[–]▶ No.90470>>90500 >>90950 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
Don't you think you should have one by now?
What are you waiting for?
▶ No.90471>>90473 >>90481
because only zoophiles get feral art
▶ No.90473>>90475
>>90471
You get off to sexualized animals in general anon, you're ALL zoophiles, only difference is you have to dress them up halfway in a human body to convince yourself they're not the animals they actually are.
▶ No.90475>>90476
>>90473
actually zoophiles are the largest consumer of feral art in the fandom its kinda of a calling card if someone has alot of feral art they are zoo.
the more you know theme
▶ No.90476>>91022
>>90475
Be that as it may, Zoophilia itself is an attraction to "animals", not specifically feral, mindless or otherwise, just anything that can be considered an "animal". So, with that said, furries in general are zoophiles, only difference is how "pure" they like their animals physically.
▶ No.90478>>90549
>>90477
still an animal representation bro
▶ No.90479
>>90477
A grand majority of ferals and anthros have the same "human" intellect, the only difference is their setting, on average. So if that were truly the case, then it still doesn't make a difference.
▶ No.90481>>90490
>>90471
This
I want to fuck a furry human, not a dog
▶ No.90482
>>90480
You're the one who's confused. Zoophilia isn't specifically, nor solely the mental state of an animal, it's also the physical/behavioral characteristics of an animal, the same characteristics that are the main appeal and point of anthro characters. Ergo, furries are zoophiles.
▶ No.90484
>>90483
Nope, the term you're looking for to fit that definition is "bestiality", my point still stands. Besides, people peddle semantics all the time here, what makes this one any different? Because now it's a label/negative connotation (you) don't like?
▶ No.90488
>>90485
It's not a matter of "what I think" it's a fact based of their definitions, what "people and popular media assume/think" it means is irrelevant. Furries paint themselves as zoophiles by sexualizing "animals", neither I nor any other outside force played any part in it.
▶ No.90490
>>90481
you still wish it had an animal cock, so your half a zoophile.
▶ No.90497>>90499 >>90576
>>90496
My usage is the proper usage, the literal textbook definition. No one wants to recognize the facts because it comes with negative connotations and associations, simple as that.
▶ No.90499
>>90497
furries fuck animals forget the details.
▶ No.90500>>90508
>>90470 (OP)
Because those white closet faggots here can't even take some guy in a fursona calling them out for being the retards they are.
If they dared to have a feral fursona their head would explode because LOOOL Zoophilia!!! Now time to fap to that cubfur thread!
Fucking Russians man.
▶ No.90508>>90511
>>90500
sorry dude if you need a four legged fursona your one step from becoming a zoophile because if you normalize and desensitize yourself to feral art thats how you get into zoophillia its the same way lolicon works now you can laugh but i want you to prove me wrong without using political statements or the goverment or any bs.
▶ No.90511>>90518
>>90508
And not using punctuation means you're one step away from being a retard.
▶ No.90517
>>90516
>"Zoophilia" - a word already defined clearly as sex with real animals in the public eye
The post you quoted has definitions from multiple sources, none of which match what you've just said. Read it again. The distinction between real and fictional is not a factor in defining it. The attraction to animals doesn't change just by adding or removing a dimension. You're just trying to make things up to fit the argument you planned in your head.
▶ No.90518
>>90511
shut up zoophile. stop defending animal rape. go back to the onion forums if you need a safe space before i call peta on your home address.
▶ No.90530>>90563
I don't have a single fursona, but among my many characters, I have two quadrupeds. In the setting for which all my characters were made, they have sapience and hold jobs. Sapient quads are very uncommon there. I don't have the tiniest interest in sexualizing non-sapient animals, in fiction or real life; I'm only attracted to someone I can have a real conversation with. But that's just me.
I've met and talked with people (online) who were into bestiality/zoophilia, but I don't understand the attraction at all. I've had a few try to explain it, but it's like any fetish you don't have-- it doesn't compute.
▶ No.90531
We all know that monstergirl fags, catgirl fags, and furfags are not the same, and this is because the former two have a sexual attraction to the constituent characteristics of animals, but not the overall appearance of one. Furries pick up that slack by preferring the whole breakfast combo meal; muzzle, paws, fur and all. Otherwise they wouldn't be a furry, they'd be jerking it to human shit. My point is that it's well accepted how furries want the full package of animal features like nobody else.
Except zoophiles. Hmmmm.mm.m...mm..m.....
▶ No.90546
>>90516
If you like said character for them mimicing the specific actions and manorisms of an animal, then congrats, you're attracted to animals.
▶ No.90548
Neither of those are feral?
▶ No.90549>>90675
>>90478
>Jack off to niggers
>Uhhhh they're monkeys you zoophile
▶ No.90563>>90626
>>90530
>snip
>pandering to the demographic.
still doesnt make it okay. you didnt mention that its not okay you just tried to thinly viel bestiality as being OK hey man i got a feral and they all hold job in my lore so feral characters are okay to be sexualized its not animals at all.
yeah thats you buddy your like 0.......00000000000.0000001% of the entire fandom. glad you dont like animals though.
▶ No.90576
>>90497
Let's instead argue what is an animal, because if humans count in this lazy definition, all humans are zoophiles. That's a dumb way to take this, so let's at least assume "animal" at very least means "different from human by lacking X qualities".
▶ No.90597>>90674
To feralfurs complaining about being lumped in with zoophiles: Take it like a man.
▶ No.90622
Feral dogs are sexy, prove me wrong.
Protip: you can't
▶ No.90626>>90673
>>90563
>you just tried to thinly viel bestiality as being OK
Except that I didn't. People who are into bestiality don't care about sapience. I do-- if the fictional critter can't hold a conversation, I'm not attracted.
>>90575
Exactly my point, yes.
▶ No.90630
Animals are aesthetically appealing and the thematic implications of the natural world are compelling for story (ie, balance, predation, survival, growing up quick, motherly abandonment.) Hence, I have feral OCs and fursona. They give me what a human with an animal head can't always fit that, not without bringing something else to the table.
I get why people might think its immoral, but the central idea behind mine is for my fascination. Sex is primary absent from how I work.
▶ No.90672
because feral art is associated with zoophilia and is a zoophile calling card.
▶ No.90673>>90727
>>90626
yeah but its not that it cant talk your attracted to its shape and form sexually when you fuck you dont hold a full blown regular conversation about quantum physics while your ejaculating 20 gallons of semen with a straight face while eating and sipping don perry and eating a 20oz steak while the macro sized waiter comes behind and anal vores you both and rips ass while doing it.
▶ No.90674
>>90597
knots dont work like that with real animals.
▶ No.90675
>>90549
>jacks off to your mom
>oh shit i like whales now i must be a fatophile.
fucking shit was like landing on mars i couldnt
tell if it was her vagina or a fat roll.
▶ No.90727
>>90673
Uh, I think you just went sailing off a cliff with that one. Care to take a deep breath and try again? No, I'm not attracted to non0sapient quadrupeds. I'm not attracted to real animals because they're not sapient. Yes, sapience is a key factor in my attraction to a fictional quad; I may not be discussing quantum physics during sex, but I'd want to have a conversation beforehand.
▶ No.90950>>92777
>>90470 (OP)
>why don’t you have a feral form of your fursona
Feral’s can’t talk.
▶ No.91022>>91024
>>90476
Jokes on you. Humans are animals, and that makes you a zoophile!
▶ No.91024
>>91022
jokes on you that means animals that are not human ie zoophile.
ie zoophillia is just bestiality with romantic bs attached its still a paraphillia and is always sexual.
▶ No.92777