[–]▶ No.55693>>55740 >>55857 >>60290 >>62030 [Watch Thread][Show All Posts]
If /tg/ can have a successful thread for these guys, there's no sensible reason we can't.
Lizard bolds > Trashtier dogbolds.
▶ No.55702>>55705
/fur/ hates servants of the serpent, but you've gotta admit that kabier's kobold design is very lewd despite being primarily male.
▶ No.55705>>55708
>>55702
No shit porn comic designed kobolds are going to be lewd.
The girl was pretty okay, otherwise, though.
My main complaint there is they looked like marshmellows, than scaled lizards, in any case. Too squishy, too many bright colors. Oh, and of course, external balls are gay.
▶ No.55708>>55715
>>55705
the snake queen, amber? yeah, she was no less lewd. she has the same general design just more female looking. and agreed with the marshmallows part. they all ended up looking like very cartoony reptiles with their pastel colors, simple builds and soft linework. still I like kabier's kobold design.
▶ No.55715
>>55708
It's better than a lot of artist's renditions, I guess.
That's more due to a rather large portion going for essentially a child look to 'em, though.
I've always rather liked Trout's take on the lot. Even if he tends to go an incredibly simple design, that rarely seems to change much. The kobolds tend to get a nice small vibe, without pulling any of the usual child frame jazz.
Downside is, like I said, it all stays in a very simplistic style, and doesn't seem to ever change much.
▶ No.55724>>55725 >>55726 >>55863
Hows about my weird colour-changing kobold?
▶ No.55725>>55806
>>55724
>ladies and gentlemen, my latest invetion: the universal sparkledogliz
▶ No.55726>>55806 >>55857
>>55724
I'm still not a fan of how the blending goes about. I don't dislike the idea of a chameleon type kobold, but the blending as is gives more of a sparkledog impression.
To be fair, a low end sparkledog impression, but still.
Also:
>no cloaca
trashbin
▶ No.55740>>55784
>>55693 (OP)
>ridiculously simple drawn character
>billions of clicks
Fuck the internet.
▶ No.55784>>55857
>>55740
Elaborate. Talking about Trout's stuff or something?
▶ No.55788>>55789 >>55790 >>55836
>>55786
Best part about a kobold
You don't know until it's too late
▶ No.55789>>55812 >>55813
>>55788
>It's too late
What do you mean?
▶ No.55790>>55791 >>55903
>>55788
It's actually the worst part if you aren't a filthy bisexual. I don't want to spend hours searching through a cave filled with kobolds, trying to find the one with a dick
▶ No.55791
>>55790
Funny, I try to find the one with a pussy.
I have the feeling if the furry world was real, it would just die out. Ironically, in a flood of jizz.
▶ No.55806>>55812
>>55725
>>55726
I didn't want to get just a single colour. At first I was gonna go with the colour of bismuth, but that turned out looking pretty weird, then the artist did the current version and I felt it looked pretty good. But yeah, the one I get from Trout in January will have a cloaca though.
Though what would you do on a still picture to try to represent her colour changing?
Originally in her backstory (for Pathfinder) is because her mom got it on with the local dragon and when the dragon realized she was magical and could fucking change colours he exiled the both of them.
▶ No.55812>>55832 >>55836 >>55869
>>55789
You stick it in their cloaca, and it turns out, there's company inside.
>>55806
I'd say keep going for the color change, but skip the gradient that it's got currently, honestly.
The color should appear to more naturally change, rather than the sudden jazz it seems to have in the above lot. It looks like your character has bands of color, rather than is simply shifting color.
Although, you might want to consider a simple gif, for the character. It'd be pretty cool.
▶ No.55813>>55832 >>55861
>>55789
You're going to be able to tell 'em apart in all likelyhood anyway, by looking at the ones who have egg-laying hips and the ones who don't.
Unfortunately, sometimes that line blurs, or there are exceptions.
▶ No.55832
>>55812
>>55813
>mfw shoving dick inside lizard for science
▶ No.55836>>55853
>>55812
>>55788
>Implying that a cute submissive kobold boy wouldn't instantly get fully and desperately aroused just from the sight of a superior male
▶ No.55853
>>55836
>implying kobolds aren't by default aroused, by virtue of having inherited draconic libido.
▶ No.55857>>55858 >>55861
>>55693 (OP)
>>55784
>>55726
these are the only kobolds in this thread
▶ No.55861>>55862
>>55857
>>55813
oh and this one too
the rest look like pokemon or some shit
▶ No.55862
>>55861
Eh, that's fair I guess.
▶ No.55863>>55864 >>55869 >>55876
>>55724
tfw not a kobold cuntboy
▶ No.55866>>55876
>>55864
tfw not a kobold vagibro with a husband who'll fill my pussy up
▶ No.55869>>55873
>>55812
Anyone you'd suggest? A small pixel-y colour changing gif would be pretty neat.
>>55863
I'm sorry anon. The blue eyed fox in the first picture is a cboi tho (pictured)
▶ No.55873>>56437
>>55869
I'd suggest you get a troutpiece and edit the lot yourself. His stuff's simple enough, it shouldn't be too hard.
Otherwise, furry animators are fairly rare, when it comes to quality
▶ No.55876>>55877 >>55954 >>55967 >>57886
>>55863
>>55866
why not cut your dick off, you could be halfway there already
▶ No.55877>>55878
>>55876
Those seem a bit thick to comfortably fit in that slit.
▶ No.55878>>55880
>>55877
They're probably not inflated with blood all the time
Then again I'm not an expert on fantasy lizard dick mechanics
▶ No.55880
>>55878
Over on /tg/, we had a nice long post about how aligator penises work.
Pretty interesting stuff.
▶ No.55903>>57017
>>55790
They have guides for this shit ya know.
▶ No.55930>>55946
Why is this thread bumplocked?
▶ No.55946
>>55930
Is it seriously?
Surely they wouldn't do that. It isn't even an image thread. We've been having discussion.
▶ No.55954
>>55876
that's gross and unreliable and dangerous tho ;w;
▶ No.55965
Yay the bumplock got removed
▶ No.55967>>55993 >>55996
>>55876
Here's a fun fact: reptile hemipenes are only used one at a time.
▶ No.55993
>>55967
What's the fun in that?
▶ No.55996>>56010
>>55967
That's terribly sad. Wasted potential, right there.
Anyway, here's that /tg/ aligator penis post. You might find it useful.
As for cloacae, I found a slightly interesting written piece about alligators. I'm just going to cut and paste the relevant parts, rest is nonsense.
>…During mating, the penis comes OUT of the cloaca, and the sperm flows along it into the cloaca of the female (fun crocodilian fact: female alligators and crocodiles have a clitoris!).
>So we know the sperm gets into the female, and we know the penis everts out of the cloaca, but HOW? The authors of the first paper listed were interested in figuring out exactly how the alligator penis works. So they took four alligator penises, and dissected them very carefully, with care for things like glands and cell types, to determine how exactly the crocodiliants get it up. And it turns out that it's a weird hybrid of methods. First off, as the authors note: Phallus stiffness can be achieved in various ways,
>The two most common ways are via fibrous tissue, such as cartilage or ligaments, and via an inflatable area of the penis, which fills with blood (or lymph) to create stiff member. And as it turns out, the alligator has BOTH. They have fibrous bodies at the base of the penis, while there is a blood sinus (empty area) at the tip. When the alligator gets goin', the authors hypothesize that the muscles around the base of the penis control the fibrous bundles to exude the penis from the cloaca. Meanwhile the tip fills with blood to create a rigid structure.
>The second question is one of flow. As in, seminal flow. How and where does the sperm flow from the penis to the female cloaca? As you can see from the diagram above, the seminal duct doesn't delivery directly to the penis, it's a little above. So there are two possibilities. The sperm could flow along a groove in the penis into the female cloaca, as occurs in birds like ducks, or it could go through a tube in the penis, as it occurs in mammals. And here again, it's something of BOTH. The alligator penis does have a groove at the base of the penis.
>But the groove (or sulcus) is lined with MORE of the erectile tissue that fills with blood. The authors hypothesize that during an erection, the groove actually closes to form a tube, down which the sperm will flow. There are even muscles that could contract to help it along. There are even more interesting things about the alligator penis. For example, there are glands associated which might produce a semen like substance, which wasn't thought to exist in alligators. There are also a lot of mucus glands and a great deal of immune cells in the penis, which is probably a good idea if you're hiding it in the cloaca (where all waste products also exit), and then sticking it in someone ELSE'S cloaca where all THEIR waste products exit.
>But overall what interests me is how much of a hybrid this penis is. It doesn't just have fibrous tissue or just fluid filled tissue, it has both! It doesn't have sperm flow along a groove or down a tube, it has a hybrid of the two.
Here are their references
Moore, B., Mathavan, K., & Guillette, L. (2012). Morphology and Histochemistry of Juvenile Male American Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis) Phallus The Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology, 295 (2), 328-337 DOI: 10.1002/ar.21521
Thomas Ziegler & Sven Olbort (2007). Genital Structures and Sex Identification in Crocodiles Crocodile Specialist Group Newsletter , 26 (3)
▶ No.56010>>56018
>>55996
>Wasted potential, right there.
For WHAT? Silly nonsense fantasies like double-penetration or penetrating two partners at the same time, or other such things that literally never happen with real animals? In case the multiple threads disparaging sergals haven't made it clear yet: genitals are not a vehicle to enable your fetishes.
▶ No.56018>>56019 >>56135
>>56010
Double penetration means more points of contact, which in turn leaves higher likelyhood of insemination.
Likewise, two partners increases targets inseminated.
Oh, and of course, multiple penises can be used to better fill the target's holes, thus pinning it in place, for more time to inseminate said target.
Nature's fetishized enough to justify these things.
▶ No.56019>>56021
>>56018
Yet none of those things happen. It's still just fantasy and the erroneous belief that evolution of an organ follows some kind plan or logic.
▶ No.56021>>56027 >>56135
>>56019
They're sensible reasons they could happen. It was only intended as an example of the wasted potential involved.
Animals do have measures to keep a mate pinned during the mating process, as well as things to help ensure insemination. Only odd one out is the double partners.
Just because you lack imagination doesn't mean something has no reason to exist. You can find reasons for just about anything. That's part of the fun. Worldbuilding is pretty much the primary reason I'm even in this whole 'furry' thing.
▶ No.56027>>56028
>>56021
Whatever. Form should follow function, not the other way around. Having two dicks is just a way to make an OC more of a special snowflake. It's never any good.
▶ No.56028
>>56027
Maybe not, but if everything was just flat and dull, we'd only have basic humans.
While I agree you should start with worldbuilding before sex appeal, there's no reason you can't try some different things to make your creatures unique, especially if you're using things traditionally on other creatures you are using as the framework for your new lot.
▶ No.56096
So, to basically repeat a question from /tg/, what do you think it'd be like, living with a koboldic maiden?
