Over several years of thinking deeply, I have made some conclusions about race that I do not like and sicken me. I desperately want to believe something else, and thought you guys could help me.
So before I start spewing my bad thoughts on race, I want to preface by saying that I do not hate people by race (if I did, then I wouldn't be sickened by what I believe).
Anyway, I have come to the conclusion that all the human races of Earth are likely not equal. Objects that are mostly similar to each other but slightly different to each other are not equal, such as different models of sedans, computers, televisions, etc. Many of these objects can have strengths and weaknesses compared to other objects, but there will always be am object that has more overall utility. For example, a CRT television has better color replication and response time than a 4k monitor, but the 4k monitor is much more useful for many more tasks than a CRT. Blacks and aboriginals likely are inferior to whites and asians based on their abilities. Blacks may have better athletic abilities, social skills, and be best at dancing, but it unfortunately seems like having high intelligence is more useful than the strengths of Blacks. Blacks and aboriginals have made very very few technological innovations compared to whites and asians. If Sub Saharan Africans did not have contact with non blacks their way of life today would be closer to ants in an ant colony to the way of life of whites and asians.
The reason why I don't have full certainty that races are not completely equal is that I believe in the divine power of God who can make people exactly equal if he wanted to. Since souls have free will, they aren't bound by absolute logical predictions, so God could have very well made all the races exactly equal. Occam's Razor conflicts with this belief once I remind myself that God created evil after all and allowed it to continue.
Occam's razor also strongly suggests that low technological innovation can be attributed to low IQ. The book Guns, Germs, and Steel gives a convoluted theory (and arguably flawed) claiming low technological innovations is all due to environment. The ancient Egyptians were able to build a great civilization in very similar conditions to sub Saharan Africans who did not technologically progress far. Papua New Guineans having few food sources rich in calories, shouldn't stop smart people from progressing their technology greatly. After all, asians historically ate so much rice that was low in calories.
This is probably the most uncomfortable belief I have: blacks are closer to apes than whites and asians are. If you look at a black person's skull and compare it to other races, you will notice, it has a smaller cranial capacity, and has a protruding pallet like that of an ape's. Apes have good social skills (relative to ape norms), and are stronger than humans. They can also crudely speak sign language. Since apes are very similar to humans in general, and that blacks seem to be most similar to apes, it begs the question, "Can humankind be a spectrum between non human and human, such as how some people claim gender is a spectrum?"
This hurt a little to type out. It's kind of long I'm sorry. I really hope you guys can discredit all these thoughts. I don't want to believe them.
