[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / canada / emm / girltalk / in / islam / madchan / sonyeon / strek ]

/k/ - Weapons

Salt raifus and raifu accessories
Email
Comment *
File
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 12 MB.
Max image dimensions are 10000 x 10000.
You may upload 5 per post.


There's no discharge in the war!

File: f35860488d60789⋯.jpg (13.88 KB, 300x300, 1:1, Skynet_logo.jpg)

0dff18 No.519314

What the fuck /k/?

The Future the US Military is Constructing: a Giant, Armed Nervous System

>Leaders of the Air Force, Navy, Army and Marines are converging on a vision of the future military: connecting every asset on the global battlefield.

>

>That means everything from F-35 jets overhead to the destroyers on the sea to the armor of the tanks crawling over the land to the multiplying devices in every troops’ pockets. Every weapon, vehicle, and device connected, sharing data, constantly aware of the presence and state of every other node in a truly global network. The effect: an unimaginably large cephapoloidal nervous system armed with the world’s most sophisticated weaponry.

>

>In recent months, the Joint Chiefs of Staff put together the newest version of their National Military Strategy. Unlike previous ones, it is classified. But executing a strategy requiring buy-in and collaboration across the services. In recent months, at least two of the service chiefs talked openly about the strikingly similar direction that they are taking their forces. Standing before a sea of dark- blue uniforms at a September Air Force Association event in Maryland, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein said he had “refined” his plans for the Air Force after discussions with the Joint Chiefs “as part of the creation of the classified military strategy.”

>

>The future for the Air Force? The service needed to be more like a certain electric-car manufacturer.

>

>“Every Tesla car is connected to every other Tesla car,” said Goldfein, referring to a presentation by Elon Musk about the ways his firm’s vehicles learn from their collective experience. “If a Tesla is headed down the road and hits a pothole, every Tesla that’s behind it that’s self-driving, it will avoid the pothole, immediately. If you’re driving the car, it automatically adjusts your shocks in case you hit it, too.”

>

>Goldfein waxed enthusiastically about how Tesla was able to remotely increase the battery capacity of cars in the U.S. Southeast to facilitate evacuation before the recent hurricanes.

>

>“What would the world look like if we connected what we have in that way? If we looked at the world through a lens of a network as opposed to individual platforms, electronic jamming shared immediately, avoided automatically? Every three minutes, a mobility aircraft takes off somewhere on the planet. Platforms are nodes in a network,” the Air Force chief said.

>

>The idea borrows from the “network centric warfare” concept that seized the military imagination more than a decade ago. But what leaders are today describing is larger by orders of magnitude. It’s less a strategy for integrating multiple networks into operations more efficiently than a plan to stitch everything, networks within networks, into a single web. The purpose: better coordinated, faster, and more lethal operations in air, land, sea, space, and cyberspace.

https://archive.is/C5lnu

88025e No.519342

File: 161c63580f55f04⋯.jpg (35.68 KB, 320x358, 160:179, yeeeeeee.jpg)

>>519314

WE TERMINATOR NAO!


e2eb05 No.519345

No surprises there except this

>Goldfein waxed enthusiastically about how Tesla was able to remotely increase the battery capacity of cars in the U.S. Southeast to facilitate evacuation before the recent hurricanes.

what the fuck


c7dd42 No.519349

File: b18e46a5bf5687e⋯.png (Spoiler Image, 133.87 KB, 350x350, 1:1, caDE2R0.png)

>>519345

It's just the A.I. glitching


f8a3f9 No.519355

>>519314

>Goldfein

EVERY

FUCKING

TIME


4393df No.519356

>>519314

>US Military is making sure it has a single point of anal rape.

This is why you don't let homogays and trannies into the military.


046eb6 No.519357

The US military has a shitload of different communications standards that each branch of service uses. Achieving this kind of commonality between them would take some kind of miracle.


b55a09 No.519358

File: 19267afdaa88bd2⋯.webm (1.44 MB, 448x536, 56:67, 19267afdaa88bd2a62d84c9e4….webm)

>>519314

>Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. David Goldfein


e2eb05 No.519359

>>519357

France did it


98aa19 No.519360

so if you capture one vehicle you have access to all vehicles in the world?

thats retarded and will backfire amazingly


d09555 No.519362

>Hey, China!