I guess it depends on which varient of kobolds you end up taking. Personally, I love the idea of her essentially fortifying your entire house, making it a certifiable bunker. Traps laid out through the halls, your garden replaced with a trench line, barbed wire running literally everywhere, and multiple supports taken out for ease of collapsing in event of an emergancy.
▶ No.56098>>56099 >>58135
My bloo 'bold. Some great stuff in this thread!
▶ No.56099>>56100
>>56098
This is the type of jazz I meant, earlier. A lot of folk go full child, with their kobolds. I can't get in to it. I desire actual hips.
I want my lizards small, but with a mature shape, at least. Not like, say, hobbits, or some other such jazz.
▶ No.56100>>56101
>>56099
I get that, I really do. I like pronounced hips, etc. in dragons (flat chests, though, I think breasts look odd). I think mine has small hips.
▶ No.56101>>56103 >>56178
>>56100
Agreed on the breasts at least. Though, I do like a touch of outwardness to the lot. Best example I've seen is this lot. Not really kobolds, 'least as far as I know, though.
▶ No.56103
>>56101
I've seen that pic before I forget what they are (something artist-created, I think) but I like them. My kobolds are an alien species in the setting I've made, and they have their own planet. It's quite possible that kobolds elsewhere on the planet look like that, and some others could look like, say, OP's first image. They likely all have the head-spikes-that-aren't-exposed-horns.
▶ No.56117>>56120
I wish there were more male Kobolds.
And ACTUAL Kobolds, not "small dragon guy with a huge cock".
▶ No.56120>>56121 >>56132 >>56410 >>57717
>>56117
Read servants of the serpent and ignore the jason shit and the story. good gay scalie fap material and the kobold designs are good if you like cute.
▶ No.56121>>57717
>>56120
I got the impression it was going to be ALL Jason fetish material. Not cucking or cheating, but "rape until they kinda secretly enjoy it."
▶ No.56126>>56127 >>56134 >>56173
▶ No.56127
>>56126
You mean bolds with boobs? They're not my thing, but we're all just making up our own kobold canons, so if you've got 'em, post 'em!
▶ No.56132>>56134 >>56162
>>56120
>Read a story, but don't pay attention to the story
Wut?
Anyway, that's pretty much the exact opposite of what I like for Kobold designs. "Cute" is fine, but not soft and shaped like dogs. Certainly not with boring human dicks.
▶ No.56134>>56135
>>56126
'Bolds with boobs are pretty bad.
As are lizards with tits in general.
>>56132
The big issue with that comic is the kobolds had more in common with marshmallows, than lizards.
▶ No.56135>>56137
>>56018
>>56021
nice pics
>>56134
idk .. I don't mind tits personally but I don't focus on that anyways. I'm just really into the lizard-gf's like pic related.
▶ No.56137>>56141
>>56135
They aren't the worst thing in the world, but I much prefer without. That's because I prefer more beastlike furstuff in general, though. I like my fantasy creatures to be more fantasy than human.
▶ No.56141>>56142
>>56137
I like the balance in that one. But I also like some weirder shit like this, because there's still the obvious feminine features tbh. I'm not sure why I like the beastly aspect, but its kind of growing on me as well.
Now if only there was a fur/scalie place on the internet that wasn't a complete wasteland/dead.
▶ No.56142>>56143
>>56141
You are as a baby to me.
Behold.
More seriously, that sort of jazz is pretty much the ideal when it comes to things like 'lizardpeople' as it were. I want something that's alien, after all, but clearly feminine at least.
Unfortunately, outside of that artist, hardly anyone really seems to hit this place. Most furries go straight human form. Even the ones that don't are still usually majority-human form.
▶ No.56143>>56153
>>56142
Ah man .. I like that too. Just not as much. Maybe because there is less physically.
I'm not really into the entirely feral thing if I'm being honest, although snakes seem like a bit of an exception. I definitely agree that there is a sweet spot like that though. I think its the thighs/midsection that does it... I just want to grab that and fall asleep with a mommy-lizard-gf who wants my bodyheat and seed. If there were more artists who did the balanced style I would probably have more than just 3 or 4 fucking pictures but whatever.
▶ No.56153
>>56143
I'm pretty much the same way. Outside snakes and dragons, I'm not much a fan of feral.
Cold blooded qts are the best, in any case. Idea of a lizard gal effectively being magnetized to you during the cold seasons is just adorable.
▶ No.56162>>56178 >>56181 >>56212 >>56410
>>56132
>shaped like dogs
I don't see it honestly. They look like cutesy anime dragon/lizard people to me which is probably what Kabier was going for. A much softer design compared to most Kobolds. Speaking of which, she actually made a daki of Gidgit pic related.
▶ No.56173
>>56126
I love the prophet Mohamad!
▶ No.56178>>56380 >>56470
>>56162
Still too marshmallowy for me. I don't mind cartoonish, good example being >>56101 , but this stuff was just too squishy for me.
▶ No.56181>>56380
▶ No.56212>>56380
>>56162
Kabier's stuff is a bit too cartoony and, well, yes, marshmallowy for me.
▶ No.56380
▶ No.56410>>56412 >>56435
>>56162
>>56120
>All the Kobolds have "generic tiny-but-thicc femboi" bodies
>Everyone has boring human dicks except for Jason's special-snowflake self-insert
>Who interrupts the plot to cram in his "please fuck me daddy" fetish
>It's all gay except for interactions with the "queen", who is asexual... except when she's not
>Every single sex scene is some type of rape, and literally nobody even LIKES (much less loves) the person they're having sex with
>And this shit slogs on for over 60 goddamn pages
This may very well be the worst comic I've ever had the displeasure of forcing myself to finish. Why are decent artists always the worst writers on the fucking planet? How can anyone like this shit??
▶ No.56412
>>56410
Jason did most of the writing but not all. Kabier played a noticeable part. Most of the marshmallowbold shit was Kabier's idea.
▶ No.56435>>56439
>>56410
Have to agree, the writing ruined the whole lot, even if I could get by the marshmallow bolds.,
▶ No.56437>>56438
▶ No.56438
▶ No.56439>>56440
>>56435
Oh, don't get me wrong, Gidget is KINDA cute, but the plot is just disgusting. I simply cannot understand how people get off to sex like this. It can only be concluded that it's only people who have literally never had real sex, and think that's what it's supposed to be like. You spend the entire comic gay-raping a straight guy, and then just when he starts to enjoy things, he goes and has straight sex to finish things off. This seems like the perfect plot, if you want to piss off EVERYONE.
▶ No.56440>>56443 >>56446 >>56447
>>56439
It's a fucking porn comic. Besides, most idiots who read it liked it. The story is shit, but then again most porn comics have shit stories to begin with. It's solely designed for gay scalies, tumblrinas (like kabier herself) or scalies that are into cuckoldry. Still, Jason and Kabier shouldn't be calling themselves a "writer"
▶ No.56443>>56445
>>56440
>It's a fucking porn comic
Ah, the "I have no respect for this medium and I will argue with you over your not having respect for this work." The most common but also the best form of heated agreement.
▶ No.56445>>56448
>>56443
Don't know what you're sperging about, but my point still stands. I am not defending it I don't even like it but it's porn for fucks sake. You are supposed to get your rocks off to it, not read it like a book and care about the story. It's like the gameplay vs story argument /v/ talks about so much.
▶ No.56446
>>56440
>It's solely designed for gay scalies
Dunno how you got that from the straight MC who doesn't turn gay from all the gay sex he gets.
▶ No.56447
>>56440
Even among porn comics, it was horribly writ, though. That's the thing.
▶ No.56448>>56451
>>56445
/v/'s retarded, and anything they say around game design should not be taken to any real degree.
Far too much of it fails to understand that story, just like anything else, is but one tool in the arsenal of gaming. A good game can be built around a story, a good game can be built around gameplay.
In any case; A sufficiently weak gameplay or story, or worse, a story or gameplay given focus but poorly executed, will always piss people off.
It's like going to a restaurant, and one place, they don't give you a salad. Fine, whatever, I don't need a salad that much if the main dish is great. But, then, you go to another restaurant, and they give you a salad, it's a good chunk of the order, only it's literally full of shit. Obviously that gives you an ill opinion towards the meal, even if the main course is good. They gave you a shit salad.
▶ No.56451>>56562
>>56448
Agreed. Both /v/'s however memes aside are hiveminds no matter how much they deny it. They all talk and act the same whilst having identical opinions and having a "blacklist" of games they hate. Say anything bad about Splatoon, say anything good about Spore and you'll be shot on site etc.
▶ No.56453>>56455
>>56452
>that pathetic tail, though
▶ No.56455>>56457 >>58846
>>56453
If I had nothing else I wouldn't complain but obviously a strong shapely tail is desirable.
▶ No.56456>>56457 >>56458 >>57718
>>56452
>human
yuck fucking eww DISGUSTING
Lesbian/Solo Kobold girls are the best.
▶ No.56457>>56458
>>56455
It's damn near vital, you ask me. A plump tail represents vitality, fertility. A kobold maiden without a good, thick tail of decent length is no good, plain and simple.
It's near as important as a good set of egg-laying hips.
>>56456
>he doesn't know the joy of a warm-blooded mate
▶ No.56458>>56461
>>56457
Its similar to some other fantasy-lizard species though isn't it? The tail is a thing of pride as well. I'm just saying I wouldn't be cruel and toss away a kobold qt because she lost/never had a tail. Human sympathy and all that.
>>56456
Weak taste boi
▶ No.56461>>56464 >>56787
>>56458
True. Across lizard-races tails are important. Though, I'd say more so with kobolds, as where other lizard-races are lizard races, their tails grow back. Kobolds are not lizards, they are dragons. Or, rather, dragonoids, anyway. Dragons keep their scars.
Still, I suppose abandoning someone over the loss of theirs is somewhat rotten. Though, when choosing a suitor, the tail ought to be one of the first concerns.
▶ No.56464>>56503 >>61224
>>56461
I really really really like this artstyle though. Is there a complete Guoh dump somewhere that isn't tumblr? I stopped using it for various reasons
▶ No.56470>>56503
>>56178
How 'bout this dragon person?
<tinyboard flag alt></tinyboard>
▶ No.56482>>56503
Trash knight has some pretty good Kobolds
▶ No.56503
>>56464
Not that I've found. I think I had one anon's mega upload at one point, but it'd be a years out of date anyway.
>>56470
I'm not much a fan of the chest bumps. Or the rather flamboyant coloration, to be honest. Otherwise, she looks nice enough.
>>56482
▶ No.56562>>56567 >>56570
>>56451
Most of fullchan are just composed of pathetic idiots desperate to have their stupid ideas confirmed, so they circlejerk together and kick out anyone who doesn't agree with them. The only reason it's not like that here is because there aren't enough posters; you can't have a mob-mentality without a large enough mob. But /furry/ was; holy shit was it EVER a goddamn circlejerking shithole.
▶ No.56567
>>56562
I don't know if that's fair. /v/'s got its few hiveminds, but even there, people are usually too busy screaming at eachother for it.
And most everywhere else seems to jump all over the place. /tg/ and /k/ being my two examples, since they're the places I most hang around.
