/k/ - Weapons

Just grabbed a random image, didn't even notice the "made in Israel" until after I posted, kek

>>522360

most deagles are

>>522358

Get a 1911 and use it like that $2,000 used car you buy when you first got your license because you'll destroy it anyway.

If you wanna go full commando, start reading about gun mechanics and visiting gun forums and reading military gun articles and going to shops to handle them all and shoot with them all.

>>522362

Didn't know that, interesting

>>522364

Appreciate the advice, I'll check the stuff you recommended out then.

>>522358

With concealed carry, you have to be comfortable wearing the gun and actually want to carry it. If it's so heavy it's pulling down your pants and there's a bump in your shirt that people ask about, you're not going to want to carry it. For this reason you should probably consider a compact or subcompact if you want to carry it every day. Also, before purchasing a handgun, you should always try shooting it to make sure you actually can, and enjoy doing so. If you don't want to practice, then you won't get good.

In other words, before you spend your hard earned shekels on a CCW, make sure that you can actually carry and shoot the gun. Ideally, your local range will allow you to rent handguns, so you can try out the models you're interested in.

>>522375

Was actually looking for that pdf on ham radios just the other day, thanks

>>522378

Makes sense, probably will go for compact then. I'll checkout some nearby ranges then, hopefully they rent. Thanks

Been carrying for right at ten years now. I've always carried a full size. Everything from a Hipoint .45 first handgun, plz no bully to a .45 CZ clone, to a beretta 92, to a CZ-75 SP-01 for the last several years.

As far as I know, I've never been 'made', even when dealing with police, military, private security, and sometimes I've had to carry in non-permissive environments (Read, get your ass locked up if you get caught).

It all depends on your comfort level. I don't mind dressing around the gun, nor do I mind always knowing it's there. That's one of the perks of carrying in my mind. If you're sensitive to that sort of thing, you might be stuck just buying a .380 and throwing it in your pocket.

>>522378

Practice, practice, practice. I've seen too many buy a gun and start carrying it and a year later still haven't shot it. I can't conceive of doing that.

Also, watch plenty of gun you tubers just to become second hand familiar with lost of common arms and general firearms practices like safety. Don't let them influence your opinions on things though, lots if them are shills for guns. Don't think you'll get actual shooting skills though, nothing replaces a range.

Am college student who can't own a fun yet, but i'm confident in field stripping AR's, AK's, popular pistols, ect. Hopefully gun rights don't get fucked harder then they are in the following years

>>522365

It's partially why .50AE deagles are illegal in the US.

Get a gun that's light for CC. Make sure you get a good feel for it before you buy. Gun shops that don't let you grope the guns aren't interested in turning a profit.

Unless you have meaty hands, get a Shield. Best Subcompact right now IMO sorry I don't like subcompact glocks

>>525667

>it can kill from over 1000 yards

Sorry. I'll fix that

>has the potential to create lethal wounds from over 1000 yards

>>525670

I doubled it in my drunk brain, I will concede that point. However your gay little chart can eat a fat dick. 450 yards you colossal faggot. Never sell a bullet short if it's all someone can afford/shoot accurately. It may cost someone their life.

>>525670

We're talking about .22lr not .22wmr or something, right?

>>525781

Also makes a decent suppressor revolver.

>>525791

>>525791

>Also makes a decent suppressor revolver.

This is one of the dumbest things a fucking leaf has ever said.

>IN;B4: IT CAN BE USED WITH A SUPPRESSOR!!!!

I know you cunt, not what I am getting at.

>>525804

Then what are you getting at burger-kin?

>>525804

fucking assburgers need to chill

>>525814

>the nagant isn't a decent revolver to use with a suppressor

If it's so bad, you should easily be able to name a couple other models of revolver that are better for using with a suppressor.

>>525822

Inflammable doesn't mean non-flammable - it's just an older way of saying flammable. Is English not your first language, or did you kill off half your brain cells after eating a bunch of flame retardant? Actually, it's probably both:

Low levels of common flame-retardant chemical damages brain cells

Finding may have implications for autism

http://www.ucdmc.ucdavis.edu/publish/news/mindinstitute/7378

>A common ingredient in flame retardants, BDE-49 accumulates in human blood, fat and breast milk. Despite these concentrations, little research has been done on the chemical’s potential health risks. However, a study by scientists at the UC Davis MIND Institute is shedding new light on BDE-49’s potential danger to brain health. The study showed that even tiny amounts of the compound damage neural mitochondria, the energy plants that power our cells. The chemical, quite literally, reduces brain power.

>One of a family of chemicals called polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs), BDE-49 can be absorbed through the skin or metabolized from other PBDEs. These chemicals have a similar structure to their more famous cousins PCBs and persist for long periods in the environment and the human body. They have been linked to a variety of neurodevelopmental disorders, including autism.

ARCHIVED - Concentrations (ppt, based on wet wt.) of polybrominated biphenyl ethers (PBDEs) from Total Diet Study in Vancouver, 2002

https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/food-nutrition/food-nutrition-surveillance/canadian-total-diet-study/concentration-contaminants-other-chemicals-food-composites/concentrations-based-polybrominated-biphenyl-ethers-pbdes-total-diet-study-vancouver-2002.html

The leaf, ladies and gentlemen.

And Californians, too.

PBDE accumulation, and its consequential health dangers, is especially problematic for California, which mandates that flame retardants be applied to a variety of products. In fact, it would be difficult to escape these chemicals.

>>525844

You bastard, you made me spit out my drink laughing. Now finish up your polybrominated diphenyl ether, or you can't have any dessert.

>>525843

>If it's so bad, you should easily be able to name a couple other models of revolver that are better for using with a suppressor.

Then how can it be considered "decent" if its the only one in its class you fucking mook

>>525852

how many of these were made?

>>534763

Around 2,500.

Current examples in the US are expensive even when horribly abused.

>>534770

>around 2,500

incorrect, they made around 2 million nagant revolvers.

>expensive even when horribly abused

I just found some good looking ones on armslist for $300. Though of course armslist so there were shit tier ones up for like $800 too.

>>534809

never mind, i take that back. i was looking at numbers for the 1895, not the 1910.

>>534754

>purse carrying

quality leafpost, as always