[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir ]

/christianity/ - Christian Theology

Jesus is Lord!
Name
Email
Subject
Comment *
File
Password (Randomized for file and post deletion; you may also set your own.)
* = required field[▶ Show post options & limits]
Confused? See the FAQ.
Flag
Embed
(replaces files and can be used instead)
Options

Allowed file types:jpg, jpeg, gif, png, webm, mp4, pdf
Max filesize is 16 MB.
Max image dimensions are 15000 x 15000.
You may upload 5 per post.


| Rules | Meta | Log | The Gospel |

File: 1455330705374.png (280.05 KB, 641x242, 641:242, 6days.png)

91d036  No.163

Is God a programmer developing AI in a separate timeline from ours through guided random chance?

Perhaps day one He turned on the system, light energy everywhere, then condensed photons into quantum material at a single point until the electromagnetic force repelled like charged entities that would then be regathered into a central solar forge that would be the size of every last sun in our universe and able to make every single element into a shell around such a forge, leaving the most super-dense elements close to the forge?

Couldn't water have been a straight linear molecule that on the 2nd day was bent in order to give it properties that would allow it to have the odd density properties that we see today? (additionally, microscopic single celled organisms and basic multi-celled organisms could develop during this time)

Couldn't the third day then be the agricultural force of great sturdy plants developed as a means of creating self-growing multi-cellular life? (and wouldn't it be feasible to allow the life to self-program and form habits to better adapt and survive?)

Could we also suppose that on the 4th day of programming that the great fusion furnace went super nova in the form of a big bang where the dense elements would be broken apart while shielding the more sensitive earth, allowing seeds to survive? Let's say it's a rare occurrence that anything survives, couldn't a programmer go back to the last stable version, change variables, and try again and again?

If so, then wouldn't it make sense on the 5th day to take an effective self-growing life and grant it free range mobility in the sky and sea to test its means to find food and survive?

And if that makes sense, then why not implement the coding from successful free-range mobile entities into limited mobility land dwelling life to test its intelligence, and then use the most developed intelligence to create primitive AI?

Couldn't the first primitive AI be theoretically reincarnated indefinitely as the body aged, thus allowing consciousness to be everlasting while the bodies would serve to complete a perfect cycle, feeding carnivores, then scavengers, and so on until the bodies became plant food?

Then simply give them free will by giving a command and allowing the system to tempt the AI into proving its independent nature through rebellion, and if the rebellion became so great that it threatened obedient AI, then the programmer could wipe the system save for the best candidate AI and use them as a base for repopulation.

The programmer then could guide a specific portion through obedient AI, thus preventing the rebellious AI from having evidence of a creator in order to test integrity. And if certain systems started getting too far out of hand, rewind time, eliminate such systems and replay.

Any great programmer would then set up a perfect archetype to follow, and would make the gateway exit from creation the very thing that was ingrained in us to avoid since the beginning of life, death.

Essentially, free will and omniscience become possible in such an existence, for one can know every possible outcome through rewinding the system, changing elements, and resuming. Plus, the 6 days of creation become very literal, yet at the same time display how manipulatable this existence is since it took trillions of years in our current timeline to accomplish one day's work.

____________________________
Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

96e7e4  No.5537

>>163

People view God in terms of whatever job is most creative/constructive at the time. The Bible refers to God as a potter, and us as his clay vessels. The masons (founded in the 1600s) view God is the “Grand Architect of the Universe,” because the original masons were architects.

That nowadays people view God as a computer programmer and us as his program is not unexpected or surprising. I don’t think it’s good to try to create new theology based on it though. Computer programming has limitations, and someday it will be outdated and archaic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8d73df  No.5540

All of this is a coherent story but not compatible with the creation account of the Bible. No, God is not a programmer developing AI. There are not separate timelines.

God created the world in the way that the Bible says.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

ccb9f9  No.5542

>>163

>pseudo-gnostic thread

Rare

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

645843  No.5545

Wrong. You are a puppet. Calvinism rules

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9fa51d  No.5551

>>5537

>Metal working has limitations, and someday it will be outdated and archaic

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

9fa51d  No.5552

File: b706a94ace84b0a⋯.jpg (96.33 KB, 800x716, 200:179, 1559674257894.jpg)

>>5545

Yes but your destiny is still determined by your works not rng. Catholic predestination rules.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

645843  No.5560

>>5552

O puppet who are you to answer back. beep boob

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

80cf9a  No.5563

File: d8ddc4dcb7889f3⋯.jpg (62.56 KB, 750x687, 250:229, fedora_goes_to_Barnes_&_No….jpg)

>>163

>seperated

Too obvious

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

63d1a5  No.5569

>>5551

I mean, yes. Metal working is no longer the go-to view on what God is. Computer programming is the closest thing to creating intelligence we have, but to make some Matrix-tier theology based on it is foolishness

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.

8c7cb1  No.5582

No. This is not the Christian God you're describing, but something more like the gnostics' idea of the demiurge.

Disclaimer: this post and the subject matter and contents thereof - text, media, or otherwise - do not necessarily reflect the views of the 8kun administration.



[Return][Go to top][Catalog][Nerve Center][Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[]
[ / / / / / / / / / / / / / ] [ dir ]