/fur/ - Furry★

>>90309 (OP)

no, yes, this isn't positive

what a trainwreck he might as well gone on camera and said i know i have wont guys but im a zoophile too roflmfao.

>>90311

this furry cant afford a manager.

hey guys how can i turn something thats family friendly and normal into a steaming trainwreck forever. i know lets totally destroy esports. horaay...

:T

This was the best thing ever, I was loosing my shit. You could hear the pure excitement in Sonicfox's voice though.

>>90332

autism makes them get excited over things that arent apropos.

>>90344

how did he even expect that thing to go.

>>90351

>Faggot acts like a faggot

Color me surprised.

>>90351

typical black guy trying to be something hes not, sorry if im racist but hes trying too hard.

So, I've always been chill when it comes to you furfags. So rather than lump you all in with this absolute fucking cuntwaffle, I'd rather ask you, what realistically are the chances that some sort of concerted response and rejection of his bullshit, from in your community do you reckon is possible?

Is the furry community totally fucking fucked when it comes to this sort of hyper partisan shit? Can it be saved at all from it? Genuinely curious.

>>90362

no it cant be saved and they seek nothing its just a melting pot of fetishism and lying to themselves and seeking validation where no validation can be had.

>>90361

>implying they didn't willingly jump in front on their own

Key & Peel were right to insult those race traitors.

>>90362

If they won't reject Zaush for raping someone or the multitide of proven animal fuckers or pedophiles, they won't reject this.

They did reject Chewfox for being on Tyra Banks and... nothing else, she didn't make the fandom look bad but Dragoneer thinks the fandom is his domain and threw her out the airlock because of his feelings. You know, the very guy who told a rape victim to keep quiet.

>>90365

Do you just go around to every thread and spread your faggotry?

>>90366

What about their claims was untrue?

>>90367

all his claims are untrue this troll above you is just trying to play damage control so the rest of his little sick fucks wont get outed.

quoted for accuracy:

>If they won't reject Zaush for raping someone or the multitide of proven animal fuckers or pedophiles, they won't reject this.

They did reject Chewfox for being on Tyra Banks and... nothing else, she didn't make the fandom look bad but Dragoneer thinks the fandom is his domain and threw her out the airlock because of his feelings. You know, the very guy who told a rape victim to keep quiet.

>>90367

I'm saying he's literally going from thread to thread spamming this same shit every time. The fact that kero is catching shit for his degeneracy proves him wrong but that's conveniently forgotten.

>>90361

Repubs as a whole throw themselves, their peers, and everyone they can under the bus. They learn it from their idiotic leaders.

>>90370

because kero still hasnt been brought to justice and hes gotten away free to roam and continue hooking up with his zoo buddies as has sephius and nelizar who got off easy on animal abuse and then nothing, the whole internet gave up because of legal BS instead of pushing the issue.

its shit like this that makes furries look worse because they get away.

>>90371

As if the Democrats are any less shitty, hah.

>>90309 (OP)

Nazifags are mad (ironically most of them hang around here) and he greeted all the furries. So it was perfect.

>>90311

>>90321

>>90320

Friendly reminder that you are on a furfaggot board and you are closet furfaggots you fat redneck pieces of American shit.

>>90309 (OP)

There's nothing good or bad for the fandom. It is however a sign that being a furry is less and less unacceptable, which is obvious because people quickly put their disgust aside when there's money to be made.

Personally I disliked the speech for an unusual reason: Gay, Black? How marginalized indeed. Everything republicans hate? I'll even grant that, WP:Assume Good Faith and so on. But what went unmentioned? The fursuit. You don't pick a fursuit up at wal-mart for $15.35. How interesting. How bourgeois.

Those with talent and disposable income float to the top, the fundamentally normal can drown - perhaps literally - in the coming order.

>>90322

Esports and furry are a perfect match for one another.

>>90362

Political partisanism is a meme. It'll go away as the parties move around and realign themselves to the new order.

Though the ultimate ideal would be a forced confrontation with reality: Democrats move left to the point of being European style social democrats and Califurnians are forced to confront the fact that, actually, they don't want to pay 60% taxes to pay for normal people to have nice things. please don't turn this into an argument about whether taxation works or whether public services are good. the point is to advocate neither of those things in themselves, it's that rich furries are greedy and out of touch, so despite claiming to support them moralistically at present, in the end furries would break for status-quo clintonism and even tax-cut trumpism before giving up their fursuits in the name of healthcare for the plebs.

>>90377

>Nazifags

Did tumblr migrate here or something when the site killed itself?

>>90378

two of those posts were me im not a redneck im middle class.

>>90380

Why would Tumblr furries migrate here? Furry is a SFW fandom that isn't about sex :)

>>90362

It's totally fucked. The majority accept it because they're attention whoring narcissists like him.

>>90380

They migrated here because they are worthless retards who need validation for their bad decisions.

>>90379

If you're shilling for DemSoc, then you're gullible for not looking at the type of characters who endorse it. They might say good appealing talking points, but they never act on their talking points. If they can't solve it under the free market with tax cuts, then they won't be able to solve it when they have political power.

There's a very good reason why the left is trying to equivocate class with sexual/gender/racial identity, as opposed to economic status. It's because rich/power minorities (Take SonicFox for instance) can claim that they're oppressed despite living better than 99 percent of americans out there. Has it ever occurred to you why the wealth inequality gap is large in left-leaning cities like San Francisco and NYC to the point where people either live in tents or million dollar apartments? It's owed to those elites refusing to pay their share because of their "marginalized" status in society.

You might think that I'm crazy, but there's several microcosms that showcase what I'm talking about. You see it in action from cities to communities like the FGC ( >>90351 ). It's not the system that makes life better for everyone, it's the PEOPLE. If you have a lot of selfish narcissists like SonicFox ruling over others, then society would be worse for everyone. Why on earth do they need donations and political ads that attack the current parties for selfish, when they can use that money to host food drives and shelters for the average american citizen? Why do they complain about the current parties making americans poor, while they brag about cutting the finances of americans like Milo to the point of giving them a TWO million dollar debt?

They will never make a difference because they are no different.

>>90387

I'm not shilling for any political ideology, I'm much too pessimistic for that. I kind of threw in some political language just for flavour text. I do believe, as it happens, that literal furries will come to power - and it won't matter if they're democrats or republicans, because really it's much more important that they're furries.

>They might say good appealing talking points, but they never act on their talking points

I think that's precisely why enacting the talking points would be fun. Imagine if Corbyn or someone came over to the USA and took power - just imagine obviously because that's not legal - but he's from a different crowd and a different tradition. These people would be forced to let the mask slip and reveal they're not actually okay paying a 50% top rate of income tax because it reduces their ability to buy $3000 fursuits, they'd have to bugger off while people at the bottom who might not pay any income tax at all, might only be paying the lowest rate would be benefiting. Keep in mind it's a thought experiment, I'm not advocating that - I'm not saying it would work - I'm just saying, that flow of events would be fun to watch sociologically.

>There's a very good reason why the left is trying to equivocate class with sexual/gender/racial identity, as opposed to economic status.

Linguistically, I find it much more useful to call people like that liberals. Their social norms are usually those of clintonite liberalism rather than the movements of the left. Obviously they're both folded under 'the left' in a broad sense, but It's a different tradition and a different culture. It's not for nothing that California - also Reagan's home state - is the center of the world.

>It's owed to those elites refusing to pay their share because of their "marginalized" status in society.

I agree, but in a sense I might disagree on the flow of causation. It's definitely "I'm an elite, how can I avoid paying my fair share? I know, I'm actually oppressed!" rather than "I'm oppressed, I should get special privileges even if I'm already an elite!", which is what's very important. If circumstances changed, those people would quickly change as well. They don't have beliefs, they have power.

>It's not the system that makes life better for everyone, it's the PEOPLE.

I'd say the system produces those people. Furry is the way it is today because of the way the fandom was set up, systematically. There's sort of a feedback loop between systems creating people and people creating systems, but the systemic level is more malleable. Where it comes to politics, in a sense I'd say it's that those people have failed, rather than an ideological failure, but that's not a defense of the ideology: It's a further indictment of those people. They ruin everything. But if you took certain systemic changes, you could get rid of those people. There are always going to be bastards, but our current shower of bastards are the product of our current way of doing things.

>when they can use that money to host food drives and shelters for the average american citizen?

I'm not a fan of this. Charity is by nature piecemeal. That's one reason why furry charity is so unimportant except as a way for the fandom to buy respectability and salve their conscience for spending thousands of dollars to buy porn comics and fuck in hotel rooms. If you want to stop people being poor, you've got to redesign things to reduce poverty rather than just having rich people pay a tithe based on their whims. Furries already do that in a sense, subsidizing some people who're chronically irresponsible with their spending, and it shows the weakness of such a system in the internet age: People with social capital get funded, normal people die.

>Why do they complain about the current parties making americans poor, while they brag about cutting the finances of americans like Milo to the point of giving them a TWO million dollar debt?

remind me who milo is

If it's milo unspellalopolis, count me unsympathetic. He's the other side of the rich narcissist coin. My greatest satisfaction would be if that entire crowd could find themselves ruinously indebted.

This post is more political than I intended, but keep in mind, I'm in broad agreement where it matters, on the fandom. I think we dislike the same people, and identify the same group as a problem, we might not have the same politics but it's kind of an aside. What's much more important is understanding the social makeup of furry and those in power. At the very least, when creating future groups, it can provide a useful guideline for who to exclude to direct the way things are developed. More likely, it'll simply lead to a better understanding of the state of the fandom.

>>90362

Not going to happen, because the fandom has no centralized leadership who can make a focused statement.

>>90365

>If they won't reject Zaush for raping someone or the multitide of proven animal fuckers or pedophiles

Well, many did and do hate those, but again, there's no head or leader who can make a formal statement. Look at Kero, getting actively and openly shit on, or all the Zaush hate-- but because there's no one big, important person stepping up to a mic and saying, The Furry Fandom Officially Denounces (person/act)... that means we don't care?

>>90398

The fandom doesn't need centralized leadership.

"Plenty of people dislike X!!!" means very little when there's a clear cultural trend of apathy or tacit approval from the majority. If furry had centralized leadership officially denouncing them, we'd be in the same situation because everyone would know the condemnation was from one leader figure rather than from the grassroots.

>>90391

>I think that's precisely why enacting the talking points would be fun. Imagine if Corbyn or someone came over to the USA and took power - just imagine obviously because that's not legal - but he's from a different crowd and a different tradition. These people would be forced to let the mask slip and reveal they're not actually okay paying a 50% top rate of income tax because it reduces their ability to buy $3000 fursuits, they'd have to bugger off while people at the bottom who might not pay any income tax at all, might only be paying the lowest rate would be benefiting. Keep in mind it's a thought experiment, I'm not advocating that - I'm not saying it would work - I'm just saying, that flow of events would be fun to watch sociologically.

I think they'll just label their critics as misogynists, transphobic, homophobic, nazis, etc. That's what happens in those microcosms after all. Heck, I believe that it happens in reality now. You know how Marc Lamont Hill got fired from CNN after being branded as an "anti-semite" for saying that Israel shouldn't oppress Palestinians? That's clear cut case of people conflating class with their racial/sexual/gender identity as opposed to power structure and economic status. Both political spectrums weaponize it.

A lot it is going to occur in the future, it'll be hilarious though. I want to see how far people would push it before they wake up.

>Linguistically, I find it much more useful to call people like that liberals. Their social norms are usually those of clintonite liberalism rather than the movements of the left. Obviously they're both folded under 'the left' in a broad sense, but It's a different tradition and a different culture. It's not for nothing that California - also Reagan's home state - is the center of the world.

You're right, I don't believe that they're legitimate leftists either. However, I notice that there's a lot of liberals who consider themselves to be leftist or Social Democrat because they believe that class is tied to gender/sexual/racial identity, as opposed to economic status.

>I agree, but in a sense I might disagree on the flow of causation. It's definitely "I'm an elite, how can I avoid paying my fair share? I know, I'm actually oppressed!" rather than "I'm oppressed, I should get special privileges even if I'm already an elite!", which is what's very important. If circumstances changed, those people would quickly change as well. They don't have beliefs, they have power.

I can't disagree, you're correct.

>I'd say the system produces those people. Furry is the way it is today because of the way the fandom was set up, systematically. There's sort of a feedback loop between systems creating people and people creating systems, but the systemic level is more malleable. Where it comes to politics, in a sense I'd say it's that those people have failed, rather than an ideological failure, but that's not a defense of the ideology: It's a further indictment of those people. They ruin everything. But if you took certain systemic changes, you could get rid of those people. There are always going to be bastards, but our current shower of bastards are the product of our current way of doing things.

You have a good point. In our system, I noticed that the altruistic ones aren't rewarded while the selfish narcissists are placed to the top. Relatives claim that I'm stupid for not exploiting others since I believe it's morally wrong. They're correct as I'm not gaining much from doing the right thing.

What I'm concerned about is the fact that selfish types would gain additional power by reforming our current system. I don't trust their character at all.

>>90309 (OP)

I'm personally glad he did what he did. It reminded me on how fun YouTube comments can be to read.

People reacting to his speech has enlightened me as to just how little people pay attention to the fighting game scene. This isn't even that bad for someone who won EVO.

As to the aside joke, yes it is bullshit that games press will pick it up and make it a big deal but it really wasn't. I know most of the people sperging out about it aren't the ones who are normally defending jokes, but it puts those people in a really bad light if a furry 'yay me' acceptance speech can be so traumatic.

>>90380

This board has always been /leftypol/'s domain.

>>90412

No, no it hasn't.

>>90379

>bourgeois means when you have a lot of money/expensive stuff

ffs read a book.

>>90415

your mistake is imagining that the term is being used in the marxist sense. that would perhaps have been justified the post referred to the bourgeoisie, but it did not.

here's my preferred book: /leftypol/ was ruined when the weebs infested /leftytrash/ and it will never be anywhere near as fun as it was in the 2016-7 period, give up and go home, also catgirls are bourgeois.

>>90416

What would Jason Unhrue's sona be? I'll draw nick fuentez as a catboy if anyone requests me to

>>90309 (OP)

All fursuiters are cringy as fuck.

>>90309 (OP)

A guy is recognized for an achievement. Turns out he’s a furry and uses it as an opportunity to plug the lifestyle. In other words he acted exactly like anyone here would have predicted he would. And yet some find it noteworthy enough to react.

I just recently got into watching esports and one of the first things I noticed is that they’re all geeky-looking types that you know from a glimpse that they gotta have some weird kinks going on. If it’s not furry it’s ponies or anime girls or something equally vulnerable to lampoonery.

his Flist lists zoophillia as one of his favorites

-via kiwifarms

>>90431

the only thing there good for is making porn of so you can expose and blackmail them later as being nothing but a fetish.

>>90322

>lets totally destroy esports

but esports are cancer, anon. Nothing of value would be lost.

>>90445

>Turns out

Anyone into fighting games knows of that faggot. He goes to tournaments in that suit and one of the "Evo moments" is him taking that shit off for once.

>>90361

I wish furries would understand that the Republicans and anyone who protects the constitution is less likely to throw you off the top of a building than a leftist, Marxist movement that has weaponized your narcissism and sexual problem.

>>90489

i use buzzwords i am CNN

>>90489

wish furries would admit they're all selfish little ayn rand cunts rather than taking all the narcissism but playing the victim rather than the beneficiary.

>>90489

That isn't how that works.

Both sides will kill you if you oppose them. One will just blame the individual rather than the reason they did it. The other one will blame the reason they did it rather than the individual.

>>90494

I'd kill any side right now because this place is full of retards only talking politics, thinking they are normalfags because they are just here to fap and doing absolutely nothing.

Maybe the whole fucking fandom is dead, I don't even know alternatives to this shithole here.

closeted zoophile with autism and a video game fetish

>>90514

the whole fandom is on its last legs as more and more zoos and pedos get exposed and popular ones too.

>>90493

It's selfish to be narcissistic though.

>>90528

What a coincidence, I draw porn of EVERYTHING.

Oh no, exposed!

>>90540

Yes but they don't admit it.

>>90362

Probably not. We don't have authoritative people or publications in which a weighty "we reject this" statement can be made. At best, we can at the individual level say "fuck this guy" into our audience of 1-3.

Honestly that's probably for the best. To have that kind of authority would require a large chunk of our population taking this interest very seriously, and making "career furry" an actual thing. Im happy just sharing an interest with fellow Tibetan salt carvers.

>>90577

>and making "career furry" an actual thing

it already is a thing with youtube/convention attention whores and popufurs

he rules and it rules that he triggered all the biggest retards online

>>90309 (OP)

yes, yes, no. there is nothing he could have done that would have made a positive representation

>>90580

I like lifestyler furs, and I'm not a lifestyler :3

>>90580

>murrsuit

>implying the suit he whore in public was used during sexual activities.

Please tell me you're joking.

Though many mainstream Republicans would say furry fandom is "over the devil" (my parents think so), he could have given a more positive speech, such as "be yourself no matter what".

>>90580

The people who claim that he's good have only looked as his victories instead of his matches. He's a zoning scrub who tries to score easy wins by cheesing the game. He's no Daigo.

>>90632

It says a lot more about you than others if you look up to an insecure narcissist as your greatest role model.

its funny sonic fox is connected to the zooleaks someway shape or form,

"we dont out zoophiles but we can totally out zoosadists " i was told once

>>90639

hes a murrsuiter. just go on the 3 or 4 telegram groups and fetlife and murrsuit.info and you'll find his suit eventually.

>>90541

oh no stop harboring pedos and zoos like its some sick joke and you dont want your income stream to dry up.

if you want free money get a real job instead of milking paraphillias that do nothing but attract bad actors to the fandom.

but thats okay i bet you tax evade and are bound to be thotaudited eventually.

