/fur/ - Furry

>newfag oesn't know about the Judeo-Popfur conspiracy

Oh, you blessed soul.

>REEEEEEEEEE

>FIGHT THE POWER BY BITCHING ON AN IMAGEBOARD

>>64380

Because most of the alternatives are worse.

Furry Network is probably the least excusable (iirc) Instead of paginating results for a search it just holds them on infinite scroll. That's very, very pretty if you're only looking for say the top 50 images. When you're hunting for something, scrolling through thousands the site becomes completely unusable. That's not "oh, it's a bit irritating", that's "it is quite literally impossible to keep going because even though I fell for the 16GB of RAM meme, this fucking website has managed to use it all by not paginating it's fucking search results."

We perfected the basics of storing large numbers of images in a web gallery in the 1990s, yet somehow people still fuck it up. Stop trying to be inventive. Take the furaffinity user interface, up the preview image size to something reasonable like e621, get people to use the fucking tag system properly, up the filesize limit, hold the backend together with something slightly better than tape and cum, and bingo. You've got a functional website. Don't fuck around, don't add pointless sparkles, don't throw in marquees and "responsive" design, just make a functioning gallery and then go to fucking sleep.

>>64380

...and Search facilities right outta 1996

>>64391

Pixiv and Pornhub can manage 'stuff like you're interested in' in spite of having 10000x more users.

>>64391

modern sites are actually switching over to that format over separate pages, Youtube goddamned does this now. It has NEVER been a good idea in the history of any website.

They also refuse to add a "kick watcher" feature claiming "free speech" and "well we'd have to code the system to notify everyone of unwatches" which are bullshit excuses. Twitter has this feature, it didn't cause a black hole to open in space nor do they notify users a watch was removed, it just happens. They're okay with preventing blocked users from being able to favorite or watch, but existing watchers they can't figure out how to allow an artist to remove those?

As for being worse, Inkbunny only thrived because of the FA cub ban, marking the site as pedo heaven. Sofurry has been around forever but the community has actively skipped over it for newer sites, it's broken as hell, their voting system is garbage(names only for 5 stars), editing a submission takes 5 hours for the new pic to load and Toumal is a dumbass. Weasyl got ruined hard for serving no real purpose and having idiot staff.

My cents.

On logging in: Yeah, just make the guest get a cookie for claiming to be 18 or over and be done with it. But I guess it revolves around the eternally prude americans being anal about not ever upsetting anyone. My censorship levels would be two simple yes/no flags: Lewd and Edgy. Plain nipples and fairly tasteful nudity is not lewd. Outright porn would be lewd. Excessive violence would be edgy. Either of the flags could be bypassed with the cookie, but I'd probably reserve both at the same time (e.g. cubs, shitting dicknipples and grater-rape) for people with accounts.

On file sizes: I'd actually lower them to force people to save their work properly. Fuck phone users for just chucking untouched photos of their fursuit sex at image boards and archives.

On website design and behavior: Less is always more, I don't want another site to greasemonkey the fuck out of. The one thing I can agree with would be image preview sizes.

>>64380

FA still exists because of the common mindset that the lowest-common-denominator average user has, where the available alternatives are just too slow and/or dead. No one wants to use these alternatives because they're slow, and yet they're slow because no one wants to use them. It's like a downward spiral that goes nowhere.

IB was relatively successful because people gave IB a chance. Weasyl on the other hand isn't working out so well because no one is giving it a chance, most users dropping out to go back to FA.

>>64381

Conspiracy is an understatement.

>>64407

Established sites are hard to kill because no one wants to bother rebuilding their fame on another new site that may not even last.

It's why eBay stays around no matter how poorly they treat their sellers.

For those of you crabbing about the preview image size, you ought to look in your account settings. Granted if you don't have an account you're SOL.

At this point, FA is pretty much "too big to fail"; if the IMVU buy-out didn't get people to jump ship to alternatives, then nothing short of it being offline for a month will.

It's unfortunate that the other furry sites aren't as "thriving" as FA is, but for every good idea (suggested tags, tag block-list, pools/folders, "popular" images) a different site does, they take several steps back with their bloat (infinite scroll, SoFurry's weird laggy thumbnail preview).

>>64398

For what it's worth, the technical aspect of IB is fantastic. It has a number of security features, its search doesn't suck, and it's frequently and transparently updated.

The only thing you have to deal with is the community, but they're friendlier than the DA-larping emo furs you get with FA. Even so, you can aggressively blacklist content, and life's good.

>>64412

not to mention you can suggest tags so it doesn't end up like FA where people either don't put anything or decide to be cute and write a dumb sentence in the tags.

>>64417

The tech has been around for a few years now in Anime circles for AI tagging-- neural-net like systems that can reasonably determine features of a drawing: wear glasses, multiple people, etc.

>>64417

People still do "cutesie" tags. Momoji did a lot and refused to allow "suggested" tags on their work, so they ragequit the site.

>>64412

>>64417

cub fans stopped adding in the "cub" tag because they knew it was being blacklisted and these pedos have to "redpill" anyone who dislikes pedo shit by forcing it down everyone's throats/ Not gonna happen, go walk into a Hansen sting house and fuck off.

you can slow down the FA server by nesting thousands of open bbcode tags in any place that allows it

>>64443

It was built from the coding of an early 2000's forum and sloppily transformed into an image gallery viewer.

It would be like taking the code of an IRC chatroom and trying to make facebook with it. That is literally Furaffinity's coding and no one wants to take a look at it and improve upon it because it's a fucking mess.

>>64447

I do, but Dragoneer/Yak/etc. won't let me REEEEEEEE

>>64422

Oh well his hyper wetting bumhole sniff diaper art is a fry cry from why i watched him in the first place

>>64429

That's hilarious. I just need a VPN and sockpuppets now.

You can also hex edit a gifs virtual size to be a few hundred pixels in size and it pads the avatar spacing accordingly. I think they fixed that though

>>64443

>FurAffinity provides a quality service to us fans and we should be thankful to the administrators who dedicate their time and efforts into making it all possible

What the fuck kind of b8 is this?

https://encyclopediadramatica.rs/FurAffinity

>>64380

It still exists because it's a safe space rapists, murderers, aisbreeders and pedophiles are all whiteknighted and welcome with open arms while child porn is distributed between staff.

>>64509

Everyone should be welcome everywhere no matter their interests or hobbies.

>>64507

How is Kayla Na the only one to get ED articles pulled?

>>64380

Pornfag BTFO.

>>64443

>No reason why a jpg or png should be over 10MB, and our servers aren't built for video hosting.

There's not a lot of animation nor videogames because of that limit. It ends up stifling a lot of creativity because of it.

Flash is going to be outdated as well, please switch to MP4/webm.

>>64429

Doesn't work. Tried with [b][b][b][b] and it didn't resolve.

Or rather, it shows as text, it didn't necessarily do as you described.

>>64556

Oh no wait you're right, it took 17.00+ sec to load the page, instead of 0.011 sec. If only there was a way to hide the text. Then you could put it on popular art submissions

>>64557

closing the tags might make them invisible, unless you already did that

>>64568

>>64560

So it looks like that if they're open and unterminated, it's spammy as fuck, but can take 15 seconds to load a page.

