No.998394
https://archive.is/RZFuo
Betting my left kidney on Yesss is the twist villain.
No.998396
Who's Yesss supposed to be?
No.998397
>Wreck It Ralph heroes Vanellope von Schweetz (Sarah Silverman) and Ralph (John C. Reilly) travel through the Internet, and encounter the Oh My Disney fan site. (They also run into a new character called Yesss, voiced by Taraji P. Henson.) While there, the adorable computer glitch Vanellope stumbles upon a dressing room filled with every Disney princess in recent memory, including Mulan, Snow White, Brave's Merida, Frozen's Elsa and Moana (who, yes, declared in her eponymous film that she's "not a princess," but she's in the group).
>Vanellope clashes with the seemingly prim and proper Disney royalty. But the women open up to her once they learn that although Vanellope hasn't made "a deal with an underwater sea witch" and wasn't "kidnapped or enslaved," she still has problems of her own.
>The princesses then start to realize that they should adapt Vanellope's casual, colorful street-style in place of their uncomfortable skirts and dresses. So, the crew changes into comfy T-shirts and shorts, with Elsa's looking like a Nike shirt emblazoned with the words "Just let it go."
you may now panic
>>998396
The blue chick in the first pic.
No.998414
>>998394
>There’s something about a really smart person empowering someone who is not as intelligent — it’s like, ‘Wow, see, I’m so good even I can teach you something.’
What a condescending prick
No.998434
>A couple of netizens help out along the way, including Henson’s character, Yesss.
>A stylish algorithm that heads up the trendy video-sharing site BuzzzTube, Yesss wants to make Ralph hip and cool, too, by promoting his viralness.
>“Just putting her with Ralph as a foil and a friend was a lot of fun,” Johnston says.
>BuzzzTube
I thought the point of the original movie was that you don't have to be popular or pretend to be something you're not to be a respectable person. What's the point of this? Are they going to retread the original by having Ralph teach this Yesss character that being viral and popular isn't everything, or is Ralph just going to learn the same shit again?
>Yesss is “a little snooty because she is smart and she does know the Internet so well.
>But then she kind of takes a liking to the big lug,” Henson says. “There’s something about a really smart person empowering someone who is not as intelligent — it’s like, ‘Wow, see, I’m so good even I can teach you something.’”
Bleegh. I stand corrected.
>Also along for the ride is KnowsMore, a know-it-all search engine voiced by Tudyk.
Is he going to go out of his way to hide information that, while true, isn't ((kosher)) with the people that control him?
What gets me most about this is that we already have movies about apps and the internet (the Emoji Movie came out what, last year?) when there's so much to talk about in the videogame industry. What about game engines or mods? What about predatory business practices like microtransactions? What about genres like MMORPGs and ASSFAGGOTS? What about that CRAPCUNTS shit, that's right up WiR's alley. Even if you want to keep it safe for Joe Sixpack and his son Little Timmy and keep it to one or two things, you can do alot with the industry. They already did it with the first, why not extend it to modern gaming?
No.998441
>>998394
wasn't the thing with the Disney princesses leaked a few months ago? I remember seeing a thread about it.
No.998444
>>998432
>These characters represent everything we want to avoid and are anywhere from 5 to 80 years old, but they're totes hip and with it, my dudes!
>Please buy our shit.
No.998484
Is Yesss suppose to be a reference to that Queen Slay meme I see people using on twitter? Disappointing they are using the "this is what that INTERNETS is like" plot that has been done to death before. For a series that was suppose to be about video games (even though the first movie does part of that right but not like how it was advertised) this sequel really strays too far from the initial concept. They had that bunny exploding scene which I thought was funny because of how dark it was for this kind of film but I expect any references or jabs at video games to make about 10-15% of the movie. Could turn out okay which is the level I expect from Disney that isn't their Marvel properties.
No.998488
how much GG is the villian of the movie? or is gonna be Trump-esque?
No.998492
The first one made me think of Tron, which was cool. This makes me think of shit related.
No.998520
>>998441
I think it was originally a leak but was later revealed to be real.
>>998484
>Is Yesss suppose to be a reference to that Queen Slay meme I see people using on twitter?
Yes.
No.998557
>>998397
>including Mulan, Snow White, Brave's Merida, Frozen's Elsa and Moana (who, yes, declared in her eponymous film that she's "not a princess," but she's in the group).
and yet Mulan is somehow in the group despite not actually being a princess in any capacity (though she would have been by marriage if Shang hadn't survived the fall in Mulan 2)
No.998560
>>998488
I have a strong hunch that Yesss is going to be the villain. Also calling it now that Yesss is going to be a walking parody of SJWs after the reveal of her being a villain.
No.998566
>>998394
Why she is among princess?
She can't do that, she is a poorfag.
No.998574
>>998432
eh, I'm okay with this as long as they still look cute in more modern attire that will still accentuate their femininity. (belly cut shirts, jean shorts, skin tight jeans, etc.)
No.998576
Christ, so that leak was real?
No.998577
>>998560
>implying
It's Knowsmore. He'll want to bump Yesss off because he's old and male and she's the hip new thing.
No.998578
>>998577
I bet he's actually turbo, and people will praise that retarded twist.
No.998579
>>998578
fuck
NOW I WANT THIS
i would still hate the movie for being a shitty sequel with InterWeBz as a plot device
Wreck it Ralph 3 will be about Romhack community and emulators?
No.998586
>>998578
>>998577
Yup. Both characters are voiced by Alan Tudyk. It'd be all too easy to have it be Turbo. And this shit seems to be taking every easy and lazy route it can.
No.998590
STOP IGNORING EILONWY
>>998586
You know it would be more original to start off the movie knowing who the villain is.
No.998657
>>998397
>the blue chick in the first pic
I'm calling, she's going to be the villain.
No.998658
>>998657
>nignog
>the villian
>in a zog joint
lol
No.998662
>>998658
Something about her design shouts "whatatwist" villain shit. If she looked like a little emoticon thing, like I thought they were gonna do, then it'd farfetched.
No.998665
>>998396
Can't wait to see Disney filing a trademark to YasQueen hashtag.
>>998394
>Dreamworks styled Princesses
It's definitely a fanservice to every Disney fan, Pixels confirmed to be the next Citizen Kane.
No.998690
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>998394
will this or Incredibles2 sucketh more?
No.998692
>>998434
>What about game engines or mods?
Better as a live-action film, documentary or not
>What about predatory business practices like microtransactions?
That warrants a separate film that shoudl start with the "I'm so poor but gifted" excuse.
>What about genres like MMORPGs and ASSFAGGOTS?
Leave them to the chinks, live-action or not.
No.998697
>>998662
>Something about her design shouts "whatatwist" villain shit
That's just her ugly nigger face, niggers naturally look evil. She wont be evil, though, because this is some jew shit
No.998699
>>998690
Incredible 2 will just be bland and boring. This will actually be terrible.
No.998725
>>998662
I get the exact same feeling about this guy.Hell, he even does the whole touching fingertips thing villains do in the middle of a trailer.
No.998727
>>998397
>The princesses then start to realize that they should adapt Vanellope's casual, colorful street-style in place of their uncomfortable skirts and dresses. So, the crew changes into comfy T-shirts and shorts, with Elsa's looking like a Nike shirt emblazoned with the words "Just let it go."
It fully pozed, like I thought it would be.
>>998657
She's a nigger, so probably not.
No.998764
>>998725
The film just looks so generic.
No.998805
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>998590
I wonder who got it worse - she or Kida?
No.998816
>>998725
>>998697
You see, this is why character design fucking matters.
No.998817
>>998574
>eh, I'm okay with this as long as they still look cute in more modern attire that will still accentuate their femininity. (belly cut shirts, jean shorts, skin tight jeans, etc.)
