/hypno/ - Hypnochan

Check out V1v3’s site. He had one, as far as I know, it supposedly conditions you to not eat junk food.

>>45317

he has quite a few actually. Many of them focusing on working out becoming a submissive act. Give them a chance. I also suggest training with his new file hypno virus. cheers

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:87752dd7fd88cd8505affabfa987e19a35f35e96&dn=Erotic%20Hypnosis

Something by Victoria Wizell

Jack Stock has some amazing files, probably.

Some of the newer WMM files aren't so bad either since cheap microphones have come a long way compared to the ones used by 3MG forever ago. Though most of 3MG files that aren't 100% sexual tend to be bad either in sound quality or content.

Coach Josh isn't so bad either, but he looks like he is super busy and hasn't pumped out a new file in over a year so… Eh?

>>45337

Actually the real MVP

Well, the femdom bodybuilding thread has taken an interesting turn along these lines. >>44417 has a quick status summary. It started at >>42837 and went from there. Project "Wolfgirl" is still in an early phase and additional input from other anons is very welcome.

Solid weightloss advice is very much lacking after someone mentioned the issue in >>44491 but got butthurt after failing reading comprehension on >>44538 and never answered the serious questions at the top of that post and in the later >>44774 / >>44775 posts.

Requesting progress on this project

>>45427

Not butthurt at all, only figured that you were not open to further discussion after you started name calling.

You only cited the laws of physics to support your claims on nutrition, in spite of the fact that billions of dollars have been spent trying to prove that HCLF is a healthy diet. The truth is that the government approved diet is what has received most of the grant money to 'prove' that is true.

IMHO, they have failed to prove it, but an additional problem with medical studies is they are very complex, constrained by moral issues, and run by humans who are subject to bias. The medical studies on fasting are just beginning, but even if I cite them you would not understand them with out a great deal of study.

I gather from following the wolfgirl posts that your primary goal is performance. If that is true, perhaps you could listen to elite performers in the combat sports. They can afford the advice of super smart and educated folks in the field of nutrition, plus the advice is at least proven in an n=1 study, or else they would find someone with better advice.

Consider Georges St. Pierre. He dominated his weigh class in MMA for many years, and then went on to win the belt in a second weigh class. That seem like high level performance to me.

You could invest 9 min to listen to him speak about fasting here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W_KS3RQbB5g

Or you could invest many hours to read and watch Dr Jason Fung's lectures, as I suggested in your thread.

Or you could just call me a lardball again… Its your project.

>>45545

Request granted

TTS - research in progress for improved vocal layering, no real help expected here from a board where the state-of-the-art is "here's a torrent for IVONA Salli"

scripts - outline begun, additional research needed for inductions/deepeners/awakeners, significant "think time" still needed for main text, ideas very welcome

Don't worry about the project being abandoned - I don't think the prototype is going to let me abandon the project…

>>45556

> figured that you were not open to further discussion after you started name calling

Which was a failure of reading comprehension - I, the persona typing this, did nothing of the sort. There's a reason, clearly explained, that the bulk of >>44538 is redtext. And if you want to say that that's still me, you're missing the point of Project "Wolfgirl" entirely.

> HCLF is a healthy diet

Assuming HCLF is "high carb low fat" leads to the obvious response that neither I nor the prototype ever said that - her response was entirely focused on calorie restriction with no consideration for composition of dietary calorie sources. You can eat only McDonald's and lose weight - the trick is to not eat too many Big Macs!

> the government approved diet

You mean the diet recommended by whatever lobby had the deepest pockets that day? I've never really followed the "food pyramid" - and I'm not fat. People who do follow it tend to end up diabetic and obese. Hmmm, I wonder if the government's advice is, at the very best and in the most charitable light, completely useless? What a surprise. Also an interesting way to breed trust in government out of the population over a few generations. Oops!

> even if I cite them you would not understand them

You don't know that. I also asked questions about the details, which I expect that you understand if you are advocating for the concept.

> your primary goal is performance

Maybe. I'm not entirely sure yet. Performance seems to be a good interim goal and a reasonable proxy for overall health that is far more attractive than health itself to most people. As a goal, it also lets me turn obesity on its ear - starting out fat just means you have "built-in" weights to lift!

> 9 min to listen to him speak about fasting

I prefer written sources because those are easier to use for reference later. That clip is nice, but says very little about the details I asked about. How long is "short" here? Is water allowed? Liquid foods? Fats but not sugars? Sports drinks?

>>45556

>in spite of the fact that billions of dollars have been spent trying to prove that HCLF is a healthy diet. The truth is that the government approved diet is what has received most of the grant money to 'prove' that is true.

So, what is the consensus on HCLF? I'm not sure how biased the researches are, but it's a hype in quite a few countries nowadays. So, I thought that HCLF is the "new government approved diet", no?

The government approved diet:

http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet (with sources)

or the nhs https://www.nhs.uk/live-well/ (more practical)

you can figure the rest out by yourself.

>>45670

Oh, I see… HCLF is out of question over there :D Thanks!

>>45670

> Not paleo or keto

> Not /fit/

Don't trust them

>>45887

Keto is super easy for people who can't stop eating fatty foods. For diets it's either you cut fats (sans good fats from produce) or you cut carbs. You can cut both if you plan on also building muscle (not just toning).

If you just plan on losing fat but keeping mass, then keto is your quickest and best bet. The hitch being you can't have cheat days but you can down all the cheese, meats, creamy sauces, bacon, butter, cream cheese, eggs, etc. you want until you are full (steadily, since fats will fill you fast).

>>45556

I finally have a possible mechanism for what you've been talking about to work. Basically, metabolism is more complex than sugars/fats/etc. + oxygen -> energy. In animals, oxidative respiration drives ATP synthesis and biological processes actually run on ATP. ATP seems to be unstable? For some reason, it's not used to store energy but is consumed as it's produced. Anyway, this leaves another option for "calories out" - food "burned" to produce ATP that is "wasted" somehow.

As long as you can dissipate the resulting heat - and this may be part of normal thermoregulation - you can burn more calories than your motion implies. This part of "calories out" could be affected very strongly by hormones and ambient temperature. Indeed, this would be another effect of significant fat - fat is a fairly good thermal insulator and a layer of "blubber" would greatly reduce the need to burn energy to maintain body temperature. For aquatic animals in cold environments, such blubber is needed to sustain life. For obese humans in warm environments, this can further reduce the ability to dissipate heat, thus impeding activity levels to avoid overheating. In very warm environments, such "blubber" can itself be life-threatening in humans, preventing the dissipation of heat produced by necessary physiological processes.

>>45670

> http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/healthy-diet

> > Less than 10% of total energy intake from free sugars

> > Less than 30% of total energy intake from fats

So what the hell is the other more than 60% of total energy intake supposed to be? That much protein would probably destroy your kidneys. This sounds like the same HCLF bullshit. On a side note to >>45556 - we agree that HCLF is not a healthy diet.

>>45887

> Don't trust them

Right. On closer examination, those recommendations are the same old HCLF crap that's making people fat!

>>45922

Keto is an interesting option. I'm trying to keep the nutritional advice supportable from first principles, if I even include any at all. It'll be omitted if I can't find reliable sources.

>>46177

Hang on… What is the difference between keto and LCHF?

Ah… You mean HCLF!! Sorry. In this case I agree. HCLF is not healthy.

>>46927

See?