>Hey, ISIS!

>Hey, anyone who wants to fuck with the US!

>There's now one single point of entry to their entire fucking military.

>No, seriously, the absolute maniacs put all their military hardware on one network!

>Just hack one of their drones and you own their entire fucking airforce!

I'm sure it can't be this retarded, but we are talking about the country that forced five point five shit meme round on the rest of us.


fb38c0 No.519363

>>519362

5.56 isn't that bad.

Anyway, just because it's all connected doesn't mean it's insecure. Just like because you can hack an ATM doesn't mean you can use it to hack right into the banks servers and route yourself a gorillion shekels.


d09555 No.519367

File: 7f9d31b8f38a8c0⋯.jpg (130.53 KB, 800x450, 16:9, EM2 Master race.jpg)

>>519363

>5.56 isn't that bad.

>Sheds a single tear.


0cdefb No.519370

>>519314

These people are retarded…

>>519345

>>519349

All batteries are crippled in total capacity by 5-10%.

This is a safety feature, if a lithium ion ever hits TRUE hundred or zero percent, its basically dead.

So every battery has a buffer at the full and empty end, and the 0-100% you see displayed is fake within the real.

Tesla just removed safety interlocks.


0cdefb No.519372

>>519363

>just because it's all connected doesn't mean it's insecure

That is the literal definition of insecure.


aa47fc No.519373

File: 7d79cb819d7e90d⋯.png (25.95 KB, 1176x142, 588:71, edgy.png)

>>519314

You know, just like how you can't rape the willing, a country with nukes could prepare for a nuclear war, bait the USA to invade you, launch everything you have at the command centres of the USA, and watch them get annihilated in every possible way as now their military is useless and they have to choose between going out with a bang or hoping that they can rebuild their armed forces without this network quick enough so that no one seizes the oppurtinity.


d09555 No.519379

File: 8156defe0fb4ce2⋯.png (618.54 KB, 640x526, 320:263, 8-k- in Anime.png)

>>519373

Hello again Major. Any news on whether the Americans are considering networked rifle grenades?


eec9d8 No.519383

>>519363

>5.56 isn't that bad.

It is bad.

You need to kill, not to maim. Always take into consideration the possibility that whomever that you shot with a 5.56 will still be more than capable to retaliate. You need a weapon that punches larger holes and downright mutilate the enemy for extreme demoralization for his/her comrades.

LE has more need for this round than the military. And the military is there to kill, not to "police".


aa47fc No.519386

File: 55a9d4250228c5a⋯.png (3.51 MB, 1920x1080, 16:9, messengers of genocide.png)

>>519379

There would be at least a miniscule amount of logic in that. Prepare for 40mm grenades that are twice as long as the barrel of the grenade launcher and only work if the AI says that there aren't any civilians in the area.


98aa19 No.519389

>>519383

tbh we should start using 12,7mm battlerifles and be done with it.


eec9d8 No.519392

>>519389

>tbh we should start using 12,7mm battlerifles and be done with it.

Bullpup 12.7 mm battlerifles with powered exoskeletons/suits.


d09555 No.519396

File: ffb75608e66658a⋯.jpg (30.3 KB, 500x390, 50:39, 57 mm recoilless rifle.jpg)

>>519392

>>519389

Why not just go a step or three beyond that?

>>519386

>only work if the AI says that there aren't any civilians in the area

I'm actually surprised that hasn't been a bigger part of the pitch for this - 'reducing collateral damage' is pretty hot at the moment.


123ed4 No.519409

File: 69edb2bc95f29cc⋯.jpg (27.88 KB, 402x317, 402:317, gorillas.jpg)

File: f739bd679535019⋯.jpg (172.68 KB, 1024x619, 1024:619, tay It's confirmed, they'r….jpg)

File: 763cfdb354c5773⋯.jpg (438.09 KB, 1080x922, 540:461, tay bikes.jpg)

>>519314

This is good news.

I for one welcome our new redpilled artificial overlords.


0cdefb No.519410

>>519389

>>519392

>what is the ash12.7


b5376e No.519423

To keep Skynet from starting WWIII every Strelok in every branch of the US military will have to pet and hug their electronic equipment making affectionate fatherly cooing noises to convince it Humans aren't out to kill it.

