ubermensch (^: