/fur/ - Furry★

I did this once, but after two days of 1-starring I was PMed by an admin who ended up taking away vote-privileges from my account.

Dunno if they rolled back my votes as well, but they have some kind of filter or algorithm in place to prevent 1-star bombs, I guess.

>>72202 (OP)

>I can 1-star everything on the front page

>>72202 (OP)

b a s e d

>>72249

>Jontard

>>72254

Literally noone hates Jontron. Even Alt Right can't hate him anymore these days. Leave, edgelord.

I told shitbag Toumal to permaban my account and wipe it as I hate his site and him. He didn't do it because he didn't want to put in 3 minutes of effort. Fuck that sorry lazy fuck and the scammers/pedos/other trash he coddles, and they will get on you if you call a pedo a pedo. No wonder 99% of their bans are like 2 days at most. They barely uphold their rules.

>>72280

I hate him. He's not funny, he focuses more on sketch comedy than on game reviews and he puts dipshit politics into everything because he needs attention. He's also one of those gamer tards that throws bitch tantrums over emulation. No, I hate him and lots of others do, you delusional fuckstick. It's what I expect from retards that think Breitbart is honest.

>>72292

Faaaaaaagot

>>72292

Please disconnect your internet. No one will miss you, and you probably won't miss us.

>>72292

>he focuses more on sketch comedy than on game reviews

Because he's literally the only one good at it.

>and he puts dipshit politics into everything

Actually now. Maybe you're watching sleeper nazis like Pewdiepie.

>because he needs attention.

With million views per video, you don't need attention. You have it.

>He's also one of those gamer tards that throws bitch tantrums over emulation.

Are you not pissed about all those little shits making videos while soullessly emulating them, having no emotional connection to the games and half-assing them, maybe just playing a stage for lulz on stream? Whats wrong with you?

Though I agree with the copyright part, Nintendo selling the same SNES shit on different platforms over and over which you can get for a few cents on a flea market is just ripping off people - but they know that doesn't work anymore, so they expect you to pay 80 bucks on cardboard now.

>It's what I expect from retards that think Breitbart is honest.

Wait, that's still a thing in 2018? Where are you living, in the friggin swamps?

>>72202 (OP)

>>72292

OP, before you embarrass yourself any further you should be aware that the tone of social desperation in your posts is outright tangible. Your pretense of "I'm a bad-ass because I can make people feel bad without suffering any repercussions" isn't impressing anyone past the age of 12.

Drop the fake attitude. If you need someone to talk to we're here for you.

Toumal is so desperate to keep his failing overlooked website alive that he doesn't want to permaban anyone out of fear of losing users. It's why bans are a slap on the wrist with a month being the worst case after several infractions. Do they really think a 1 day ban is going to make people feel sorry for what they said? He's actively coddled the fandom's biggest financial scammers for 10 years while also telling people "FA banned you because they are mean!! I'm nice, come here, you're always welcome!"

I do not see SoFurry being online in the next 3-5 years, he has to be losing money operating a site that was passed over in favor of Inkbunny and Weasyl.

>>72292

>It's this asshole again

Sofurry made it fucking impossible to wipe a gallery by making it an exceptional pain in the ass to delete submissions. Again the whole "artists shouldn't control their belongings, art belongs to the world" bullshit mentality from people who also think "pirating music, movies and video games is bad" because I guess only the rich deserve rights.

However there's a bug in their site they can't fix- if you delete a folder it wipes every submission in the folder. If you placed your art into folders then you can wipe your whole gallery, even if it's massive like 1K submissions, in under a minute.

>>72416

Its a shame, Weasyl and Inkbunny are fucking terrible and Sofurry works rather well for me

But oh well, furfags always gotta choose the option that sucks the most dick

>>72924

>It's THIS asshole again

Sofurry just passed a cub porn ban, but knowing Toumal it's a purely "on paper" rule for legal liability in Europe. He won't do shit to enforce it.

He and Dragoneer let "cub-obsessed" freak supersonic250 post cub, harass other users and generally do what she pleases, cub fans run this fandom because it's full of pedophiles. Even in the comments to the site update there's someone all "well fuck the general population if they hate pedophilia" over this.

I'm writing Chris Hansen a tell-all letter.

>>73148

>supersonic250

Please stop your sperging about this guy. Holy shit, just get a room and bang already, alright?

>>73148

https://www.sofurry.com/siteupdate/view?id=129

>The reason for this alteration is a changed legal landscape, not necessarily by changes of US law, but by how it is interpreted and acted upon.

Looks like it's more likely for legal liability in USA.

>>73148

>Sofurry, a primarily story-oriented website starts banning cub content

>When even stories containing HUMAN children having sex is protected speech in the USA

If they're claiming they have to do it for legal reasons, they're lying.

>>73196

Their servers are located in Europe/Germany. That's why it's prohibited.

>>73201

>The reason for this alteration is a changed legal landscape, not necessarily by changes of US law, but by how it is interpreted and acted upon.

They vaguely reference US law (or in this case, common law & precedent cases), not the laws of the EU.

What probably happened is that some ass-mad SJW decided to go on an autistic crusade against SoFurry for whatever reason, and started sending threatening letters to SoFurry staff or their hosting provider.

Move the new SoFurry AUP drama here: >>73227

>>72292

I thought people like you all left to /leftypol/ after getting their feelings hurt.

>>73614

>He says as /pol/ spergs out and demands the entire site become a safe space for """"white"""" users

>>73633

Are you the Turk that got anally ravaged out of moderating /pol/ or something?

>>73555

>Not having a cute avatar and making cute/sexy/joke comments so people click you, as a form of advertising your image

>>73641

lolwut. I'm a furry Anon and I don't go to /pol/. Are you some nazifag sympathizer or something?

>>73682

The absurdity of the mainstream left sometimes makes me wish I was, but no. NatSoc types tend to handle banter better in my experience though.

>>73716

I'll take the mainstream left over the mainstream right any day. Better have your rights trampled over because you're too "privileged" than get lynched because you aren't privileged enough.