[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / baaa / caco / choroy / dempart / leftpol / otter / pokemon / tk ]

/christianity/ - Christian Theology

Free speech discussion
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


File: cfc56aa078f4d77⋯.png (78.23 KB, 853x872, 853:872, spurdpope.png)

1f197d  No.1724

What's with the whole "really present Christ in the Eucharist"? Jesus spoke in metaphors all the time, but this one thing he said that sounds the most like a metaphor out of everything he ever said is supposed to be taken literally?

Please explain please.

c1b91b  No.1731

There is no explanation, catholics let their tradition get out of hand and go against the Bible again. They also see the eucharist as a sacrifice, and they deny that it's symbolic, choosing to believe that it's the true flesh and blood of Jesus when the priest consecrates it. Given these statements it's easy to see how they don't believe Jesus's one death on the cross was enough to atone for our sins, instead they believe they need to continually re-sacrifice Him. Yet Christ's own words go against that: when He died on the cross He said "it is finished", not "yeah guys, it's important I died now but remember to keep sacrificing me for eternity, but only in the one true church or else it doesn't count".


5994ca  No.1735

File: e3370ccc2773528⋯.jpg (230.3 KB, 809x818, 809:818, Screenshot_20190314-113859….jpg)

>romanists invent a doctrine that centralizes authority in them

>Enforce it harshly

>Unlearned, superstitious commoners buy into it for generations

>Reformation happens

>Centuries pass

>Catholics today hold to "real presence" as a point of zeal, use textbook doublespeak in their apologies


9eb605  No.1744

Its just as simple as you've observed. It's a metaphor, but some people break their backs trying to say otherwise.


f6944b  No.1882

>>1731

<this

>>1724

Its important to note as well that cucktholicism is locked to this now. They can't admit the truth even if they wanted to because their adherent lunatic followers would eat them alive if they did.


1faeca  No.1903

>>1724

>Jesus spoke in metaphors

Sometimes, yes, but he always clarified. Every single parable he spoke is immediately followed by what he meant. If he were speaking metaphorically about "this is my body", then he would have immediately said "the body represents me, but isn't really me."


302143  No.1905

>>1903

>Every single parable he spoke is immediately followed by what he meant

Not true. Many parables are not directly interpreted. Example: the Prodigal Son in Luke 15.

Even if they were all interpreted internally, a metaphor is not a parable, and none of the relevant passages around the eucharist are parables.

The argument you're making would only work if you could say that Jesus's metaphors were always internally interpreted, but that's not true either. Example: John 4:14

<But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life.


e3b27f  No.1906

>>1724

>believe literally every single thing in the Bible!

<except this one thing because I hate Catholics.

Enjoy Hell.


f996af  No.1907

>>1906

>Earnest question, explain please

<You only question it because you hate Catholics! Damn you!

Pottery


64e284  No.1909

>>1907

>come to the last refuge for Catholic hating kikes, potties, and gnostics

<b-but I totally love catholics! I swear!!

Get fucked, kike.


302143  No.1910

>>1909

Zero self awareness


f996af  No.1911

>>1909

(you)


c1b91b  No.1921

>>1909

What, you expect him to go to somewhere with an obvious catholic bias and ban-happy mods? It'd be an echo chamber and he wouldn't be able to see both sides of the argument and decide for himself which one he believes.


187eb1  No.1922

>>1921

>get fucked mackerel-snapper is a legit argument

This board is "/pol/ with Jesus". Add porn and it becomes /b/. There are no "sides" here, only shitposting.


302143  No.1925

>>1922

This board is worksafe Christian discussion without censorship. If you think someone is wrong you can tell them so, and if you think someone is trolling you can sage and hide.




[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Cancer][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir / baaa / caco / choroy / dempart / leftpol / otter / pokemon / tk ]