>>90644

nerd

>>90644

A win is still a win at the end of the day. A serious competitor would be stupid to hinder themselves by not abusing things that are broken in a game. If you're playing to win, why wouldn't you give yourself the best possible tools to do so? Git gud lol

>>90704

Sure, but some wins are more entertaining to watch: and that's kind of a big deal in all sports, the rules exist to make them fun after all.

>>90388

>Republicans passed the 1964 civil rights act. Democrats opposed it.

The CRA was passed by the 88th congress which was mostly Democrats in both houses and then signed into law by a president who was also a Democrat. Irrespective of that the majority of both parties in both houses supported the legislation so I don't even know why that "info"graphic tries to make that point. A better point might be that a Republican president signed off on the '57 CRA after the Democrats boned it (IIRC the Democratic filibuster against it still holds the record for longest in US history) but even then the majority of both parties in both houses supported the legislation.

Thinking in partisan terms isn't particularly helpful but I can understand doing so because that's the system that has co-opted our government, however falling for lies and ignoring nuances like the party shift that occurred in the late 19th / early 20th century only serves to dumb down the conversation. Images like that and the people who post them unironically are why nobody takes the US seriously anymore outside of our military.

>>90580

>people defend him because "he gud at vidya"

I don't, I just think it's funny to watch people get mad about him. He's actually the kind of e-sports personality that I very much dislike because he tends to be a cheesy bitch. It nets wins but I just don't have fun watching it and then people online will try to emulate that playstyle and every online match in any given game turns into the same match over and over. Same with Smash's scarflard, hitting someone and then running away until the timer expires does not impress me. I kind of feel that way about nearly everything vidya related these days, there are relatively few things that I'll watch since I'd usually rather be playing the game itself but sometimes I'll check out a speedrun or whatever and instead of someone playing the shit out of a game it'll be someone swimming into a corner in Majora's Mask for 5 minutes until the game glitches and they warp to the moon. Shit ain't gonna change for my sake so I've accepted it but I still can't help but be disappointed in the direction that my hobby has gone.

>>90740

I never got this “cheese/no-skill” element in gaming. The fact is, if a method exists to obtain wins without using skill, then the player base will not be sorted by skill but by the use of that exploit. Which is what most players are bitching in forums.

But in fact we can see from regulated competition that it isn’t the case. Winners tend to be the people with the skill and the sponsored training support.

Yes it’s possible that there are broken elements in any game, but if you go up against a pro, knowing those tricks isn’t going to help you. He knows them too. He also is able to play at such a high level that you wouldn’t be able to use them against him.

I hate Justin Bieber but he sells records. He has talent. I don’t have an appreciation for that talent but that is no reason for his millions of fans to turn their backs on him.

The esports community would not christen him the best gamer in the world if all he could do was exploit a couple broken games.

>>90741

>I never got this “cheese/no-skill” element in gaming.

Calling someone cheesy is not the same as saying they don't have skill. That's a common conflation in recent years and I'd imagine that's why some people don't quite understand these complaints. A dogshit player isn't going to win championships purely because he's good at exploits but high level players can certainly lose to simply decent players if the decent players cheese it up with low risk / high reward tactics. A good example would be MKX because NRS can't balance zoners for shit, if someone gets decent at cheesing with Jacqui then you pretty much have to play perfectly to get around her, including being ready for EX projectiles on reaction. If broken shit was never a factor then nothing would be banned from tournaments but that's often not the case.

So like I get that, but I also have a hard time believing that the title of “worlds best gamer” would be granted to someone who just got lucky at exploiting all the shit that should have been removed from official tournaments. If he was just a “pretty good” gamer he wouldn’t have made it to those tournaments to begin with.

Sure some luck is involved, but also, if you’re aware that exploits exist and you don’t prepare yourself to deal with them, then you’re just that kid that cries and quits playing cops and robbers because “there’s no way you shot me from there.”

I think there’s a very popular expression about not hating the player which may have some relevance here.

>>90749

Preparation is just one facet of the equation Anon, you can prepare yourself for cheese all you want but executing a defense against it is an entirely different thing in practice, especially when doing so for an entire match. This gets back to low risk / high reward tactics, that's why everyone IRL switched to guns ASAP. Also I'd caution you about titles, this is relatively new to vidya but stuff like boxing has 9001 "world champions" because there's no real universal metric for that kind of thing and probably never will be.

>I think there’s a very popular expression about not hating the player which may have some relevance here.

Well there's basically no fighting game that I don't shit on in some way. For example zoners in general are often poorly balanced and I think that contributes greatly to the professional scene being the way it is today. Take a look at the 2014 Sm4sh invitational, a lot of the people who actually fought were eliminated relatively early and many of the people who remained kind of just fucked off to the sidelines to throw projectiles. The winner is (or at least was) infamous for running away from people until the time ran out like I mentioned earlier. I hear he's gotten better about it recently.