If you just have like a thousand of them copypasted, it takes 0.184s to load the page - which works if you have many comments on a submission. So it does have a slowdown, just not noticeable. If there was an HTML tag to hide the text entirely that might work, but at best you can use color="" and try to match the background color, but there's the FA light and dark template, plus the "new" one, so it'll probably be caught pretty quickly

>>64569

So you can use [color=transparent] tags to hide the text, but if they highlight or quote you, they'll see it. Unfortunately. Same if they look at the page source. At best, you would have to use a dozen sockpuppets and say "nice!" with a bunch of invisible tags and hope nobody gets wise. However, it's like 15 seconds per page load, which I'm sure they'll notice. But that's per comment

>left FA and disabled account long ago because wasn't cutting it as an artist, had few watchers after many years and gave up on it because it's a waste of my time

>watch a lot of artists, do not remove watches

>notice inbox fills up and chokes site

Good, fuck Dragoneer and his shithole of a site. Its design is in the 90s, he protects criminals and now his fuckwaste of a stolen site is overrun by /pol/tards and "owned" by a Russian malware distributor that sells stolen art prints.

>>64549

>how dare they not include a group that would gladly exclude anyone they don't like!

Serves the fuckers right to receive what they'd gladly do to others.

>>64618

She's not an lolcow in comparison to Chris chan.

>>64641

people who have done FAR LESS have pages, she has picked plenty of fights and started a lot of shit over 10 years or so. Sorry but she deserves a page many times over no matter how butthurt the idea makes her fanboys.

One of her hardcore fanboys pretended to be in special forces, until actual military people picked apart his claim as 100% bullshit.

>>64647

hell, Steve Addlesee, who behaved about the same, had a lot of hatred despite being less well-known.

Does anybody want a fur-themed social network, here?

If not, why browse FA? For the art only?

>>64618

Is it wrong that I find that image of Mel kinda hot?

>>64380

>Need to click on the image again to view the full image

there's an option in the settings to make all images be expanded by default.

FA is still garbage and the people that use it are retarded tho, but i just wanted to correct you on that because you didn't even bother checking the site settings you retard.

here's a more important matter:

what will happen to all the porn that is exclusively on FA when that dumpster fire eventually burns out? the onion archive barely works as it is and only has a fraction of content that existed on the site before the date it was made, the onion archive does not refresh or update its content (to my knowledge, mind you)

shouldn't there be an archive project for it? what about inkbunny? and also what about retarded mentally unstable artists that one day, without warning, wipe their galleries clean?

>>64649

You're out of the loop because you weren't paying attention due to your porn downloading obsession.

GNUSocial/Mastadon/Pawoo/etc. (the network, not the primary SJW Mastadon server)

>>64726

what are you talking about?

>>64732

forgot link: https://vj5pbopejlhcbz4n.onion.link/fa/geminisaint/

so as you can clearly see, yes it does update its contents.

>>64732

>>64733

oh, dont mind me, im retarded then. I have a hard time getting it to work most of the time, constant stream of 404's and loading errors.

also, is there such an equivalent for inkbunny?

>>64735

>constant stream of 404's and loading errors

Googlebot is slamming the proxy and making it slow. What I don't understand is why not just host the site on the clearnet instead?

>is there such an equivalent for inkbunny?

to my knowledge, no.

>>64721

either save your personal copies or forget about it. The artists are not entitled to make copies available of their property, nor is anyone else obligated to do the job for you.

>inb4 "art ownership is BAD" liberal crying

Fuck you, I own my art or I don't make it in the first place.

>cub fanatic harasses me, posts callout journals filled with lies about me because I dislike cub and it pissed her off

>report to staff

>"durr we don't see any journals, stop bugging us" even though one was visible on her profile page

>staff confirmed for letting cub fanatics slide

>block everyone who watches the shitcunt, make it clear her fans are not my fans, she plays hurt feelings and pretend victim over it

>eventually get enough on her to know where the fuck the crazy bitch lives and what her job is, go figure an underage porn fanatic works around kids

I'm literally not surprised staff would protect a rapist after that

>>64742

>block everyone who watches the shitcunt, make it clear her fans are not my fans.

That is excessive. You don't get to decide who likes your stuff. There is a risk of sockpuppets but that's just how it works.

>>64768

>>64768

Thank Satan I only deal with artists that only want to be credited for the work they did and don't care what I do. It's fun to share with others, and the artists I've worked with have actively encouraged sharing and even profiting from their art.

>>64618

>she's a nigger

You forgot that one.

>>64683

Yes fuck you. You are the fucking fault people fall for that fucking bitch. Their dick.

Furries are just so fucking horny, I'm actually jealous because they have ZERO standards.

>>64683

Oh wait, you're fucking Mel right? She's self absorbed enough to love her own shit.

>>64512

I would like to shoot up a school and express this on multiple platforms online. I should still be allowed to visit and attend them even though I'm a registered gun owner.

>>64768

This can't be real

>>64768

did you get permission to save that image?

>>64380

it's a cp trafficking ring that's why

>>64768

I don't just save images I leak and distribute them. You're not going to do anything about it and can't do anything about it besides bait for replies.

>>69013

Thankfully no

>>64544

>There's not a lot of animation nor videogames because of that limit

There's not a lot of animation nor videogames because furfags are fucking talentless, that's why.

And when some actually talented guy steps in he is immediately shooed away because you're too fucking stupid to admit you shouldn't have dropped buckets of money on the first guy who lied about being a game developer or an animator.

>>69087

>Dropping shitloads of money on dead projects that had no future.

Are you talking about that one guy we all know and love? :^)

>>69092

Which one? There are plenty. Like Spoony.

>>69092

>>69097

>>69100

Spoony, Jasonakike, Fek, whoever, I can't and won't bother keeping track of them all.

Projects that died even before being conceived by the insufferable narcissists behind them. Professional wishful thinkers who somehow manage to trick people into believing they have any idea about how they're supposed to do the job they're getting paid several yearly salaries to do. And instead of laughing them away like you should laugh away a kid with MS Paint claiming to be a Renaissance artist, you idolize them. I wouldn't be surprised if all these furfag celebs had their hands deep into money laundering schemes of some sort.

>>69106

>I wouldn't be surprised if all these furfag celebs had their hands deep into money laundering schemes of some sort.

You mean: Any Patreon person, especially Youtubers and Streamers who are poor af but still somehow able to efford EVERYTHING.

>>64391

Inkbunny's design is great, its only downside to me is the no humans rule.

>>69159

>Going to furry sites for humans

wtf is wrong with you?

>>69249

They look less human if you put a human in it. Ugly chick rule.

>>69291

Fuck that's pretty retarded.

You can't be a mixed loli/ cub/ adult human/ adult fur/ zoo/ feral artist anywhere anymore.

>>69291

Why people use inkbunny is beyond me.

>>69296

E621.

>>69297

If you check the front page you know.

It's everyone who wasn't allowed to draw toddlerfur getting together. And not the fun kind. The creepy kind. The kind that draws details like braces on underage characters because the border between just art and actual sex offender just broke.

>>69297

Use it because Bushy is there. :3

>>64380

Because furries are conformists

>>69319

You can do the same with Paheal. e621 already has some kind of community which seems only to consist of underage lurkers because they like EVERYTHING. And their comments are borderline retarded.

>Why does FA exist?

Because the only people competent enough to run a better site can make more money going to work as a full stack developer or sysadmin for someone else or doing a startup and not hosting a fetish art gallery.

For example, a lot of furries are gud enough at programming to run a better site, but FA doesn't pull in enough dough to bother with running a competitor when you could go work on other more broad-market projects.

