[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / canada / imouto / leftpol / loomis / quests / russian / startrek / v9k ]

/girltalk/ - Girl Talk

Female board for 8chan's females
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Flag *
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Oekaki
Show oekaki applet
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options
dicesidesmodifier
Password (For file and post deletion.)

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, swf, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 2 per post.


RULES /// FAQ

Board has been removed from index temporarily.


File: f49c6de58fdd54d⋯.png (613.08 KB, 500x600, 5:6, tumblr_n362sasPMV1t95blxo1….png)

a01530 No.10905

So Femanons what do you think of this very particular type of girl, the one tha always tries to controll her partner, and always goes for the "betas" and passive guys.

They all tend to say that they like "cute shy" guys or some dumb shit like that, but in the end what they tend to like is the power that she has over her partners/ dates.

So opinions, also if you are one of those please explain why do you like to fuck your partner's mind so much?

f73ac8 No.10912

File: f9cfcd36195d305⋯.jpg (9.67 KB, 180x150, 6:5, sNAIL GIRLS NEVER CHANGE.jpg)

It makes me feel powerful, tbh.

I like being the one on control, and I don't find myself as submissive as most girls. I like to take the lead on a relationship.


a01530 No.10916

>>10912

And hows is that going on for you?

Also, why is that your type always try to manipulate the poor guy?


c9eb65 No.10925

>>10916

From personal experience, I'd say something during their early life. Maybe they felt "wronged" by something/one, and they just seek out a way to "right" it. At least, that seems to be unisex around these parts, not sure about elsewhere.


54bcdb No.10930

it's me tbh

I like fucking with people

it's funny

and I have a sadist domme streak a mile wide

dating a shy, awkward guy makes it more likely I get one comfortable with being controlled


f73ac8 No.10936

>>10916

Woah there, easy. I am not an evil mastermind. I just like being in control.

I wouldn't manipulate anyone for the sole purpose of hruting them.


bcfc77 No.10939

>>10916

This all boils down to codependency/narcissism, really. It comes out of Alcoholics Anonymous and it really is the best framework to talk about this phenomena.

The thing most men, and women, with codependency issues don't understand that they have an unhealthy relationship with the self.

Why do controllers seek them out? The controllers are self-centered. They're narcissists. Now, nothing is absolute, but they certainly have narcissistic qualities.

I certainly can blame the narcissist who took advantage of me, but the fact is that codependency is an unhealthy dynamic. Develop a better relationship with yourself, and you won't have to deal with someone preying on you like this. Just don't put up with abuse.

That's not to say that someone with a codependency streak can't have a good relationship, but that all depends on the severity of it. Or you can stop holding out for someone who won't take advantage or get sick of your compassion and become healthier and more mature. The choice is yours.


bcfc77 No.10943

File: 3111c560e6e19c1⋯.png (436.95 KB, 1400x1025, 56:41, assholes.png)

>>10905

>>10939

Also, to clarify a bit:

Not everyone who has a dom streak is a manipulating, evil totalitarian narcissist who wants to fuck your mind. Not every compassionate streak is necessarily a codependency.

But the fact is that you're an easy mark for =the narcissist if you have serious codependent issues. You're easy to take advantage of, it's like two peas in a pod: they perfectly complement each other. Until the codependent snaps out of it, anyways.

The problem is the codependent valuing the relationship so much due to fear of abandonment, even where abuse is receieved, they simply take it. Some snap out of it, others don't.

Personally, I'm in recovery.

Step back and learn to value yourself. You can still be compassionate, just don't be compassionate and serving to a fault. Don't be taken advantage of, and don't slip into the other extreme: narcissism.

Somewhere in the middle is a nice thing. I'm sure you're a compassionate person, and it's hard to unlearn that completely without something world changing, but the fact that you are being preyed upon by those with extreme narcissistic qualities means that you're compassionate to a fault. They can smell it on you, like sharks to blood.


fd50ca No.10946

File: a246b011b8ab784⋯.jpg (1.49 MB, 1599x2391, 533:797, Borderline Info.jpg)


bcfc77 No.10947

>>10946

That too, but the problem with those faggots is that they virtue signal for some poon and don't get any, and they're not really compassionate, they're just rock bottom losers who've learned to signal for ideals.

BPD vs NPD are very similar, but different. And they certainly both prey.


f0e226 No.10948

>>10905

I only recently discovered his board but I have related question.