Dressing like a whore isn't a good way to accentuate your femininity, and certainly doesn't look as good as a good dress.
No.998831
>>998590
She's not a princess, she's a scullery maid.
No.998866
>>998578
>>998590
>>998577
>>998586
>not wanting the villain to be set up from the beginning openly admitting he's evil but then the twist being that one of the characters who seemed good all along is actually playing both good and evil like a fiddle so the evil party has to join up with the good ones
No.998881
>>998866
You know well that they aren't that clever.
No.998984
>>998866
>expecting anything interesting from disney
lol
No.999284
>the emoji movie is objectively a piece of shit
>but this is okay because Disney made it
No.999298
>>998725
I thought that thumbnail of the first image was supposed to be a (caricatured) statue of Walt Disney himself.
No.999343
>>999298
I thought he is Putin.
No.999366
Isn't Vanellope supposed to be the queen of candy land? Oh right she decided she's gonna be the president instead so that's why the princesses don't like her.
No.999381
>>999284
I've seen even people who loved the first movie compare the two. This looks like it's gonna be shit and anybody who thinks otherwise is deluded. Maybe it won't be, sure, but all marketing that's been done for it hasn't done a good job of conveying that.
No.999397
>>998397
>travel through the Internet, and encounter the Oh My Disney fan site.
Someone save us all.
No.999420
>>998394
>Betting my left kidney on a strong woman being a villain in 2018
I'll be taking that kidney.
No.999442
>>998394
We have a new trailer and look at the Internet World background and compare it to the cellphone World in Emoji Movie,there's almost the same amount of product placement.
No.999443
>>999442
>"So people assume your problems were solved because a big strong man came to your rescue?"
This shit makes my blood boil. Disney should know better.
No.999444
>>999442
People are coming up with bullshit reasons why this is totally different from the Emoji Movie and totally fine as we speak.
No.999447
>>999442
Weren't the majority of the Disney Princesses saved by a guy? How can they act like a male character's chivalry was unwarranted or unwanted? Even normal people are going to see that.
No.999451
>>999447
and the fact that their problems were solved because a strong man came along to save them
>frogger married prince and got lodsemone to run a restaurant
>belle didn't have any problems except living in a bumpkin town and getting harassed by gaston, now she lives in a castle with servants
>aurora doesn't need anyone to roll her around to prevent bed sores
>ariel gets to live on dry land instead of the living nightmare infested ocean
>snow white isn't DEAD
>rapunzel gets reunited with her parents
>cinderella isn't a slave any more
>jasmine didn't have to become the concubine of a maniacal wizard or prince, gets a flying carpet, visits from an all powerful djinn and a monkey in a fez
mulan, moana, pochahontas are all NOT princesses
merida's only problem was not wanting to marry and she avoided that responsibility at the risk of her mother ending up a rug in her father's castle
and elsa was a complete fuck up who squandered her childhood in isolation, pushed away the only people who cared and turned her sister into a ice sculpture, only through lesbian incest did they fix anything but still without the help of a man, anna would have been eaten by wolves
No.999452
>>999451
>frogger married prince and got lodsemone to run a restaurant
Except she didn't, his parents cut him off from their money.A better way of saying it would be
>Frogger fell in love and realized there's more to life than working 24/7 for her dream.
No.999453
>>999447
>>999451
Even normalfags are going to have a hard time digesting this. Some of the older movies can be argued about the whole "saved by a white male" stuff, but the recent ones focused in completely different things. The only one I can think it revolved around that idea is The Little Mermaid, but I personally found that movie to be the weakest one Disney released in the 90s
No.999454
No.999458
>>998560
I could see it tbh. The entire original movie ended up being one long set up for a stealth joke that Ralph was a bad enough dude to save the president.
No.999461
>>999442
>the internet is all shine, rainbows and megacorps
This sort of dystopic bullshit is the reason of why I want to die.
No.999464
>>999461
>the internet according to Disney
No.999473
>>998434
Because the people with the power to get the movie made dont actually understand the games industry at all (as a consumer, they ubderstand it plenty from marketing POV). The people they pay to understand and present this shit dont know OR care beyond whataver they think is popular (so streaming and the like being the focus, not mods and the ramifications of pvp permadeath in online games).
Warningcolors got to influence the movie more so than gaming fans.
No.999476
>>999462
>It's a Disney movie anon, did you seriously expect them to not make the internet rainbows and sunshine?
Not all Disney had to be sterile or far off the road from any content look at the hunchback of notre dame for example.
Emoji movie was an ad movie for apps, was bad from top to bottom and misrepresented everything possible.
Wreck it Ralph was just a movie about arcade video games.
Wreck it Ralph 2 is now another ad movie with so much miss-representation of what is the internet that it is scary when you compare it to the internet in the 90s/2000s in today's context.
I'm very depressed to see that this awful interpretation is going to be viewed by children and adults.
Even summer wars was closer to it than this.
No.999478
>>999476
>Wreck it Ralph was just a movie about arcade video games.
I forgot that it promoted some biscuits and other sugar products.
No.999479
>>999451
>mulan
Random person of Chinese bourgeoisie.
>moana
Is the daughter of the chief of the village/island.
>pochahontas
Is the daughter of the chief of the village/tribe.
No.999480
>>999476
>with so much miss-representation of what is the internet that it is scary when you compare it to the internet in the 90s/2000s in today's context.
To quote /tech/
>More precisely the web has become garbage. I used to be able to browse it just fine on a computer with 4 megs ram, a little over 20 years ago. But more and more websites every year force nasty designs that need a browser that requires several gigs of memory and a fast cpu.
>I guess the fun, oddball shit like finger and talk daemons are gone now, and they use that centralized facebook and twitter shit instead.
No.999485
>Each princess had unique designs and styles by different artists
>New designs are homogeneous, bug-eyed, doll-proportioned shit
>Their personalities will be bastardized for the sake of a one-off gag and/or wimen empowerment
No.999491
So there's no difference between Disney and shallow Disney imitators like Dreamworks now right? No artistry or prestige or class, all just memes and pop culture references. Also, we get it with the Disney princess deconstruction guys. It's been included in literally every Disney movie with a female protagonist of 21st century including your most traditional film since the 90's Moana. We really get it. It was only funny the first time in Enchanted and you're also poisoning your brand for all eternity with post-modernism.
No.999496
>>998394
>Yesss is a nigger
>the leak about the Disney princesses and C3PO was real
My absolute disgust.
No.999498
>>998579
>Romhack community and emulators
Maybe it could but again they'll never show for example that illegal roms are what saved Nintendo's virtual store ass because Nintendo lost/didn't archive most of their old games.
No.999499
>>998577
But Knowsmore and Yesss are ownd by the same company called google.
No.999530
>>999442
Gee wouldnt it be cool if mario appear in Wreck it Ralph 2?
disney:
>starts masturbating
No.999531
No.999533
>>999531
>implying Disney would allow chans once they control the internet
No.999535
>>999451
>cinderella isn't a slave any more
I like how instead of her complaining about being enslaved, it's Belle. Even though she wasn't kidnapped, she offered to save her father.
No.999537
>>999442
>All these movies no vidya characters
>Not even boing boing wahoo makes an appearance
No.999538
>>999442
Why did they have to do this? I actually liked the original Wreck-It Ralph a lot and they shat on it with this crappy movie.
Ralph was right and he should have made everyone in his game go homeless for being fucking ungrateful faggots.
No.999546
>>999443
>>999447
>>999451
>>999452
>>999485
Jesus, clean the shit out of your ears, you fudge-packing midgets. They're talking about getting generalized as "damsels in distress", not some fucking big red endorsed feminist bull-shit. You know, that shit where just because there was a male love interest, dykes immediately dismiss their accomplishments in the story? That's the shit they're talking about.