Incidentally, kobolds would be /k/ as fuck, I bet.
Pretty much perfectly suited to modern warfare. Not so big deal if you aren't particularly strong, or tough, as it is that you are able to shoot accurately, and can move quick.
Endurance would be a problem. But, I'm not so sure kobolds really lack that, as much as they simply are physically weaker.
▶ No.56570>>56779
>>56562
Depends on the board my friend tbh.
Even then it's not a concrete thing.
Boards like /v/ and either of the /pol/s definitely have their shitty vol teams who do their best to kill every discussion that disagrees with some general concept, but actual dissent manages to leak through whenever the hotpockets are asleep and unable to screech, and outside of the obligatory "S-SHILL SHILL SSSSSSSSHHHHHHHIIIIIIIIIIIILLLLLLLLL" spergs other anons typically respond civilly.
Most of the other boards seem pretty alright from what I've seen.
Except for /a/. I don't know what the fuck happened but that board managed to dip below cuck/a/ in regards to quality.
▶ No.56779
>>56570
>Except for /a/. I don't know what the fuck happened
The mods are in love with lolis and moeshit and have created a culture on the board which worships it, almost to the exclusion of everything else. If you look at the catalog, 95% of the threads are some moeshit show with a cute little girl as the OP. Also, the mods will actively edit posts to remove anything that doesn't fit their agenda, including criticism and anything "off topic".
It's a classic case of overbearing moderation killing a board.
▶ No.56787>>56789 >>56792
>>56461
>kobolds
>dragons
Dragons are mammals. Kobolds lay eggs and are more like a lizard/dino.
▶ No.56789>>56871
>>56787
Dragons are absolutely not fucking mammals.
▶ No.56792>>56867
>>56787
Dragons lay eggs too
▶ No.56867>>56868 >>56872 >>56895
>>56792
Monotremes are mammals. They lay eggs too. Dragons have the body structure of a dog/cat and often have paws with pads and fur. They are mammals.
▶ No.56868>>56873
>>56867
Go back to the anatomy thread and shit it up with your poor taste some more pal. Dragons and Kobolds are reptiles you delusional retard.
So aside from that, should Kobolds be tied up and used as fucktoys tho?
▶ No.56871>>56895
>>56789
>A creature in the dragon family with tits
>Then claims they aren't mammals
Yeah right, whatever you say.
<tinyboard flag alt></tinyboard>
▶ No.56872>>56873
>>56867
Mate, come to the beast folk thread. And tell me how a creature with 6 limbs, scales, and lays eggs is a mammal. Because to my ears, that creature doesn't belong in any animal group alive today. The only creatures with 6 limbs are insects.
<tinyboard flag alt></tinyboard>
▶ No.56873>>56874 >>57029
>>56872
>>56868
Most dragons have paws with pads, fur, hair or whatever and the anthros have tits. They ARE mammals. Most people see them this way. Stop being retarded idiots.
▶ No.56874
>>56873
Mate, show me a mammal with wings, scales, and 6 limbs.
<tinyboard flag alt></tinyboard>
▶ No.56895>>56901
>>56867
They do not have paw pads, unless you're a faggot. Likewise for fur. I can accept feathers, but fur is gay.
>>56871
Stop namefagging, you gay-ass cuckold.
▶ No.56901>>56907 >>56922 >>56993
>>56895
No, please kys.
<tinyboard flag alt></tinyboard>
▶ No.56907>>56908 >>56912
>>56901
>Chris Sawyer
Nope, I've seen his dragon x horsefucker porn, you aren't f ooling anyone
▶ No.56908
>>56907
Fuck me, I thought I was on /tg/ for a second, nevermind
▶ No.56912>>56921 >>56936
>>56907
How can I find it?
▶ No.56921>>56924
>>56912
Maybe I'm thinking of someone else then. I remember seeing some similar styled stuff back when Yiffstar was called Yiffstar, and a random image feature. That's how I found Karabiner and lots of older artists
▶ No.56922>>56923
>>56901
Oh, hey, I used to play Rollercoaster Tycoon all the time. I didn't know he did lewds too.
▶ No.56923
>>56922
Actually two different people
▶ No.56924>>56927 >>56936 >>56939
>>56921
Oh it's m/m. Oh course. Like friggin everything. Nevermind then.
▶ No.56927
▶ No.56936
▶ No.56939>>56949 >>56990
>>56924
>Like friggin everything
Bitch, there's like sixty fucking images of kobolds in this thread and only FOUR of them are even of males, ONE of which is unquestionably m/m.
▶ No.56949>>56985 >>57003
>>56939
That's mostly because 8chan /fur/ is strangely mainly straight.
Good, I say. /furry/ was horrible about that.
Still, kobolds are I think one of the more balanced species. Lot of kobold women. Not sure why, exactly. Perhaps because kobolds require a bit more than simple raw scribbles of penis on a human frame.
▶ No.56985>>56988
>>56949
There was a lot more of EVERYTHING on /furry/. More gay content, more straight content, more people complaining about gay content. You're delusional if you think everywhere isn't like this place. e621 has something like 150% as much straight content as gay (and that's if you don't count the solo females which also outnumber solo males).
Honestly, at this point trying to say that being straight makes you the victim, in a world that already caters to you 99% of the time, is incredibly disgusting.
▶ No.56988>>57005 >>57011
>>56985
Eh, I'd make the case that /furry/ didn't have all that much straight content. 'Least not when I stopped posting there.
I'm not trying to say I'm the 'victim', mate. Maybe stop projecting your insecurities so much?
▶ No.56990>>56992
>>56939
I want dragons fucking mares. I don't care about Kobolds, I think it's one of the most stupid fandom trope in recent years, only made up for people who suck at drawing. And whyever Kobolds are lizards, must be a stupid ass pen & paper thing.
▶ No.56992>>56993
>>56990
Why are you looking for dragons fucking mares in the kobold thread?
▶ No.56993>>57004
>>56992
Because this looks like a dragon about to fuck a mare. >>56901
▶ No.56995>>57003 >>57551
So why isn't there more art of groups of horny kobolds begging to get fucked by a dragon? Like regardless of what a bold is packin in their slit, I think any kobold would give all to take some proper draconic dong.
▶ No.57003>>57011
>>56949
I think /fur/ is a pretty even split as far a sexuality is concerned, and while /furry/ wasn't as balanced (trending towards gays), it had a much bigger problem of "gays vs. strights" shitposting. This alone outright killed several threads just because of how frequent people argued about it. Luckily, /fur/'s been free of this since its inception and I'm really glad because of it.
As for kobolds, I haven't looked into the ratio of male to female, but aren't they kind of an ambiguous race assuming the females have flat chests? Although, now that I'm looking at e621, a lot of people seem to just assign human genitallia to whatever gender the kobold is supposed to be.
>>56995
I'm a bit surprised too. I couldn't find very much art of it at all. This one is pretty cute though.
▶ No.57004
>>56993
No it doesn't.
It looks like a dragon about to eat a horse.
Can't you read pictographs you autist?
▶ No.57005>>57006 >>57011 >>57016 >>57719
>>56988
what kind of gifts do kobolds typically like?
▶ No.57011>>57017
>>56988
You might not be saying it, but walking in here, "Oh, woe is me, there is too much gay stuff!" sure is acting like one.
>>57003
It's difficult to figure out what the ratio really is, because most of the "kobolds" around on e621 are just small dragons that have none of their actual traits. Few of them have a proper genital slit or cloaca. Like how putting a striped tail on a fox does not a raccoon make. At this point, it's become little more than a meme label to put on your cutesy dragon OC to make it more of a special snowflake.
>>57005
A double mastectomy?
▶ No.57016
>>57005
Being dragonoids, gems and coins are always good. Otherwise, mechanisms. Kobolds love traps, after all. So things that help facilitate traps are always good.
Kobolds do have a bit of a penchant for mechanical puzzles, along that lines. Especially the "secret way to open" type boxes. You know, the ones that require you to move something or hold it just right to open the 2nd compartment, or something like that.
▶ No.57017>>57018 >>57019
>>57011
Rad numbers, my friend.
But yeah, as usual, a lot of furry artists fail to accurately represent whatever creatures they draw, or they exercise their artistic license too much. In this case, kobolds have a pretty simple definition. The modern kobold is depicted as a small, cold-blooded dragon/lizard-like humanoid. There are, canonically, variants for different climes and even a species with wings, so there's certainly room for variation with kobolds. What doesn't make a kobold are mammalian features, e.g, tits, bellybuttons (yes I know there's one in the accompanying images) , hair, external genitalia. Personally, I would love more faithful kobold art/porn. They are what I have an interest in, not the weird too-human/lizard abominations that label themselves as kobolds.
>>55903
I somehow missed this until now. This is great.
▶ No.57018
>>57017
>3-4 feet
Just the right height.
▶ No.57019>>57020
>>57017
The most important thing, I think, is that they really shouldn't be "attractive", in a typical furry sense. Not cute or soft or smooth or well-proportioned or anything like that. More like scaly, homely, scrawny, rat-like and pathetic looking. Kinda like an ill-formed child digging through a dumpster on the wrong side of town. That's not to say they can't have admirable traits or personality, but it should never LOOK that way.
▶ No.57020>>57021
>>57019
I disagree with that. You don't have to have rough scales, and anyone who does just straight child like kobolds is a faggot.
▶ No.57021>>57022
>>57020
A creature that is four-feet-tall and weighs as much as a medium-sized dog is going to be physically child-like, no matter how you beat around the bush about it. That certainly doesn't mean they would be proportioned like children or act like them. Don't be so defensive.
▶ No.57022
>>57021
That's what I mean. Thus the term "straight child like kobolds". Just because they're small doesn't make them child-like. They're just tiny, not child-like.
See the picture I had posted as an example of this.
▶ No.57029>>57057 >>57060
>>56873
This. Dragons are indeed mammals. Laying eggs isn't exclusive to saurischians (see monotremes) Reptiles don't have paws, mammalian ears and fur for crying out loud.
▶ No.57057>>58984
>>57029
There are tons of illustration where they don't have paws nor ears, your argument is null
▶ No.57060>>58984
>>57029
Dragons don't have paws, fur, or mammalian ears, you fucking jew.
▶ No.57551>>57568
Bumping.
>>56995
You might be interested in this one.
▶ No.57568>>57592
>>57551
As a kobold, your options are either spine-breaking dicking, or hotdogs in hallways. Also probable pelvis snapping.
▶ No.57592>>57603 >>57612
>>57568
Why does there have to be such a huge size disparity, anyway? Dragons don't always have to be the sizes of school buses or airplanes. What if you just got a younger one?
>hotdogs in hallways
Someone needs to do a short comic where a dragon asks a kobold to top, and the kobold just refuses because that goes against his principles of being subservient.
▶ No.57603>>57609
>>57592
For the most part, I agree. Dragons can be fairly small. Though, they're really going to be fairly large, even if they're not to that degree. Young dragons might be fuckable, by a kobold, in any case. Though, the problem is, a kobold is also quite a small creature. While a human might be able to fuck an adult dragon, a kobold's going to have difficulty.