>>64512

Zoofags and emofurs shouldn't.

>>69249

Human art on FA is better than furry art on FA.

I am a dogfucking faggot, please rape my face.

>>71226

First one is shittily copied indian bs and second one is still furry. Just nekofur.

Stop being salty.

>>71236

To be fair, Inkbunny has lower quality, because diaperfurs and toddlerfurs are often on the artistic bottom. Considering how high quality loli-porn can be in comparison, this fetish seems super-niché and unpopular.

>>71236

>>71234

>>71239

>>71240

>>71241

wtf stop stealing my name you faggot! nothing will stop me from having dogs rape my face

for I am

the real kobayashi

and you cannot stop me

from the dogs i will want to rape my face

please

SEND YOUR DOGS TO RAPE MY FACE

>>71273

I noticed the stiffness, too, but i dont think it's that bad.

The lack of neck comes from the style he's using. 'Near feralfur'. almost no human at all.

>>71287

Please stop impersonating me. I know you're probably envious of my drawing skill, but show some dignity will you.

>>71293

This form of child-like circlejerking faggotry is so dumb it's almost scary.

>>71293

STFU you're impersonating ME, faggot. I know how to use 8chan from all my friends on reddit they taught me how to do spacing right and I have been browsing this website with this name since it was established back in 2008.

>>71300

Also someone please rape my face

>>71320

with their dog

>>71327

*chans prefer Anonymous, with using a name for no good reason being frowned upon, so of course they'll get mocked.

>>71327

>implying bullying namefags is a bad thing

>>71403

There's also this:

https://twitter.com/Cernovich/status/994995307757817857

>>71403

lol butthurt. Anyone can claim to be antifa, so any one person acting can't represent the whole. same can't be said of neonazis whose idology is to hurt people by default.

>muh NJHS

Who gives a shit what the state thinks? Cuck.

>>71407

I've never seen a weeaboo whine over someone saying anime art sux.

>>71414

Yeah, take this (You) as a souvenir as you go

>>>/leftypol/

>>71415

Not an argument. Would you like to try again?

>>71417

Why do politifurs and zoofurs ruin everything?

>>71418

and by that I mean they should rape my face with their dogs instead of talking about politics all day.

>>71421

Not an argument, nowhere in communist or marxist ideology does it promote violence against jews or blacks or whatever. Hate, it ain't.

>>71420

Yes. Please rape my face with your dawgz

i wonder if me means dogs as in hotdogs or real dogs or penises.

>>71422

You're right, I'm sure when you're eventually lined up against the wall and shot, that it won't be for hate fueled reasons

This topic was about furaffinity, not fights about politics.

Wtf dudes.

>>71422

>implying commies don't promote violence against anyone they consider the bourgeois

cute

>>71425

Still not an argument, what some people read a book and claim to do has no bearing on the is said by the original author himself. I could just as well say your shitpost was an inspiration to go on a mass shooting and that's the reason you need to be sent to prison for "hate" or whatever. Again, communism/marxism does not promote violence against an ethnicity like neonazism does and so it's not a hate group. If you think otherwise, cite your source in Marx's thesis or fuck off. Whatever Stalin/Mao/whoever did is not representative of his works.

>>71427

Bourgeois are not an ethnic group. Try again?

>>71403

>A hate group is one that advocates and practices hatred, hostility, or violence towards members of a designated sector of society (e.g. Nazism, KKK, ISIS, Alt-Right)

This sounds like Nazism, KKK, ISIS, and the Alt-Right are the designated sectors of society that are being protected, lol.

>>71432

>Hating fascism makes you the REAL fascist!

lmao miss me with that centrist lie

>>>/facebook/

>>71434

>Fighting fascism with another form of facism is perfectly fine because it's okay when we do it!

Nigger, miss me with that leftist delusion

>>>/tumblr/

>>71422

No but it does tell you to break the rules and kill the bourgeious. That's why you have a higher kill count than Nazis.

>>71437

Not an argument

>>71439

It is an argument because you are morally bankrupt people who break their own rules to get an advantage over others.

>>71442

>False equivalence

Still not an argument

>>71410

>lol butthurt. Anyone can claim to be antifa, so any one person acting can't represent the whole. same can't be said of neonazis whose idology is to hurt people by default.

What a bullshit excuse, it's a formal organization.

>Who gives a shit what the state thinks? Cuck.

Homie please, you work for the state. You're a clique of fake revolutionaries who are backed by the 500 million dollar SPLC and ADL.

>>71444

It is a false equivalence. Communists are worse than Nazis as they're morally bankrupt individuals who have a higher kill count.

>>71403

I can't close my account fast enough

>>71452

It's simple, just praise Hitler

>>71452

Thank you for complying with the new policy and closing your account!

>FA posts a bunch of new rules

>99% will never be enforced

Not when furries flock to Drumpf for defending pedos and not when he's still more worried about people factually calling Zaush a rapist & pedophile. They barely enforce most written rules to start with and do so only selectively, and choose how to interpret those rules if you didn't actually break one but they hate you.

>>71414

yeah not with Putin being a Jew that outlawed Holocaust denial.

But gays, yeah, Putin will stick them in camps for hurting his religious fee-fees. Camps? Russian police just shoot you and leave the body.

>>71453

calling Zaush a rapist gets you banned faster. These "on paper" rules counter the fact FA operates like fucking Breitbart, out of touch with reality, burying info they don't like.

lol, cry more alt-right snowflakes. maybe start your own furry site where you can congregate and pretend you're oppressed

>>71463

>He thinks alt-right is a real thing

>>71463

We did though, it's just you losers whine about it instead of staying in your hugbox.

I'm so sick and tired of politics in general infesting the Internet and my hobby. Normies ruin everything.

>>71470

Stop pussyfooting and blame the left. I hate being rude, but being neutral with them only makes them double down on their bullshit further.

>>71489

It's not "the left" it's unironically the jewish owned media pushing this tripe

>>71491

If I'm being honest, it's just Jews being power-hungry and manipulative in general. Deo pushed for the bans and she is a semite.

>>71494

if I'm being honest, attributing it to Jews as a whole group is about as silly as attributing privilege as being a solely white thing to have. now, there are certain Jewish individuals whom have definitely used the halocaust as a stepping stone to propel themselves to multigenerational riches, but.. it's kind of like pitchfork and torching scientologists when it's just the top of the pyramid that are fucking with humanity..

>>71498

>he, on the other hand, thinks that alt-right is in any way a serious group.

>inb4 muh charlottesville

you know, it's pretty clever of Trump to get elected so that he could make America his latest reality television show. we live in a culture of outrage, someone somewhere is always trying to get you specifically outraged because that keeps you emotionally engaged more than anything else. why do you think televised news hasn't died in the age of accessing terabytes of information in mere moments?

>>71497

You're right in point that out, but I can't help but notice they're the primary instigators of recent political shitflinging since the last two years. They use the holocaust card as an incentive to assault people or censor speech that they had little issue with prior to 2016. The SPLC and ADL are multimillion dollar organizations that have Jewish CEOs.

I don't want to be rude towards that demographic, but they're doing everything they can to prohibit voice and income of those in a country that they don't belong to. Meanwhile, they turn a blind eye to their country's own atrocities.

>>71500

Televised news hasn't died because the TV news journalists have dignity and authority and they only report news factually and unbiasedly. Meanwhile, internet news is the opposite of that (eg, Infowars).