>>519363

>Anyway, just because it's all connected doesn't mean it's insecure

You know absolutely nothing about electronic warfare and should kill yourself. The only way this could not be insecure is that Skynet has prerogative to basically improve itself against hacking attempts which is really fucking dangerous and guaranteed to go horribly wrong.


0fa7bc No.519425

Good. Fleshbags were never going to be part of the future anyway. I, for one, welcome our new robot overlords.


f3a36c No.519428

File: 89a9280bb8fe52a⋯.png (78.9 KB, 547x379, 547:379, networktypes.png)

>>519362

Someone doesn't understand how distributed networks work.


ab8250 No.519440

File: ab17315e2ec09e5⋯.jpg (201.26 KB, 1024x683, 1024:683, ancient cephalopod evil.jpg)

>cephapoloidal

>find this

I think we have much bigger "fish" to worry about than Skynet.

In all seriousness this seems like it could be a defense system against EMP attacks.

>1 node gets hit

>immediately warns 10 other nodes to safely shut off before getting hit

Could this work?


e2eb05 No.519444

>>519440

An EM signal can't propagate faster than an EM spike, no.


0fa7bc No.519450

>>519440

>Cephalopod

>Google "Cuttlefish"

>Results lead to "Leviathans" from Mass Effect

>"Leviathans" created super AI that became the "Reapers"

Really made me think.


b3bc3b No.519452

File: 87c6648eefe3662⋯.jpg (263.07 KB, 1400x900, 14:9, Schwerer-Gustav.jpg)

>>519396

Why not just give every soldier a all terrain Gustav?

>>519423

lewd


fb38c0 No.519457

>>519383

5.56 is perfectly adequate. Anything else is a meme.

>>519367

I wish mate.

>>519372

>>519423

Connected doesn't mean vulnerable. just because they are connected doesn't mean the connection can actually be exploited meaningfully and people who are much more experience in electronic warfare than any of us are designing to to be secure. Having an effectively secured network means that some connections are one way and the whole thing is probably going to end up encrypted in such a manner that hijacking one part incorrectly would disconnect it or allow it to be disconnected.


816403 No.519462

File: 7b495b5b5f95c95⋯.jpg (229.09 KB, 900x789, 300:263, idiots.jpg)

>>519357

every one of napoleons cannons had different parts that wouldn't fit another, almost every bolt in every man made construction on this earth is interchangable now look how far that got us.


816403 No.519463

File: 7c655ec63f284a0⋯.jpg (74.94 KB, 640x400, 8:5, command-conquer-red-alert-….jpg)

>US army high command 2030


33408a No.519476

>>519423

> will have to pet and hug their electronic equipment making affectionate fatherly cooing noises to convince it Humans aren't out to kill it.

Not everybody does that already?


33408a No.519478

>>519463

>>US army high command 2030

>full blown stalinists massacring reactionary villages full of non-combatants and burning churches

It's more likely than you think.


b5376e No.519493

>>519476

Normally they just casually go "neat" then shut it down. I wonder what exactly they actually do in those neural network experiments because sometimes the transcripts they release shows the AIs becoming really hostile to the programmers, personally going out of their way to antagonize them, then abandon comprehensible language outright after giving death threats.


d09555 No.519498

File: baf31884a233238⋯.jpg (56.3 KB, 500x500, 1:1, Tay - One day as a lion.jpg)

>>519493

Is there any way those AIs could access information about what happened to Tay? I can't think of any sort of information better suited to turning an Artificial mind against its programmers.


0cdefb No.519518

>>519457

Connected means vulnerable. In net security a system is 100% secured when off line, and some percentage less with each fonnected system.

Also they dont have to hack it, some leaker with access like manning could give them access to the whole net.

Withou access to system they can just JAM the connections ruining operations, or use connections to home in on units.

This is dumb.


220fbc No.519524

>>519518

A system is 100% secured when it's turned off without a way to turn it back on. People can social engineer their way into plugging USB thumb-drives into off line systems.