I've always felt if she's better looking than me

by enough I'll let her be controlling. I'm no alpha but I can be convincing if I have to. I've just realized in any modern relationship women have all the cards thus why fight? My question here is, is it wrong if I let her call the shots but know exactly when to put my foot down and take charge? I've always been pretty good at knowing when to "flip the switch" in life when things get too real.


fa9065 No.10949

>>10912

Snail we all know by now you're a big abnormality. You want to make a beta male to raise his wife's adopted African children, instead of producing your own.

>>10936

Do you feel in charge?


bcfc77 No.10950

>>10948

As long as you're not dealing with a transient, calculating, emotionally destructive sociopath, then whatever works in your relationship. True borderlines and narcissists are incapable of actual compassion, or empathy, I think we were talking about that, and it's not exclusive to women or men.

It's whatever man, as long as you aren't being totally emasculated. Don't call it an act, it's a reaction, depending on the context it could be a healthy reaction. Asserting yourself isn't inappropriate, as long as you aren't actually hurting them or being unreasonable.

I'll try to give an example among many: a manipulator may tell you that you're responsible for their hurt feelings in being assertive when refusing to comply with their selfish wishes, and then try to further manipulate you into feeling guilty about it or something else.

Is it wrong to be assertive in this case? No. It's appropriate. If they can't understand this, or if they cry and shit their pants and don't use their big girl/boy words to actually explain it, or try further manipulation like a sociopath would, you cut all ties with them.


0bc7ff No.10951

Why can't you all just be normal people who treat each other as equals in a relationship, and as an actual individual and not a gender? Preferences for being dom-ish and sub-ish shouldn't have all this bullshit psychobabble baggage attached.

It is utterly baffling to me.


fa9065 No.10953

>>10951

Or perhaps he might be wondering why somebody would assume genders are identical, before throwing natural order out of a plane?


bcfc77 No.10954

>>10951

Dom/sub is fine, the topic is abuse and manipulation. OP asked about the subset of women who target submissive guys and then proceed to abuse them.

Narcissists, sociopaths, abusers, manipulators, preators, borderlines, it's not exclusive to women, or men, they're assholes.

You have a sense of self-worth, understand what manipulation is, and then you don't have to put up with it and you tell them to go fuck themselves. It's that simple, without the psychobabble.


0bc7ff No.10956

>>10953

You don't have to think someone is identical to think they are an equal.

But you're sound like the kind that thinks all non-whites should be gassed so that point might be lost on you.


f0e226 No.10957

>>10950

>Asserting yourself isn't inappropriate, as long as you aren't actually hurting them or being unreasonable.

Yeah, that's basically the answer I was looking for. And yeah your example checks out, the person you described sounds abysmal.

Guess I'm not bonkers then. Neat.


b5394f No.10960

>>10957

Keep in mind that many things are subjective or percieved in a way that was unintended which is why communication is important. Probably hasty to end a relationship over a single fight unless you actually make the connection right there that you're dating a borderline or straight up sociopath.

Autism tbh. Borderlines are cute how they like to outright tell you that you're rescuing them or whatever other bullshit to appeal to a white knight reflex, like they've got you all figured out. Cute in a wannabe psychopath sort of way.

Even psychologists don't want to deal with their bullshit. They just say what they think you want to hear.

A rock is a more calculating predator.


fa9065 No.10965

>>10956

That's a big assumption.


a01530 No.10969

>>10930

You seem to have problems.

>>10936

I heard that before, all my friends and even my bro got manipulated by girls that said the same thing. I'm not accusing you of being one of them, but you gotta understand that most girls that tend to go for the shy guys end up being manipulative.

>>10939

>>10943

I'm don't have problems with myself, dude, lol. I'm okay and I'm dating some girls right now, but it really bugs me that I'm surrounded by this types of relationships, I guess that I have shitty/beta male friends or something.

>>10951

No, we are not equals.

>>10954

Pretty much, yeah

>>10956

You are still wrong.

>>10950

Pretty much, although I would also say that you should always be assertive no matter what, honestly assertiveness is a good thing, it shows that you are confident, other males will threat you with respect, girls will do the same and more, the only situation where I can thing of where being "alpha" or assertive is a bad thing, is when someone has a gun pointed at your head or something.

