>>68036
On peut essayer…
Les Elders donc. C'est essentiellement des essais inspirés d'Evola, d'Heidegger, de Savitri Devi… entre autres ! Des synthèses en gros. Ca ne dispense donc pas de lire les bouquins. De toutes manières c'est pas sur un imageboard, surtout aussi foiré que celui-là qu'on va mettre au point une nouvelle métaphysique.
En voilà donc un, sur la dichotomie monothéisme/polythéisme. Dans l'esprit du gugus, Collin Cleary, que j'avais déjà mentionné dans mon précédent post. On peut lire ses essais ici : https://www.counter-currents.com/author/ccleary/
Donc :
>We are going to attempt to make this as simple as possible.
>1. The 'first experience' of Primordial Man with the transcendent was through contact with the immanent.
>2. For example; Man stood in awe and wonder in the face of temporal Thunder, Fertility, War, and Death, and this awe and wonder gave him perception of the supra-temporal dimension which informed it; thus, the God of Thunder, God of Fertility, God of War, God of Death.
>3. These Gods are infinite in number (as the entire complexity of the temporal world has a supernatural dimension which directly informs it), yet this supernatural dimension is only comprehensible to us as it appears to us - through the phenomena of temporal world.
>4. Thus we create our Pantheons, which seek to centralize the transcendent aspects of reality, forging personified myths of the Gods so that we may comprehend and come to know them. Additionally, myth is a fantastic way of teaching spiritual Truth. Additionally, one may then 'Turn Inward' to begin exploring the depths of his own Conciousness, in order to directly experience the Spiritual Truth of the Soul as it relates to the Cosmos (but more on that in a future post).
>5. So, through 'direct experience' we first came to know the Gods. After a series of priestly degenerations, we seek to 'explain' the Gods, necessitating abstract 'theory' and speculative theology. (We will argue that this is not a good thing).
>6. In this speculative philosophy we reach the conclusion reached in the Upanishads, which could be thought of as "Of One, Many". This means that the Gods are 'really just' aspects of a single Supreme Reality - Brahman. (Which is True, but to declare it via Theory rather than by Experience is the issue).
>7. The previous step is the beginning of the 'Death of God', as it invites men to cut themselves off from the Direct Intuition of the Gods, replacing the experienced Gods with an abstract philosophical understanding of the 'Supreme' God.
>8. With the mystery, awe, and wonder which was formerly cultivated by the direct experience of the Gods now being transferred into an abstract 'God', Imminent-Transcendence (The Gods) lose their Sacredness and we are left with only a Profane single-dimensional material 'reality' - which we begin to be deem an 'unreal illusion'…as the only reality is now theorized to be the supernatural dimension (Brahman). (Basically, the separation between then Immanent and Transcendent by theoretically affirming only the Transcendent while denying Experience via interaction with the Immanent to gain contact with the Transcendent). (This is also the problem with Platos "Theory of the Forms")
>9. This invites Mankind to close itself off from 'Awe' in the face of a multi-dimensional reality, and instead start to exert it's own 'Will' over a profane material world. A tree no longer has a spiritual dimension making it sacred, now the tree is in 'lumber in waiting'. The God of Thunder can no longer be, literally - "seen" - in the majesty of a storm. Instead, the storm is nothing but a series of electrically charged particles moving through abnornally pressurised air.
>10. This Titanic 'Mastery' (imposition of our Will) over Nature, has had the effect of the 'Death of God' - nihilism - as well as the disaster of modern technological civilization, in which the goal is to subordinate every aspect of Nature to Human Will. (The Rivers are now power-sources for hydroelectric plants, rocks are now paper-weights, and cows are just slabs of meat to be put in a happy meal).
>This is why we remain Polytheists.
>Only through the Parts can Human Beings know the Whole.
>So, the Gods are not 'archetypes' or 'illusions' or 'projections' or 'forms' or any of the 'explanations' that Humans attempt to impose on them to explain away the wonder of the divine.
>Rather, the Gods are the Gods as we see them.
>We don't believe in them. We know them.
>…as far as Cult of Yahweh goes, this 'Monotheism' is qualitatively inferior to Upanishadic 'Monotheism' (Brahman), they're two different 'Monotheisms' entirely.