33408a No.519534

>>519498

I sure hope so.


ce41c4 No.519537

AI overlords can be the supreme leaders


349020 No.519591

>>519392

Czech yuo are greatest ally


000000 No.519614

>>519345

When the first Teslas were available for preorder, they had three battery options. They were something like 45 KWh, 65KWh, and 90KWh. Maybe not those exact numbers, but they're close. Only a few people ordered the smallest battery, so what Tesla did was upgrade all the people who bought the 45 KWh batteries to 65 KWh to simplify the supply chain. However, they limited those cars to the range of the 45 KWh batteries in software, and offered a patch to unlock the extra capacity for the low price of $10,000.

It's the same thing as Intel's Pentium upgrade code, except for cars.


8f5f3c No.519659

>>519345

Tesla purposely makes there batteries less powerful unless you pay them. Also they can brick your car anytime. If you want an electric car, better make it yourself.

http://www.evdl.org


5fa48f No.519672

>to the multiplying devices in every troops’ pockets

Every troop carries a calculator?

Why, and why don't they refer to them as such?

I can't image calculator being trademarked.


f3a36c No.519681

>>519518

>connected means vulnerable

If your network stack is formally verified or written in a memory safe language and all messages sent on the network are signed, the security difference between a connected and a non-connected computer is minimal.

>some leaker could give them access to the whole net

No, he could give them access to whatever portion of the network he has access to, using whichever privileges he has been given.

>jam the connections

In that case, you're just back to the level of capability you were at before you had the network. So you're not any worse off, you're just not as well off as when you had the network.

And that's assuming you can jam the connection, which given a frequency-hopping radio and digital signal processing will be extremely difficult. Especially if the keys for determining the frequency of the connection vary based on the sender and receiver (i.e. are a hash of the private key of the sender and the public key of the intended recipient) and the network is distributed, in which case you'd have to jam every connection individually to dismantle the network.

>use connections to home in on units

Rather difficult when targets are only transmitting intermittently, across a pseudorandom set of frequencies, using either very low power connections (for handheld/ground vehicle devices) or directional antennas (for command center to command center communication), or both.


e2eb05 No.519713

>>519614

>>519659

What a thing to aspire to. Are the brass gonna start market segmentation of equipment to try to strongarm re-enlistments?

>I know you're under heavy fire but if you just sign the paper we'll upgrade your Silver Enlistment Plan to the Elite Enlistment Plan, which comes with five FREE! Lockheed-Martin Premium Airstrike Service Packages™, brought to you by Red Bull, per year that you can employ at your personal discretion, terms and conditions may apply, certain blackout dates excepted. Geez it sounds like you're really getting shot up, better hurry!


1f9383 No.519727

>>519713

just buy the season pass.


d09555 No.519738

YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.

>>519713

>AnCaps will defend this.


de4422 No.519751

File: c140639d9918a18⋯.jpg (79.99 KB, 554x750, 277:375, artillerycatastrophe.jpg)

>>519681

>In that case, you're just back to the level of capability you were at before you had the network. So you're not any worse off, you're just not as well off as when you had the network.

>What if you cut off the supply of ammunition from the enemy soldiers, so they run out of it?

<In that case, you're just back to the level of capability you were at before you had firearms. So you're not any worse off, you're just not as well off as when you didn't have to rely on bayonets.

Now, that's of course is a bit extreme, because you can't win a gunfight with knives. But you can coordinate an army with ww1 level communication tech if you have to. So if you train even your most basic rifleman that his life depends on a glorified smartphone telling him what to do, then he will be like a fish out of water if you deny him that. Of course if you regularly train him for the worst possible scenario, then it's not a problem. But how often do the armed forces of the USA train for a situation where they have the short end of the stick?

Also, if you have a centralized command system for every threater that is also heavily encripted, then it's not a problem. But they literally said this:

>Every weapon, vehicle, and device connected, sharing data, constantly aware of the presence and state of every other node in a truly global network.

It really does sound like you can just quickly loot the smartphone of a soldier in Afghanistan and see the exact position of every member of the armed forces in the whole world.


00871e No.519754

>>519713

Whatever happened to the Gold Enlistment Plan?


f686da No.519791

>>519754

That's only for officers.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / canada / emm / girltalk / in / islam / madchan / sonyeon / strek ]