I'm not going to tell you that those people didn't win or call their wins illegitimate but I do think cheese needs to be recognized wherever it's present.

>>90365

Can't stand this concept. That blacks don't suck the big black cock infront of them and are a race traitor because of it.

halariously tagged in the zoo leaks so akela looks like she has a leg to stand on while simultaneously shielding "Normal zoophiles"

>>90662

no its not that they dont want zoophiles its that there outing anyone that poses a threat to outing the entire zoo community to protect "normal" zoophiles.

>>90704

People try to think that he's a prodigy, he's really not. He's just an arrogant narcissist who cheeses his matches to win. A lot of players lose to him initially because they're used to mindgames where they think several steps ahead. The only reason why people watch his matches isn't because he's good, but because they want to see him lose.

Other FG competitors are leagues better than him. Mike Z (the dev who created skullgirls), was a guy who played a low tier grappler in Blazblue and his matches were very fun to watch.

>>90740

>it's funny to watch people get mad about him

pointing and laughing at you for being a massive autist is not "getting mad", sonicfox.

>>90751

Well perhaps those purist types who don’t believe in victory as the sole deliverable in a game tournament can stick to the highest forms of gaming, and play only the “fair” games that don’t facilitate “cheating,” and leave the title of best gamer to those who employ all of the tools they’re given to win.

It’s more fun to watch Jackie Chan fight than a typical MMA champ, but that’s because most of what Jackie Chan does is stylized for the camera. Maybe he’d win in an octagon match but chances are if he did he wouldn’t just kick a dude in the spleen for an instant takedown.

If this guy was so bad then how come he keeps winning?

>>90875

>“cheating,”

I ctrl+f'd and you're literally the only person ITT using that word.

>If this guy was so bad then how come he keeps winning?

Show me where I called him "bad."

>>90879

I don’t know that you did. I’m not challenging you, just using a conversational form of rhetoric.

What I mean is, when someone attains a #1 title acknowledged by experts in his discipline, and a bunch of people start going off about how his skill isn’t real or that he’s a grimy player that just exploits broken aspects in games, how do you know they’re not just hating and the guy isn’t just actually good at gaming?

Did the runners-up rally against him? Has anyone here actually played him?

I understand why he may not be the most fun player to watch but like, skrillex and deadmau5 aren’t as fun to watch as Steve Vai or Neil Peart either... furry gamer dude plays competitively, to win tournaments. If he focused on looking pretty and not winning his career wouldn’t go so well.

>>90309 (OP)

As an outsider, it just makes the stereotype that “furries are all just obnoxious attention whores” look true. The entire speech was just unnecessary

>>90884

How is anyone here an outsider?

>>90885

I was just board exploring when I found this thread, thought I'd give my 2c

>>90882

>just using a conversational form of rhetoric

By ignoring what people are saying and substituting your own words in place of theirs? We've reached the point at which I don't think you're acting in good faith.

Nobody's questioning whether or not he wins, but this is a poor metric for whether or not he plays like a bitch which is the actual topic here. In fact securing those wins is literally the entire point of playing like a bitch. You can say he does it to win but this isn't news to anyone, we all understand why he does it but that's just qualifying *why* he plays like a bitch.

>>90888

I am using my own words to express my own thoughts.

At issue is whether the guy is skilled or not. However it’s worded. The claim is that he wins because he’s grimy or cheap or cheesy or whatever.... not because he has superior skill. What word do you prefer to use?

Like that guy said ^^ a win is a win. If a less-skilled player can best you using a well-understood (and going by the expert opinions here it seems to be well-understood) weakness in the game mechanic, then guess what? You’re probably cocky and assumed that he wasn’t as clever and resourceful as he really is!

A true master player doesn’t fall for bullshit like that. Shooting at an untended goal does not make you a cheesy hockey player.

>>90886

Ah got it. It’s kind of a dumpster fire. I hope you don’t get sucked in. But nice to meet you.

>>90991

See! And people mock me for not wearing pants!

I'm not a nullo!

I have a huge dick!

>>91012

I'm kinda glad to know that niggers can be just as lame as us.

>>91012

post more anubus cub porn you faggot

>>90788

gay

>>90309 (OP)

Yes, to all of those.

>>90884

>furries are all just obnoxious attention whores

that's not a stereotype, it's a fact.

>>90388

What people forget is, through the middle of the last century, Democrats and Republicans essentially switched sides on nearly every issue and position. Well into the 1950s, Republicans were the progressives and Democrats were the traditionalists. This infographic is especially funny because black civil rights is the central issue around which Democrats and Republicans changed positions.