You can now return to bitching about this heap without being such massive trigger niggers.
No.999547
>>999546
I thought Merida saved herself tho, that was the point of the movie.
No.999554
>>999546
You are an unwelcome stranger to this board, and an even more unwelcome pest to this entire website. The moment kampfy was kicked was the moment you perversely deranged, opinion-intollerant neobolsheviks thought you could invade, and hide behind the guise of "this is a freedom of speech board now!" while jabbering on about a side of politics that are beyond harmful to the safety and foundation of human civilization. That side of politics should have been destroyed the moment one of history's grandest monsters, Karl Marx, passed on after his ardent followers sought to the destruction of Tsar Nicholas II and his family.
You do not have a voice here, and you will never have a voice here, regardless of this being /co/, /tv/, /v/, /pol/, or even that festering anus of a board like /trannypol/. You do not belong here, and for your sake; heed my words, and heed them well, even if I am just an anonymous face in the croud:
GET. OUT.
No.999560
>>999442
>Disney writers somehow have enough brain cells to accurately predict people complaining about the name of the movie
No.999562
>>999464
>Disney's representation of themselves is a motley assortment of companies/franchises they bought out and parade around as if they made them
the lack of self-awareness is astounding
No.999570
>>999442
My god this really does have no plot. Also
>that Rapunzel line
Both she and Vanellope would have been up shit creek with no paddle if the male lead hadn't come along. Even animals can understand not shitting where they eat, seems Disney execs don't.
No.999572
>>999464
>putting the muppets on the lineup
Didn't Disney run that into the ground with that awful show and is quietly trying to get people to forget they own it?
No.999573
>>999572
No, because a CGI Muppets babies reboot just came out.
No.999577
>>999547
Merida pulled a prank on her parents by winning her own hand in marriage but then endangered her mother and her brothers by seeking help from a witch that turned them into fucking bears
and actually i don't think she even really saved anyone, her mother ends up saving them from another were-bear and merida just stands in the way of her dad so they don't kill her mother
merida is ironically not brave at all in the movie
>>999546
also wouldn't vanellope have been stuck in a candy dungeon forever if it wasn't for ralph?
No.999592
>>999442
Troopers are security guards?
No.999631
HookTube embed. Click on thumbnail to play.
>>999570
Rapunzel was perfectly able to go up and down from her tower. She'd probably have eventually gone down while Mother Gothel was out. Even then, it's not like he solved ALL her problems. He got her out of her tower and mainly just used her until he realized he liked her.
The only one I can think of that entirely relied on men was Aurora, unless I'm forgetting the movie. It was a man who fought Maleficent and lifted her curse.
Mulan and Moana were the leads of their own movies, Cinderella had her prince charming more as a prize for all the bullshit she went through and ultimately got to the point of winning him over by her force of will to stay positive and not just off herself, Ariel is similar in that the prince is just part of what she originally wanted and ultimately didn't do much beyond helping in the final battle with Ursula, the only problem Aladdin solved for Jasmine was that she was being forced to get married and he wasn't a complete shitbag, Snow White only has a single problem solved by her prince charming (aka being dead) and even then she still has to worry about that Queen probably still wanting her dead, and Tiana and Pocahontas are considerably worse off once their princes pop up. Also Ana's prince tried to kill her and the other guy she likes fucks reindeer.
I think there is something to be said about the idea that all the older princesses had all their problems solved by men. Like, particularly Cinderella. Embed related.
No.999635
>>999631
Ah, I forgot Belle. Who, again, wasn't really saved. She wanted adventure, and she didn't really get it. If anything, I'd argue that she settled for solving a man's problems rather than actually fulfilling her own wishes.
No.999637
>>999608
>Treating corporations as your friends and not just faceless conglomerates out to make money off of you is insidious
It's like she almost figured it out but stopped right before the finish line and gnawed her limbs off.
No.999638
>>999631
I've become increasingly happy that the objectively best wife material Disney ever made is ignored by their stupid "Princess" Line. I'm convinced that if they weren't fucking terrified of 'teh furries and the youth' they'd be pimping her out as the original independent princess.
No.999646
>>999631
The fuck, that video said the exact opposite of Cinderella's problems being solved by the men of the story.
No.999647
>HAHA lets make a bunch of movies with the same ugly same face protag about flowers and princes and market it to dumb women and gear our entire company and everything we buy to the brain dead princess audience
No.999649
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>999631
>Snow White only has a single problem solved by her prince charming (aka being dead) and even then she still has to worry about that Queen probably still wanting her dead
Did you even watch Snow White?
No.999653
>>999649
I did, years ago. I forgot the queen was actually killed. Sorry for forgetting a detail of an extremely old movie.
Not that it really changes anything. For as far as she knows, the queen is still alive, iirc. And it's not like the dwarves killed her; it was divine intervention.
No.999654
>>999646
I linked it to show how Cinderella solves her own problems despite being typically seen as the embodiment of a princess having all her problems solved by men, anon…
No.999656
>>999654
Then don't type shit like
>I think there is something to be said about the idea that all the older princesses had all their problems solved by men.
If you don't actually agree with it faggot
No.999659
>>999656
Don't be a fucking moron. I wrote that because there IS something to be said about it. About how wrong it often is. As the video points out.
No.999669
>>999654
I think technically her problems were only solved by her fairy godmother, the prince only played a role by proxy. If it wasn't for the magical glass slipper then she's still be slave to her evil stepmother, the prince takes backseat.
No.999690
>>999442
Letting normal people on the internet was a mistake in the first place.
No.999695
>>999669
Marriage was a political tool. Nobles married other nobles because they wanted to acquire something. Meeting a prince was one thing, he then had to be willing to put the game aside and cause an enormous scandal by marrying as far below his level on the social hierarchy as he possibly could.
The whole story is just an effort to escape poverty by marrying up to a big, strong, very wealthy man.
No.999697
>>999442
>take me to the website that is super-intense and really nuts!
<https://8ch.net/pol/
No.999710
Saying Cinderella didn't need the Prince is like saying Arthur didn't need Excalibur.
>b-but they said "solved ALL my problems!"
Bullshit. No one ever means "Prince Charming solved literally all of my problems". It's "Prince Charming saves the day". That he came in and solved the major issues, which is the case in every single one of these stories (barring Cinderella, that was Fairy Godmother). No one ever means that they never had another problem, they never fucking cared because it's simple little fairy tales. "Happily ever after" is an ending. No one cares beyond the ending. Learn the moral and move on. But no, they want to re frame the discussion in their disgusting post-modernist feminist viewpoint. Distracting from the already diluted truths and morals.
If anything, Prince Charming is the one being objectified in this situation.
No.999713
Merida doesn't even want to be there.
No.999715
>>999695
>>999710
Literally all he did was fall in love with her at the end. He didn't help her overcome her sisters or step mother; she did that herself. Stop getting both your panties in a twist.
No.999721
No.999737
>/co/ - Comics & Cartoons
No.999742
>>999737
<animation and cartoons are completely different
You must be over 18 to post here.
No.999743
>>999713
Shit, I didn't even notice she was there.
I wonder why they seemed to try as hard as they could to crop her out of the trailer scenes.
No.999746
>>999743
Brave was shit and a financial failure. I'm surprised they even put her in.
No.999749
>>999746
Why does every faggot on /co/ insist that everything they dislike is a financial failure? It was the third highest engrossing film of its year. It wasn't a crazy success, but it wasn't anywhere near a failure.
It's probably more to do with it being Pixar and not true 'Disney.'
No.999776
>Actual princess in an actual Disney movie.