>>71502

You're exaggerating, right? Please tell me you don't actually unironically believe that televised news meets any of those keywords you threw out.

>>71506

https://theoutline.com/post/4543/journalists-ptsd-online-harassment-digital-ptsd-alt-right-white-nationalists?zd=3&zi=kmslqf5u

>>71518

There's /fur/, just be open about your beliefs.

>>71522

I'm talking about FA, but, alright.

>>71204

is there a link to this actually on anyone's profile, or other proof this is real?

i looked out of curiosity since it just seemed ridiculous and couldn't find anything, but then May 4th was a while ago and usually that date was pushed off profiles by other people saying "thanks for watching!"

not helping was that O-ruff had moved to 0-ruff, which could be the backlash to this? even if it's fake

>>71470

it was always going to happen tbh

the more time i reflect on the furry fandom, the more i realise the idea of an apolitical internet was always a bizarre fantasy. you can't have an apolitical community where a good chunk are unable to meet basic living costs and an equally large chunk are throwing more than the average yearly salary at drawings of foxes fucking. even if you exclude tedious cultural politics, you're going to run into clashes of worldview. Though i have to wonder if the tedious cultural politics are a proxy war for the income skew, at least in America it's an idea that would hold. And since nowadays we're all living in America (Amerika ist wunderbar...)

>>71536

>it was always going to happen tbh

>the more time i reflect on the furry fandom, the more i realise the idea of an apolitical internet was always a bizarre fantasy. you can't have an apolitical community where a good chunk are unable to meet basic living costs and an equally large chunk are throwing more than the average yearly salary at drawings of foxes fucking. even if you exclude tedious cultural politics, you're going to run into clashes of worldview. Though i have to wonder if the tedious cultural politics are a proxy war for the income skew, at least in America it's an idea that would hold. And since nowadays we're all living in America (Amerika ist wunderbar...)

It didn't happen with Kemono art despite having the same conditions as America. I think it's because Japan has a "live and let live" mentality. An anime like Angel Cop wouldn't be produced in the west at all.

>>71544

Umm.. Japan has a very, very strict social expectation for people to not rock the boat. It's very much a "muh honour" thing, but it's considered disrespectful for someone to speak out or go against the grain at all. It's so deeply trained into them as a society that it even comes out in video games - their attitudes when it comes to raiding are completely different than western approaches.

The "live and let live" mentality is more like... They don't want to speak out in case they're insulting yakuza.

>>71545

That's how it should be in the West. It should be more fearful to be impolite than to fear boogeymen who draw things you don't like.

>>71487

>not enough evidence to classify Antifa as a hate group

that's the most retarded thing I"ve heard out of the FA admins in a long time.>>71403

>>71558

Infowars, Sargon, and Conservapedia calling Antifa a hate group doesn't count as valid sources.

>>71559

https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/analysis/anarchist-extremists-antifa

:clap: LITERALLY :clap: A :clap: .GOV :clap: WEBSITE :clap:

>>71565

>end date

>2010

At least get it to 2017 for parity, come on now.

>>71559

The DHS and several federal institutions did, you're retarded.

Then again, you were also retarded enough to think that furries on FA were planning another holocaust through their art. The left can't tell right from wrong.

>>71563

A day is coming soon when you will be shot for your crimes against the people. You fear the masses of your country and you are right to fear them. I would pull the trigger myself but I wouldn't deny those directly under you boot first right. Until that day, enjoy posting on your little fascist furry board.

>>71596

>A day is coming soon when you will be shot for your crimes against the people.

What crimes? The fact people insulted your wank material? Nothing more than idolatry and delusion.

>You fear the masses of your country and you are right to fear them. I would pull the trigger myself but I wouldn't deny those directly under you boot first right. Until that day, enjoy posting on your little fascist furry board.

No one fears a group of left-wingers who form their actions from whatever gives them a dopamine hit. You might think that you're freedom fighters, but you're a collective of nihilistic zombies who are incapable of forming independent thought. You're always finding a dumb excuse victimize themselves after seeing their twitter feed.

Even after the ban, it made no difference to you because you cowards want to feel like a victim. We'll live in your head, rent-free forever. Deal with it.

I would honest to got bet a large amount of money that there's some /leftypol/ discord where <20 "people" gather or organize brigades like this to make it seem like they're a majority.

>>71596

It's funny because this is 100% how I feel about kikes and leftist traitors.

>>71604

It's just the same two types of losers with a VPN. The Donald Trump gfur sperg and the /leftypol/ kike who claims that our speech is terrorism and their terrorism is speech.

>>71563

>>71588

The word "hate" appears nowhere on that website, let alone "hate group."

Being classified as extremist is not the same thing as being classified as a hate group. If you have an organisation based around calling people nigger on the internet, that's a hate group but it's hardly extremist.

which isn't to defend or attack the policy either way, just to hold language to what it says rather than what people want it to say.

>>71607

I get that, but it shows that "hate" doesn't mean what it used to mean anymore. It used to mean "acting on your anger against x person/group", now it means being "being offensive to minorities" by placing "It's okay to be white" posters.

The left redefines terms to get an edge and manipulate people. That's why it's best to call their hatred of right-wingers as "hate". Do you see love from their terrorist attacks and "#punchanazi"? Don't compromise with people who are wrong, double down because you are objectively right. That's why we're right-wing. Always draw the line early for left-wing cretins.

>>71601

You continuing to live is a crime you fascist scum. You will be executed for crimes against the proletariat. I'll warm up the guillotine for you.

>>71604

You deserve the guillotine too fascist filth.

>>71608

>The left redefines terms to get an edge and manipulate people

Ah, kinda like what you're doing now by assuming the left is some sort of cohesive whole with singular opinions.

>>71676

I feel like taunting you further, but I don't think you're up for this site. Just pop in SSRIs and snooze. Watch this nippon indie kino that I linked.

>>71692

That's a false equivalence as I'm not redefining a general term like "hate". You can definitely accuse me of generalizing people, but I wasn't complaining about generalization. I was talking about how your side selective enforces their guidelines. The reason why I complained about it is because they're one-sided rules only meant to hinder the opposing one. The types of rules that are equivalent to playing football/soccer, but stating that only those with your jersey can move and shoot around the field.

Dragoneer was only suspending accounts who violated the ToS offsite, which was complete BS. If you're a leftist who supports the speech of others including those qgin you hate, then I'm not talking about you.

How many of you have noticed the following?

>watching accounts you have never heard of

>accounts you were watching are no longer on your watched artist list

Staff seem to be adding their buddies to random user watch list to pad their fame and taking you off other user's watched lists if they don't like you very much.

Lulz has actually defended this practice several times with "well it's their site, if you don't want them messing with accounts then leave" same as they do to justify staff editing your submission tags without permission.

>caught this one as I never NEVER use these useless things and saw submissions had tags added anyway

nothing wrong with the website design, your on a fucking chan op.

>>71710

Less is more.

>>64381

Explain moar plz.

I sent a ticket asking if FA staff remove postings if the characters are canonically below 18. They do. So how long until people get the idea to report everything because x char isn't really an adult, you disgusting pedo!

>>73451

If I were Inkbunny staff, I'd do exactly that while rubbing my hands and grinning evilly.

Sorry asshole, but if an artist ships me an original work I paid for and I want to make copies of the work, then they should not be able to influence my making those copies since I paid for services and goods.

>>73454

Mr. Burns, what are you doing here?