>>90388

thanks dinesh

>>91065

No they didn't, and alternate hypothesis does a great bit on youtube about that.

>>92811

>Parroting dumb left tuber skeptics

>>90907

>I am using my own words to express my own thoughts.

So do you think he's bad? Do you think he's cheating? Because I didn't use those words, you did.

>A true master player doesn’t fall for bullshit like that.

I don't think that reasoning holds water. This gets us back to low risk high reward strategies, specifically in the sense of playing the odds. Take advantage of the broken aspects of a game in a manner that requires perfect execution to overcome and you'll win more often than not no matter your opponent. And again, this gets you wins, those wins do not mean someone isn't cheesy. Those things are not mutually exclusive.

where's the porn?

>>93475

nice murrsona.

>>92989

yes stop using DUes EX 1 please, thats my game not yours hipster.

i do, look at all the leak threads on kiwifarms and twitter and the zoo leaks on telegram, look at all the murrsuiters photos that get leaked to the threads, look at the two major heads of the snake on telegram arrested.

>>93476

How much porn do you think he has of himself?

If this flaming faggot's supposed to be the face of modern furries, then I'm glad I abandoned this crap in favor of going back to casual board/booru lurking years ago. I forgot who it was that said it, but this fandom/community really is stuck in a perpetual state of high school, socially and maturity wise.

>>93506

The furry part has nothing to do with this.

>>93522

In the context that it's furries getting caught, often through furry-related activities, it does.

>>93524

You missed his point. He's saying that all gays are pedos. Furry is just gravy

>>92864

>>92862

Give me hard evidence that the republicans and democrats have changed sides. They haven't and you don't know what you're talking about.

Also watch his video on his defense of france's conduct in WW2, it's phenomenal. Can't be assed to find his nixon republicans one right now. https://youtu.be/GByhK2HgLPw

>>93528

theres more straight child molesters then gay child molesters, its just that the word gay child molestor brings more headlines and saber rattling then, STRAIGHT pedo molests GIRL.

if you read the recent headliner on CNN about the baseballer who molested that girl child, its tiner then the gay guy who molested a 10yo boy.

the anti gay pushing propaganda is so heavy in the US it makes me wonder why gays are even allowed anything at all, if everyone just thinks there pedos or degenerates.

I think its because its not "many" and beef and an image that men want of twinky effiminet men getting up the ass.

men want to look manly Burly with a hot small sized trophey wife doing lumber jack things while drinky whiskey and 100 proof alcohol while spitting flames while skydiving off a mountain while they do this:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tILjF_IpvXA

>>93685

Ok so let’s assume that homosexuality is inherent and can’t be learned. Because I hear a lot of that.

How can you believe this and also be concerned about indoctrination? Cuz if you do you’re stupid and the world has no obligation to fold itself up to fit in your head.

Or maybe you can learn to be gay... so if that’s the case then what is the big deal? If you overqueerify him you can just put him on the football team and fix it.

The only legitimate excuse is if you believe in modern religion and think it’ll send you to hell. And that’s not on you when it comes to other people’s kids. That is pretty clearly stated in the Bible. I dunno about he Koran or Torah but I was raised to judge not and render unto Caesar what is his.

>>93691

Most /pol/acks think it’s a mental illness, caused by either disease or trauma early in life. In any case, you cannot simply unlearn a mental disease, and not all disease can be cured. Therein lies the problem.

>>93703

>>93691

>Or maybe you can learn to be gay... so if that’s the case then what is the big deal? If you overqueerify him you can just put him on the football team and fix it.

Also, might I add that I find it very concerning that you find it perfectly acceptable to to sex up people who are under the age of 13, and then think that no lasting trauma will come as a result of it: https://archive.fo/YHSLZ

>>93703

Oh look, the guy who thinks all gays are disease-spreaders who destroy society is back again. Odds on how long before mods declare this post to be more political bullshit with no place on this board?

>>93703

T. gondii is thought to provoke risk-taking behavior. I know about that. I’ve never heard it referred to as “the gay virus.” (Yes I know it isn’t a virus. I have cats. I’ve heard of toxoplasmosis before.)

STDs are not spread by homosexuality. They’re spread by sexual contact and also thru incidental and medical exposure. Statistics that demonstrate gay men in the 80s were 50 times more likely to contract HIV than straight men really have no bearing on what risks your kids would face today, if they were educated about the risk of disease.

I think religion is a bullshit excuse too. That’s why I said “you THINK you’ll go to hell.”