>Can fend for herself
>Has an actually unique design and aesthetic
>Is never acknowledged at all
You know what maybe that's a good thing.
No.999790
>>999442
I think I figured something out. On the original movie, Rich Moore (This and Zootopia) Directed, Clark Spencer (Lilo & Stitch, Robinsons, Bolt and a few others) Produced and Jim Reardon (Simpsons writer, Zootopia) all worked on the story together. Phil Johnston (Zootopia) and Jennifer Lee (Directed Frozen) they pitched the initial screenplay but I think Rich, Clark and Jim helped turn the story into something special, at least above usual Disney standards.
For Ralph 2, Phill joins Rich in directing, Clark still produces and story is still Jim I think, he isn't listed on the wikipedia page but his personal Disney wiki has him working with Josie Trinidad (Zootopia) to turn the screenplay into a story. The screenplay itself is written again by Phil but since Jenny is busy with Frozen 2, he brought in Pamela Ribon. She got her foot in the door by writing Moana and Smurfs Lost Village but her wiki page makes her come across as a glorified blogger and this choice comment "In November 2014, she found a Barbie book from 2010 titled I Can be a Computer Engineer. She decried elements of the book where Barbie appeared to be reliant on male colleagues. Mattel has since ceased publishing the book."
Wouldn't be surprised that a feminist has been given creative freedom, brings in the other disney princesses and then tells the viewers they don't need no prince and Rich can't override her because Phil is directing as well. She also does the voice for Snow White because she wants to self insert.
I'm not hoping the best for this movie anymore.
>>999451
Pretty much, who knew your princess could actually work with a prince to help solve her problem instead of shunning him, getting stuck and then blaming him because he didn't help her.
>>999461
Twitter isn't mostly bots, Google isn't censoring people and Facebook doesn't have people following you adding data to an ever growing list of things they have on you.
>>999538
I like the original too, something that had the backing of disney but it felt like the people working on it had more creative freedom than other projects that Disney work on.
>>999776
Best Princess.
No.999792
>>998394
You know what's fucked up? I actually LIKED the first one. ( I wanted to wreck Calhoun! Felix, that lucky sonovah-) So I was excited to hear they were doing another. Then I saw this trailer. Now I am hunting the infinity stones to snap this movie and everyone who made it out of existence.
No.999795
>>999647
Jasmine is still best girl btw.
No.999813
>>999776
Why did it have to fail? Just imagine if it was successful and set a trend for the Western animation industry! We would have had animated action movies instead of sing-song princesses and smug animals in non-animal situations! Maybe even adult animation that is not an edgy trash! And those mercs deserved more screen time! They deserved their own animated series! Video game! History took a wrong turn that year!
>>999795
>>999790
Funny how this racist, misogynist place has boner for shitskin princesses.
No.999818
>>999776
>Best princess will stay forgotten while the rest get turned into terrible feminist caricatures of themselves
Works for me.
No.999820
>>999813
I think it would have succeeded had they decided to make it a trilogy like originally planned. There was too much stuff to cram into one movie but fuck did I enjoy what we had. It was like Disney's version of Stargate.
No.999830
>>998690
It just looks like a lot of "lulz dads can't raise families." Cause in American culture you're either a totalitarian father, or Peter Griffen. But, who knows, maybe it'll surprise me!
No.999836
>>999813
Didn't Disney make sure to get the movie fail in the box? Or that was Treasure Planet?
No.999865
>>999836
Treasure Planet, but that was mostly due to really poor marketing strategies with Dilbert's character.
Atlantis actually did really well and got two theatrical releases, the second one having an alternate opening.
No.999875
*threatens a little girl with broken glass*
No.999878
>>999875
Isn't this really out of character for all of them except for Merida and maybe Rapunzel? Pocahontas was a pacifist for sure.
No.999880
>>999875
>Jasmine holding a lamp
Will Smith will shit on Robin's ashes on the new Aladdin remake.
No.999885
>>999776
>Underrated films not getting the feminist treatment
I don't see a problem here
No.999887
>>999878
Pocahontas wasn't necessarily a pacifist. She had to be restrained from beating John Smith's twink's ass when he shot the dude she was originally supposed to marry.
No.999890
I feel really vindicated for overracting and hating the first one now on principle alone.
No.999898
>>999546
…all her problems did get solved when Ralph showed up in her game.
No.999912
>>999888
Trips tell the truth.
No.999948
The guy with a Tom & Jerry reaction was telling the truth. Yesss and the princesses getting fed until they burst fucking when?
No.999959
>>999546
>>999776
I think I understand why she is not in the club. Her problems were caused by a big strong man showing up, and her problems were solved by a fucking nerd.
No.999963
>>999959
What problems were ACTUALLY solved by Milo that he didn't end up indirectly causing himself?
No.999965
>>999959
but that's all the more reason to include her
No.1000030
>>999963
Well, before Milo, Rourke and co. arrived on the scene Kida's dad was already fucking everything up by keeping their power source locked away which was leading to the steady decay of Atlantis, so he didn't indirectly cause -that-.
He just sped up the process.
The only problem that Milo solved that he and his buddies had absolutely no hand in causing was the problem of Atlantian illiteracy. Though it always bothered me that in the thousands of years the Atlantians were fucking around in their city they never stopped to relearn their own fucking language. Milo could read and speak Atlantian fluently and he was only in his early- to mid-20's, so it's not like it's impossible to learn the language over a relatively short period of time. You mean to tell me that these 8,500-year-old assholes couldn't find the time to decipher their own writing? Come on.
No.1000055
>>999631
>The only one I can think of that entirely relied on men was Aurora, unless I'm forgetting the movie. It was a man who fought Maleficent and lifted her curse.
Really it was the three fairy godmothers that defeated Maleficent. They just used the prince as a proxy.
No.1000070
No.1000080
>>999697
can you imagine just how shit this site would become if 4chan or 8chan were mentioned in the movie?
No.1000118
>>1000070
Left side is Ralph Breaks the Internet, right side is the Emoji movie. Memes aside they're surprisingly similar.
No.1000175
>>1000080
There's a joke for that couch somewhere, but fuck it.
No.1000203
>>1000080
that would be like murder to an imageboard
No.1000207
>>1000070
Outside of imageboards people are actually claiming this to be "like the emoji movie, but good". Apparently all it takes to make this sort of cringe worthy bullshit acceptable with the masses is using characters from a film that they already liked (or as the image claims, "when Disney does it").
No.1000212
>>1000207
I don't think it's the characters, just the brand behind them.
No.1000214
>>1000207
>or as the image claims, "when Disney does it"
That is literally all it takes. If anyone else made the new Star Wars movies, for example, nobody would've cared.
No.1000294
No.1000297
No.1000298
No.1000309
>>1000287
>Implying Kristoff was needed in that movie at all and actually solved all her problems rather than just helping her once or twice
>Implying Belle wasn't the one solving all of the Beast's problems
No.1000310
>>1000309
So make an edit that removes those or uses better examples in their place if it bugs you.
No.1000311
>>1000310
Why would I? Faggots in this thread are super upset about it but they're missing the 'all' part of the sentence. Even if we're talking Aurora, the one who most relied on a dude to fix the bullshit she was in, you could pretty easily argue that she's probably got issues beyond that that she's got to solve for herself.
Belle really was the worst possible example you could have used, though. I don't know why you'd even bring that up. What did he solve? He killed Gaston, but it's not like she ever even wanted him dead. He was just obnoxious.