>>64407

Weasyl is more or less everything I could ask for, which makes the fact that people refuse to use it even more tragic.

>>64509

this unironically

>>73463

What's good about Weasyl?

>>73451

http://www.furaffinity.net/user/johawk/ has a few underage in his gallery.

>>73608

Here I am, questioning my life, and then retards draw like that all day.

>>73740

This should be our cue to report this "person" even more.

>>73608

This is the best end for a Trump supporter

>>73746

How the fuck do you report submissions?

>>73778

Why would you report troll accounts?

>>73780

Because I didn't want to see some guy's hairy asscrack every time I used the search term he tagged his photo with.

>>73781

>Using the search on FA

>Willingly subjecting yourself to such a barrage of shit and vomit

Is your brain OK? You know e6 exists for that right?

>>73803

I'm glad you're so concerned about my brain anon.

Anyone use Furaffinity Forums? I never did

>>74111

They're pretty terrible

https://archive.fo/wZQMM

BIG SPICY NEWS

Apparently FA is facing a defamation lawsuit

Some time back I wiped my gallery, found a way to fuck up the onion archive by replacing the files with garbage to goof with their archived backups and deleted my own personal copies of everything. I have not regretted this in the least. FA is run by a defender of a rapist, Sofurry defends known pedophiles, and every other furry-centric art site is also run by awful people, all sharing basically the same terrible community. Oh you left FA because of Zaush? He's on every other site and the staff welcome him. Enjoy accomplishing nothing by doing that. If you have a problem with the fandom, leave every site, not just one site. It's gonna be the same garbage no matter which site you use.

>>75545

>waaah they don't pat the asses of white supremacists, I'ma sue them

This won't even see the inside of a courtroom.

Retarded faggots who earned a permanent "no you will never come the fuck off, cry moar" spot on my block list act like total victims. Sure. Act like a cunt and get told to fuck off, such a victim. Block me, then get mad when I block you back? Fuck you!

No the block list doesn't violate your free speech right, you stupid asshole. It will never be deemed as such on ANY website. It's me telling you to shut the fuck up and making you do it.

>>75545

If they didn't kill so many people, extreme-right people and their wacky legal theories would actually be pretty funny.

This will be a repeat of the sovcit/alt-furry bullshit that shut down rmfc.

Grab your popcorn folks!

Because most people are just watching and favorite-ing art or buying commissions. FA has the largest user base and chance to find something, and not enough people have migrated to other platforms while killing their FA for users to follow them. A lot of emigres won't nuke their FA because of a desire for having some other means of people finding their work.

There's also something shitty about all of the alternatives that makes the grass look browner once you get there.

>Inkbunny

Offshore pedophile asylum and other assorted cancerous autism nurtured by a hard line anti-criticism rule book.

>Weasyl

Poisoned in its earlier days by SJW infestation and presently hobbled by technologically incompetent staff

>Furry Network

Owned by (((Varka))) and designed around a hideous Web 3.0 "all the things be mobile nao" design

>SoFurry

Decent for perusing literature but cumbersome for using it as creator.

What people act like the block function on a website is-

>my rights to free speech have been silenced!

What the block function on a website actually is-

>someone refuses to put up with me acting like a huge faggot and doesn't want any further communication with me!

And even if it is used by some sensitive baby who can't handle critique or has thin skin(ie Kayla-Na) well that's still just too bad, and if they're blocking you over arbitrary reasons then maybe they're a fuckwad and you shouldn't give them the time of day. And block them in return.

>>69087

I loved "Dust: An Elysian Tale," it's too bad almost every other furry themed game I've found has been a visual novel.

>>75677

Well now there's that Ghouls n Ghosts clone named Foxes and Forests.

>>64380

Because it's still less autistic than most alternatives suh as SoFurry

Also because capitalism means that monopolies can crush the competition Varka owns all major furry sites.

Wasn't there a former staff member who quit because they kept trying to work on code to update the site, but the lead programmer wouldn't let them push small bug fixes, but also wouldn't let them see any of the sites embarrassing code? Does anyone remember their name?

>>81138

LexyEevee?

>>81192

>LexyEevee

Looked it up, doesn't look like the thing I remember. Similar stories of most ex-programmers it looks tho

>>78594

The need for validation despite being completely boring shits.

>>78594

>what is with Mexicans not understanding the internet, like this guy or those who upload porn memes on Pinterest

Fixed.

The only thing FA did right in years now was to rig the block function to actually prevent blocked users from faving or watching you. After that I instituted a policy of silently blocking people who -watch me, if my art is either that boring to them all of a sudden, or they got offended by it for whatever reason enough to get mad and -watch, then it can be permanent.

It happens a lot with Sonic fans, I haven't done that shit in years so they get their fee-fees hurt and constantly -watch me since they don't like my new focus. Yeah sure, you're free to think an artist sucks now and -watch, the artist isn't entitled to welcome you back or pander to you to get you back, either. Free speech & expression works both ways and you are not entitled to get your ass kissed by the world.

Furries are so selfish anymore that they will think it's a personal insult if the artists they watch aren't constantly showing respect to "the fanbase" and only drawing what they like. Why comment to an artist or, gasp, pay them for work, just wish really hard and get insulted when you aren't getting your wish.

>>81315

What pisses me off the most is that a lot of furries refuse to even acknowledge anything outside of their limited "comfort zone" interests or fetishes and take personal offense if an artist does things outside of that/

This is all electronic notifications. There is no physical space being taken up. Your inbox is not a pile of papers shoved into your mailbox, it is notifications you can look at or ignore. You could just ignore the stuff, or GASP actually look at it and develop new interests but furries never goddamn fucking do. They only want their niche, which will never change, and if an artist isn't delivering that niche, cut any support for them off instead of expanding your damn horizons some. We're not talking "they did some guro shit that creeped me out way too bad" or "they expressed extremist political views I found in bad taste or disturbing", we're talking "they did a drawing of a thing I don't know and that hurt my feelings, I only want X franchise art and I don't need my inbox filled with things I dislike".

I had someone -watch once because I uploaded 6 things in a day, they griped I was flooding their inbox too much. People like this can absolutely go fuck themselves.

You gripe that artists paywall behind Patreon or show no enthusiasm anymore, what do you show them? You're entitled and think that anything outside of your nice is garbage and that artists owe you only that niche, and that if they dare do anything else they have to be punished. Artists either do what they want and get little notice or sell out and only do the flavor of the month shit and NOTHING ELSE and hate every minute of it. We're fucked either way! And if we take down you suddenly pretend you care about things you barely looked at when they were freely available! And every artist must only do what you want, even though 500 other artists also do that, but single out the one who isn't playing ball and act like you're a deprived victim! "I only got 399 Zootopia pics this month, I wanted 400!"

Forgive me if I find it insulting when I get a -watch for some stupid shit reason which amounts to "fuck the artist, they did a thing I hate and my feelings > their feelings." You're not deprived. Your tastes could expand but you refuse to. You treat artists like slaves that should only ever grant your wishes. You get upset over fucking NOTHING and act like artists should be punished whenever you're offended, which is often because you're offended easily.

No wonder the fandom got overrun by SJW and /pol/ extremist political crap, the pretend victim and entitlement mentalities were already there.

>>81316

If I had to compare furries to anyone, ti would be metalheads. NO ability or desire to go outside their comfort zone, just assume everything that isn't in their interests is garbage without knowing about it, and get mad when your feelings are hurt because you think anything else is treason.

