/fur/ - Furry★

They (as a concept) may or may not be gay depending on the circumstances.

The entire point of a trap is to convincingly present themselves as the opposite sex until it is revealed what set of genetilia they have. For the person being the trap, it's 100% gay. But for the person on the receiving end,

>If you're into the trap and don't know that the person is a trap until the trap is sprung, and are instantly turned off or revolted,

You are not gay, because for what you knew the trap was the opposite sex until it was found out otherwise, and you still have no intentions of changing hetero sexuality.

>If you're into the trap and don't know that the person is a trap until the trap is sprung, but are into it anyway,

You're most definitely gay, if possibly only for girly guys / manly women. no two ways about it, though the whole trap facade is rather redundant.

>>91155

i say sticking something inside a guys asshole makes you gay because your not immediately going away and punching the shit out them

>>91150 (OP)

>>91155

The biggest fags are the ones who act like traps are a not-gay thing.

what a cute dragon

>>91150 (OP)

This reminds me of the OP for "Miss Kobayashi's Dragon Maid". I wish there were more dragons and a little less maids in that show....

I'm not going to change your mind either, as I agree with your statement. Plus, >>91155 (checked) is absolutely right.

>>91168

its about Maids..... <. > what do you want them to do? make it Mis Kobayashis Dragon Emporum?

>>91169

No, I'd simply like more dragons. For example, Tohru's draconic features nicely fit into some of the events of the series, like flying Kobayashi to work, or having Kobayashi and co. use Tohru's large body as a raft when they take a trip to the beach. On the other hand, Kanna, Elma, Quetzalcoatl, and Fafnir haven't really used their dragon forms in any remarkable way, which is disappointing to me. Granted, I still need to finish the anime (and probably check out the manga at some point), so maybe there's room for more dragons down the line.

>>91155

>If you're into traps to begin with and specifically intend to fuck traps you know are traps instead of the opposite sex,

Bruh that's ultra gay.

They're gay but they're the best kind of gay.

>>91200

>If you're into traps to begin with

>and specifically intend to fuck traps you know are traps instead of the opposite sex,

When was that stated? That entire exilination never touched on whether someone goes out of their way to bang traps. Which is absolutely gay.

Though, if you (as a male) only intend to bang reverse traps, or you (as a female) only intend to bang traps, is that gay?

Being attracted to males is gay, by definition.

However, being attracted to traps (who, by definition of the term, are males who convincingly appear to be female) is in general not an attraction to masculinity or any male feature except for genitalia. Therefore, to label such attraction as making someone gay is misleading and avoiding it for that reason is valid.

also, liking traps usually makes you bi, not gay.

super gay