Fortunately kobolds have their natural stretchyness, at least when it comes to males.
▶ No.57609>>57706
>>57603
Given their reproductive strategies, I always thought kobolds would have disproportionately large penises. Like bigger than a human's despite being only 3-4 feet tall.
Really starting to want to write something about kobolds.
▶ No.57612>>57618
>>57592
What, haven't you heard of a power bottom?
▶ No.57618
>>57612
Doesn't work when the kobold prematurely ejaculates just from having you hovering above him.
▶ No.57706
>>57609
Even with fairly big dicks, the kobold's going to struggle. I mean, dragons are some odd ten times their size.
▶ No.57717>>57740
>>56121
>>56120
Why does Jason have to ruin everything?
▶ No.57718
>>56456
If they didn’t draw a human how would they do a self-insert fantasy?
▶ No.57719>>57793
▶ No.57740>>57765
>>57717
Jason Unruhe ruins proletariat organization and Jasonafex ruins porn
▶ No.57765
>>57740
Reminder never name your child Jason.
▶ No.57793
>>57719
>colored orange
>explodes easily
A kobold would love this shit. Good job, anon.
▶ No.57886>>57909
>>55876
Being null would be fun :3
▶ No.57909>>57961
>>57886
I don't know what you think the definition of "fun" is, but always pissing all over yourself and never being able to have another orgasm doesn't seem like what I think of as fun.
▶ No.57961>>57965 >>57992
>>57909
girls don't always piss all over themselves, do they...?
▶ No.57965
>>57961
they do and they either don't wipe at all or wipe their ass and their pussy one time in one motion using one piece of toilet paper
▶ No.57992>>58044
>>57961
Yes, and even so, nobody has ever given a good answer as to where the hell the urethra would go on a "null". They're usually portrayed with a featureless crotch and an anus and nothing else; I'd have to assume they just pee out their butthole somehow.
But seeing how such anatomical trickery is impossible for a human, it would just be where your urethra already is, minus the dick. This is sticking out in front, as opposed to a woman's which is pointed more downwards. So barring some kind of acrobatic positioning, it would just spatter everywhere and dribble down your legs.
▶ No.58044>>58062
>>57992
Or it could just be where girls have it owo
▶ No.58062>>58068
>>58044
Okay, so it dribbles down the inside of your legs instead of the front. Not much of an improvement.
▶ No.58068>>58194
>>58062
o-oh... th-that's what girls get?
▶ No.58071>>58072 >>58088 >>58098 >>58102
Can I post a hybrid? This character's mom is a rabbit, dad's a kobold. She's mostly rabbit in looks, but has kobold size (in my setting, they're around 4' tall) and tail type. Breasts come from the rabbit side, too, my kobolds are all flat.
The note on her bag refers to a book, but also references her side job. Won't bore people with info here, just postin' bunbold.
▶ No.58072>>58075
>>58071
Looks a bit too bunyish for me to really think "kobold".
Not enough lizardic traits.
If you're going more "cutebold" i guess it technically works. I tend to avoid such, myself. A bit too empty feeling.,
▶ No.58075>>58084
>>58072
I tried to get more character than the standard low-on-details cutebold. And not that it'll matter here, but like any character I create, her entire background has been written up, I know who she is, what she does, why she is this mixture, etc.
▶ No.58076
P.S. Considered giving her a couple of horns, may still do so. Opinion? My kobolds have their horns covered by scales, so hers would have skin/fur over. Maybe two per side, short but pointy.
▶ No.58084
>>58075
That's good at least. I like characters who are characters.
My only complaint is that it looks like a regular bunny with a tail.
I'd say horns are a good idea. That or have a few scales just running along somewhere.
▶ No.58088>>58126
>>58071
My problem is that it's a rodent and kobolds never had rodent traits. Kobolds were dog people and now they're lizards. Calling this a kobold is like those idiots calling dragons mammals.
▶ No.58098>>58126
>>58071
>hybrid kobold and rabbit
>no kobold traits because I can only draw rabbits
>I know kobolds don't have giant tits, but she has giant tits anyway
This is some of the laziest and most pointless shit I've ever seen. Don't you ever get tired of designing the worst characters?
▶ No.58102>>58126
>>58071
The thread is more /tg/ and world building oriented than furry, so most of the users probably won't appreciate her here. The things that appeal to us mainly revolve around how designs fit a particular context like a story or genre. Lewd stuff for us is better if it's set in a particular world instead of a unique avatar alone.
▶ No.58126>>58130 >>58136
>>58088
I get that, I really do. She's supposed to be a hybrid, but in my setting, kobolds are... well, they're not mamma;s OR reptiles, they (and dragons) are something else.
>>58098
Didn't draw it. Artist drew exactly what I asked for. He drew my kobold, too, also to my specs.And no, I don;t get tired of designing characters I enjoy, and I hope at least a few other people enjoy them, too.
>>58102
I figured I'd toss it in just in case, since there were lots of people just posting images. But yeah, I've joined in the discussion as well, I'm not only coming in to toss out an image.
▶ No.58130>>58135
>>58126
>He drew my kobold, too, also to my specs
Then why the fuck didn't you post that character??! Would that have just made too much sense?
▶ No.58135
>>58130
I did, waaay back in the thread. This post:
>>56098
▶ No.58136>>58138 >>58141
>>58126
I think a mammal kobold hybrid is just wrong and completely defeats the purpose of it being kobold. Dragons are Saurischians like Dinosaurs. They would fall under reptiles as do dinos and avians. This would apply to kobolds too.
▶ No.58138>>58149
>>58136
You've got every right to think that. But then, we're already taking kobolds a ways from their D&D origins, aren't we? Full mammal might indeed be weird but, as said, mine haven't gone there. They're some sort of middle ground, though more towards the reptile side as far as physiology. Horizon is just a crossbreed with a mammal (which, in this setting, is only possible with certain pharmaceutical fertility pills).
My world has its own rules, and since it's just a setting for roleplay with friends, I don't feel a need to necessarily make it to others' standards; kobolds and dragons are alien species there, from different planets in the same system, possibly sharing a common ancestor.
▶ No.58141>>58144 >>58149
>>58136
I can accept kobolds and dragons as warm-blooded, but definitely not mammals. And even there, only 'warm blooded' largely due to the firebreath mechanic, I'd argue. As in, more 'magical' heating mechanism than just simply warm blood.
▶ No.58144
>>58141
Mine are indeed somewhere between those two, and partly because of the fire. But they're not magical.
Wouldn't wanna meet that guy in a dark alley. Looks like he'd fuck you up good.
▶ No.58149>>58154 >>58156
>>58138
Kobolds are not rodents. They were canine/human hybrids at one point, but they are now lizards. You can call your furshit a kobold all you like but the fact of the matter is that it is not technically a kobold as it is far more rabbit than saur. It's much like those dog dragons furries love so much where they stick a dragon wings and horns on an anthro dog and call it a "dragon". Calling it a rabbit reptile hybrid is the correct term.
Stick to your blue kobold. She is actually a kobold.
>>58141
Dinos and Dragons are both warm blooded. They are Saurischians as I explained earlier. Saurischia includes reptiles avians and dinoaurs. Dragons are very much the same as a dino when it comes to classification. Hard eggs, warm blood, and scales/feathers.
▶ No.58154
>>58149
>Calling it a rabbit reptile hybrid is the correct term
I'm not going to call your criticism unfair. If I didn't want to hear it, I wouldn't post. But "rabbit/reptile" mixes species and class; "rabbit/kobold hybrid" is proper, as those are her two species.
▶ No.58156>>58157
>>58149
The problem with that guy's "kobold hybrid" is that it has no features that say "kobold".
It looks like a normal rabbit.
▶ No.58157>>58161 >>58220
>>58156
Tail is kobold, and I'm having horns added, but yes, the externals are mostly rabbit. But I'd think that'd be common with hybrids, that one parent's looks tend to dominate. Rabbits in my setting tend to be only slightly smaller, so having one at 4' is practically dwarfism-- except in this case, it's just being half a species that's always around that height.
▶ No.58159>>58164
>>58158
Certainly looks better.
▶ No.58161>>58162 >>58163 >>58164
>>58158
>>58157
This is not a Kobold no matter how much you imply it. The "features" you give it are not unique to Kobolds. A Kobold cannot be a hybrid as that defies DnD lore. There really is nothing reptilian at all about it nor Kobold. Stop deluding yourself. It's just a "run of the mill" anthro bunny with snowflake features akin to a sparkledog sona with dragon wings and horns.
▶ No.58162>>58165
>>58161
To be fair, dragons, cannonically, can mate with anything. It's not that far fetched to say dragonoids can mate with anything, and kobolds are dragonoids.
▶ No.58163>>58164
>>58161
Forgot to add: The only case when it is acceptable is it's previous design being a dog troll. You are adding rabbit into the mix. That does not work and it never was, nor will be a Kobold.
▶ No.58164
>>58159
Thanks. She has a 'bold tail but she needed something else, too. The jewel-tone eyes are also a kobold thing in my setting, rabbits usually have the same eye palette as many other species (gold, gray, pale blue, brown, pale green).
>>58161
>>58163
So what you're saying is, kobolds absolutely may not deviate from the traits set down by their D&D origins, even when they're in a non-D&D setting. Unless they're the GEn. 1 dog type. The Gen. 2 lizard type is different, somehow, as to whether it can be modified. Got it. I guess I gotta change my dragons, too. No more bipeds! They're all gigantic quads who live in caves and hoard gems. Thanks for setting me straight!
▶ No.58165>>58166 >>58167
>>58162
To be fair, there are no Kobold "hybrids" mixed with bunny wabbits in DnD lore. Have your little universe, but you can't call it a Kobold. Your character is as deluded as a sonic sona. If you're able to call it a "Kobold" I can say that Trump is actually a yellow fluffy duck and not a rich human president.
▶ No.58166
>>58165
LOL. I'm glad you've established that you make the rules in all settings. Thanks for that. If someone likes what I post, great. If they don't, but want to talk about it as part of the long, multi-layered discussion going on here, great. If they just want to tell me how stupid I am... well, that's great, too. I always need a chuckle.
▶ No.58167>>58169 >>58170
>>58165
You can certainly make your own setting where you have a fluffy yellow duck named Trump, mate.
I don't really disagree with you on the whole, I think that character is lazy and unappealing, but it ain't like DnD are the only set in stone way to do kobolds.
I certainly prefer their take, but I don't think it's healthy to just say 'NO DEVIATION WHATSOEVER'.
▶ No.58169>>58172
>>58167
I couldn't agree more. I know my bunbold isn't to everybody's taste, and I know the D&D ones are the Gold Standard of kobolds. But I can have my own fun. If others don't like it, fine. If they think I'm an idiot, that's fine too. They can think the moon is made of green cheese.