But indulge me anyway and quote the verse that says it’s OK to be angry with your brother WITH cause. I don’t think there is one. It does say in the Old Testament that you should murder your whole family, and the town should join in too, if they choose to put a Flying Spaghetti Monster on the back of the family car... but I don’t think modern Christianity interprets the Old Testament as literally as the children of Israel did.

Your response pretty much demonstrates that only religious nut jobs are concerned about homosexual influences on children. Shit makes me embarrassed to be seen at church.

>>93709

Sorry, Bell/Weinberg published in the 70s, not 80s... but you get the idea.

And, of course, I had to fuck up the formatting on the red text by someone who I think is acting retarded on purpose.

>>93707

Bumplocked lol

>>93715

Good sir, no made up graphs are needed. STDs absolutely can not be transmitted by rainbows, pink ribbons, or even butterflies. Only sex, dirty needles, and tainted donor pools. Or certain unhygienic communal living practices. It doesn’t matter if you’re gay or straight, your chances are the same in an individual encounter.

Now when God says that “thou shalt not do A if you see B,” he is NOT giving you permission to do A in all other instances. That is definitely not how the Bible is to be interpreted. Otherwise you could covet your neighbors VCR because it wasn’t explicitly listed with his ox and his ass, or give fuck all respect for your adoptive father and mother because they don’t give you enough allowance.

>>93728

Ok so they compared the normal American Dream nuclear family with a family with gay parents. People who are irrationally despised by an unfortunately large proportion of society. They get “queer” painted on their front door a couple times a year. The kids get made fun of or beat up. They get shunned at church and the grocery store and their car gets keyed all the time.

And we learn from this study that there is more unemployment, drug use, suicide, etc in the family that is being tormented by their community.

The most shocking thing to me about that study is that someone wasted the effort to conduct it.

>>93741

Apparently because you copy pasted my post and added a map with a bunch of African nations highlighted.

The shit you’re posting here is really dangerous. I realize that everything is hyperbole on the net but you should seriously consider at this point that there could be a reason so many people react with hostility to the things you say.

You’re quoting religious doctrine like you’re concerned for the spiritual well-being of your society, but you don’t mean it. Nothing about Christianity involves persecuting and tormenting people you don’t like or agree with. The same goes for Islam and any other religion, some of which, by the way, have nothing to say about sexuality.

If you really give a shit about today’s kids being led astray by the queers, then get off your pasty white ass and do something about it. Become active in your local community. Be a big brother. Promote chastity and marital devotion. Try doing something about the 50% divorce rate. Become a youth or marital counselor. There are innumerable things that take almost no effort that you could be doing, instead of spreading hate and lies about homos in an anonymous message board.

You’re not going to change anyone’s mind with phony stats and fundamental Christian hooey. That shit is on the way out.

>>93686

reality

>>93685

the romans also think small penises are masculine.

>>93755

because the focus on the overall form of the body and having a large dangling cock would take away from the overall display of physical physique.

TLDR the romans trolled us all and told us that sexuality is not the entire basis of life and sexual conduct but that sexuality is a mere facet of the entire form.

>>93757

No, I really did not. Someone replied to my assertion that you can’t teach gay with a bunch of bible quotes and religious objections, maybe because I said that religion is “the only excuse.” I never said it was a valid one, or that I agree with it (I don’t, and I don’t believe that God will send you to hell over the shape of your or your son’s penis. But some people do.)

The point I was trying to make was that if your only debating technique is to belittle and attack your opponent, you may feel satisfied and victorious after a discussion but you LOOK like an ignorant blowhard. This is how Donald Trump debates issues. He throws a tantrum or fires people until he gets his way.

Even other anons have tried to help you stop spinning your wheels and flinging shit everywhere but you’d rather keep wallowing and going nowhere than follow the conversation with the rest of us. You’re so blinded by your aimless passion you want to keep arguing against circumcision with me, an uncircumcised, anti-circumcision American who would never subject his own children to that trauma.

You can keep ranting at me about what’s in my own head, but that’s weird and stupid and like I said if you really cared you would not be wasting time here but actually doing something about it.

I thought that guy a couple posts ago was helping us talk about this in a meaningful and productive way, but really it’s just everyone but you.

What do you want out of life? Is this doing it for you?

>>93685

Given that the US federal age of consent is 12, one would think that EVERYONE would be in favor of repealing the law.

>>93762

I’m sure it could happen. Maybe even eight more. People are astonishingly fucking stupid.

>>93762

Four more years OF retard? Admittedly, he hasn't affected my life in any major ways, positively or negatively, but we do have a President who throws temper tantrums. Frankly, it's tiresome.

he fucking lost guys, karma bit him in the ass:

https://archive.li/xg76m