No.1000313
>>1000298
dont know how but if any of you can be my guest…
>>1000309
If it wasn´t for him she wouldn'teven get to where her sister was and the funny part is SHE knew that
No.1000315
>>1000313
>If it wasn´t for him she wouldn't even get to where her sister was and the funny part is SHE knew that
Doesn't sound like 'all' her problems to me. It was also just an asspull to have a reason to keep him in the movie. There was no real reason why she couldn't have found her own way up the mountain, and after that point he didn't do shit. He couldn't save her from being frozen, he couldn't save her from Hans, he couldn't stop her sister. He was a pointless character that only existed as an empty vessel of what was Kai from the original story, using Flynn Rider's original design, and to make up for the other love interest being a villain.
No.1000316
>this one assblasted twitter goon seething at the thought of someone countersignalling this propaganda-laden trash heap of a movie
No.1000317
>>1000316
Projecting too hard. The thread's been all but entirely derailed by faggots just so angry at a simple sentence that's perfectly valid for the vast majority of characters. I'm perfectly happy insulting what we see for a number of other things, including how it's basically just the Emoji Movie, and how we've yet to see any actual video games, just stupid websites and Disney shilling itself while clearly trying to downplay Pixar's past (like with cropping out Merida from the majority of the trailer).
And no, you faggot, a guy helping a girl through a single problem is not 'all her problems getting solved when he shows up.'
No.1000319
>>1000315
>There was no real reason why she couldn't have found her own way up the mountain
oh really, she just went full leroy jenkins on that, she doesn´t even got some winter clothes to pursue his sister, it was pure luck that she found that shack where another strong, big man help her with her problems
ok maybe not all of her problems but the only problem she had in that moment, that was looking for her sister and try to help her return to the kingdoom so everyone could survive
No.1000323
>>1000319
I mean plot-wise. There's no reason why she wouldn't have winter clothes. In the original story, Gerda was able to get to the Snow Queen's palace and save Kai by herself. They fabricated a problem and made Gerda into the more inept Ana just to have a reason to keep "Kai" aka Kristoff in there.
No.1000327
>>1000323
ok but that´s in the original, for whatever reason in the disney version they keep him and he helps her a lot and on important things that could lead to her death.. so no he wasn´t a pointless character
No.1000328
>>1000311
You're clearly either a faggot or a chick on her period. How about you come back to /co/ when you stop being at least one of those.
No.1000332
>>1000311
>>1000317
Did you also defend that pile of feminist horseshit "Maleficent" when it came out?
No.1000333
>>998394
Trailer 1: Oh cool this is about the internet. Kinda worried its cancer like the Emoji movie but hey.
Trailer 2: 80% of the movie will be about her fitting between Disney princesses (who I all hate these days, no exceptions… where's Maid Marion tho?! Racist!), same old gender role shtick and Disney jerking themselves off. PASS.
No.1000335
>>1000333
Double-trips of truth
No.1000341
Kills me because Ralph's motivation of just wanting not to live alone in the garbage for doing his job gave the first film some actual heart.
Without that Sarah Silverman's presence becomes intolerable.
No.1000345
>>999792
Your post couldn't be more Gen Z tryhard even if it tried.
>>999890
Same. I remember back on cuckch /tv/ in the year or so between the film's release and GG everyone was religiously sucking its dick. You made a thread that decried it and the Gisnep shills would be all over you in a matter of minutes.
No.1000349
>>1000327
I mean, does he even 'help her out a lot'? He just leads her up the mountain. That's his whole purpose. He's useless beyond that. He doesn't actually solve any problems she has beyond their initial meeting. He is also a reindeer fucker.
>>1000332
>Implying I'm defending this shit movie
No.1000353
>>1000349
You're defending at least part of it, and it's a cliche jab at the damsel in distress trope at that.
No.1000360
>>1000327
>pretending he wasn't forced and unneeded in the story as soon as they made Elsa not a villain and forced Hans into one
He was there for the movie to have a notable male who wasn't a villain or implied to be one.
No.1000361
>>1000353
Why do I feel like, if these same fuckers insulted the Disney princesses to say they were all damsels in distress, you would be equally as asshurt about that?
No.1000363
>>999830
It's just the first movie with reversed genders. In the end the characters will learn (again) that they need to be united to work as a family.
No.1000364
>>999875
I would fuck them all.
No.1000365
>>999887
I don't think she would have threatened a little girl.
No.1000367
>>999451
Moana was saved by The Rock.
No.1000369
>>999546
No, the movie is mocking up the trope of princesses being saved by strong men and then living an eternally happy live after.
Of course in the end of the movie they will learn they don't need a man to be happy, and will start dressing like dykes. Disney's female characters are all asexual at this point.
No.1000372
>>999631
The thing is that at one point of the story they were saved by men and in the end they lived happy forever after. But not anymore of course, you don't need a man to be happy, please be an asexual dyke who only cares about yourself, goy.
No.1000373
>>1000367
She had to force him to do anything, and the entire movie was her righting his stupid mistake that he kept trying to run away from. His epic character moment was just him manning up and facing his own issues.
>>1000365
I mean, yeah. Valid point. I was just being a smartass, honestly. Though I'm kind of surprised that they end still push Pocahontas in brands. You'd think they'd quietly phase her out, considering they're trying to be diverse and progressive and she's basically a bastardized version of a story of a pre-pubescent girl who's iirc enslaved.
They're better off making a movie about Sacagawea and then pretending like Pocahontas never happened. Basically just put El Dorado and Pocahontas together, and that's what you get.
No.1000375
>>1000372
>Men showing up and fixing all their problems
>Being helped by a man once
Anyway, stop leddit spacing (>>1000369 is pretty clearly you) and focus on something else to bitch about instead, like their disgusting sameface or something.
No.1000376
>>1000373
>She had to force him to do anything, and the entire movie was her righting his stupid mistake that he kept trying to run away from. His epic character moment was just him manning up and facing his own issues.
And then saving her.
No.1000377
>>1000375
They fixed all their problems by marrying them in a happy ending.
No.1000378
>>1000364
>racemixing
Go away you degenerate.
No.1000380
>>1000376
When did he actually save her? The water saves her multiple times, but he doesn't really do any saving. He just keeps trying to run away, and then occasionally pretends to be tough but basically immediately needs Moana to help him. And even if you can think of a single time he saves her (and not just distracts someone for her), he's still not fixing any of her problems, god forbid all of them.
You can argue about how this showcases the problem with new Disney movies, but it's not the hill to die on if you're trying to argue that a man showed up and solved all her problems. He is literally the cause of all her problems. He stole a rock that caused a goddess to go crazy and start killing all the islands, and she had to go and get it and give it back to her while he kept trying to refuse to help.
>>1000377
They only get married in a handful of the princess movies, man. And marriage does not fix problems. The only one you could be referencing that actually does this is Cinderella. And even then, she's basically been fixing her own problems by finding ways of overcoming her family herself.
No.1000446
>>998579
>Wreck it Ralph
>Ever being about video games
Silly anon, where did you get the idea that this was supposed to be about video games? Obviously the 3rd movie would just be a self-insert advertisement for other Disney movies as Ralph goes into the world of Marvel™, Star Wars™, Pixar™, and much much more!
No.1000469
>>1000333
Where's Mulan though? She didn't have her problems solved by a man and solved her own problems, I guess you can't be a princess when you don't reinforce disney's shitty (((agenda))).
Also RACIST!
No.1000471
>>1000361
Probably because your intuition sucks shit.
No.1000474
>>1000469
>no Mulan because she declined being royalty which is worth less than being born royal
>but Moana, who isn't really a traditional princess
>but Beauty, who isn't a princess
>and Tiana, who isn't a princess
>Pocahontas sitting in this pink castle full of white royality because its fine that her home was taken away from her
>were Anna and Elsa both princesses or are they just there for marketing value and their dresses?
>no Marian because making one 3D furry fanservice movie is enough
Progressive Disney right.
