[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / flutter / fur / in / sissy / tenda / trap ]

/g/ - Technology

Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Options
dicesidesmodifier

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.

File: 202428201d09bd8⋯.gif (10.72 KB, 200x200, 1:1, 1357929469471.gif)

 No.7882

Whats wrong with systemd? or Ubuntu?

 No.7890

If I recall correctly, systemd is practically super big brother, rolling EVERYTHING a system needs into one daemon. This can cause a bit of FUD/actual fear as everything from system logging, user access, services are all running under one process, hence crashing the entire system if it goes down.

As for Ubuntu, it's not quite an issue with the software as is the direction Canonical has taken in the past (Mir, their own 'open source license', moving more towards cloud from being "The Linux for Human Beings", installing Amazon Links automatically, harvesting system info, etc). TBH, if you install Ubuntu from the mini iso, you'll be better off.


 No.7893

as fsr as i knoe systemf starts several procesdes independent from each other. so there should be no problem with stability


 No.7920

>>7890

>daemon

How is that different from a demon?


 No.7940

File: 148e06ffa4b8475⋯.jpg (33.01 KB, 450x399, 150:133, dudeweed.jpg)

>>7882

nothing wrong with systemd. keep using it and be a good boy. poettering dindu nuffin. it'll grow faster and replace linux altogether. once Linus dies, Linux dies with him and Systemd will be complete replacement of it. be happy in the end that bio-luminescent in the dark CIA african-american owns every servers, workstations and super computers in easy way. you, all of (((You))) were asking for it


 No.7941

well if it takes over linux you can still use bsd ¯\_(ツ)_/¯


 No.7951

File: 6a37c42cec9e5d1⋯.jpg (69.13 KB, 695x537, 695:537, systemd-refugees-welcome-b….jpg)

system-D was pushed by Red Hat on many distros in an NSA rush to disrupt the linex community and got pretty goodresults at it.

its code, it's shitty, managed by fluently sexed morons like GERMAN NAME REDACTED and xir minions, and is so big that no man will ever look at it in a single human life.

all of the above points to CIA > RED HAT > GERMAN NAME REDACTED > goyish distros.

Avoid as cancer, then lurk more:

https://suckless.org/sucks/systemd/


 No.8032

>>7882

7554 said:

>Systemd is funded by government agencies (source: https://www.redhat.com/en/technologies/industries/government/federal), systemd has never been audited, systemd's code grows so fast that it cannot be audited correctly, systemd suffers from a severe case of scope creep (source: http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page / also read: http://without-systemd.org/wiki/index.php/Arguments_against_systemd )

Ubuntu

Developer Canonical Ltd.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canonical_(company)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LTD

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Private_company

Linux distros are just a set of default installed programs on top of the linux kernal. You are a fool if you choose to use one that is ran by a for profit LTD. That is what is wrong with using it. But honestly it probably doesn't matter, because if you have to ask you will probably be running software you install that is not respecting your freedoms. Is Ubuntu actually worse than most other distro's in practice or only in theory? I don't know and I don't care to know. I do know it is worse in at least one way, you are trusting a for profit company with your updates. In the past they have done sketchy privacy invading things. I wouldn't choose them when there are better alternatives easily available.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / animu / arepa / flutter / fur / in / sissy / tenda / trap ]