>>57980
> sissies pitching a characteristic fit at the moment and not using this thread as intended
I wonder if that may be why they've been collectively banished to a cyclical containment thread?
>>57986
> Well, I expect him to permanently damage the board based on the actions he's already taken.
Given the antics of the sissies, I think your "damage" is my "clean up" for the board.
>>57992
> How fucking retarded do you have to be to type in stutters…
That was deliberately written for effect, to indicate a statement made on the verge of tears. Note the extremely sharp transition back to my normal writing voice in the very next paragraph.
That's also something that anyone who has lurked for two years should recognize.
hownew.ru/?
>>58002
> it's hard not to feel like the original community us dead, and hard not to feel like feminization content is to blame.
Agreed.
> make the board inclusive of all facets of the overarching kink, and not trying to stamp out the things that just doesn't interest them specifically
The problem is the sissies trying to assimilate everything. If they're allowed to run amok, they really do shit up the entire board, or at least the B4mb1s did, which seems to have been the tipping point for action. There was a thread a year or two ago that was an interesting discussion - we even had someone turn up who claimed to be part of a group mind and the conversation was fascinating. As far as I could tell, he was either what he claimed to be or a mind-reader. The sissy brigade showed up to whine about the discussion that wasn't about their kink and to generally be annoying, like whiny children in an audience throwing insults at a panel of scholars.
>>58003
Looks like the first actual topicpost in the containment thread, 31 hours after the thread opened.
Can we get him G0ddess Gr4c1e's H4pp1ness Curse as his reward?
>>58005
> The Board Owner (along with other anons) suspected that sissification and feminization threads were an entry point for shitters who didn't understand or were outright hostile to imageboard culture, and that these people were driving out other anons. Not everyone into these fetishes is a bad poster, but given their behaviour in both here and the meta thread, I'm inclined to believe he's right.
They don't all have to be bad posters to produce this kind of response - just enough to give them all a bad name.
>>58006
> ban sissy hypno. It seems like the easiest solution.
This is giving the sissies one last chance to behave.
>>58007
> Maybe this should be treated as the discussion thread for this policy since that's practically the only way its been used since it was created and the actual sissy containment thread should be a new one?
It's a cyclical, the policy discussion will roll off the thread eventually.
>>58012
> you can't deny sissy shit is the lifeblood of this board. Congrats hotpocket, you killed the board.
A slow board with quality is better than a raging torrent of shit.
>>58016
> >jannies attempt trial containment
> >rather than deal with it for two weeks all of the trannies are having a massive sperging fit
> Honestly you should have predicted this.
The sissies seem to want to be banned outright. I wonder if they just have a persecution complex and work to cause persecution when they don't have enough?
>>58018
> instead of doing an all-out ban
Logically, the reason is to offer the sissies one last chance to behave.