And what really grinds my gears:
>Moana in a royal environment, still wearing her tribal clothes, but not even the ceremonial ones, bare feet. Don't the other princesses care? Would be awkward if they asked her to change her clothes right?
>Pocahontas in her tribal dress; in fact, that she's here is so fucking ignorant, and I'm not even a SJW.
>>1000446
Oh god I see it happening.
No.1000475
>>1000367
Without Moana, The Rock wouldn't have his hook, therefore couldn't have helped her.
No.1000476
>>1000287
>>999546
Disney went too forward with Zootopia. Time for 1000 steps back.
They don't even understand their own source material. Vanellope not being the damsel was the whole point of the first movie. In fact, she dragged Ralph along, he just helped her with the rough work… well… and destroyed her car.
No.1000492
>>999638
I'm yet to watch this movie but I've heard she doesnt really do much except wait for Robin to save her.
Is that true?
No.1000495
>>1000474
Mulan IS in the trailer, anon…
No.1000513
>>999880
You had to remind me we live in a post Robin Williams world.
No.1001031
How do you guys feel about the new Disney/Pixar formula?
No.1001034
>>1001031
You know what? It's honestly not that terrible a formula all things considered, but it does seem pretty lazy when you put it like that.
No.1001062
>>1001034
You know what they say; if it ain't broke don't fix it. To be fairly honest I'd take a well written cliché story over poorly written (((current year))) crap any day.
No.1001064
>>1001031
Is this some kind of metaphor for marriage?
No.1001065
>>1001031
Could be worse. I rather have the formula instead of random SJWism spewed all over a cynical movie that isn't appropriate for it (e.g. Emoji Movie).
Also, your formula pic is immediately broken by Coco.
No.1001066
>>1001065
I assume that's why Coco isn't included in the picture.
No.1001070
>>1000474
Tiana is super a princess, she married a prince after she solved all his problems. Her singular problem was solved by a gator.
No.1001071
>>1001070
Oh wait yes thats true.
That other bitch was just Mardi princess, she's an actual one now.
No.1001134
>>998590
>the deleted scene of her getting her clothes torn will never be made public
Feels really bad…
No.1004053
>>999888
>>1000333
It's real hard to argue with double trips.
No.1004115
>>1000492
Not really. She makes friends with a local village boy, goes to tell Robin about the archery contest, and then saves him when he gets captured by offering herself if the prince will spare Robin (but they escape afterwards anyways).
In the original ending Robin is hit by an arrow and she drags him to a church. They get followed by the sheriff but King Richard arrives just in time to put an end to everything.
I mean, she doesn't grab a bow and start mowing down guards. Though if I remember her handmaiden actually gets in a few physical scraps at some point.
No.1004309
>>998397
>the Oh My Disney fan site
IT'S NOT A FAN SITE IF IT'S OFFICIAL
No.1004313
>>1001134
You what I really hate ?
Double standards. It is true that violence encourages violence, but not knowing about violence is worse in the sense that one cannot identify violence or some form of them. And here we are in 2018 this nightmare where people don't even recognize when they are being tyrannical towards others all of this because they never explored another part of life.
No.1004807
>>1004309
But anon, it is the OFFICIAL Fan Site, where fans can discuss Disney movies under the rightful supervision of Disney :^)
The reasoning must be something like that.
No.1008696
>>998394
What is that big guy's name in the first picture?
Destroy-it-Dan?
Smash-it-Sam?
Crush-it-Carl?
Flatten-it-Phil?
No.1014118
>>998397
(((Schweetz)))
Not even trying to hide the Jewery at this point.
No.1014146
No.1015166
No.1015175
>>1008696
I think it was Mush-it-Mike
No.1015178
No.1015201
Scrolling past, Ralph's shirt made me think for a second they'd pixelated out his nipples.
No.1023704
Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Necroing this thread, because new trailer dropped.
>Ebin fortnite maymay dance
>Rickrolling
[worry intensifies]
No.1023706
>>1023704
>[worry intensifies]
You telling me you didn't lose all hope of this being good when the first trailer dropped?
Also has anyone else realized that Pixar and Disney seem to have lost the ability to design good looking humans?
No.1023713
>>1023706
>>1023708
Mostly because I ended up enjoying the first one, some pacing issues and swing-and-a-miss jokes aside. So with what little information was provided early on, there was some hope that they could do something to make this "work", but this last trailer is approaching Emoji Movie levels of fuckery.
No.1023715
>>1023704
It's like Disney dipped it's toes in autism
WE NEEE MORE
No.1023725
I wish they'd do some funny elsagate reference. There's probably no way in hell it will happen, even though Disney has the rights to Elsa and Spidey both.
No.1023739
>>1023704
It's not even out and it already feels dated, pretty much the emoji movie 2.0. Can't believe that this is what Disney has become
No.1023763
No.1023788
>>1001131
A fan fiction that will make millions
No.1023806
>>1023704
Not a single thing about this looks good.
No.1023808
No.1023810
>>998394
>blue niggers
not watching
No.1023819
>>998394
They've been shilling this for so long that I thought it had already come out.
>Release date: November 21
I'm tired of it now though.
No.1023831
i know she's voiced by some ugly jewess, but goddamn do i want to fuck vanellope
No.1023866
>>1023704
>ralph goes to the dark web and buys cp with dogecoin
Jesus Christ, Disney!
No.1023877
>>1023704
>disney makes animated movie about video games
>most of it is focused on fairy-tale kingdom with a lame excuse of "that's where the game is set"
>disney makes animated movie about internet
>most of it is now focused on video game with a lame excuse of "that game is online"
No.1024023
>>1000476
>and destroyed her car.
That he built for her.
No.1024099
>>1001031
What about the fact that they're literally ripping the plot from Romancing the Stones?
No.1024123
>>1008696
Slap-it-Sylvester?
Blast-it-Bob?
Crack-it-Carl?
Pop-it-Peter?
Snap-it-Steve?
Crush-it-Cameron?
No.1027148
>>1023704
We need to see this
No.1027243
>>1023788
>that will make millions
Jokes on you it's only the investors who gets the money.
No.1027267
>>998866
There are movies that do this now, right? I'd like to explore that concept.
No.1027332
>>1008696
>>1024123
>Ralph finds dozens of chinese ripoffs of his own game
>movie ends with him leading a gook army of himself to save the day.
No.1027565
New stills featuring random ecelebs
No.1027652
Plot leaked.
>Picking up after the end of Wreck-It Ralph, a child playing Sugar Rush, the game where Vanellope lives. somehow manages to break the game's steering wheel. While a child in the arcade finds a replacement steering wheel on eBay for $200, the wheel apparently costs more than arcade owner Stan Litwak says Sugar Rush makes in a year. Litwak decides the only option is to unplug Sugar Rush, leaving Vanellope devastated and homeless.
>Ralph attempts to cheer Vanellope up by giving her a place to live in his game, but she finds herself inconsolable. At the same time, Litwak decides to set up a Wi-Fi router in the arcade, which Ralph and Vanellope find out from Sonic leads to the Internet, where eBay is.
>Ralph and Vanellope travel through the power cables of the arcade into the router, labeled in the movie as "Wifi," and shoot themselves into the world of the Internet in pursuit of this "eBay." The internet world looks like a city dominated with real destinations like "Snapchat" and a few fictionalized ones like "BuzzTube."
>On arrival, they meet KnowsMore, who is essentially the Google search engine represented as a little purple man. When Ralph meets him, KnowsMore starts spewing out search suggestions the minute Ralph speaks a syllable. When Ralph says "Umm," KnowsMore quips back "umbrella," "Umbridge" and "Uma Thurman." KnowsMore admits his autofill is acting up a bit, and Vanellope quickly cues up a search for the Sugar Rush steering wheel to get her and Ralph moving. KnowsMore finds the listing on eBay, cuing up a vehicle that sends the duo off to eBay.