▶ No.58170
>>58167
P.S. Dancing harem kobold? YES PLEASE
▶ No.58172>>58175
>>58169
Mind that in this case, you're the one saying the moon's green and made of cheese in your setting.
Still; I say you can do that if you want.
I'm still going to call it shit-tier, though
▶ No.58175>>58179
>>58172
You can call it shit-tier. What you can't do (not that you're necessarily trying) is call it objectively shit-tier. I like it, you don't, all's well in the world. I'd comment on people calling their opinions objective, but in my experience, those people sincerely believe that they have facts and not opinions.
That comic is adorable.
▶ No.58176>>58177
>>58174
Sure.
I'll call you a retard, just like how I said TES is gay for having tall dwarves, but you can.
▶ No.58177
>>58176
And I'll say I'm just having fun, and on we go.
▶ No.58179>>58180
>>58175
Rabbits are objectively Kobolds. Dragons are objectively dogs with paws.
▶ No.58180>>58181
▶ No.58181>>58182 >>58183
>>58180
>using LOL unironically
A dragon with paws and paw pads is better than a dragon without. Dragons are mammals.
▶ No.58182
>>58181
Hey, I like fuzzy dragons as much as scaly ones. Mine are scaly, egg-laying critters (without bewbs), but to each their own. This guiy looks like he's got some bovine or caprine traits.
▶ No.58183>>58184 >>58185
>>58181
Complete nonsense, and anyone who says that is undoubtedly a dicksucking queer with no imagination.
What you posted is not a dragon. That's a dog at best.
▶ No.58184>>58190
>>58183
It's a Dutch Angel Dragon which is a dragon much like bunnyanons bunnysona is a Kobold.
▶ No.58185>>58186 >>58187 >>58189 >>58190 >>58192 >>58220 >>58601
>>58183
You didn't post a kobold, either. That's a mishmash of triangles. These are kobolds, so says D&D! They're lithe and thin and have long tails and long digitigrade legs.
▶ No.58186>>58188
>>58185
But Kobolds are Rabbits you fucking retard. They are not reptiles. Fandom is always canon.
▶ No.58187
>>58185
>that picture
Did anyone notice that in this official DnD art, the Kobolds have paw pads like a canine? That means the way tumblr draws Kobolds is true.
▶ No.58188>>58189
>>58186
Love the attitude, it's funny. "If you won't follow objective canon, you'll get my unbridled mockery." You must be a joy at parties.
▶ No.58189>>58191
>>58188
You seem deeply offended. It is a fact that Kobolds are mammals. They officially have canine paw pads. See >>58185
▶ No.58190
>>58185
Blame my running out of images. Though, I do disagree. That's a kobold. It's clearly lizardic and small.
DnD kobolds've varried wildly in art depictions over the years, anyway.
>>58184
So basically "not at all". Gotcha.
▶ No.58191>>58192
>>58189
Color me amused at this sort of trolling. It's funny to see it off Reddit.
▶ No.58192>>58193
>>58191
Not even trolling, faggot. Do you not see the canine paw pads in the picture that >>58185 posted? They are clearly visible on the kobold riding in the treasure.
▶ No.58193>>58195
>>58192
Yep, I see them. Some padding is probably necessary for a biped.
▶ No.58194
>>58068
Pretty much, yeah.
▶ No.58195>>58196 >>58197 >>58204
>>58193
>bipeds require padding
Not true.
Besides, They're supposed to be reptiles and that is not the padding a reptile would have. Their toe alignment is identical to that of a dog whilst having identical paw pads. They are mammals because a reptile would not have dog feet.
Kobolds are mammals. Dragons are mammals. End of story.
▶ No.58196>>58204 >>58212
>>58195
I'm actually not very interested in that debate, since mine are neither. Everybody else can have kobolds any way they want them. I was just posting the D&D picture as a gag response to all the "my opinion is an objective fact" crap-- it's one of several "official" images I found, which varied widely, I just chose one at random. Do whatever the hell you want, it's your canon if it's in your setting.
▶ No.58197>>58204 >>58205 >>58212
>>58195
Fuck off back to the anatomy thread, dude. Go and shit that up instead of here. >>>53564
▶ No.58204
>>58197
>>58195
>>58196
It's ultimately fantasy stuff
▶ No.58205
>>58197
This.
Likewise, please, stop giving the retard attention.
▶ No.58212
>>58196
Okay. Kobolds are Rabbits. That's a fact.
>>58197
Are you in denial that Kobolds have paws and pads? They're like a dogsona.
▶ No.58220>>58263 >>58304
>>58157
>I'd think that'd be common with hybrids, that one parent's looks tend to dominate
No, that's just artistic laziness. It's like making a raccoon/fox character and then only sticking a ringed tail on a normal red fox.
It IS possible to make a kobold/rabbit OC that actually looks like it has elements of both. But not for you. You're just incapable of designing good characters. You drew a cactus and are calling it a rabbit, because "anything goes" in a fictional world, right? Wrong. I encourage you to look up something called "Harry Potter and The Portrait of What Looked Like a Large Pile of Ash". Now come back here and tell me that there is no objective reason why the ACTUAL Harry Potter books aren't better than it.
>>58185
The feet are vaguely doglike in shape, but don't have pads. There is no color differentiation like there are on dog pawpads, so they are more like calluses. See pic related for what the underside of a Komodo Dragon's feet look like. Similar to the picture, and not like a dog's.
Either way, canon says they are lizards and are cold blooded and lay eggs. So not a mammal, even IF they had pawpads. Which they don't.
▶ No.58252>>58257 >>58530
I R63'd my lizard just in time for christmas
▶ No.58257>>58263 >>58264
>>58252
Now he's a cuntboy with a dick
?.?
Lewd
▶ No.58263>>58405
>>58257
How is it a cuntboy if it has a dick?
>>58220
Look closer. 4 seperate round pads on each toe and the iconic canine pawprint in the middle. Literally dog paws. It's most visible with the kobold lying in the treasure.
▶ No.58264
▶ No.58304
>>58220
>You drew a cactus and are calling it a rabbit, because "anything goes" in a fictional world, right?
As soon as I begin designing a fictional world intended for public consumption, I will eagerly do so.
>The feet are vaguely doglike in shape, but don't have pads
I was the guy who posted the D&D image, just to poke fun at the idea that deviation from the D&D mold is practically blasphemous. I wasn't the poster who went on the trollish "now scalies are all mammals and the D&D picture proves it" tangent; that was someone else, trying to poke holes in my not-a-mammal-but-not-a-reptile concept.
▶ No.58405
▶ No.58530>>58533 >>58535
>>58252
Got a pair more of my 'bold. Male version actually using his PP, and a female version with a CLOACA
▶ No.58533
>>58530
Still infinitely better than the rabbit sparklebunny.
▶ No.58535>>58546
>>58530
I thought it was supposed to be female. Why does it have a dick?
▶ No.58546>>58547
>>58535
Because I felt like R63ing my character. No need to stay the same gender in every picture.
▶ No.58547>>58548
>>58546
Eh, I guess if it's more of a fursona, than a character.
▶ No.58548>>58549
>>58547
She's also magic, so who is it to say she can't just magic her gender around, idk. I just wanted some cute kobold conedick in my life, and I already liked Slin here.
▶ No.58549>>58550
>>58548
That's a nice looking tail, have to say.
▶ No.58550>>58553 >>58595
>>58549
Yeah, Trout does really nice and thick tails, I'll be getting a picture from him in January, that'll be fun.
▶ No.58553>>58596
>>58550
He's definitely one of my favorite artists when it comes to kobolds. Even if he never seems to really draw anything different. All the kobolds kind of have the same look about them, I mean.
He also does semi-decent cloaca. Maybe not the best I've seen but he certainly gets there.
▶ No.58560>>58566 >>58590
i love these puppy nosed kobolds in 5e, they're so cute, just wanna boop their snoots
▶ No.58566
>>58560
Looks absolutely disgusting.
▶ No.58590>>58594
>>58560
These are the same ones the anon posted earlier. They have fucking canine paw pads. They are dogbolds.
▶ No.58594>>58597 >>58601
>>58590
except they fucking don't, the only thing 5Ebolds have in common with dogs is the nose, that's it
▶ No.58595
>>58550
tfw no cboy bf who'll feed me lust potions
▶ No.58597>>58599 >>58601
>>58594
I'm that anon from earlier. Having seen larger copies of what a posted, this guy has it: the only non-lizardy feature is the nose. The toes and front of foot are rounded in such a way that they could have pads, but they don't.
The early editions of D&D described them as more akin to goblins. I don't know offhand when they changed to the draconic variety. Still, aside from that shiny black nose, they're not at all canine, though illustrations I can find have them varying from thick and stout to skinny and sinewy.
▶ No.58598
>>58596
I wonder if they'll ever stop drawing that shitty bird comic and go back to drawing bolds.
▶ No.58599
>>58597
Ah, got it. Pre-3rd Edition. Description was a goblinoid with scales, a rat's tail, a canine face, and horns. Here's the official drawing.
▶ No.58601>>58687
>>58594
>>58597
How retarded are you people? Look at the Kobold lying in the treasure in >>58185 's pic. They are quite visible and colored yellow. There are four seperate round pads on each digit and the large canine pad in the middle. With the doggy nose and those paw pads it's clear that these new Kobolds are based off dogs and lizards.
TL;DR: Kobolds are returning to their original design.
▶ No.58626>>58627 >>58651
stop spamming trout you fags
▶ No.58627>>58628
>>58626
I don't think that 2nd one is a kobold.
Real cute, though.
▶ No.58628>>58630 >>58631 >>58632
>>58627
artist is nezumi. kobold or not i dont fucking get the scalie autism about fantasy species. refer to the dragon or wyvern posts on /v/ for a heavy dose of autism
▶ No.58630
>>58628
Thats the most disgusting Jaggi I've ever seen and I'll do everyone a favor to farm it for bones and Jaggi skin.
▶ No.58631
>>58628
Don't get me wrong, I adore Nezumi's work. But it ain't a kobold.
▶ No.58632>>58633
>>58628
>Nipple slits on scalies
▶ No.58633>>58635 >>58687 >>58691
>>58632
It's certainly preferable to regular tits, but I'm a touch opposed to tits as a general rule.
▶ No.58635>>58638 >>58685
>>58633
yeah flat is superior
▶ No.58638>>58655
>>58635
Fuck....I love seeing scalies in lingerie.
▶ No.58651>>58655
>>58626
>stop spamming trout
*shrug* Literally the only artist who does male kobolds. But for a few exceptions, anyone wandering in here would assume kobolds are a single-gender species.
▶ No.58655>>58662 >>58683
>>58638
What's with this vomit-yellow trash?
>>58651
>*shrug*
What kind of degenerative faggot uses emotes on an image board?
▶ No.58662
>>58655
only a faggot. no wonder he's asking for dicks
▶ No.58683>>58684
>>58655
I dunno. What kind of degenerate faggot puts lingerie on a goddamn lizard?
▶ No.58684>>58687
>>58683
What's not to like about lingerie? It makes them look sexier. No reason not to put it on a lizard. Or literally anything else for that matter.