Hardcore metalheads refuse to listen to anything not metal. They think every other genre sucks. They actually get upset if their favorite metal musician works with a rapper.

Corey Taylor praised a fan-made Slipknot/Bieber mashup and didn't trash Bieber. Slipknot fans got pissed, and were already pissed at the guy who did the mashup, you'd think he butchered their families or something.

And it's not worth pushing people to break these habits. They're in a rut and they like being miserable. They need only one thing and they need to be insulted if the people they expect to supply them do otherwise. And with the furry fandom if you are not already popufur you never will be even if you do the flavor of the month shit because they're already getting it from the popufurs anyway. That's funny innit? YOU don't give them what they want and they get mad, you do give it to them and they hardly give a fuck because you're not a big name. I get more -watches than +watches and it's been that way all year. There's no reason other than hurt feelings and entitlement. I don't expect people to be happy with everything I do but it's really reached a point where the fandom is TOO sensitive about small things and I actually think -watching because "I don't like enough of it" sounds more idiotic than anything because it's literally on your screen, no tin your lap. It takes up NO room.

I would go to Tumblr but the place is an SJW shithole, I'd rather not be doxxed because I uploaded tits. I could run an independent site but I'd have to pay out the ass to host AND advertise it and still no one would visit because they are glued to DA, FA, Twitter, Tumblr, Instagram, Pinterest, Facebook or Youtube. I bet independent personal websites will vanish totally within 10 years, they will be that much harder to get visitors over a pre-made site with a built-in potential audience.

I am just so sick of the shithead mentality of the fandom anymore. It's really no wonder artists seem to reach a point of "fuck it, I can't do what I want" and either sell out or give up. Yeah yeah, I knowm it's not just the fury fandom that does this, entertainment has always been riddled with this "the customer is always right, screw the producer" fan mentality but furries really thrive on it big time. On /fur/ I see a lot of "the artists owe me and the world" posts, a dislike of artists owning their drawings, an entitled need to get free fap material even though you haven't yet jacked it to 10% of your porn collection and a severe disdain of artists who do give you stuff because "hey, fuck em".

Show us some love for the work we do, we don't NEED to supply you. We can draw it and never upload. We can not draw at all. Encouragement is nice, acting like a bitch because you didn't get your way to a specific set of rules really fucks YOU over in the long run.

>>81316

>>81317

While I agree with the gist of your post, you're too defensive of artists as a whole. I think it's because you identify with them as a group, which isn't something you have to do. It's something you can consciously reject.

Bad artists breed bad consumers in a vicious cycle. If you've sold out then yeah, fuck it, the customer is always right even if he's a dickhead for encouraging it. A plague on all houses. But the thing is, someone had to sell out to begin with to make that acceptable. But then as you say, furries are naturally the kind of fandom that would breed a tendency to sell out. The consumers are brainless, they were never going to contribute to a creative community where they do their own art, and it's kind of shit, but if you want to be part of a creative community you've got to create even if it's shit, if you just pay other people to create what you want then you're useless. If you only draw pornography because it's an easy ego hit to get MURR!!! comments you're little better, you're one of the constraints on the development of the fandom as something that actually fosters creativity and personal development rather than pandering to the easiest lowest-common-denominator desires there are. But now furry is a market, and as has been the prevailing consensus for decades: you can't buck the market.

Now here's a mixture of advice and loathing for the state of the fandom: Artists who don't like it should fuck off and leave. That's not "oh, if you don't like it then go away!!" anti-change nonsense, it's the only viable option for their own sanity. Furry isn't going to change, so your one option is to withdraw. It doesn't matter what you do next - draw and upload to a place where you get less attention, draw and don't upload it at all, don't draw anymore. What's important is not being part of furry. It's what I do. I haven't uploaded much yet, but I've got a few short animations done in an artstyle that doesn't immediately scream furry and after I've uploaded those I'm going to pretend like I've never heard of the fandom, "check it out" when someone invariably points it out to me, tweet that it seems like a sell-out mess that isn't for me and go back to doing my own thing. Sink or swim, I'd rather build my own independent fanbase with a few furries clinging on at the sidelines than set the top of my aspirations as being popufur as the tallest dwarf in the dwarf porn factory, awkwardly wearing clothes and carrying a star trek communicator.

In many ways watches confuse the measurement for the real thing anyway. Plenty of people +Watch and then pay no attention whatsoever. It's like YouTube subscribers. I've ran a videogame channel on YouTube forever and I've always ignored the subscriber count, it means nothing to me. What I like are comments because they show actual engagement, rather than just interaction that appeals to computer algorithms. But then by that token, I'm a very bad person when I consume because I never subscribe or watch. If I care enough, I'll remember the profile name (and it will be in my browser history) so there's no reason to have an automated list of all the porn or 50s movies I might've seen stored server-side and vulnerable to leaking (since FA code is fucking QUALITY) but we've all been trained to look at the metrics the computers want like subscriber count and view count rather than human measurements of engagement like taking the time to comment or create something related. Not that it matters too much since most furry comments would be inane, but they would at least show individuals were willing to say something and do more than click a button. I'd take 10 comments over 150 watchers.

Everything above might read like I disagree with you entirely. It's not that, it's just that the imageboard format doesn't really justify going through little pieces and going "agreed!" when I could just throw out the extra things I have to say. My biggest disagreement with you would be on hanging around the fandom at all: I think it's a bad idea.

On a side-note, I think it's quite natural to have disdain for pornographers. It's one of those hypocritical elements of modern society: We all consume it, but the people who actually make it are looked down on because it's one of those things you're not supposed to think or talk about in normal life and making it your full time job of hobby runs right up against that. Whether the selfsame rule applies within furry, I have no idea.

>>89341

At first, I thought it was just a photo with a filter applied.

>>81320

I have roughly 400 watchers. Roughly 1%-2% ever fave or comment. I could block all those who don't do either(FA prevents a blocked use from commenting/faving/etc) and they probably wouldn't notice even if 10 years went by.

Some users have this "well I don't have to do any of that" mentality which is selfish in the end, and hurts them because 99% are actually too lazy to save a copy of the art to their computers, so they bitch and moan hard when submissions are deleted because, gasp, they got 3 faves over 5 years and the artist is cleaning out their gallery of crap no one seemed to care for. A lot of FA users are rather entitled, using the watch feature as a lazy bookmark(trust me, I don't think most furries are even aware of what the bookmark feature of a browser does), thinking they'll just look at it later and then they forget, thinking that this is permanent online storage when they have no control over access to it. Then they rely on the onion archive for deleted art, except that will go down because, surprise, that shit costs a fortune to host AND it risks a DMCA purge because, despite what many furries think, it's not public domain content.

Popufurs generate further problems- people watch them because they're already popular so their counts shoot way up and as a result people ignore non-popufurs. Once you hit a certain watcher count it acts like a sponge because people want to suck up to the big names, and if someone is watching 2K+ users they aren't looking at their submissions inbox to start with because that would be a full time job.

>>89371

Ok but how does one go about favouriting/commenting on all the images in the gallery of an artist they follow and like without looking like some sperglord stalker? I see these screencaps artists post of some follower of theirs starring/hearting/liking a fuckton of their submissions in a row and it makes me cringe. Its like some loser following a girl on instagram and liking all her photos from like 2013. And theres only so many times a person can comment "I like this" in some shape or form on any future submission without seeming disingenuous at best or like some no-life porn addict at worst.