>eBay itself looks like a giant auction house, which includes the voice of auctioneer champion Brian Curless among those fielding bids on "gently used hip replacements" and a potato chip that looks like Beyoncé.
>Ralph and Vanellope find the auction for the Sugar Rush steering wheel, but neither are actually aware of what an auction is. Instead they think it's a game where you shout out numbers, and whoever says the biggest number wins. They pull ahead of the auction initially with a bid of $1,000, but then start competing with each other to make up the biggest number. They shoot the price up to $15,000 and more until it lands on $27,001.
Upon learning that they now need real money to purchase that wheel, Ralph and Vanellope start looking for ways they can earn the cash to complete the transaction. They first look into selling digital goods from other video games.
>They enter the video game Slaughter Race, described as a apocalyptic Grand Theft Auto, and steal a car from the featured driver Shank (Gal Gadot). This doesn't work though: While Vanellope appears to stay ahead of the pursuing Shank at first, Shank outsmarts Vanellope and stops the theft.
>Next, Ralph and Vanellope meet Yesss, the algorithm for social video site BuzzTube, who suggests they create a viral video to make the money. Ralph goes on to make a series of videos featuring himself, which takes off. Feeling great about himself with the videos series' success, he decides to walk into a room where he can see the comments people are leaving, and he's at first upset when bad comments start appearing. Yesss finds him and lets him know that he shouldn't worry about these, that the comments often "bring out the worst in people."
>Ralph mentions that he's used to people not liking him from being considered the villain of his video game, and briefly decides he doesn't need the internet anymore. But Yesss reveals that the videos have indeed earned him all the money he needed, bringing in $30,000.
>Fans also got a look at the Disney Princess sequence, which is even more hilarious than previous trailers have teased. Vanellope meets the princesses, who ask her questions that showcase the various things that have gone wrong with the princesses' lives – like if she's been poisoned or has magic powers. Then, the princesses decide they would like to ditch their gowns for Vanellope's more casual look. After a quick transition reminiscent of the classic Adam West Batman series, the women appear dressed for a sleepover and Ariel is so excited to wear a shirt that she wants to sing about it.
https://archive.fo/eTASv
No.1027657
>>1027565
>all these literally whos
No.1027660
>>1027652
I didn't think it was possible for me to give less of a shit about this movie than I already did
No.1027661
>>1027652
>200 dollars is too expensive
No.1027673
Here's a question?
How would 8chan or 4chan direct a movie about the internet and have it not be complete trash that is dated references, is SJW propaganda designed to attack muh mean trolls, or feels like it was made by a group of corporate people rather than a series of people that genuinely want to design a film?
No.1027677
>>1027673
Why would you mention 4chan at all?
No.1027688
>>1027565
>Who the fuck are these people?
I guess everyone else who people actually care about either got fired by Disney is friends with someone who got fired by Disney or said some fucked up shit at some point. The only people left that fit disney's squeaky clean requirements are literal nobodies.
No.1027696
YouTube embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>1027565
>>1027688
>Flula Borg
>squeaky clean
No.1027697
>>1027673
>How would 8chan or 4chan
>and 4 chan
>is SJW propaganda designed to attack muh mean trolls,
No one claimed that as much as it is a celebration of liberal internet normalfag culture, idealizing such culture is a bad thing. In WIR's world the internet holds no negativity at all.
>direct a movie about the internet
Well Mr. Faggot Specify what you mean, we talking a movie about Ralph or a standalone new movie.
No.1027699
>>1027697
standalone new movie separate from Ralph.
No.1027701
>>1027673
Well in the first place directing is a distinct role from writing, even if producers are trying to do both from the backseat these days. Second issue is a movie shouldn't be "about" the internet per se. The focus of engaging works of fiction is generally on capturing a story, interactions between characters, or conflicts the characters face. There's nothing wrong with the internet being involved, but if that's the top priority then everything else will suffer. If George Lucas's first thought had been to make a movie about laser guns and laser swords, Star Wars would've flopped.
If I was writing a movie and decided it would make sense in context to have the internet involved in the story, I would try to keep the following restrictions. Avoid referencing specific websites or phenomena; you can have a generic social network but if the audience can tell it's supposed to be more like Facebook than Twitter then it's going to age horribly. Don't try to make any moral conclusions about the internet/websites being good or bad; it would be silly for TV and it's silly for any other medium. Don't imply anything about the future of the technology; you're not making sci-fi and if you are then you should consider the possibility something else will supersede the internet. If you have to have different groups in conflict, humanize them; trolls are not cyberterrorists, they're people who want a laugh at others' expense. Conserve detail; there are probably whole categories of internet culture nobody in the production staff has ever heard of so don't feature a bunch of irrelevant shit unless you want people to know the extent of your ignorance.
No.1027710
>>1027652
The ending got leaked from a tie-in picture book, too. Vanellope decides to live in the internet while Ralph goes back to the arcade.
No.1027726
>>1027565
Holy shit, first pic is a perfect example of the uncanny valley
No.1027752
>>1027710
This sounds like such a boring movie.
No.1027872
>>1027652
This sounds like a movie without a conflict.
No.1027874
>>1027710
This is sounds worse than your average Illumination Entertainment film.
No.1029275
>>1027565
Who the hell are they?
No.1029276
>>1027710
Here's the link to the picture book
https://imgur.com/a/6KPM0XC
That climax just pissed me off so much
No.1029279
>>999830
>American culture
I think you mean "Jewish-American" culture. Remember, the Jew grows up in an environment where the mother > father.
>>999875
You would too if a fucking Jewess crashed your diplomatic meeting.
No.1029280
>>999442
>snapchat
I don't think Yidsney realizes that that app was used for sexting originally unless my college roommates were wrong.
No.1029281
>>999959
Or maybe because most normalfags probably couldn't name her, yet they recognize all the shit Yidsney slaps on merchandise all the time. Remember, making money is king in the corporate world. This whole shitfest feels like a fucking advertisement.
No.1029285
>>1029276
Why would Ralph risk Vanellope's life to keep being her friend? Ralph sacrificed their friendship to save her life in the first movie. What gives?
No.1029297
>>1027652
>inane video going viral plot that was already worn out when Jem took it out back and shot it
dear god (((Disney))), could you be any less in touch?
No.1029755
>>1029276
My God!
Also…
>Vanellope fucks off leaving the rest of the citizens in her game stranded
Talk about irresponsibility, and what about the fact that they ordered the fucking controller to fix everything? Ralph did nothing wrong. Vanellope was just being a spoiled brat, and he should have dragged her butt back to the arcade.
What's even more sickening is that that was what the entire story to the film Brave was about. That you do have responsibilities that you have to own up.
No.1029877
>>1029755
>Mulan in non-traditional, modern clothing
This hurt me more than it should've
No.1029887
>>1029877
It depicts the westernization and eventual loss of her culture. She doesn't even look like Mulan, what the fuck.
No.1029937
>>1029755
Not to mention that when it was revealed she was really a princess in the first movie, she took that shit up to the point of declaring herself President. So not only was it pretty scummy of her to ditch everyone else like that, it's inconsistent. It's like Ralph and Vanellope went backwards somehow, like they're less developed than they were in the first movie.
No.1029944
>>1029276
That ending just craps over the whole moral of the first movie… Ralph abandoning his game even though he had as good a reason as any is treated like a horrific betrayal(which it sort of is given the game can't function without him) whilst nothing at all is made of Vanellope fucking off to the flashy new game. Not to mention the fact that Ralph was entirely willing to risk his life in order to help Vanellope get accepted in her game. It was a whole big thing about trying to fix your problems and improve your own situation rather than just setting off for perceived greener pastures. That's not getting into the fact that Vanellope's glitch ends up breaking the game she fucked off to, albeit inadvertently. Heck, one could draw parallels to Turbo in that they both wanted to get in on the fancy new thing and ended up destroying the place. In conclusion, this movie is probably gonna suck unless the book has a completely different ending from the film.