▶ No.58685>>58710
>>58635
>complains about shit taste
>second pic has paw pads
wew
▶ No.58687>>58709
>>58601
I've looked at it many times. They're the same color as the feet, so they're just toes and ball. You want to tell me a gecko has dogpads too? It has round toes.
>>58633
Love Sefeiren's 'bolds. I wanted a tiny dash of that in my design, but didn't want to just copy it.
>>58684
Ehhh, to each their own. I don't need frills covering the bone on a chop, and I don't need them covering the hot bodies of dragons.
▶ No.58689
P.S. If you're going to do a D&D dogbold, it should have obvious scales everywhere but the face, big pointed elven ears, two (and only two) horns, and a bald rodent tail, no? Still isn't likely to have padded feet, in the drawing they're basically human feet with scales and big toe claws.
▶ No.58691>>58695
>>58633
Would like to be the kobold boy in that pic :3
▶ No.58695>>58707
▶ No.58707>>58709 >>58718 >>58802
>>58695
He's obviously a cuntboy
▶ No.58709>>58711 >>58718 >>58811
>>58707
Vagibro.
Best thing about kobolds with cloacas, you never know what's inside until it's too late.
>>58687
Personally I'm not a fan of Sefeirens' bolds mostly because of the more child-like proportions a lot of the time. They're also rather square-chested, which I'm not a fan of. Not that I like tits, but completely featureless blocks of square that just look like a human man's chest is also pretty gay.
Frills are amazing. You add frills, and it makes things look nicer. Just because they're nice on their own doesn't change this. Properly done frills are like a frame to a great work of art, or landscaping to a well-built home, or garnish on a nice meal.
They compliment the meal, make it look that much better.
▶ No.58710
>>58685
Give him some credit; feral t rex is rare, and very nice.
▶ No.58711>>58712
>>58709
Agreed. Frills and Finears are really nice. I greatly prefer them over the mammalian ears that are often paired with dragons.
▶ No.58712
>>58711
In this case the frills were referring to things like lingerie, but also yes. Very much a favorite detail of mine,.
▶ No.58718>>58780 >>58796
>>58707
It's obviously a female, if you look at the face. Also, Sefeiren never draws male 'bolds.
>>58709
>you never know what's inside
This has been mentioned before, but I just don't buy it. With many reptiles, if you look at the shape of their vent, you can tell the sex without needing to stick your finger inside. Pic related. Something similar could easily be done for kobold cloacas (along with other simple tertiary sex characteristics), but most artists couldn't be made to bother. They're all female anyway.
▶ No.58780>>58789
>>58718
2zoo4me
I only dig realism if it's mechanical
▶ No.58789>>58793
>>58780
I'm sure there are several people here who appreciate your virtue-signaling, but that wasn't remotely the point you gibbering retard.
▶ No.58793>>58794 >>58796
>>58789
Vaginas and Dicks > Coprophilia Clocoa meme
deal with it dork
▶ No.58794>>58795
>>58793
Reptiles don't have vags or human/dog dicks. sorry faggot.
▶ No.58795>>58799
>>58794
Would be better if they did tbh.
▶ No.58796
>>58718
I'll be honest with you, anon, I don't think I could tell those two apart all that well.
>>58793
You're no true xenophile. Go fap to your gay humans in a funny coat of paint.
▶ No.58799
>>58795
Then they wouldn't be reptiles. Do you like dog paws on dragons?
▶ No.58802>>58805 >>58810 >>58840
>>58707
What would you do if you had a kobold and a pair of scissors?
▶ No.58805
>>58802
I would use the scissors to cut up some orange cloth so that he could make himself some clothes. And if he wasn't very good at seamstressing, I'd have to help him by guiding his hands while holding him from behind to pass the time while I'm knotted inside his cloaca.
▶ No.58810
>>58802
I'd get him to use the scissors on me
▶ No.58811>>58812 >>58813 >>58815 >>58840
>>58709
What's this vagibro meme people have been forcing?
▶ No.58812
>>58811
Vagibro = FTM
The degenerates of /fur/ have a fetish for tomboys whom identify as a man.
▶ No.58813
>>58811
Bros with vags '3'
▶ No.58815>>58994
>>58811
It's another word for "cuntboy", which a fantasy thing that doesn't exist. That is, a delusion by straight guys who want to fuck a woman who doesn't act like one. It's being so overwhelmingly desperate to show they are straight, that they're putting cunts on even other men, to prove how straight they are. Yes, they would fuck an actual man if he had a cunt, because he is JUST THAT STRAIGHT.
▶ No.58840>>58843
>>58802
I'd help trim her claws
>>58811
A while back, I think it was on /v/, someone suggested calling "cuntboys" "vagibros" to piss off the degenerates who lust after cuntboys.
So, I took it up, because it was hilarious. Whenever I see someone saying "cuntboy", I respond with "vagibro".
▶ No.58843>>58844
>>58840
>500
There's a bigger version of this androgynous guohbold somewhere. I can't find it on his transgenderfluidblr.
▶ No.58844>>58845
>>58843
This is why I despise tumblr as an art depository. I do not understand why so many people use it.
▶ No.58845>>58846
>>58844
Dumblr as shit and rainbow as it is, is better than deviantshit. It really is better than having some autistic fetishist creep post a very disturbing comment on one of your works.
Speaking of the guohbold, I found the bigger version. Does guoh really draw malebolds?
▶ No.58846>>58847
>>58845
I don't think I have ever seen Guoh do a male kobold. Even that one, I'm fairly sure, is female.
Nearest I've seen is this >>56455 , and that's still at least androgynous .
▶ No.58847>>58848 >>58849
>>58846
I always got the impression that he hated male ones and I cannot blame him but there is one distinctively masculine looking one on his other cloudgenderblr with a gun. It's supposed to be a gunslinger.
▶ No.58848
>>58847
>said one twice
sorry, I partied too hard last night.
▶ No.58849>>58851 >>58869
>>58847
He certainly doesn't seem to be a fan of malebold, but there's a lot of them that kind of saddle the line, you ask me.
▶ No.58851>>58856 >>58857 >>58869
>>58849
Nobody except tumblrinas who never played DnD like malebolds and that's a fact. Regardless, the dumblrites will just make them "genderfluid non-buneary" like they always do. The addition of sequential futaism to the species in the latest DnD guide doesn't help either.
▶ No.58856
>>58851
I don't know, I'm not opposed to them. Just, I prefer the women, and with males, I want it more as just a character than any kind of sexual interest.
▶ No.58857>>58859
>>58851
I'm here to jerk off to cute small lizards, I don't really care if some guy says his OC species is all female.
That shit hasn't worked for anything ever.
▶ No.58859
>>58857
>external balls
You really are gay.
▶ No.58869>>58953 >>58989
>>58849
No male ever born has a waistline like that, anon.
>>58851
Pretty ironic you should say that when the only people likely to even acknowledge the existence of male kobolds are going to be the ones playing them in DnD. The ubiquity of female kobolds, here, is for no other reason than because they are being sexualized. Don't pretend like you actually play tabletop with that attitude, being so triggered that male anythings even exist.
▶ No.58947>>58949
>>58886
3 of those are not kobolds, and only 1 of those 3 can be confused as a kobold if you have eyesight problems
▶ No.58949>>58990
>>58947
None of them are kobolds, silly. All kobolds are female.
▶ No.58953>>58978 >>58981
>>58869
Furries sure seem to think otherwise, given the shit they draw.
>>58861
>external balls
G A Y
A
Y
>>58886
This one at least does it right.
▶ No.58978>>58981 >>58993
>>58953
External balls might get removed in a fight o3o
▶ No.58981
>>58953
Eh... even really wide femboi hips don't usually have that same straight-to-the-spine plunging waistline as a woman's figure. And even if they screw it up, someone who's actually great with anatomy like Guoh wouldn't. That's a female; plain and simple.
>>58978
Yeah, especially most furry characters who have testicles the size of goddamn tennis balls at the smallest.
▶ No.58984>>58992
>>57060
>>57057
They do and you're both fucking retards for denying it. Tumblr draws kobolds with paws and they look objectively better.
▶ No.58989
>>58869
>No male ever born has a waistline like that, anon.
but damn wouldn't it be nice if they did, would make for some sexy ass traps
▶ No.58990>>59020
>>58949
And Braixen from Pokemon are seven males to one female but guess what the majority of porn has them as?
Anon I admire your dedication in the face of sheer annihilation but the dick wants what it wants and there is no stopping homolust.
▶ No.58992
>>58984
>Tumblr does it better
Get out!
OUT!!!!!!
▶ No.58993
>>58978
What did he mean by this?
▶ No.58994>>59002 >>59004 >>59020
>>58815
So do you have to be gay to be into guys with vags or do you have to be straight to be into guys with vags
▶ No.59002
>>58994
Probably bisexual. No true homo would get anywhere near a vagina and I assume the same applies for straights when it comes to other mens dicks.
▶ No.59004>>59102
>>58994
You have to be gay-in-denial.
I mean, I can't say it's really gay, since it's not got a dick. Not like how I can say futa is gay, or traps are gay.
But, it's basically gay. It's right on the edge of 'gay', with a big neon sign that says 'IM NOT ACTUALLY GAY I JUST LIKE GUYS WITH CUNTS' as though that helps.
▶ No.59020>>59022
>>58990
>guess what the majority of porn has them as?
I asked e621.
>Braixen male solo: 147
>Braixen female solo: 673
You get nothing. You lose. Good day, sir.
>>58994
Straight. Gays don't like feminine traits; it's kinda their defining feature, despite the popular stereotype.
▶ No.59022>>59036 >>59038
>>59020
>You get nothing. You lose. Good day, sir.
But you just proved my point? My point was that Braixen are canonically primarily male but furries draw them almost always female. I don't think you know what I said and english isn't my first language so if you say I wrote it badly then you're racist or something.
Who's the loser now?
▶ No.59036
>>59022
They can't handle the truth of the magical fox trap.
▶ No.59038
>>59022
>I don't think you know what I said and english isn't my first language so if you say I wrote it badly then you're racist or something
Being of one race or another has nothing to do with language proficiency. That's an acquired skill, not an inborn trait. There are no inborn traits; that's why racism is so absurd.
▶ No.59102>>59107 >>59110
>>59004
What if you're actually just gay and you're into them, then.
▶ No.59107
>>59102
Then you're not really gay
▶ No.59110>>59573
>>59102
Then you're not as gay as you thought you were.
After all, those are not guys, and they do not have dicks. But, they do look like guys.
It's pretty gay, but it isn't actually gay.
▶ No.59455>>59457 >>59556 >>59560 >>59997
love me some kobold cuteboys
▶ No.59457>>59495
>>59455
>external balls
G A Y
▶ No.59491
▶ No.59495
>>59457
That's right, I'm gonna suck some cute scalie balls.