>>81315

>you're free to think an artist sucks now and -watch, the artist isn't entitled to welcome you back or pander to you to get you back, either

People do this?

If they stop watching you because you don't draw what they like anymore, who cares?

If they eventually take a liking to what you decided to move on to and watch again, cool I guess.

It's not like you went out of your way to lure them back.

Why make it out as if it's personal?

Does it bother you that much?

>You could just ignore the stuff, or GASP actually look at it and develop new interests

Why does everyone have to like everything?

What's wrong with having a favorite subject?

People telling you that drawing what they don't like is fucked, but there's no reason to expect them to just spontaneously like it either.

Think you're both in the wrong on that one.

>I could block all those who don't do either(FA prevents a blocked use from commenting/faving/etc) and they probably wouldn't notice even if 10 years went by.

Yeah, but why?

What purpose would that serve other than giving you a way to act in some kind of negative fashion towards someone that isn't doing what you want them to?

Just appreciate that there's one more person out there that at least likes your work enough to want to be notified when you've done more.

It's little different than all those people that comment hollow shit like "I love this!" and "SO cute!".

Either way, all you can tell from it is that someone likes your work.

>when submissions are deleted because, gasp, they got 3 faves over 5 years and the artist is cleaning out their gallery of crap no one seemed to care for

I'm not going to say the artist doesn't have the right to delete everything feeling like no one cares, but I will say I never saw the point.

I haven't started an account anywhere myself, but I doubt I'd ever just empty out the gallery entirely even if I gave up on drawing entirely.

There's just not much reason to do so imo.

No matter how few people actually do care about your work, what does it hurt to leave it up for them and any other people that may stumble upon it later?

If you're deleting your old work due to employment risks, that's entirely reasonable and why I completely agree that it's still on the viewers to make back ups of anything they really want to keep.

I'm just not sure why you're this strung up over watches, just how highly do you value them that they get you so stressed out?

>>89379

2-5 word no effort comments are so shit. If you want to leave a good comment that the artist will appreciate, say something about the artist, not just the artwork. My favorite kinds of comments are the ones where people tell me I've improved a lot, or that I've drawn a certain emotion really well.

>>89366

It practically is, 'cept that the 'filtering' was done by hand rather than automated by a script.

trips :DD

>>71222 (checked)

That actually looks decent. I feel like the person just blocked you and you're asshurt now.

>>89444

pedo :DD

>>89407

>>81138

oyu mean the guy who Starchild or Starwind or something the guy who put a bunch of backdoors and admin privs to people?

>>89456

WITH A REBEL YELL.

>>71204

Furry version of #ThotAudit will strike him (if it hasn't already)

Personally I suspect FA is a data mining and/or money laundering scheme for IMVU to use as a front, why else would they buy a porn site? Hell, makes me wonder if the site wasn't ready to close before the buyout since Neer turned down much larger offers in the past. He practically gave the site away.

>>89524

>the audit will only hit people that /pol/ hates and use that meme word against

yeah, sure.

>>64424

can't you just suggest "cub" and its synonyms

I left the shitpile, moved to my own website and dumped the stupid fandom shit I hated(Sonic, etc) from my gallery.

Far as I can tell no one from FA followed the link and they certainly never emailed. I had to take the email link down because web bots were picking it up to add to email spam lists.

They don't want t leave their catch-all gallery site to view anything. I swear furries tape bottles to their dicks so they don't have to go to the bathroom.

>>89549

they'll turn off user-submitted tags to block that.

>>89554

Okay?

>>89482

>Nowhere in here does he call for the extermination of jews

It's also called "reading between the lines", but I guess I'm expecting too much from a parrot with room tempreature IQ.

>>89558

and you had to respond why? Big deal if you're not impressed, I wasn't born to impress you, so fuck off if your bitch feelings are hurt by the post, fag.

>>64398

Sofurry was actually great when was called yiffstar because it knew what it was and it was just a place to read furry erotica. That was it. It worked. It was great. But Tourmal tried to make site be new FA and it failed hard. The transition itself was so fucking glitched it just erased many stories out of the blue and that pissed some writers off and they either quit site for good or took quite some time to write stuff again.

Today site is a ghost of its former self and I really do wonder where people go to read or post their furry smut; certainly isn't in FA or IB but also not SF anymore. if someone knows please do tell.

>>89573

Its not there, you're projecting you stupid paranoid faggot.

FA has a hard coded limit of about 2K names on the block list. I bet this is there to prevent "block everyone who watches a popufur". I blocked all 28K watching a certain deranged nut, found someone I know on the list faving one of my submissions, checked and found the list cut off pretty short in my block field.

I pay zero dollars for a free site to use and I complain about it non-stop......the post.

Lick a clean vagoo faggot.

>you have no right to say a site is run poorly if you don't pay money

I can and I will, and I can not use the site if they wanna fuck it up.

Lick my asshole, conservative soyboy.

>>78594

that's just /k/

because dragoneer is a zoophile and a pedophile and makes tons of money through "donations" which he then writes off as tax and walks away with it free

>>91520

no hes blocking people that think there better then everyone else because they exist on a website and have internet popularity

>>91414

its 2k because if you need to block more then 2000 people you shouldnt be in the furry fandom, the website is trash anyways

>>71204

time to audi everyone on furaffinity. start reporting people.

because of this man:

https://kiwifarms.net/threads/dragoneer-preyfar-firepyro-sean-piche-spottybitch-princess-piche.34077/

>>91538

also hes a pedo as shuik draws teenagers/ late stage children who have hit puberty on inkbunny.

>>64380

Quite a few social media sites, pounced for example, and craigslist personals, for a more mainstream one, had to completely shut down because of FOSTA/SESTA. Logging in to view porn is pretty much necessary on any site with identifiable user accounts.

10MB is a great file size limit. If you can’t fit a file in ten megs you aren’t in the market for a social media site. Their cdn is already slow. I don’t want their servers getting bogged down with gigapixel closeups of buttholes.

The design was totally revamped like uhhh less than two years ago. It’s way better than it was. It’s still got flaws and it’s total shit for music or writing but they’re not completely ignoring it.

Instead of asking a web traffic analysis group what furry sites are hot, have you tried asking furries? 90+% of people searching the internet for furries are looking for people to make fun of or harass.

There used to be a “open full view” option in there. Maybe you don’t have an account so you don’t know about it. That saves you the extra click to see it in full resolution. I don’t use it because I prefer the image to be rendered at full size for the page composition. But some people like it.

>>89526

I am pretty sure IMVU are exploiting it any way they know that might make money.

As for why he turned down previous offers it was probably for personal reasons. You don’t become a successful internet entrepreneur automatically just by making a successful web site. And just because he got a real big offer once doesn’t mean that in today’s economy it’s worth that much today.

>>91475

I used to have an account on that site but toumal is really just such an obnoxious person irl and online that I got sick of hearing him talk shit about races, nations, and sexualities that offend him. It’s easier being a furry without toumal and sf in your life.

I could say similar things about dragoneer but you gotta give him credit.. he exercises his questionable judgment quietly with deeds, and not loudly in the forums.

>>91547

i think he let IMVU buy them out more for legal protection, can you imagine how massive there legal team is?

>>91534

if you ever consider blocking thousands of people on a site, you'd be better off not using that site.

>>91559

If I was dragoneer I would much rather that be imvu’s mess than mine!

