>>2915

You're thinking of the Coolidge effect, which was mentioned in a thread right here in >>310 and the joke it came from involved chickens rather than cattle. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coolidge_effect

>or is it true from experience? or is it wrong?

Seems pretty accurate to me. But I'm running with a non-standard sample, you know?

>>2916

what do you mean by non standard sample? O.o

>>2915

ooo Ooo OOO science time! Resent studies have shown that Yes this is true, and it's a big part of both Porn addiction AND the ridiculously high modern masturbation rate. Humanity has access so all these "willing parties" that we are basically overloading that part and why many of the lonelier cuqueans and anons can self pleasure 20+ times a single day, it's also believed to be part of why powerful men had harems, Greater selection = Greater capability.

>>2925

>recent studies

Interesting, would be good to see the conclusions they made. Could you cite them so I can check them out?

>>2923

I mean that my boyfriend's got a higher than average sex drive and is more predisposed to seek out new girls, so basing any conclusions off him and applying it to all men isn't going to be reliable.

err…wait what?…i still cant really take that it was a real and not a joke but okay…

>>2925

can you elaborate me though, what recent studies that you mention is?

also as a man, i find it quite…weird that if one day i am going to marry a woman and my body will biologically lost interest after having s*x with her for a while…maybe if i didnt have s*x frequently maybe, i wont…or maybe if i have s*x more frequently with her, i wont…

well i still dont understand much about the theory in biological terms though so maybe i am wrong….and i dont even know if i want to marry anyway…..

>>2934

sometimes i was wondering like…how did your BF have time to seek out new girls?…

i am under impression nowadays people are enslaved by their own working shift time/college and study time and have rarely free time of their own

not like i am saying you are lying…just curious

tnx for reply everyone

>>2952

>s*x

>i am under impression nowadays people are enslaved by their own working shift time/college and study time and have rarely free time of their own

Are you a time traveller?

>>2952

>"s*x"

>working and sleeping leaves no time for fun, nevermind evenings and weekends

>"tnx"

Teenager detected.

And from one guy to another, let go of your fears. The majority of married men get laid on average of twice a week.

>>2954

i am not… but i wish i am….

so i can make all of my previous tests becomes 100, be able to avoid shiity people for hang out. be able to have more motivation to work.. and find better job…

>>2956

i am not exactly a teenager, 21 now. but i am used to have forums censor the words or i'll get banned that i am used to just censor my own words

>>And from one guy to another, let go of your fears. The majority of married men get laid on average of twice a week.

i am not so sure what this mean though…

if you are taking about the working and sleeping leaves no time for fun…because my college days and my working days are sht….i barely have time for myself other than to bath sleep and eat….

i am not afraid of married men not getting laid on marriage, i am just curious how people here can manage their time so easily….

>>2957

Don't worry about having to censor yourself here. This place is all about free speech and having the right to call everyone else a faggot whose opinions are dumb and that you have superior taste Even though you don't. Me on the other hand I have impeccable taste

Anyways to answer your questions:

1. Your body doesn't lose interest in the woman you're with. What happens is that when a man is introduced to a new sexual partner the man gains more sexual energy than normal. It's a survival instinct bred into us from ancient times. During times when human population was low the men who were able to outbreed other men and get several women pregnant at once were the ones to have their genes passed on.

2. Marriage in many places is shit nowadays for a man. It favors the woman to the extreme and I can not in good conscious recommend it. However nonetheless I do recommend having a long, even lifelong, relationship with someone. Just so long as it's not legally binding. Of course there are other reasons to get married, but those reasons are highly place specific. I could give you American reasons but I'm pretty sure you're not from a native english speaking country, no offense.

3. As for time management, it's not so bad really. Most people that post on this board are of the older variety so we only have work to worry about and higher education, if any, has already been completed. Not only that but it's usually the woman in the relationship that goes pussy-hunting for her man, usually from close sources such as: Friends, Coworkers, or in some cases even Family. This leaves the Man and the Quean time enough to enjoy themselves with a nice Vixen of their choice.

>>2958 man…tnx so much for your comment, it does explain a lot. even though maybe it has been explained before

and yeah i am not a native english speaker, its okay…and i dont think my english is that bad…

still trying to cope with the fact that this is actually biologically exist, and i read this happens to female animals to, but to a very lesser degree….

>>2961

Just conjecture here, but I would imagine it applies more to females of species which typically have multiple births. Cats, for example, usually have several kittens at a time, frequently with different fathers. So it would make sense for them to respond to multiple partners, as it diversifies the genes of their offspring.

For humans, it makes less sense, since multiple births are atypical and multiple births with different fathers are very unlikely. So it makes more sense to choose quality over quantity. Which isn't even addressing the social aspects.