Also, your partner should accept your assertiveness too, if she or he can't handle you being honest then ditch the girl/guy.


b5394f No.10973

>>10969

There's a point where assertiveness is nothing more than self-righteous defensiveness.

If you constantly think that your way is the right one, and dismiss the other and fail to consider what they're saying, or outright fail to empathize, you're probably not a pleasant person to be around. I believe the medical term is "fuckhead." Which is worse than being a doormat tbh.


a01530 No.10976

>>10973

lol, sure m8, I'm a fuckhead.

Also, I never said anything about not listening to other people, there are a lot of good thing that you can learn by listening to other people (and some stupid shit too) but that doesn't change the fact that you should still be assertive.


b5394f No.10980

>>10976

I didn't say you were a fuckhead, I said there is a point where one can be overly assertive, and thus be a fuckhead.

True assertiveness is half empathizing, you are correct.

Also, drop the tough guy sexual dimorphism "we're not equal" bullshit. No one cares, fag.


9351b8 No.10981

>>10973

>Has personal problem with being assertive

Figure yourself out

Being blindly assertive doesn't serve anyone. Be true and honest with yourself and others. If you don't have a clue then be assertive enough to be honest with yourself and others. Assertiveness isn't about pushing others around. It's about making decisions for yourself and acting it out. This includes the decision of innaction. To not let others push you around until you can figure out the right course of action.


b5394f No.10983

>>10981

Yeah, except I don't, and that's not what I said.

I can see you have a personal problem in the context of reading comprehension.

Crash couse: assertive, passive, and aggressive.

Assertive: "I matter and I think you need to take my feelings into account, even if my position may not be as strong".

Passive: withholding or deferential, doormat for all intents and purposes.

(Overly) Aggressive/combative/contentious: fuckhead.


f73ac8 No.10985

>>10949

I am in charge.


ccc59a No.10990

>>10905

"cute shy" guys are mixed bags.

It's easy to put them in the pushover category, but some can be very intelligent and turn out to be very patient power players and you may find yourself on the receiving end of a manipulation.

Also when you agitate them, especially in their core values, which they are very passionate about, they can react violently and unpredictable.

That said, they can react very well to positive feedback and building their character can be a very satisfying experience. But I learned to fear and be wary of the cute and shy guys and girls.


a01530 No.10991

>>10980

We aren't, what's so difficult about this concept that you can't understand?

Anyway, you guys seem to have your own shit that needs to be fixed, so I will lay back and see how this thread will evolve.


a01530 No.10992

>>10990

Isn't that just a person with mental and social problems? Also, care to give me an example of agitating them when it comes to their core values?


b5394f No.10993

>>10991

>we aren't

Yes, that's true.

Did you know that boys have a benis and girls have a bagina? Did you know that women are not as physically strong as men, even with some serious regimens or supplements, or even in rare cases of some serious life threatening adrenal stimulation in a pinch? It's true. Did you know that women are, on average, smaller than men? Wow, I'm a walking encyclopedia here. Bask in my prowess.

A good relationship is a union of mutual respect and caring. That's what's meant by equal. Preferences of domination of submissiveness are almost an aside, it's a different context. You can be a prime specimen of power lifting and still prefer to submit. People are complex, who'd have thought.


9351b8 No.10999

>>10983

You seem to be mixing up assertive with thick headed indifference.

A more healthy approach would be to view it as being forthright. Being strong willed and honest.


fa9065 No.11093

Why is this thread getting bump locked with no survivors?


a01530 No.11149

>>11093

Cuz some women around here don't wanna talk about how fucked in the head they are.

Besides, I don't think people tend to responde that much threads that are on the second page


b5394f No.11188

>>10999

I wasn't mixing up anything, I was saying that there is a point where assertiveness becomes nothing more than self-righteous defensiveness. It could be construed as such even without the extreme, but we view it as 'healthy.'

True assertiveness is half empathizing and consideration. Being strong willed is only an ideal so far as you aren't incapable of empathizing with the other.

Also, people can agree to disagree.


b2e91b No.13782

>>11093

>>11149

>Why is this thread getting bump locked with no survivors?

BO wants to show everyone how (((she's))) the most manipulative (((female))) on the board.


f73ac8 No.13815

>>11093

/pol/itics




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / canada / imouto / leftpol / loomis / quests / russian / startrek / v9k ]