▶ No.59556
>>59455
>tfw you will never be a virgin knight that rescues and marries a cute and silly excitable male kobold
Living is pain
▶ No.59563>>59565 >>59617
Wanting to fuck traps is actually objectively more straight than just wanting to fuck girls without penises. It means you're attracted to more women overall than the other straight dudes. Honestly you're more gay if you don't want to fuck a girl with a cock, fags.
▶ No.59565
>>59563
Traps aren't women anon
▶ No.59571>>59988
>>59560
I want to remove his penis so he isn't tempted by it
▶ No.59573>>59617
>>59110
So it's
>a. something that gay people would like but that they can pretend is not something gay people would like
and
>b. not something that gay people like.
▶ No.59578>>59618
Anyone Know what the nude version of this looks like? sefeiren posted they were selling at MFF
▶ No.59617>>59618
>>59563
If it has a penis, it is gay.
>>59573
Neither.
It's something that is technically straight, but pretty fucking gay otherwise.
Compare to Futa. It looks female, it's got tits, it's got hips, but it also has a dick. That's gay.
It has to be a dick to be properly gay. But vagibros come very close.
▶ No.59618>>59619 >>59663
>>59578
wtf I want a daki now
>>59617
Traps are gay, because it is a male.
Cuntboys are gay, because it is still a male.
Dickgirls are straight, because it is a female.
Herms are straight, because like dickgirls, are female.
Maleherms are gay because they are male.
▶ No.59619
>>59618
Vagibros do not have a penis, therefor it cannot be gay.
Dickgirls have penises, so therefor it must be gay.
Herms also have penises. But they also have vaginas, so I can accept them as "bisexual".
Maleherms is same as above.
▶ No.59663>>59682
>>59618
Incorrect. If there is a penis involved (and it's not yours), It's gay as fuck.
C-boys are half-gay
▶ No.59682>>59683
>>59663
It's either gay or its not, you can't say its only half
▶ No.59683
>>59682
It's a difference between "You are a homosexual who loves cock up the butt", and "bro that's pretty gay lmao"
▶ No.59702
Females with tits and vag are straight.
Guys with a dick/s, balls and no tits is gay.
Everything in between is for FAGGOTS
▶ No.59988>>59998
▶ No.59997>>60034
>>59455
Yo, I'm down with the rest of these, but we need to have a serious discussion about that first one...
▶ No.59998>>60092
>>59988
I'll make you into a nullfag if you're not careful, anon
▶ No.60034>>60111
>>59997
i'll take it if you don't want it
▶ No.60092>>60148
>>59998
And I'll make you into a fuckin corpse, wankstain
jk love u bb <3
▶ No.60111>>60118
>>60034
By all means, but it's more the poor classification that's raising flags for me
Can't just slap some thigh-highs, a thong, and a sports bra on the reptilian equivalent of Danny Devito and call it a cuteboy all of a sudden No offense to Mr. Devito
▶ No.60118
>>60111
Yeah, and the deliberately-off-putting veiny hyper dick is pretty much the antithesis of "cute".
▶ No.60148
>>60092
Zano pls go and stay go
▶ No.60269>>60271
Guoh's kobolds are the best.
I finished drawing one of his characters.
I hope that I'll draw as well as him one day.
▶ No.60271>>60272 >>60335
>>60258
The fuck is this rabbit thing with completely nonfunctional teeth supposed to be?
>>60269
That looks really good, actually.
▶ No.60272>>60273
>>60271
Ty but I think the toes/chest are not so good.
▶ No.60273>>60352
>>60272
Maybe not. They end up looking a touch like a blob, over something with clear bone and structure. Though, I think that's more due to the lack of detailing lines, than anything else. When you have only a few lines for that sort of thing, everything gets this sort of 'blobbish' look.
As far as the chest goes, I didn't really notice an issue until you mentioned it. Probably due to being further from the focus of the image.
▶ No.60290>>60291
>>55693 (OP)
Kobold is shit, orc is better
▶ No.60291
>>60290
>pigfaced barbarians with green skin
>"good"
▶ No.60335
>>60271
Shit's what it is.
▶ No.60346>>60359 >>60363 >>60604
Do you think kobolds would use a dagger as a dildo? And how lewd would a magic-capable kobold get?
▶ No.60352>>60363
>>60273
I see, there's indeed a lack of detail compared to Guoh's kobolds.
I wanted to additionnel color/texture that's why I didn't put too much details but I'm not so good at coloring.
The kobolds you are posting are drawn by you?
▶ No.60359>>60411
>>60346
>Do you think kobolds would use a dagger as a dildo?
That sounds extremely painful.
▶ No.60363
>>60346
Back end of it, while in a sheath, could doubtlessly be used to a reasonable degree.
Also, I am much prefering these solid color lots for your weird little guy.
Looks way better.
>>60352
No, sadly not. I'm rather low-tier with my own drawing at the moment. Been practicing a bit, but unfortunately I don't get the time to do so much.
These should be mainly by Guoh, I believe.
▶ No.60407
>>60381
Compared to you (who are a small, submissive 'bold that wants his cloaca good and filled).
▶ No.60411>>60446
>>60359
Only if used the wrong way 'round.
▶ No.60446
>>60411
Yeah.
If they go hilt-first then they'll experience emotional trauma for not get their boypussy ripped apart
▶ No.60604
>>60346
Only if the dagger is in his scabbard.
Are you the artist who drew these kobolds?
▶ No.60620>>60644
>>60608
All kobolds are dragons.
▶ No.60621
>>60608
>not realizing "compared to you" IS a reference to "for you"
>not wanting to be an extra-small kobold and held and loved by a bigger one
Begone.
▶ No.60644>>60663
>>60620
>dragon
>cold blooded
They're draconids, but actually lizards.
▶ No.60663>>60664
>>60644
They stem from dragons. They're dragonoids. Thus they're basically dragons, when it comes down to it. Just, weaker, smaller, and less intelligent.
▶ No.60664>>60665
>>60663
DnD says they're lizards and cold-blooded, but related to dragons. They are lizardfolk. Also;
>four limbs
>clumsy
>no wings
▶ No.60665>>60666
>>60664
"Lizardfolk" in the same sense that dragons are "great lizards", maybe.
Besides, dragons are basically cold blooded too, it's just that they have magical fire in their blood what negates that.
Kobolds aren't as magical as dragons, is all.
▶ No.60666>>60667
>>60665
No. DnD also says dragons are warm blooded. The two are distinguished from one another. A kobold is a lizard but related to dragons.
▶ No.60667>>60670
>>60666
Does it say why they're warm blooded?
Dragons are lizards, too. They just have warm blood, which I've always said was due to magical means warming the lot.
▶ No.60670>>60671
>>60667
Dragons are not lizards. They have fucking canine esque anatomy and paws/pawpads.
▶ No.60716
>>60714
>Goblins
>mammals
>have skin
>have long ears
>no tails
>somehow the same as kobolds
This is just some kobold-hater propaganda.
▶ No.60717
>>60714
>not wanting to be abused by a big dragon qt who thinks of you as nothing more than a sex toy
▶ No.60720
>>60719
The original DnD was also incredibly shit.
I wouldn't use it as anything.
You can't mug property.
Besides, your dragon owner'd protect you from that. I mean, that's straight up theft! And while a dragon may be rich, a dragon's also pretty obsessive. If so much as a copper coin of theirs is stolen, they'll burn the entire country that theif was from.
▶ No.60727
>>60714
>Being this blind
>Being this dumb
>Ugly 1st edition purist
You're such garbage that not even the most obsessive hoarder dragon would hesitate to throw you out.
▶ No.60732>>60733
>>60713
tfw not the boy in that pic
▶ No.60733>>60744
>>60732
>boy
That's a cunt. It ain't even a cloaca, where you could at least say "maybe the dick is inside".
▶ No.60737>>60743
>>60736
Maybe they used to be, back when DnD was trash-tier dumpsterfire of a system, but now, they're dragonoids.
▶ No.60743>>60745 >>60766
>>60737
Actually, depending on the realworld mythology you draw from, they're considered "goblins" (especially in the irish/celtic/welsh stories).
Now said source determines whether they are ugly little men, or demons, or furry dogmen. However, modern "mythology" usually has them a distinct subtypes, and that's just fine.
▶ No.60744>>60745 >>60751
>>60733
yeah so he's a cboy rather than a dboy so what
▶ No.60745
>>60744
Vagibro.
And being a kobold, I doubt it is even that.
>>60743
I was meaning in the context of DnD But, yeah, there's a lot of different takes on them, just like a lot of different mythological whatnot.
Elves can be short little children looking guys with pointy ears. Or basically terrifying goblin looking fucks, for that matter.
▶ No.60751>>60758 >>60771
>>60744
Kobolds are flatchested, meaning there's literally no difference between a cboy and a girl. So there's no point making the distinction.
Either it's a boy, or it's not, and none of your nonsense is going to change that.
▶ No.60758>>60762
>>60751
Not necessarily. There's more to females than a mere set of tits.
Egg-laying hips are your best bet to look at. Though, sometimes you might be wrong, and that's just a very effeminate male. But, hey, this happens with humans too. Unfortunately, cloacas mean you have no way of knowing until it is too late.
▶ No.60762>>60763
>>60758
How big ARE kobold eggs?
▶ No.60763>>60768
>>60762
Well, I'm no biologist, so it's hard to say, but they're going to likely be bigger than alligator eggs, I'd wager. Can't find any set size for them, unfortunately, but hatchlings are usually about six inches long. Using that, I'm going to put the guess about four inch long eggs. Given that kobolds are a fair bit larger than the lot, 'least excluding the really old alligators who can grow pretty massive. Average size of one is usually a bit inflated thanks to the tail, I'm going to say, so I think it's fair to call kobolds a bit bigger over all, even if they technically would be 'shorter'. I pin that on counting the tail for them. I'm putting the wager a kobold egg's going to be at least three times that, if not more.
One thing to keep in mind, though, is that an alligator lays 35-50 eggs at a time. So, a kobold's likely to have a fairly large stack sitting inside her, too, if they're pretty similar.
▶ No.60766
>>60743
**Pretty sure kobolds originate from Germany actually as a sort of sprite/goblin/household spirit kind of thing. The scaly kobolds are from D&D with the dogbold meme being from a Japanese misconception based on some weird translation when D&D came out over there. Hence why you basically never see scaly kobolds in your Jap cartoons or European medieval folklore.
This is also why kobolds become more linked to dragons in later editions of D&D- because in doing so they get more flavour to them than just "goblins but with scales".**
▶ No.60768>>60786
>>60763
I did some comparisons of human fetal size at a given length, seeing how kobold hatchlings are about 6-8" in height when born, and came up with about the size of a goose egg. 4" in length and somewhere around 8" in circumference.
Scaling that to kobold size (they're like 70% the height of humans) gives a figure of 11" around. Human newborns have heads of about 14" around, which is somewhat close. One could therefore say that a kobold's cloaca when laying an egg would have to stretch 80% as much as a human's vagina does when giving birth, so would need hips 80% as wide as human females in comparison to males. (And they lay an egg or two like once every few weeks, which means male kobolds are at full hotdog-down-a-hallway status).