>>91548

He admitted the sole reason SF banned cub porn was due to the laws in various countries. He then posted in the comments of that news post that he wanted "age of consent" laws abolished.

Go figure he lets every pedophile he knows have free reign of that place.

>>91567

its also because he lost his alert pay but then IMVU has taken over.

>>91567

hes also a closet pedophile its quite obvious from all his art he gets.

>>91567

and then furries will dismiss this as drama and go NOT DRAGONEER U GUYS ARE TROLS >:C

>>91567

Well age of consent laws are pretty stupid if you really think about it.

When has any child molester ever used “but she said it was ok” as a defense? AoC laws really only offer “protection” to young adults who regret doing something slutty. Or parents who think their daughters are being slutty. The specific age also varies all over the world and even all over the USA.

Kids or adults who are sexually assaulted are still victims of sexual assault. If you diddle a little boy you’re supposed to be babysitting the important thing is not whether the kid was into it or not, it’s the fact that you diddled a little boy you’re supposed to be babysitting.

>>91577

there not there to protect someone whos slutty there there to protect people from being exploited by adults and pedophiles like you. were talking the US and sexual explotion of children is a federal crime, as anyone over 18 or even of the same age can sexually exploit someone, the kid cant be into it because a child doesnt know any better the accountability falls on you to know better and NOT DO IT at ALL its SIMPLE.

>>91579

anyone in the fandom who comes up to me and is sexual saying there 'under 18" is immediatly blocked, theres no reason off the bat a 16 bah lbah lbvah anyone under 18 should be coming at me not knowing me at all and offering me sex, thats just cop bait.

>>91577

Oh look, a pedo, no surprise.

Some states actually do have laws to protect men who screw the underage IF the underage person lied abut their age. But not all states have such protections, even though it should be a federal law.

However if you know they're 13 and pester them for sex you're still a scumbag, and even if they say "yes" you're still a piece of shit.

All those guys on Chris Hansen, they were told the decoy's age in chat right off and still pushed to groom the "kid" or what they believed was a kid. National TV humiliation is more than warranted, no matter what the pedo shits at lulz.net say. And none of them ever pulled the "it' snatural to be attracted to young teens" Milo card- most lied and said the decoy indicated 18+(proven lies as Chris had the chat logs) and only rarely did they admit the decoy stated to be underage. That one odd guy in the first episode even tried to get the decoy to out loud say she was 19 while in the house with her- even though he assumed they were alone. Yeah... they know it's wrong, many of them even admitted in chats they knew it was illegal and did it anyway.

You can't reason with these sick fucks.

>>91579

I’m not a pedo. This may amaze you but it is possible to have an informed opinion about something that doesn’t directly apply to your own life. Try it some time with something that you’ve never thought about.

Also this will really blow your mind, and I apologize, but it’s also possible to be against raping kiddies AND to think the laws are fucked up. I can disagree with one moronic thing you say without having you oppose your stance on morality.

As a parent I think it’s a bullshit law because my kids know how to tell strangers they don’t want to be raped. And I also think it’s a bullshit law because it won’t work any better to deter crime than the laws that prevent raping adults. And also because if a 17-year-old seduces a 15-year-old and gets her knocked up it’s not statutory rape.

Sofurry has such a shitty code that if you log out and view your own profile or submissions every few minutes, the view counter goes up. Even FA only counts your own views on occasion!

>>91601

>I'm not a pedo, I'm just saying fucking kids is okay...

>>91601

>how to tell strangers they don’t want to be raped

Because that will magically stop a rapist, holy shit you're dumb! Often when the pedos don't get consent they just hold down the kid, being strong and big enough to do that, then may end up even killing the kid to ensure they can't talk.

Your daughter saying "no" to someone's face doesn't do shit.

>>64497

Zaush doesn’t run FA you retard. It’s Dragoneer shit dumpster fire of a site.

>>91662

Ok so explain how the law will stop a rapist now.

>>91662

If you read a few court transcripts and articles on child abuse you will find that physical force is not as common as you think.

>>91599

i hunt them on the regular and would rather just put a bullet in there face tbh.

>>91690

no its all coersion and pushing, they dont need physical force they use threats and intimiation and "dont tell daddy this is a secret between us" and all that jazz

>>91689

it wont but it will make it harder.

because whene 1 million people visit the site bot or otherwise and you google monetize and 24k people donate like 500 or 1000 dollars you start to make bank, there server costs were released years ago and it doesnt cost them anything over like 3 grand to host the server.

>>64409

Honestly every other site is broken as shit and employs (((modern))) web design and mandatory JavaScript. Its because furaffinity didn't redesign the site for no reason I stay there. However, if they redesigned the site to (((modern))) standards I would be gone in a heartbeat. Try growing other furry sites without JavaScript or without a web browed who's codebase is several gigabytes large

>>91797

For some reason evey time I said modern it redacted it

>>91797

That automatic extending page every website does now pisses me right off. Separate pages will ALWAYS be superior. Not only can I get down the list much faster if I can skip right to page 9, but after scrolling so much that shit starts to clog up CPU usage bad.

Then again old outdated site design sucks in many ways. If I can't search for an exact term in quotes, fix your shit. FA isn't as bad as Imagefap, which has never been actually updated since it opened, but it's still very lacking in many basic features. Add in that "kick watcher" feature Twitter has. Tags are useless and I don't bother to fill them out, make them useful or I don't care to mess with it.

>>91800

Also, nothing you would do with a whole page.. like searching or printing or offline reading... can work on a website that waits for your eyes to go somewhere before loading the content that belongs there.

>>91797

googles censorship program at work. your blacklisted

>>91800

Watch kicker? Why the hell would that be a feature? Block someone from messaging or commenting on your posts OK but blocking someone else from subscribing is just pointless and a good way to get web-scrapers crawling your site.

>>91852

What do you mean?

>>91417

DONK-EH

GET THE CAM-RUH

>>91891

Twitter has it. It did not cause a black hole to swallow reality as the "muh freedoms" tards said it would. I use it to boot MAGA tards and bots from following me.

FA right now, you can't kick an active watcher, but if they're not watching you and you block them they can't start watching you. FA simply refuses to code that last part. They claim "we'd have to code a system to notify people they were booted" which is just an excuse- Twitter does not notify people their follows were forcibly removed.

because rich european zoophiles and murrsuiters and pedophiles fund his site for there personal networking grounds.

>>91928

>Twitter has it

No offense but twitter is a hell hole

>>91985

Offense intended but no one is obligated to listen to anyone else and blocking someone is not violating free speech. Twitter got the right idea on how to handle blocking.

>>91991

No that's retarded. The purpose of blocking is to stop you from seeing what someone else is posting. Kicking people from seeing what you're posting is just some unnecessary passive aggressive shit.

>>91994

Twitter is full of communists and sjws. Of course they have that feature so they don't get TRIGGERED

>>92041

>and it's my twatter page.

it belongs to twitter

don't like it? nationalise twitter.

>>92101

>it belongs to twitter

But I'm occupying it, so unless you petition to nationalize my twatter page your SOL.

Don't like it? Learn2hack.

>>92113

https://digitaldefynd.com/best-ethical-hacking-course-certification-training-tutorial/

even a dumbass in african with a CSIII course can learn hacking. it doesnt take an idiot with an IQ above 87 to learn how to hack.

>>92121

THEN DO IT YOU NIGGER

DO IT SO HARD