No.1029968
>>1029276
>Sarah Silverman and her loli/shota crew will now die because characters that die outside their own games don't regenerate
Did the writers throw their pre-established autistic rules out the window?
No.1030007
>>1029755
>>1029937
>>1029944
Why does it feel like the writer behind WIR2 >>999790 is trying to take advantage of everyone poor memory of previous films (Disney Princess movies, WIR1 other cameos, etc) and just turn it into an excuse of a story with joke based crossover cameos? That basically just promote franchises Disney owns except Fox so it's already outdated when you think about it.
Even the writers of the first WIR mentioned how they had permission from Nintendo to use Mario and the writers still didn't put him in because they wanted to give him a good proper role instead of a brief cameo (outside of his namedrop from Fix It Felix Jr at his party who is basically him game function wise)
No.1030054
>>1027652
3dcg Gal Gadot is hawt
No.1030064
>>1029755
>that picture
Dear Lord! Snow White looks fucking psychotic! Like she's plotting to murder everyone in that room with an ax level psychotic.
No.1030083
>>1029755
are there any more of those shirts, can I have a source? I wanna see just how deep the rabbit hole goes
No.1030084
No.1030107
>>1030007
I'm guessing it had a completely different script that was closer to the first film until Disney realized they could use this one to shill for their franchises. Then they had someone rewrite it.
No.1030111
>>1027652
This script is so catastrophic and current, it would make a perfect "time capsule movie of the 2010s". It will age very badly but will be extremely telling of the times we live in nowadays.
No.1030621
>>1030083
>are there any more of those shirts
Just Jasmin, the brand is called "Misfit".
No.1030625
It pains me every time I see that thumb nail with YAASSS QUEEN SLAY pop up on the catalogue. I can't wait for this movie to come out and be forgotten within a week.
No.1030628
>>1029276
>the villian is Ralph's insecurity
Oh wow, this is really pozzed.
No.1031056
>>1027710
Why would Vanellope abandon her game and Ralph?
No.1031085
>>1029944
To play devils advocate, Vanellope was removed and replaced by Turbo in her game, even if she was reinstated in her game (I can't remember if she did) there's at least precedent of her being gone. So depending on how long the movies have in between them no one would notice. And being a racing game character she's a lot more expendable then the villain Ralph is (in his game).
But on the other hand to that, her being gone was due to being replaced so there was no vacuum in the leadership position. And she technically was still in her game, but as "cut content" basically. So yeah it is bullshit that she's getting a pass. To basically compete in Carmageddon/Twisted Metal no less So as one anon was saying of characters don't regenerate outside of their game they're going to have to pull some shit
No.1031086
>>1027652
Wouldn't the parents of the kid that broke the steering wheel be the ones responsible for replacing it?
No.1031105
>>1029755
I swear I can feel the STDs radiating from those t-shirts.
Also, what the fuck is wrong with Snow White's face?
No.1031182
>>999647
Why are their faces so triangular? Though Pocohontas has that nice lip bite.
No.1031189
>>999795
>best girl
>not Eilonwy
No.1031207
>>1027652
>Sugar Rush makes less than $200 a year.
According to pic related, Sugar Rush can't earn in a year what the average arcade game is expected to earn in a week. Sugar Rush can't even get an average of 2-3 people a day to play it, assuming it cost a quarter to play.
No.1031218
>>998394
Can this movie hurry up?! All I want is pics of Ralph fucking the princesses or Vanellope getting fucked by them.
No.1031225
>>1031127
What's the song name?
No.1031226
>>1023704
>>1027652
>literally 'stale memes and corporate advertisements: the movie'
People shat on the emoji movie for the exact same things but will love this because "it's okay when disney does it".
>>1027565
This surely won't age their movie like sour milk in the sahara years from now when none of these people are relevant anymore.
No.1031256
>>1031225
Carpenter Brut - Hang'em All
No.1031259
>>1031226
I guess it was too much to hope that normalfags would dislike this for being the same shit as the emoji movie and not love it because it was made by Yidsney.
No.1031266
>>1031259
I know right? Fucking blackpill as fuck, nornies will never be fucking saved.
No.1031267
>>1031266
If you're who I think you are than you better fuck off since you never talk about cartoons or comic books, only about blackpills.
No.1031288
Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.
>>998394
It must die in flames, but there must be someone to light those flames.
No.1031289
>>1031288
I don't understand why these exist, and especially for Descendants of all things, did anyone even like that shit?
No.1031292
>>1031288
Why won’t disney just stop trying to ruin children?
No.1031317
>>1031292
Not all children, only Gentile children.
No.1031324
>>1031289
What was Descendants?
No.1031344
>>1031324
It’s about the children of disney princess villains.
No.1031345
>>1027565
>that fucking handrub in the third image
Fucking memes, I swear to whatever higher entity willing to listen…
No.1031436
>>1031105
While I know it's not the case, it unintentionally looks like she hit her head (and has bruises under her eyes) and has those "hit your head, see cartoon birds fly around it" effect above her.
No.1031539
>>998394
I still can't believe the twist villain is Ralph himself who becomes a computer virus. Everything about this movie sounds so fucking lame. I thought it would be about PC gaming, instead its just 2 hours of Disney shilling its awful Oh My Disney blog and ads for other normalfag websites.
No.1031543
>>1027565
>>1031226
>This surely won't age their movie like sour milk in the sahara years from now when none of these people are relevant anymore.
No.1033193
Invidious embed. Click thumbnail to play.
Couldn't last 6 seconds.
>>1031436
Huh, it does.
No.1036610
Is it out yet? Is it what we feared?
No.1037056
>>1036610
It should be out.
No.1037061
>>1036610
After reading synopsis on Wikipedia, Ralph is the bad guy because he's mad and possessive and doesn't want Venelope to go to a different game after her own game gets shut down. Ralph is more less written to make all the bad decisions that cause the major problems. In the end Venelope leaves and Ralph is left alone in the arcade and he occasionally video chats with her. Seems like a allegory for white men ruining things and being possessive to me. Apparently there's also a part about "mean internet comments" too. While I don't think it's probably as pozzed as it could have been, that Disney Princess trailer seems emblematic of the overall message. So it's definitely agenda driven. The biggest crime of the movie is abandoning the original's focus on video games.
No.1037233
>>1036610
It's out and it sucks.
No.1037234
>>1036610
IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes are calling this film, the best film of the decade.
No.1037235
>>1036610
The shilling for this film is so bad that Polygon's review is one of the more honest ones.
No.1037242
>>1036610
>>1037061
>>1037233
>>1037234
>>1037235
OK WHEN DISNEY DOES IT
I cannot find a single cam for this movie, holy shit
No.1037335
>>1037242
Just shows that Disney has deeper pockets and an idiotic fanclub
No.1037792
>>1036610
Yes, it's WRECKED. Even the rickroll at the end
No.1038705
>>1037792
>Even the rickroll at the end
"hello fellow kids" the movie confirmed. normalfags were a mistake
No.1041682
>Directors Rich Moore and Phil Johnston said that a Ralph Breaks the Internet spin-off film focusing on the Disney Princesses could be made depending on the audience's response and "if there's a good story to be told".[119] Also, John C. Reilly says that he has an idea if a third film was to be made, which would see Ralph and Vanellope "beaming themselves right out into space".
MAKE. IT. STOP.
>>1033193
Please tell me this piece of shit flopped.