But then again, while human females have noticeably wider hips, this is only partially due to the width of the pelvis, and partially due to a difference in fat distribution, which doesn't really apply to kobolds. Since humans and kobolds have about the same difference of sizes between males and females (aka sex dimorphism), the difference is more that of individual proportion than absolute pelvic width; to whit, males and females have a pelvis about the same width though they are of different heights. It's a difference in shape, not size. Given a lack of fat on the hips, that 80% of human size of the birth canal would likely eat the difference up.
I can only conclude that kobold males and females would have about the same width hips, unless female kobolds have the same kind of fat distribution as humans.
▶ No.60771
>>60751
how about gender and stuff owo
▶ No.60786>>60837
>>60779
Possibly. I've run out of images to post, so I'm going through my unsorted Guoh folder.
>>60768
I think this discounts the amount of eggs being laid. Besides that, I'm not sure if "goose egg" would work, given how small they end up being. I'd pin this on not counting for the needs of an egg being a bit larger than the needs of a fetus in the womb, myself.
'Course a lot of this depends on how big kobolds start at. So it's a touch hard to say.
▶ No.60837>>60847
>>60786
Eggs are only laid one at a time, so the size of the pelvis only matters for the narrowest diameter of any given egg, whether there is one or twenty in there. However, canon information I can find says that kobolds typically lay one egg, and sometimes two but only 10% of the time.
>I'd pin this on not counting for the needs of an egg being a bit larger than the needs of a fetus in the womb
The thing is, the size of the egg is going to be the exact size of the animal as soon as it hatches. When it's laid, it has a huge yolk which will feed the young, and an embryo that is basically microscopic. As the embryo ages, it consumes the yolk and uses that material to grow. Because an egg is a closed system, it can't get any bigger than the amount of material that's already in there (that would defy conservation of mass).
▶ No.60847>>60860 >>60866
>>60837
Given the spawnrate of kobolds, that either is inaccurate, or they fuck like rabbits. Suppose they could just constantly lay eggs fairly often.
Exactly. So, while the egg can't be smaller than the hatchling, that doesn't mean the egg can't be larger than the hatchling. In fact, it has to be larger, since you're leaving behind a shell. Plus there's the question of whether the material within'll take more or less volume than the finished product, as it were.
▶ No.60860
>>60847
i-is that a m-male guohbold? wtf??
▶ No.60866
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>60847
That's what the information says. As the egg is laid only two weeks after fertilization, it means they still can produce roughly 28-29 young per year. That's somewhere around 1/2 to 1/3rd as much as wild rabbits reproduce, but then again wild rabbit young have a 50% mortality rate. Inside of a mountain, protected by an entire colony and all the traps that can be built (and possibly by a DRAGON), kobolds have zero natural predators so mortality rate would be very low. Even in the worst places of the world, human infant mortality rate is only as much as 5-10%. Applying a low end of that (after all, kobolds don't have modern medicine), means you'd still get something like 26 kobold wrymlings surviving to a year of age, per female, per year.
So supposing you have a small colony of 200 kobolds that move into a mountain somewhere. There are 100 females, and you can assume perhaps 2/3rds of them are of breeding age which is 66. If each of them produce 26 young in a year, by the end of it the colony will now have 1916 kobolds.
As for egg size, with real animals the hatchlings end up pretty well crammed in there by the time they emerge. Vid related. Thickness of the eggshell itself isn't really enough to matter; maybe it adds a few millimeters to the circumference.
▶ No.61224
▶ No.62030>>62033 >>62040
>>55693 (OP)
Why do people believe Germanic house-elves who're pendants to Romance goblins are reptiles?
▶ No.62033
>>62030
Because yet another goblin-elf race'd be gay
▶ No.62040
>>62030
Because they were merely vaguely inspired by Germanic house-elves, and never were supposed to be exact representations. It's really quite fucking obvious.
▶ No.63052>>63672
>>63049
It looks like 3 separate layers of shins, ass, and torso. You need to join these layers together, e.g. the lines that form the shins should not form a closed shape. Also it would help to have lines showing how big the tail is at its base
▶ No.63057>>63672
>>63049
Horns need some detail. Thought they were weird ears at first.
▶ No.63672>>63673 >>63678
>>63049
>>63052 makes some good points about the knees, but the chest is fine. It's behind the knees based on perspective, therefore it's fine for it to be linearly disconnected. >>63057 is right too.
The subtle angles of your linework in places like the fingers and the snout are very well done. Simple and abstract but convey the gestures of these structures. That's real artistic talent.
My one real criticism is that the tail is in a very awkward and nonrealistic position that would break her spine. You're doing a frontal view; you need to continue on with the depth perception (which you're very good at, by the way). It should be coming up behind her, around her shoulder or so.
Also she's not a boy
▶ No.63673>>63678
>>63672
>external balls
TRASH
But he isn't wrong about the tail. A kobold should squat, and if sitting, the tail should go under the creature.
Unfortunately, very few people do the tail right.
▶ No.63678>>63679
>>63668
>1st pic
You didnt lie anon, it's a qt alright
>>63672
>2nd and 3rd pics
I like the style here
>>63673
Christ you are so autistic, i wish you would just fuck off the board already with your constant xenoshitting
▶ No.63679>>63693
>>63678
What's the issue with xenophilia? Lusting after proper tail seems right admirable to me.
▶ No.63693>>63700
>>63679
It's cause he shits up every scalie thread on here and tg
▶ No.63696
>>63695
tfw not a nullbold who puts a bigger dildo on his strap-on harness each new time he's with his bf
▶ No.63700>>63701 >>63755
>>63693
You realize I also make most those threads, not to mention keep them alive, right?
Certainly seems to beat image dump cucks.
▶ No.63701>>63753
>>63700
What did he mean by this?
▶ No.63753
>>63701
Basically means I like lizards a lot, and so make these style of threads relatively often. That, and a few other threads around similar styles. Kobolds are a favorite, in any case. Right beside dragons.
▶ No.63755>>63757 >>63777
>>63700
Doesnt make up for your constant autism no one gives a fuck about your ideas of perfection with fictional beings. you are as dull as waifufags except with species particulars you never shut the fuck up about, its been going on for over a year and i can still pick you out of any thread because you are such a boring faggot with no new material, its aalways the same song and dance literally as bad as eeriefag and pushed into threads where it doesnt even belong. please kill yourself, im so tired of your stagnant existance.
▶ No.63757>>63764
>>63755
>Doesn't belong
>Thread I made
???
▶ No.63764>>63766
>>63757
you've never heard the phrase "outlived your purpose" have you
▶ No.63766>>63769
>>63764
Outlive this, big boy.
*whips out dick*
▶ No.63769>>63770
>>63766
That better be in a cloaca.
▶ No.63770>>63771
>>63769
>cloaca
>dick
pick one
▶ No.63771>>63772 >>63777
>>63770
You can have both.
▶ No.63772>>63773
>>63771
that's gay tho. what would a cloacaboi have a dick for
▶ No.63773>>63774
>>63772
Bullying and to help keep things tight when you're railing his little tailhole.
▶ No.63774>>63775
>>63773
you could bully him over lack of peen tho
▶ No.63775>>63776
>>63774
True, but call me crazy, it strikes me as more fun to bully his useless tiny penis.
▶ No.63776
>>63775
gee that's a bit backwards on the bullying scale ishn't it
▶ No.63777>>63778 >>66505
>>63771
What creature's dick is that?
>>63755
>no one gives a fuck about your ideas of perfection with fictional beings
I do. These things aren't just based on artistic whimsy, but on history and culture. A dragon or kobold with external balls, mammaries, or addition of pawpads is an affront to these creatures' origins.
▶ No.63778
>>63777
I believe it is an alligator penis.
I'm pretty sure I saved it from the /tg/ thread where someone did an interesting breakdown of alligator genitalia.
▶ No.66497>>66518
So, /fur/, you are kobold konnoisseurs , I'm sure. What do you like about my kobold, Tik Tik?
https://www.furaffinity.net/user/tiktikkobold/
▶ No.66505
>>63777
>kobold with external balls, mammaries, or addition of pawpads is an affront to these creatures' origins.
>Although usually invisible, a kobold can materialize in the form of an animal, fire, a human being, and a candle.
ok
▶ No.66518>>66526
>>66497
I've told you this before, but I don't much care for the pig-looking nose bit. Shift of color there just looks odd.
I do like it otherwise, well enough. Especially that first picture.
▶ No.66526>>66545
>>66518
Yeah, the pink is much better, as seen in that first image. That was done by lazerbot, btw, the "Tails Gets Trolled" guy. Really nice.
>>66518
which reminds me to probably tell uwusoft about that before they make a finalized model.
▶ No.66545>>66563
>>66526
Everything else about the lizard is cute, anyway.
▶ No.66563>>66565
>>66545
is the shape of her beak fine?
▶ No.66565>>66574
▶ No.66574>>66593 >>66628 >>66911
>>66565
If it were a solid color, I'd say so. As is, makes me think of a bat's nose.
▶ No.66593>>66595
>>66574
I guess I have lazerbot to thank for showing me what it looks like colored in.
I'll certainly look into it for future art! Luckily, I write stories, so you can imagine her face lookng however you want.
▶ No.66595>>66623
>>66593
I think you ought to try the color on the underside of the chin, following to the torso.
Might look better, while maintaining that variance.
▶ No.66623>>66627 >>66629 >>66662
>>66595
The main design point I gave Papa was a heart-shaped underbelly
▶ No.66627
>>66623
Looks kind of odd to me. Like some sort of weird one-piece suit, only attached by paint.
▶ No.66628>>66662
>>66574
hm... I suppose i could go with a revision soon, starting with the laserbot one as a base
▶ No.66629>>66635
>>66623
>slavigrade stance
▶ No.66635
>>66629
if someone wants to whip up a better design, feel free. I am not an artist
▶ No.66662>>66669
>>66628
>>66623
How about making the light spot larger?
▶ No.66669
>>66662
Looks interesting. It's a possibility, I'd say. Not sure, but I think remaining issues are mostly around the chest.
▶ No.66911>>66940
>>66574
what do you thin fascinates kobolds when it comes to human dick?
▶ No.66940
>>66911
Different shape?
Warm blood?
Texture?
There's a few different potential factors.
▶ No.67034
Only non-shit thread currently active?
"active" about as much as it gets, I mean
>>66825
strange color but alright
▶ No.67282>>67859
What do kobolds think about human fascination with their b u t t s
▶ No.67421>>67494
Do you think she's ready?
▶ No.67494
>>67421
No
those horns look a bit out of place
▶ No.67859
>>67282
makes more sense than being invested in gross chest tumors.
Anyway. /fur/ you like kobold pics. Do you like kobold stories? When I posted Tik Tik, everyone commented on her appearance and not any of her fantastic adventures.
▶ No.67883
Kobold Adventure version 2.19 is now live.
▶ No.69699
Kobold Adventure version 2.20 has been live since Wednesday.